Newton and Einstein are wrong in some things

Jim ryan

Member
Jul 22, 2015
132
0
16
With all of the new information at our fingertips, science refuses to allow Newton and Einstein to be challenged.
 
With all of the new information at our fingertips, science refuses to allow Newton and Einstein to be challenged.
I didnt know science was in charge of what people challenged?

To a degree you are correct, because the media controls everything that gets out there and is allowed to be considered and as the government the media and science are in collusion,, anything that they don't want said, doesn't get said in the mass media, which is the place where things get changed.
 
What argument do you have against their science?

Big bang earths core

The evolutionists have no way of proving that string theory or the big bang boom theory is plausible, but since they are a product of brainwashing, one cannot expect them to understand anything more than the copy and paste they have been taught since early childhood.

The evolutionists are a product of teaching for the sake of sensationalism and money.

To prove my point, newton claims there would be zero gravity at the center of the earth, when in fact, at the center of the earth, centrifugal force is much too great to be held to zero gravity. Centrifugal force from The huge ball circling the inside of the earth, would not allow zero gravity.

To come to zero gravity, that huge ball of Iron ore would have to come to a standstill, which it never will, until the earth dies.

Most of the space junk circling our planet will not come down to earth, because of centrifugal force.
That same centrifugal force is created by the ball of metal circling the inside of our earth, which will not allow the center of the earth to come to zero gravity. Newton was wrong.

At zero gravity, nothing will move, without force.


These evolutionists have no leg to stand on, because they cannot prove the big bang boom or string theory.

When science has no way of proving something it makes something up. That is what is being taught to children and has been taught to children for a great many years.
I use cause and effect for anything that I write. Science makes up things because it cannot prove cause-and-effect for what it claims, in many cases.

The above is just one thing that I have written about science.
 
Last edited:
What argument do you have against their science?

Big bang earths core

The evolutionists have no way of proving that string theory or the big bang boom theory is plausible, but since they are a product of brainwashing, one cannot expect them to understand anything more than the copy and paste they have been taught since early childhood.

The evolutionists are a product of teaching for the sake of sensationalism and money.

To prove my point, newton claims there would be zero gravity at the center of the earth, when in fact, at the center of the earth, centrifugal force is much too great to be held to zero gravity. Centrifugal force from The huge ball circling the inside of the earth, would not allow zero gravity.

To come to zero gravity, that huge ball of Iron ore would have to come to a standstill, which it never will, until the earth dies.

Most of the space junk circling our planet will not come down to earth, because of centrifugal force.
That same centrifugal force is created by the ball of metal circling the inside of our earth, which will not allow the center of the earth to come to zero gravity. Newton was wrong.

At zero gravity, nothing will move, without force.


These evolutionists have no leg to stand on, because they cannot prove the big bang boom or string theory.

When science has no way of proving something it makes something up. That is what is being taught to children and has been taught to children for a great many years.
I use cause and effect for anything that I write. Science makes up things because it cannot prove cause-and-effect for what it claims, in many cases.

The above is just one thing that I have written about science.
You've recited stupid crap from some religious pamplet. There's a lot of bs in science but Einstein's theories have been challenged. He was a proponent of the steady state model when a Roman Catholic priest came along and offered up the theory that was duped by Hoyle (as a term of derision) The Big Bang), claiming it was an attempt to fit his religious views into science.

It can't be "proven" but few would argue against it these days.
 
maybe someone with a brain will happen along that I can talk to. The children on this board that offer nothing more than childish innuendo and name-calling, are boring, boring, boring.
 
maybe someone with a brain will happen along that I can talk to. The children on this board that offer nothing more than childish innuendo and name-calling, are boring, boring, boring.
If everything is boring, maybe the problem isn't everything. Being a smug asshole doesn't make you look smart, bytheway.
 
And yet, alchemy and planned economy are marginalized nowadays.

No, there is a very real planned economy, but it is by the rich and for the rich, of all nations that come together, under the one world heading.
 

Forum List

Back
Top