OohPooPahDoo
Gold Member
Our guns protect that right, not some lawyers' scribbling. If it dared to, the Court could easily interpret the Constitution as gun ownership only relating to the National Guard, when in uniform. Why would you trust an unelected tribunal more than your elected representatives?If you're going to take away the power of the Court to interpret laws and strike down those that in their opinion are unconstitutional,
how would you deal with a situation where a legislature somewhere outlawed gun ownership, outright?
Really? Is that how the citizens of D.C. got their right to own firearms protected, they just went into Congress and started shooting
The court could not "easily" make such an interpretation considering they've already decided that there is an individual right to own firearms.
Last edited: