ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
You guys cry everytime Pailin or Bachmann takes a picture. No one will ever be happy with it because they are crybabies and nit pickers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Shame on Newsweek......cancelled my subscribtion today and so did my family enough is enough. the corrupt state run media is way over the top
That's a fake, I am sure.
Newsweek would never give Michelle Bachmann a lead story, much less a cover.
Soft focus is always flattering.Definitely got the crazy eyes going on.
I think this is a good pic of her though.
If a conservative mag had done this to Hillary , the left would have been up in arms about it.
It would have been blasted by all the news outlets.
It was classless to put that on the cover, and it reflects poorly on the magazine's professionalism. There's really no way around that. This is why politicians (especially women) should have their own photographer doing the shoots; be in control of your public image.
And imo The Economist is the only news magazine worth reading and buying. Most of the rest are just hack rags.
Just go
Sep 17th 1998 | from the print edition
..NOTHING in his life became him like the leaving it, says Malcolm of Cawdor in Macbeth. In Bill Clintons case, nothing in his presidency condemns him like his failure to leave it. He has broken his trust and disgraced his office, but he clings on. Saving his skin at all costs, against the odds, has become the theme of his political career. Each escape is notched up as a victory. But every time he wriggles throughgrubbier, slicker, trailing longer festoons of contritionhe does more damage to his country.
Just go | The Economist
Yeah, I know why.What's the problem?
Doesn't look like it's photoshopped.
Over your head or just being an ass?
I'd go with calling her the "Queen of Rage", being the problem.
well anyone with the iq level of 12 understands why they said this.
She is the tea party candidate and they are full of rage.
But hey make up whatever you like
That's not the point, Thumbs. An apology was proffered and the rabid right roundly rejected it on the grounds that it was 'pussy' and a bow to the politically correct.I just read several pages of "outrage" about the Tar baby comment right here on this board! I've been on vacation the past week and I wanted to catch up. Seems that there are Conservatives who think apologizing for the ham handed Tar baby comment was an exercise in sissiness. Now, I read about how offended Conservatives are that one of their poster girls is featured on the cover of Newsweek in what they consider an unflattering photograph. It's just too rich in hypocrisy to let pass without comment.
But hypocrisy is what being a rabid political partisan is all about.
So you support the lie that obama was called a tar baby.
shame
The sensitivity of the rabid right was turned way down. Down to the setting marked "angry dismissal".
And now, less than a week later, the hackles are raised on the backs of the necks of those same Conservatives over a crappy picture of the Playmate of the Month for the Tea Party types.
Shallow, ain't it?
Is it possible that she just might, in fact, be "crazy"?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkwTgf2pUdA]‪Michele Bachmann in Bizarre Hypnotic Trance with Chris Matthews‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]
I love it. Jobs is the number one issue. And what did Republicans do for jobs? They downgraded our nation's credit rating. Besides, how many right wingers on this very site have said, "Republicans never said jobs jobs jobs"?
You get closer and closer to nutbarville every day.
Stay classy.
classy? applauding a sexist, juvenile photo sounds pretty low rent to me, but hey, thats me.
Oh hey, so whats it like in nutbarville? they serve afternoon cocktails? High tea? Scones?
oh please, do tell how this is sexist.
this is becoming just down right pathetic that everytime something like this comes up the term Sexist comes up.
Shut up, its not
Why do Republicans still bother with Newsweek?
What's the problem?
Doesn't look like it's photoshopped.
Over your head or just being an ass?
I'd go with calling her the "Queen of Rage", being the problem.