Newt, Ron Paul and Mitt are FOR a "single payer" system.

R

rdean

Guest
Watching the Republican debate on CNN, all three said that if you buy insurance that's part of a big group, then can keep your insurance even if you lose your job.

HELLO! That was Single Payer which Republicans vehemently opposed.

WTF?
 
Medical bills are the number one cause of bankruptcy. How come Republicans feel we don't pay enough?
 
Which is the biggest problem? The bill or the insurance coverage? Cost of service or amount of coverage? Two different things. Pick one.
 
Dr. Ron Paul is not for gubmint run socialized (i.e. "single payer") medical care.

Liar.

Ron Paul said you should buy private health care. Because if you get your insurance through the company you work at, if you lose your job, you could lose your health care. He said one answer is to be part of a large group which would bring down the cost of insurance. That is what a "single payer" system is. A large group.

If there is a "large group" someone has to manage it. If not the government, then who? Health care companies? Oh wait. They're the reason medical bills are the number one cause of bankruptcy.
 
I want government to nurse me from cradle to grave. I'll be an obedient consumer hamster, a dedicated soldier, a worshipful drone.... in exchange for all my needs provided for me by my loving caretaker. Bring it!
 
Fuck insurance!!! THAT IS NOT THE PROBLEM!!!!!

IT'S THE COST OF SERVICES!!!!!!
 
Dr. Ron Paul is not for gubmint run socialized (i.e. "single payer") medical care.

Liar.

Ron Paul said you should buy private health care. Because if you get your insurance through the company you work at, if you lose your job, you could lose your health care. He said one answer is to be part of a large group which would bring down the cost of insurance. That is what a "single payer" system is. A large group.

If there is a "large group" someone has to manage it. If not the government, then who? Health care companies? Oh wait. They're the reason medical bills are the number one cause of bankruptcy.
More than one large group is more than one payer.

Which makes you too stupid to count to two (which is more than "single"), along with being a liar.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzKUzRJUzQ0]Cake- Sheep go to heaven goats go to hell (with lyrics) - YouTube[/ame]
 
Until they support HR 676........ they are still for the medical insurance industry = grab your wallets!


Improved Medicare Single Payer Insurance for All is one substantial part of the solution.

- Easy to Implement: Medicare has been in existence since 1966, it provides
healthcare to those 65 and older, and satisfaction levels are high. The
structure is already in place and can be easily expanded to cover everyone.

- Simple: One entity – established by the government – would handle billing
and payment at a cost significantly lower than private insurance companies.
Private insurance companies spend about 31% of every healthcare dollar on
administration. Medicare now spends about 3%.

- Real Choice: An expanded and improved Medicare for All would provide
personal choice of doctors and other healthcare providers. While financing
would be public, providers would remain private. As with Medicare, you choose
your doctor, your hospital, and other healthcare providers.

- State and Local Tax Relief: Medicare for All would assume the costs of
healthcare delivery, thus relieving the states and local governments of the
cost of healthcare, including Medicaid, and as a result reduce State and
local tax burdens.

- Expanded coverage: Would cover all medically necessary healthcare
services – no more rationing by private insurance companies. There would be
no limits on coverage, no co-pays or deductibles, and services would include
not only primary and specialized care but also prescription drugs, dental,
vision, mental health services, and long-term care.

- Everyone In, Nobody Out: Everyone would be eligible and covered. No
longer would doctors ask what insurance you have before they treat you.

- No More Overpriced Private Health Insurance: Medicare for All would
eliminate the need for private health insurance companies who put profit
before healthcare, unfairly limit choice, restrict who gets coverage, and
force people into bankruptcy.

- Lower Costs: Most people will pay significantly less for healthcare.
Savings will be achieved in reduced administrative costs and in negotiated
prices for prescription drugs.

Healthcare-NOW! - Organizing for a national, single-payer healthcare system.
 
Until they support HR 676........ they are still for the medical insurance industry = grab your wallets!


Improved Medicare Single Payer Insurance for All is one substantial part of the solution.

- Easy to Implement: Medicare has been in existence since 1966, it provides
healthcare to those 65 and older, and satisfaction levels are high. The
structure is already in place and can be easily expanded to cover everyone.

- Simple: One entity – established by the government – would handle billing
and payment at a cost significantly lower than private insurance companies.
Private insurance companies spend about 31% of every healthcare dollar on
administration. Medicare now spends about 3%.

- Real Choice: An expanded and improved Medicare for All would provide
personal choice of doctors and other healthcare providers. While financing
would be public, providers would remain private. As with Medicare, you choose
your doctor, your hospital, and other healthcare providers.

- State and Local Tax Relief: Medicare for All would assume the costs of
healthcare delivery, thus relieving the states and local governments of the
cost of healthcare, including Medicaid, and as a result reduce State and
local tax burdens.

- Expanded coverage: Would cover all medically necessary healthcare
services – no more rationing by private insurance companies. There would be
no limits on coverage, no co-pays or deductibles, and services would include
not only primary and specialized care but also prescription drugs, dental,
vision, mental health services, and long-term care.

- Everyone In, Nobody Out: Everyone would be eligible and covered. No
longer would doctors ask what insurance you have before they treat you.

- No More Overpriced Private Health Insurance: Medicare for All would
eliminate the need for private health insurance companies who put profit
before healthcare, unfairly limit choice, restrict who gets coverage, and
force people into bankruptcy.

- Lower Costs: Most people will pay significantly less for healthcare.
Savings will be achieved in reduced administrative costs and in negotiated
prices for prescription drugs.

Healthcare-NOW! - Organizing for a national, single-payer healthcare system.

Here's my question. And I've yet to see a serious answer:

If the government should be responsible for providing all of us with health care, why shouldn't they also be in charge of feeding us? Providing us with shelter and clothing?
 
Until they support HR 676........ they are still for the medical insurance industry = grab your wallets!


Improved Medicare Single Payer Insurance for All is one substantial part of the solution.

- Easy to Implement: Medicare has been in existence since 1966, it provides
healthcare to those 65 and older, and satisfaction levels are high. The
structure is already in place and can be easily expanded to cover everyone.

- Simple: One entity – established by the government – would handle billing
and payment at a cost significantly lower than private insurance companies.
Private insurance companies spend about 31% of every healthcare dollar on
administration. Medicare now spends about 3%.

- Real Choice: An expanded and improved Medicare for All would provide
personal choice of doctors and other healthcare providers. While financing
would be public, providers would remain private. As with Medicare, you choose
your doctor, your hospital, and other healthcare providers.

- State and Local Tax Relief: Medicare for All would assume the costs of
healthcare delivery, thus relieving the states and local governments of the
cost of healthcare, including Medicaid, and as a result reduce State and
local tax burdens.

- Expanded coverage: Would cover all medically necessary healthcare
services – no more rationing by private insurance companies. There would be
no limits on coverage, no co-pays or deductibles, and services would include
not only primary and specialized care but also prescription drugs, dental,
vision, mental health services, and long-term care.

- Everyone In, Nobody Out: Everyone would be eligible and covered. No
longer would doctors ask what insurance you have before they treat you.

- No More Overpriced Private Health Insurance: Medicare for All would
eliminate the need for private health insurance companies who put profit
before healthcare, unfairly limit choice, restrict who gets coverage, and
force people into bankruptcy.

- Lower Costs: Most people will pay significantly less for healthcare.
Savings will be achieved in reduced administrative costs and in negotiated
prices for prescription drugs.

Healthcare-NOW! - Organizing for a national, single-payer healthcare system.

Here's my question. And I've yet to see a serious answer:

If the government should be responsible for providing all of us with health care, why shouldn't they also be in charge of feeding us? Providing us with shelter and clothing?

Put out a serious question and you might get a serious answer.
 
Fuck insurance!!! THAT IS NOT THE PROBLEM!!!!!

IT'S THE COST OF SERVICES!!!!!!

That's one of the stupidest things I've ever read here.

Let me give you an assignment.

Find out how much the VA pays per patient for every dollar they get.

Now, find out how much Cigna or Aetna pays per patient for every dollar they get.

Remember, the CEO's of Cigna and Aetna get a hundred million dollars. Just from skimming insurance policies. How many insurance policies do you have to sell to get enough money for a $100,000,000.00 paycheck?
 
Put out a serious question and you might get a serious answer.

A feint and a dodge. As expected.

It's a serious question. Your refusal to answer it says volumes.

Our government is not the USSR. It's not communist China. It's not some secret cabal. It doesn't "give us stuff".

Our government is created from people we vote into office. It's job is to help organize the country so three hundred and eighty million people can live in freedom, comfort and good health and so we don't kill each other. We pay to have it run. We want smart people working in the government so it can do "smart things". Like NASA. NASA has created hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue. Their discoveries are the basis for many of our industries.

Now the Republican view of government is this kind of weird "drown it in a bathtub" and "every man for himself" with touches of "let him die" and "we should be led by the rich". And don't forget the church.
 
Fuck insurance!!! THAT IS NOT THE PROBLEM!!!!!

IT'S THE COST OF SERVICES!!!!!!

That's one of the stupidest things I've ever read here.
You've obviously never proofread a single one of your posts.

You're a creep. You edited my post. Fuckface.

That's one of the stupidest things I've ever read here.

Let me give you an assignment.

Find out how much the VA pays per patient for every dollar they get.

Now, find out how much Cigna or Aetna pays per patient for every dollar they get.

Remember, the CEO's of Cigna and Aetna get a hundred million dollars. Just from skimming insurance policies. How many insurance policies do you have to sell to get enough money for a $100,000,000.00 paycheck?
 
Put out a serious question and you might get a serious answer.

A feint and a dodge. As expected.

It's a serious question. Your refusal to answer it says volumes.

Our government is not the USSR. It's not communist China. It's not some secret cabal. It doesn't "give us stuff".

Our government is created from people we vote into office. It's job is to help organize the country so three hundred and eighty million people can live in freedom, comfort and good health and so we don't kill each other. We pay to have it run. We want smart people working in the government so it can do "smart things". Like NASA. NASA has created hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue. Their discoveries are the basis for many of our industries.

Now the Republican view of government is this kind of weird "drown it in a bathtub" and "every man for himself" with touches of "let him die" and "we should be led by the rich". And don't forget the church.

That's nice.

Now, if the government should be responsible for providing all of us with health care, why shouldn't they also be in charge of feeding us? Providing us with shelter and clothing?
 

Forum List

Back
Top