Newt the nut implodes yet again.

I love your desperation, Maple.

So what are you going to do when Mittens loses?

You need to check out in-trade it's where people place bets on who the nominee is going to be, Ann Coulter touts this site due to it's accuracy, they accurately predicted a Bush win over Kerry in the 2004 election when all other polling data was calling it too close to call. People actually place bets with real money and the real money is the best poll yet. Most polls were calling Kerry and Bush close in Florida and this poll called it accurately as a blow out for Bush in Florida. When you consider that most people don't have land lines anymore they just use their cell phones you wonder where they get all this data.

Mitt Romney is at 46%
Newt is at 36%

and after all of this Freddie Mac stuff comes out Newt will end up in the dust with the other Gop candidates as a has been front runner.

But you are a liberal bigot anyway so you will be voting for Obama no matter who the GOP candidate is.
 
Last edited:
Gingrich, Romney turn up the heat in New Hampshire | Reuters


Hello Newt, you are running as a conservative Republican, yet you just attacked Romney from a Democrat play book, you see Newt as a conservative Republican you belong to a platform that believes strongly in free market capitalism, where yes, in order for companies to survive in the private sector they sometimes need to file for bankrupsy and lay people off. They do that in order to restructure and grow again and hire more people back. Now Newt, I know you are an historian but how you forgot this historical fact is beyond belief. You attacked Mitt from the Democrat playbook, one is which they have attacked Mitt Romney, but you see Newt if business's do not file for bankrupsy when they need to they can't hire anyone back in fact all employess are without a job and without any hopes of ever recoving a job. Your attack on Mitt, is reminiscient of socialism. Are you sure you are a conservative Republican?

And by the way, you "consulted" for Freddie Mac for years making $30,000 a month a total on 1.8 million and you were there " consulting," right until Freddie Mac blew up and took the entire country down with it and that $30,000 a month was tax payer money.
From the link:


During an interview with Fox News, Romney called for Gingrich, a former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, to return $1.6 million in consulting fees he received from the troubled mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

Asked about the comment during a campaign stop, Gingrich fired back at Romney.

"If Governor Romney would like to give back all the money he has earned from bankrupting and laying off employees over his years at Bain (Capital), then I would be glad to then listen to him," Gingrich said. "And I bet you $10 - not $10,000 - that he wouldn't take the offer."

The slashing retort was vintage Gingrich, and showed why Romney's campaign has begun only recently to attack Gingrich.

Only a Romney supporter who cheers for Mr. Potter when watching It's a Wonderful Life would think Romney got the better of that exchange.

If Romney is only counting on the millionaire vote, he's going to have a rough ride.

You just don't get it, do you? We WANT a guy who is going to SLASH at Obama. We want Obama to know he was in a fight.

I thought the plan was to make Obama a one term president. Why waste all your efforts with that obstructionsist repub congress just to blow it all by supporting an implode at any second bomb thrower like Newt?
 
I love your desperation, Maple.

So what are you going to do when Mittens loses?

You need to check out in-trade it's where people place bets on who the nominee is going to be, Ann Coulter touts this site due to it's accuracy, they accurately predicted a Bush win over Kerry in the 2004 election when all other polling data was calling it too close to call. People actually place bets with real money and the real money is the best poll yet. Most polls were calling Kerry and Bush close in Florida and this poll called it accurately as a blow out for Bush in Florida. When you consider that most people don't have land lines anymore they just use their cell phones you wonder where they get all this data.

Mitt Romney is at 46%
Newt is at 36%

and after all of this Freddie Mac stuff comes out Newt will end up in the dust with the other Gop candidates as a has been front runner.

But you are a liberal bigot anyway so you will be voting for Obama no matter who the GOP candidate is.

I could give a crap about InTrade. InTrade had Guiliani as the nominee in 2008. We all saw how well that worked out...

Newt will probably prevail for the simple reason that all the whining objections you've raised to him have been out there for a while. The Freddie stuff is old news. That was so two weeks ago.

But Mittens has never been above 25% on the RCP average. Maybe the rest of the GOP can't agree on who they want, but they can agree on who they don't want. Mitt Romney.

And honestly, if you are citing crazy-ass Ann Coulter, I'm not sure what is to be said about you.
 
I thought the plan was to make Obama a one term president. Why waste all your efforts with that obstructionsist repub congress just to blow it all by supporting an implode at any second bomb thrower like Newt?

A couple of points here.

First, don't believe your own bullshit. Newt has survived in this business for 35 years. He's been declared dead more times than Lazarus and keeps coming back. You underestimate him at your peril.

Second- this election will be a referendum on Obama. Now, if the economy bounces back next year, he's maybe got a shot. If it doesn't, he's done, and even he has admitted that.

So why should conservatives settle for half a loaf when they can get a whole loaf?
 
Wasn't there some scandal about bribery in the Salt Lake Olympics?

Not that I have ever seen or heard of, if you have please provide the link.

2002 Winter Olympic bid scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Come on Sherlock..... aren't you missing something here??? Like the time line???

Here.... let me help..... From your link........

Aftermath

Mitt Romney was brought in to head the SLOC.[8] Romney aided in reorganizing the committee and helped to begin fixing the budget, which at the time was US$379 million short, and renewing sponsor enthusiasm.[9]


2002 Winter Olympic bid scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
But I won't vote for Mittens. Because he's a scumbag. And a Mormon.

I'm no Romney fan, but what does Mormon have to do with anything? Why do you care?

He has an intense hatred for mormons for some undisclosed reason.

Poor Joe


Untitled.jpg
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
The reason it does not resonate with you is because you are a liberal Democrat, it will most certainly not resonate with anyone who has an R behind their name. Newt should run as a Democrat you two would get along.

I will admit, that I don't understand the menatlity of a Romney who looks at a company like AmPad that employs hundreds of people and thinks, "Wow, I can make millions by looting that place of all it's assets and putting those folks out of jobs".

I think Most Republicans, Democrats and HUMAN BEINGS wouldn't understand avarice at that level.

Clearly, it isn't resonating with working class Republicans, who have rejected Romney twice now.

Come on, guy. the thing is, You all try to Push Romney, and no one is buying.

Romney's record is impeccable and if you ever read something besides a message board you would know it. You are a know mormon hater and bigot and that is the only reason you bash Romney.


Romney's record is not "impeccable." He has made mistakes too. He was pro-choice when it was convenient for him to be pro-choice--he then changes his stance when he's running for President.

Right now--Romney is throwing rocks when he lives in a glass house. Assuming that Newt Gingrich is guilty by "association."

It was Romney that threw the first rock--Gingrich came back--and now the Romney whiner's are out in force trying to dive for cover--and blame Gingrich for simply DEFENDING himself.

Romney is getting very irritating. He's like the next door neighbors small dog that keeps chasing you around--barking and nipping at your heels. You want to kick him in the head--but you won't because you're afraid you'll offend your neighbor.

The problem with Romney is--he doesn't seem to get yet who the real opponent is--like Barack Obama doesn't exist.

No wonder he couldn't beat Ted Kennedy or John McCain.
 
Last edited:
Not that I have ever seen or heard of, if you have please provide the link.

2002 Winter Olympic bid scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Come on Sherlock..... aren't you missing something here??? Like the time line???

Here.... let me help..... From your link........

Aftermath

Mitt Romney was brought in to head the SLOC.[8] Romney aided in reorganizing the committee and helped to begin fixing the budget, which at the time was US$379 million short, and renewing sponsor enthusiasm.[9]


2002 Winter Olympic bid scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That's nice....now, tell me where I said ANYWHERE that Romney was involved with the scandal. TIA
 

Come on Sherlock..... aren't you missing something here??? Like the time line???

Here.... let me help..... From your link........

Aftermath

Mitt Romney was brought in to head the SLOC.[8] Romney aided in reorganizing the committee and helped to begin fixing the budget, which at the time was US$379 million short, and renewing sponsor enthusiasm.[9]


2002 Winter Olympic bid scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That's nice....now, tell me where I said ANYWHERE that Romney was involved with the scandal. TIA


Just heard another reason as to why Newt Gingrich can't win in the general against Obama.

This guy on Hannity says--he's too fat--and will be up against a thin--HIP--basketball playing Obama. Now if this country determines who the leader of the free world--is-- based on their appearance-& if they're HIP or not -then this country is already in deep kimchee. But if you think about--that's what got Obama elected in the 1st place.

UNBELIEVABLE ignorance.
 
Last edited:
Gingrich, Romney turn up the heat in New Hampshire | Reuters


Hello Newt, you are running as a conservative Republican, yet you just attacked Romney from a Democrat play book, you see Newt as a conservative Republican you belong to a platform that believes strongly in free market capitalism, where yes, in order for companies to survive in the private sector they sometimes need to file for bankrupsy and lay people off. They do that in order to restructure and grow again and hire more people back. Now Newt, I know you are an historian but how you forgot this historical fact is beyond belief. You attacked Mitt from the Democrat playbook, one is which they have attacked Mitt Romney, but you see Newt if business's do not file for bankrupsy when they need to they can't hire anyone back in fact all employess are without a job and without any hopes of ever recoving a job. Your attack on Mitt, is reminiscient of socialism. Are you sure you are a conservative Republican?

And by the way Newt, you "consulted" for Freddie Mac for years making $30,000 a month a total on 1.8 million and you were there " consulting," right until Freddie Mac blew up and took the entire country down with it and that $30,000 a month was tax payer money not private investor money. There is your difference Newt.


From the link:


During an interview with Fox News, Romney called for Gingrich, a former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, to return $1.6 million in consulting fees he received from the troubled mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

Asked about the comment during a campaign stop, Gingrich fired back at Romney.

"If Governor Romney would like to give back all the money he has earned from bankrupting and laying off employees over his years at Bain (Capital), then I would be glad to then listen to him," Gingrich said. "And I bet you $10 - not $10,000 - that he wouldn't take the offer."

The slashing retort was vintage Gingrich, and showed why Romney's campaign has begun only recently to attack Gingrich.

Newt the nut now calls Freddie Mac a means to go to Mars.

Gingrich Said Freddie Mac Could Be Good Model for Mars Travel - Businessweek

Dec. 2 (Bloomberg) -- Newt Gingrich in 2007 extolled the virtues of Freddie Mac, saying he would be “very cautious” about changing the way the mortgage-finance company’s public- private business plan operated.

In an interview placed on Freddie Mac’s website, the Republican presidential candidate said the U.S. government- sponsored enterprise, or GSE, could serve as a guide for rebuilding the hurricane-ravaged Gulf of Mexico, improving health care and funding space exploration. For decades, Freddie Mac collected profits while benefiting from an implicit taxpayer guarantee of its debt,

Freddie Mac Ties Threaten to Hurt Newt Gingrich’s Credibility - ABC News

Gingrich is refusing to elaborate on his work at Freddie Mac, the government-backed mortgage giant that hired the former House speaker as a consultant months after he left Congress, and paid him more than $1.6 million over eight years.

After saying at a Tea Party town hall today that he would “cheerfully answer any single question,” Gingrich refused to answer reporters’ questions about Freddie Mac. When asked by ABC News why he wouldn’t talk about that issue, the former congressman replied, “They [the Tea Party audience] didn’t ask.”

During the town hall, he reaffirmed his claim that he hasn’t ever done any lobbying “of any kind.”

“I did not influence peddling of any kind,” he said. “But the truth is if you have the reputation — if you just take what people say about me in the debates and say to yourself: ‘Is that a person somebody might have hired for advice?’ — it’s hard to argue they should have hired someone who is truly dumb.”


Oh, you are not dumb Mr. Gingrich you are smart as a fox, but people are getting on to you.

Many people have been hired as consultants after retiring fro their former positions that proved their successes. Seeing Gingrich was a successful bipartisan politician that could reach across the aisle and influence people with his knowledge of history in so many areas does not make him a lobbyist. Is there proof that he was a lobbyist and not a consultant?

News reports I read from the last debate applauded him for his performance again. Can you tell me exactly where he imploded and what happened? The OP didn't clearly show that.
 
But I won't vote for Mittens. Because he's a scumbag. And a Mormon.

I'm no Romney fan, but what does Mormon have to do with anything? Why do you care?

He has an intense hatred for mormons for some undisclosed reason.

I thought I was pretty clear on my dislike of them. They are generally untrustworthy, which is what happens when you grow up believing lies and then twist your brain into a pretzel trying to rationalize it....
 

Forum List

Back
Top