Rinata
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2009
- 6,790
- 973
- 153
Except we never really were.
Our problem with CLinton was not that he was a horndog. We knew he was a horndog when he was elected.
Our problem with him was that he used the power of his office to cover up, pay off or intimidate the objects of his affection
Getting a blow job from Monica Lewinsky wasn't a crime.
Getting her a $40,000 a year job at the Penatgon when she couldn't write a memorandum was.
Lying about it in court was.
Getting other people to lie was.
Hiding evidence was.
Really??? Was he found guilty of any of those charges?? Your problem with Bill Clinton was that he was a liberal Democrat.
More concerning was his rape of Juanita Broderick.
That was never proven either!!! What is your problem??? You have nothing!!!
Broaddrick never went to the police, she told NBC-TV's Lisa Meyers, because she was sure no one would believe her and because she felt guilty for inviting Clinton to her hotel room.
But, if Broaddrick's story sounds familiar, it also sounds fishy--and raises too many questions for me to believe her.
* Broaddrick says she can remember every detail of the rape, except the month and day it occurred. If it scarred her for life, wouldn't she remember the date? Or at least the month?
* Broaddrick says she told her husband, David, what happened. But, at the time, David was not her husband. He was her boyfriend, with whom she was cheating on her first husband. Question: What if Clinton and Broaddrick had consensual sex? If you're cheating on your husband, and then cheat on your boyfriend, do you tell your boyfriend the truth?
* Within one year of the alleged rape, Broaddrick attended a fund-raiser for Clinton and accepted appointment by him to a state advisory board. Why did she still want to support a man who raped her?
* Broaddrick claims Clinton kissed her so hard he left her lip visibly black and blue, and she covered up by telling people she'd had an accident. But her first husband, Gary Hickey, says he remembers no such injury when she returned from Little Rock, nor such a story.
* One year later, Broaddrick filed divorce papers against Hickey, claiming he struck her on the mouth. Was that the only time?
* Broaddrick also told two girlfriends, who are sisters, what happened, which both confirm. But both admit they hate Clinton because he commuted the death sentence of the man who murdered their father. Can they be trusted?
* In 1997, Broaddrick signed an affidavit and gave a deposition in the Jones case, denying twice under oath that Clinton raped her. "These allegations are untrue and there is no truth to these rumors." If Clinton did rape her, 20 years later, why would she still not tell the truth?
* Last year, Broaddrick told independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr that her Jones testimony was false, but that she had been under absolutely no pressure from the president or the White House to file a false affidavit. So, did she lie to the Jones team? Or did she lie to Starr? Or is she now lying to NBC? How do we know?
The truth is, we don't know. And we'll never know. But we do know this. We know that Starr's investigators talked to Broaddrick and listened to her story--and decided not to pursue it. That, in itself, casts huge doubts on Broaddrick's credibility. If Starr would impeach Clinton for oral sex, he would certainly indict or impeach him for rape, if he could prove it. Which nobody can.
Clinton Rape Charge Can't Be Proved - Los Angeles Times