Newly Elected Muslim Congresswomen Favor Eliminating Israel

[Sixties Fan]

Satire time:

We Somalis Are So Proud That Ilhan Omar, A Somali, Cares More About Palestine Than About Us – PreOccupied Territory

 

[Mindful]

Ilhan Omar’s Attacks on Supporters of Israel.

When Congresswoman Ilhan Omar asserted that U.S. support for Israel was “all about the Benjamins”—i.e., all about money—and that the money came from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), most of the ensuing controversy revolved around whether these statements were anti-Semitic. But that misses the point, argues Michael Walzer:

Omar’s claim about “the Benjamins” is simply false. Money counts in American politics, but not in the way she says it does. American support for Israel has moral, political, religious, and strategic reasons; it isn’t bought. That falsehood is more important than the anti-Semitism that probably motivates it—or, better, we shouldn’t care about Omar’s moral character but rather about what she says.

Jewish critics of Omar have complained more about her character or her anti-Semitism than about the lies she repeats. . . . A congressional resolution condemning all forms of bigotry is no doubt commendable, but it doesn’t serve our political purpose. What is necessary is a fierce and detailed exposé of all the lies about the Jews. And it is important that the word be used: lies.

Many of Omar’s critics prefer to be offended, hurt, and distressed by her repetition of anti-Semitic tropes rather than outraged by the dishonesty of the tropes. And they are, in turn, afraid to offend Omar’s supporters, who seem to think that the lies Omar repeats are simply her opinions; they are just like everyone else’s opinions. . . .


Expose the Lies in Ilhan Omar’s Attacks on Supporters of Israel

 

[Mindful]

^If Jewish Democrats don’t get tough about this, they will soon find themselves unable to be tough about anything. They will be pushed out of the Democratic party just as Jews are being pushed out of the Labor party in the UK.

Long ago, [the German socialist leader] August Bebel gave a name to left-wing anti-Semitism: “the socialism of fools.” Now the fools are in Congress.

 

[DOTR]

New Muslim congresswomen favor eliminating Israel

I am so happy they stated that is the long term Goal. For that reason alone Israel will never give up any more territory or allow " Right of Return"

Liberal Jews oppose Israel as well in many cases.

 

[DOTR]

^If Jewish Democrats don’t get tough about this, they will soon find themselves unable to be tough about anything. They will be pushed out of the Democratic party just as Jews are being pushed out of the Labor party in the UK.

Long ago, [the German socialist leader] August Bebel gave a name to left-wing anti-Semitism: “the socialism of fools.” Now the fools are in Congress.

Yet the Labor Party is still backed and supported by Jews. Just as the Democrat Party enjoys their support.
You are a logical person. Think about it.

 

[Mindful]

^If Jewish Democrats don’t get tough about this, they will soon find themselves unable to be tough about anything. They will be pushed out of the Democratic party just as Jews are being pushed out of the Labor party in the UK.

Long ago, [the German socialist leader] August Bebel gave a name to left-wing anti-Semitism: “the socialism of fools.” Now the fools are in Congress.

Yet the Labor Party is still backed and supported by Jews. Just as the Democrat Party enjoys their support.
You are a logical person. Think about it.

There's the Labour Party, and there's the "labour party". Lately infected by a mutant strain. The Democratic Party is going that way.

 

[USAF 2023]

New Muslim congresswomen favor eliminating Israel

I am so happy they stated that is the long term Goal. For that reason alone Israel will never give up any more territory or allow " Right of Return"

Liberal Jews oppose Israel as well in many cases.

Not so. The Jews that actually believe Israel does not have the Right to exist are the Hasidic Jews

 

[DOTR]

New Muslim congresswomen favor eliminating Israel

I am so happy they stated that is the long term Goal. For that reason alone Israel will never give up any more territory or allow " Right of Return"

Liberal Jews oppose Israel as well in many cases.

Not so. The Jews that actually believe Israel does not have the Right to exist are the Hasidic Jews

No its very true. Atheistic liberal Jews oppose Israel at every opportunity. And they support a party steeped in anti-Israelism. Marxism and anti Zionism go together always. And Jews are over represented in Marxist thinking.
What’s the capital of Israel?

 

[Coyote]

The doubling of Muslims elected to Congress, especially through the wins of two women, is perhaps the starkest example of the situation Muslims have found themselves in since the election of President Donald Trump. The president immediately turned his Islam-bashing into policy with the travel ban, anti-Muslim groups now hold sway with the White House, and hate crimes targeting Muslims have risen in recent years. Yet in the same period, a record number of Muslims ran for office, donations have poured in to Muslim advocacy groups, and Muslims are showing unprecedented civic engagement, forming strategic alliances with other groups in the Trump administration’s crosshairs.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/hannahallam/muslim-women-congress-tlaib-omar

Both of these women need to carefully read what people are claiming they wrote.

FACT CHECK: Did Rashida Tlaib Tweet About America 'Raping and Pillaging' Her People?

Islamophobia. The only form of bigotry that is still socially acceptable and politically endorsed.

Rather than just toss out slogans, why not define “islamophobia”?

Criticism of religious totalitarianism and a patriarchal, politico-social structure that is antithetical to western values of personal freedoms is not islamophobia, it’s a valid criticism of religious totalitarianism. I find that the most strident screeching of the “islamophobia” slogan comes from moslems (and their apologists), who presume to reserve for themselves a position of privileged inviolability in public discourse and in print that illustrate its arrogant--and dangerous--opposition to basic freedoms that we all-too-often take for granted.

Just ask these guys:

Egyptian blogger among 24 facing jail terms for ‘insulting’ the judiciary

It seems I fell asleep and somehow woke up in 1215. The ink on the Magna Carta is not yet dry.


All of the tenets that have allowed the West to develop represent the distillation of centuries of Judeo-Christian principles and convictions, ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, the Magna Carta, the work of Locke, Hume, Rousseau, Paine, et al. into a codified framework of law that guarantees rights and liberties to all people— fair and equal treatment under the law.

Are you surprised that westerners have an aversion to moslems who insist that we are to accommodate limits on our freedoms because moslems find those freedoms repulsive?

Like I said. Islamophobia is the currently acceptable hate machine endorsed by and propogated by bigots everywhere who make no disinctions.

Wjen you perpetrate false canards like creeping Sharia, rape jihad, Mohammed was a pedo, and no go zones you are no different than the antisemites who propagate untruths about Jews. Only we call those people what tbey are: anti semites.

What specific limits on your freedoms are you being asked to accomodate that are unique to Muslims?

Be afraid

The random Muslim scare story generator: separating fact from fiction

 

[DOTR]

^If Jewish Democrats don’t get tough about this, they will soon find themselves unable to be tough about anything. They will be pushed out of the Democratic party just as Jews are being pushed out of the Labor party in the UK.

Long ago, [the German socialist leader] August Bebel gave a name to left-wing anti-Semitism: “the socialism of fools.” Now the fools are in Congress.

Yet the Labor Party is still backed and supported by Jews. Just as the Democrat Party enjoys their support.
You are a logical person. Think about it.

There's the Labour Party, and there's the "labour party". Lately infected by a mutant strain. The Democratic Party is going that way.

Ok let me try it this way....

 

[saltydancin]

The doubling of Muslims elected to Congress, especially through the wins of two women, is perhaps the starkest example of the situation Muslims have found themselves in since the election of President Donald Trump. The president immediately turned his Islam-bashing into policy with the travel ban, anti-Muslim groups now hold sway with the White House, and hate crimes targeting Muslims have risen in recent years. Yet in the same period, a record number of Muslims ran for office, donations have poured in to Muslim advocacy groups, and Muslims are showing unprecedented civic engagement, forming strategic alliances with other groups in the Trump administration’s crosshairs.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/hannahallam/muslim-women-congress-tlaib-omar
Both of these women need to carefully read what people are claiming they wrote.
FACT CHECK: Did Rashida Tlaib Tweet About America 'Raping and Pillaging' Her People?

Islamophobia. The only form of bigotry that is still socially acceptable and politically endorsed.

Rather than just toss out slogans, why not define “islamophobia”?
Criticism of religious totalitarianism and a patriarchal, politico-social structure that is antithetical to western values of personal freedoms is not islamophobia, it’s a valid criticism of religious totalitarianism. I find that the most strident screeching of the “islamophobia” slogan comes from moslems (and their apologists), who presume to reserve for themselves a position of privileged inviolability in public discourse and in print that illustrate its arrogant--and dangerous--opposition to basic freedoms that we all-too-often take for granted.
Just ask these guys:
Egyptian blogger among 24 facing jail terms for ‘insulting’ the judiciary
It seems I fell asleep and somehow woke up in 1215. The ink on the Magna Carta is not yet dry.
All of the tenets that have allowed the West to develop represent the distillation of centuries of Judeo-Christian principles and convictions, ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, the Magna Carta, the work of Locke, Hume, Rousseau, Paine, et al. into a codified framework of law that guarantees rights and liberties to all people— fair and equal treatment under the law.
Are you surprised that westerners have an aversion to moslems who insist that we are to accommodate limits on our freedoms because moslems find those freedoms repulsive?

Like I said. Islamophobia is the currently acceptable hate machine endorsed by and propogated by bigots everywhere who make no disinctions.
Wjen you perpetrate false canards like creeping Sharia, rape jihad, Mohammed was a pedo, and no go zones you are no different than the antisemites who propagate untruths about Jews. Only we call those people what tbey are: anti semites.
What specific limits on your freedoms are you being asked to accomodate that are unique to Muslims?

Be afraid

The random Muslim scare story generator: separating fact from fiction

So like Christians proclaiming Christ existed before God as all were supposed to be afraid of their crusade, Islam is proclaiming Allah existed before God & now all are expected to be afraid of these pseudo-religious sciences ?

 

[The Original Tree]

Good lord. The audacity of it. How dare they elect a Muslim to office in America. Of course they can’t possibly be qualified!

The problem is neither supports eliminating Israel. They support a one state solution. Something Some pro-Israeli’s have been supporting as well. One supports the right of return in a very eloquent manner that echos the same feelings of “right of return” that Jews have toward the land of their ancestors. Seems the Islamophobia bias is showing.

The so called diatribe was nothing more then answering a specific question from the interviewer. The OP took a tiny fragment of the interview out of a richer context, the entire interview is here:

Rashida Tlaib on Democratic Socialism and Why She Supports the Palestinian Right of Return

A One State Solution would Actually Be ILLEGAL since Palestine was divided up in to two parts. West Palestine which is all territory West of The Jordan River and was designated as The Homeland of The Jews.

And East Palestine, which is all Territory East of The Jordan River or Transjordan, which was designated for all Arabs who wanted to live there, forming a new never before existing state of Palestine. They don't have to call it Palestine. They can call it Transjordan if they prefer that.

This has been set in international law for over 100 years. I am curious now, why The Arabs want to change International Law and have rejected all attempts and offers for a two state solution, and now want a one state solution?

 

[Hollie]

The doubling of Muslims elected to Congress, especially through the wins of two women, is perhaps the starkest example of the situation Muslims have found themselves in since the election of President Donald Trump. The president immediately turned his Islam-bashing into policy with the travel ban, anti-Muslim groups now hold sway with the White House, and hate crimes targeting Muslims have risen in recent years. Yet in the same period, a record number of Muslims ran for office, donations have poured in to Muslim advocacy groups, and Muslims are showing unprecedented civic engagement, forming strategic alliances with other groups in the Trump administration’s crosshairs.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/hannahallam/muslim-women-congress-tlaib-omar

Both of these women need to carefully read what people are claiming they wrote.

FACT CHECK: Did Rashida Tlaib Tweet About America 'Raping and Pillaging' Her People?

Islamophobia. The only form of bigotry that is still socially acceptable and politically endorsed.

Rather than just toss out slogans, why not define “islamophobia”?

Criticism of religious totalitarianism and a patriarchal, politico-social structure that is antithetical to western values of personal freedoms is not islamophobia, it’s a valid criticism of religious totalitarianism. I find that the most strident screeching of the “islamophobia” slogan comes from moslems (and their apologists), who presume to reserve for themselves a position of privileged inviolability in public discourse and in print that illustrate its arrogant--and dangerous--opposition to basic freedoms that we all-too-often take for granted.

Just ask these guys:

Egyptian blogger among 24 facing jail terms for ‘insulting’ the judiciary

It seems I fell asleep and somehow woke up in 1215. The ink on the Magna Carta is not yet dry.


All of the tenets that have allowed the West to develop represent the distillation of centuries of Judeo-Christian principles and convictions, ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, the Magna Carta, the work of Locke, Hume, Rousseau, Paine, et al. into a codified framework of law that guarantees rights and liberties to all people— fair and equal treatment under the law.

Are you surprised that westerners have an aversion to moslems who insist that we are to accommodate limits on our freedoms because moslems find those freedoms repulsive?

Like I said. Islamophobia is the currently acceptable hate machine endorsed by and propogated by bigots everywhere who make no disinctions.

Wjen you perpetrate false canards like creeping Sharia, rape jihad, Mohammed was a pedo, and no go zones you are no different than the antisemites who propagate untruths about Jews. Only we call those people what tbey are: anti semites.

What specific limits on your freedoms are you being asked to accomodate that are unique to Muslims?

Be afraid

The random Muslim scare story generator: separating fact from fiction

It’s disappointing that you just used the “islamophobia” slogan to excuse Islamic terrorism. It’s not a canard that people’s lives and freedoms are at risk from Islamic terrorists seeking to impose their brand of a brutish, repressive politico-religious ideology on others.

We can take France as one example. Here’s a list of (Islamic) terrorist attacke since 2015.

Deadly attacks in Europe since 2015

You should notice that the list includes among the attacks that killed 86 people in the truck ramming gee-had, the Charlie Hebdo mass killing. You remember the Mo’ tunes thingy, right? What I find rather ironic, is that, that entire situation exposed a rather monumental hypocrisy, on the part of islamics.

The restrictions on illustrating or creating images of Muhammud, for fear that they might encourage or elicit worship of the the Arab warlord, represented the original offense here. Of course, far from being something intended to encourage worship of Muhammud, the cartoons in question were an expression of journalistic freedom and freedom of expression – a long held right that westerners embrace. In response, large groups of moslems rallied and protested at embassies, threatened to kidnap westerners, chanted (bizarrely) "Death to America", boycotted Denmark and invaded sovereign Danish lands in Indonesia.Oh yeah, they also gunned down staff at the newspaper.

In response to fear of idolizing Muhammud and expressing the western ideals of freedom of speech and of expression, Moslems threaten violence and go on fiery rampages...in idolization of Muhammud and his reputation.

Super.



We can move on to the Islamic problem in Germany, Sweden and elsewhere across Europe if you wish. Speaking of No-Go zones…..

Swedish police name dozens of "vulnerable areas"—but are they "no-go zones"?
Are There No-Go Zones in Sweden? Police Identify Dozens of 'Vulnerable Areas' Rife With Criminality



Deliver Me: Parts of Multicultural Malmö 'Too Dangerous' for Postal Service
According to Sweden's state-owned post operator PostNord, parts of Sweden's third-largest city are so dangerous that allowing staff to work there would be a violation of the employer's responsibilities. By contrast, locals, who have had no packages delivered in no fewer than seven years, complain of a violation of their basic rights.



Gee-Whiz. Why are those "islamophobic" Europeans making such a kerfuffle about..... you know..... just slogans.

 

[USAF 2023]

New Muslim congresswomen favor eliminating Israel

I am so happy they stated that is the long term Goal. For that reason alone Israel will never give up any more territory or allow " Right of Return"

Liberal Jews oppose Israel as well in many cases.

Not so. The Jews that actually believe Israel does not have the Right to exist are the Hasidic Jews

No its very true. Atheistic liberal Jews oppose Israel at every opportunity. And they support a party steeped in anti-Israelism. Marxism and anti Zionism go together always. And Jews are over represented in Marxist thinking.
What’s the capital of Israel?

Atheists would be opposed.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Despite presenting itself as an innocuous Muslim civil rights organization, records show that CAIR was created as part of a Hamas-support network in America. Hamas is a Muslim Brotherhood legacy group that openly seeks Israel’s destruction. The FBI severed formal relations with CAIR in 2008, saying that the group was not “an appropriate liaison partner” until it could determine “whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS.”

That policy remains in effect. The United Arab Emirates, meanwhile, designated CAIR as a terrorist group in 2014.

(full article online)

CAIR’s Damaging Influence Evident in Ilhan Omar Controversy

 

[Hollie]

The problem of "identity politics" is being displayed in rather ugly fashion.




Omar: Trump Is Not a Human

Omar: Trump Is Not a Human

After drawing comparisons between President Obama and President Trump in an interview with Politico, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) clarified Monday that they are not similar because the latter is not a human.

“As she saw it, the party ostensibly committed to progressive values had become complicit in perpetuating the status quo,” the article in Politico Magazine states. “Omar says the "hope and change" offered by Barack Obama was a mirage. Recalling the "caging of kids" at the U.S.-Mexico border and the "droning of countries around the world" on Obama’s watch, she argues that the Democratic president operated within the same fundamentally broken framework as his Republican successor.”

When Fox News’s Guerin Hays questioned her about the article, she mostly refused to answer until she finally snapped and said they “absolutely” were not the same because “one is human the other is not.”

 

[rylah]

The "Phobia" part in "Islamophobia",
is a cover for a failure at forced conversion, and opposition to the wonders of dhimmitude.

 

[Coyote]

The "Phobia" part in "Islamophobia",
is a cover for a failure at forced conversion, and opposition to the wonders of dhimmitude.

It is nothing more than bigotry.

 

[Coyote]

The doubling of Muslims elected to Congress, especially through the wins of two women, is perhaps the starkest example of the situation Muslims have found themselves in since the election of President Donald Trump. The president immediately turned his Islam-bashing into policy with the travel ban, anti-Muslim groups now hold sway with the White House, and hate crimes targeting Muslims have risen in recent years. Yet in the same period, a record number of Muslims ran for office, donations have poured in to Muslim advocacy groups, and Muslims are showing unprecedented civic engagement, forming strategic alliances with other groups in the Trump administration’s crosshairs.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/hannahallam/muslim-women-congress-tlaib-omar

Both of these women need to carefully read what people are claiming they wrote.

FACT CHECK: Did Rashida Tlaib Tweet About America 'Raping and Pillaging' Her People?

Islamophobia. The only form of bigotry that is still socially acceptable and politically endorsed.

Rather than just toss out slogans, why not define “islamophobia”?

Criticism of religious totalitarianism and a patriarchal, politico-social structure that is antithetical to western values of personal freedoms is not islamophobia, it’s a valid criticism of religious totalitarianism. I find that the most strident screeching of the “islamophobia” slogan comes from moslems (and their apologists), who presume to reserve for themselves a position of privileged inviolability in public discourse and in print that illustrate its arrogant--and dangerous--opposition to basic freedoms that we all-too-often take for granted.

Just ask these guys:

Egyptian blogger among 24 facing jail terms for ‘insulting’ the judiciary

It seems I fell asleep and somehow woke up in 1215. The ink on the Magna Carta is not yet dry.


All of the tenets that have allowed the West to develop represent the distillation of centuries of Judeo-Christian principles and convictions, ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, the Magna Carta, the work of Locke, Hume, Rousseau, Paine, et al. into a codified framework of law that guarantees rights and liberties to all people— fair and equal treatment under the law.

Are you surprised that westerners have an aversion to moslems who insist that we are to accommodate limits on our freedoms because moslems find those freedoms repulsive?

Like I said. Islamophobia is the currently acceptable hate machine endorsed by and propogated by bigots everywhere who make no disinctions.

Wjen you perpetrate false canards like creeping Sharia, rape jihad, Mohammed was a pedo, and no go zones you are no different than the antisemites who propagate untruths about Jews. Only we call those people what tbey are: anti semites.

What specific limits on your freedoms are you being asked to accomodate that are unique to Muslims?

Be afraid

The random Muslim scare story generator: separating fact from fiction

It’s disappointing that you just used the “islamophobia” slogan to excuse Islamic terrorism. It’s not a canard that people’s lives and freedoms are at risk from Islamic terrorists seeking to impose their brand of a brutish, repressive politico-religious ideology on others.

We can take France as one example. Here’s a list of (Islamic) terrorist attacke since 2015.

Deadly attacks in Europe since 2015

You should notice that the list includes among the attacks that killed 86 people in the truck ramming gee-had, the Charlie Hebdo mass killing. You remember the Mo’ tunes thingy, right? What I find rather ironic, is that, that entire situation exposed a rather monumental hypocrisy, on the part of islamics.

The restrictions on illustrating or creating images of Muhammud, for fear that they might encourage or elicit worship of the the Arab warlord, represented the original offense here. Of course, far from being something intended to encourage worship of Muhammud, the cartoons in question were an expression of journalistic freedom and freedom of expression – a long held right that westerners embrace. In response, large groups of moslems rallied and protested at embassies, threatened to kidnap westerners, chanted (bizarrely) "Death to America", boycotted Denmark and invaded sovereign Danish lands in Indonesia.Oh yeah, they also gunned down staff at the newspaper.

In response to fear of idolizing Muhammud and expressing the western ideals of freedom of speech and of expression, Moslems threaten violence and go on fiery rampages...in idolization of Muhammud and his reputation.

Super.



We can move on to the Islamic problem in Germany, Sweden and elsewhere across Europe if you wish. Speaking of No-Go zones…..

Swedish police name dozens of "vulnerable areas"—but are they "no-go zones"?
Are There No-Go Zones in Sweden? Police Identify Dozens of 'Vulnerable Areas' Rife With Criminality



Deliver Me: Parts of Multicultural Malmö 'Too Dangerous' for Postal Service
According to Sweden's state-owned post operator PostNord, parts of Sweden's third-largest city are so dangerous that allowing staff to work there would be a violation of the employer's responsibilities. By contrast, locals, who have had no packages delivered in no fewer than seven years, complain of a violation of their basic rights.



Gee-Whiz. Why are those "islamophobic" Europeans making such a kerfuffle about..... you know..... just slogans.

So you can’t list any specific limits on your freedoms or ways you are being asked to accomodate that are unique to Muslims?

 

[rylah]

The "Phobia" part in "Islamophobia",
is a cover for a failure at forced conversion, and opposition to the wonders of dhimmitude.

It is nothing more than bigotry.

It is not, and it is certainly not irrational.
During the mid 19th century my grand grand father gave away several stores in Jaffo as "protection" for his friends' family.
Common in local practice, his children would be taken to Muslim families and converted, especially the girls first, This was one of the common and a real dangers of the Jewish minority living under a Muslim rule.

The Jews of Safed, Tiberias, Jerusalem and Hebron were expelled in spite of paying "protection" to Arab tribes. That was on top of the double, and in Jerusalem a triple Ottoman tax the Jews were forced to pay,

When someone says they want a Caliphate to replace Israel, we believe them - that is not an irrational fear from some TV screen thousands of miles away. That's 3 hours drive away from home.