Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Taliban could never take over our country, nor can any other country or coalition of countries do such, why? Because we have a strong defense, which Paul advocates, strong defense doesn't equal military interventionalism and nation-building. None of which we can afford anyways.
The moment the republican party gives me more than one fiscal conservative is the day I'll support more than one republican.
No one wants to invade us. This is where Paul and many of his supporters just don't seem to get it. We are facing a new type of enemy. Fighting over land has been left to the third world nations. Those who oppose us want only death and destruction. They don't need armies with boots on the ground to achieve their goals. 1 man/woman and one wmd is all it takes now. There is NO DEFENSE from this threat other than an offense to prevent the possibility from even happening.
We don't live in 1945 anymore.
There's always been people who want to kill us for us being us.
You know what the never ending war on terror has done? Created more people who want to kill us for us being us.
Hence why I don't support the Bush/Obama round the clock round the globe military intervention policy.
I can't watch videos at work, but he's right.
Who cares if Iran has 100 nukes if we can defend ourselves from them?
And Iran is no threat, if they ever launched one we'd intercept it easily and their country would immediately be made into dust. No matter how much they hate us they'll never launch one because it'd be suicide.
I can't watch videos at work, but he's right.
Who cares if Iran has 100 nukes if we can defend ourselves from them?
And Iran is no threat, if they ever launched one we'd intercept it easily and their country would immediately be made into dust. No matter how much they hate us they'll never launch one because it'd be suicide.
You've just proved my point that you don't understand the threat. We could not stop a hand delivered dirty bomb or nuke. Nor could Israel stop a launch because the window of opportunity would be to small. And if you don't think that a MAJOR conflict between Israel and Iran would be a game changer your seriously delusional.
USA Today/Gallup Poll: Romney, Gingrich Beat Obama in 12 Swing States
Yep, this tool is a one termer.
Gosh, I'm SOOO glad that we started another thread for the Ron Paul Cult of Personality zealots to derail with their frothing paeons to his awesomeness.
Does it ever occur to these dingbats that looking like a touring performance company of "Jonestown: 2011" in Paul's behalf does nothing but turn people off? Any time any person's supporters start telling me how he's the One Great Hope For America, the Only One Who Can Save Us!, they've told me exactly one thing: I'm not voting for him. Ever. Slavishly adoring zombies are my number-one red flag of a bad candidate . . . listed right below having a (D) by his name, of course.
It's an open political board, get used to it... Fact is Gramps called me out as a Paul supporter as to why my opinion does not hold merit... I simply provide the Neocons with information about their candidate, then you guys avoid it because you know you support a Progressive liberal.
What?...
Maybe if you guys spent half as much time looking into your candidates as you do making insults to the people that have looking into the candidates you would have a credible opinion... Just sayin, maybe you guys should try refuting the rather large lists of bad policies Newt has supported for years
What's fun to watch is the depressing role Newt supporters are shifting into, mean comments in place of policies they support that Newt offers... It's like watching the fall of Cain all over again.
Perhaps if you weren't spending so much time in every damned thread insisting that Ron Paul is God's Gift To The United States, The Only Perfect Candidate EVER!, you would notice that I have spent a great deal of time discussing Newt's policy ideas AND his past. You might be shocked to know that thinking your Great God Ron Paul would make an abysmally shitty President doesn't mean I haven't thought about the candidates (and certainly not that I'm as blindly slavish as you are to Paul). What it means is simply that I think Ron Paul would make an abysmally shitty President.
I feel no need to try to get into in-depth debates with Pauliacs, any more than I do with the crazy homeless man at the bus stop, and for the same reason. You're insane, and there's no point.
If you ever find anyone talking about voting for Newt Gingrich using the same glowing phrases and tones that you Paul lunatics do, you let me know.
I stopped reading there. Do me a favor and quote where I have said anything like that, ever... Go ahead, use search all you like.... This is where you either don't answer my question or once again resort to insults.
And for the record I have stayed very much on topic in this thread, it was about Newt and Mitt, I talked about Newt, Gramps brought up Paul. Try and keep up.
With Dem's now associated as "Thieves/Criminals/Cronies", Obama losing in all swing states doesn't surprise anyone, especially now that word got out about Jon Corzine!
USA Today/Gallup Poll: Romney, Gingrich Beat Obama in 12 Swing States
Yep, this tool is a one termer.
USA Today/Gallup Poll: Romney, Gingrich Beat Obama in 12 Swing States
Yep, this tool is a one termer.
Of course, you and Newsmax are ignoring the fact that Obama has the edge nationally in polls, and the 12 swing states only have a slight advantage over him.
I'm nominating Ron Paul....
I'm a libertarian and not to mention believe that the other candidates are RINO's - they're the same as what we had in the past. We need something new....
I'm nominating Ron Paul....
I'm a libertarian and not to mention believe that the other candidates are RINO's - they're the same as what we had in the past. We need something new....
Yeah, well, a foreign policy based on sticking your head under the covers and pretending the rest of the world doesn't exist would certainly be new.
I'm nominating Ron Paul....
I'm a libertarian and not to mention believe that the other candidates are RINO's - they're the same as what we had in the past. We need something new....
Yeah, well, a foreign policy based on sticking your head under the covers and pretending the rest of the world doesn't exist would certainly be new.
The decades of interventionist policy has worked perfectly.
Ending democracy in Iran, supporting Saddam Hussein, supporting Osama Bin Laden, none of those things have caused blowback or bit us in the ass.
The continued Bush/Obama policy of military intervention has to continue, otherwise I'll be hiding under my bed from Quran readers the rest of my life.
Yeah, well, a foreign policy based on sticking your head under the covers and pretending the rest of the world doesn't exist would certainly be new.
The decades of interventionist policy has worked perfectly.
Ending democracy in Iran, supporting Saddam Hussein, supporting Osama Bin Laden, none of those things have caused blowback or bit us in the ass.
The continued Bush/Obama policy of military intervention has to continue, otherwise I'll be hiding under my bed from Quran readers the rest of my life.
Clinton hid under his bed when UBL repeatedly attacked us. Little to no response and look how that turned out.
Along with talking about historical mistakes you also have to learn from them. We helped Iran, Saddam and The Taliban. Yet they turned on us. Bush responded and its that simple. Maybe he didn't do it exactly as he should have but that's for history to judge not you.
USA Today/Gallup Poll: Romney, Gingrich Beat Obama in 12 Swing States
Yep, this tool is a one termer.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich now trails President Obama by double digits, his second straight weekly decline since becoming the GOP frontrunner.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Voters finds Obama earning 49% of the vote, while Gingrich receives 39% support. Eight percent (8%) prefer some other candidate, and another four percent (4%) are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Last week , Obama led Gingrich by a five-point margin, 45% to 40%. In late November, Gingrich held a slight 45% to 43% edge over the president.
USA Today/Gallup Poll: Romney, Gingrich Beat Obama in 12 Swing States
Yep, this tool is a one termer.
RMeanwhile, a wide enthusiasm gap has emerged between Republicans and Democrats, with 61 percent of Republicans say they are extremely or very enthusiastic about voting for president next year, compared with 47 percent of Democrats.
The most enthusiastic include some of the GOPs base conservatives and middle-aged men and women. The least enthusiastic include key Democratic constituencies responsible for Obamas 2008 victory, such as minorities and younger voters.
"Enthusiasm is a tremendous benefit," Republican National Chairman Reince Priebus told USA Today. "We're going to be able to mobilize a grass-roots army. It helps us recruit volunteers and run absentee-ballot programs. We can fill rooms with people making phone calls and going door-to-door."
The decrease in the number of voters who identify themselves as Democrats, coupled with the increase of those who call themselves independents, will make Obamas re-election quest more difficult. Excluding those who lean Democratic, the portion of voters who identify themselves as Democrats has slipped to 30 percent from 35 percent in 2008. Meanwhile, the portion of independents has climbed to 42 percent from 35 percent.
