New Report Shows Marijuana Arrests Unfairly Target Blacks

topspin

Rookie
Apr 29, 2010
4,149
197
0
New Report Shows Marijuana Arrests Unfairly Target Blacks
by Mike Meno

On the same day that the California NAACP endorsed that state’s ballot initiative to end marijuana prohibition (now officially named Proposition 19), our allies at the Drug Policy Alliance released a new study that shines a light on the systemic racial bias behind marijuana arrests taking place all across California.

Among the report’s findings:

“In every one of the 25 largest counties in California, blacks are arrested for marijuana possession at higher rates than whites, typically at double, triple or even quadruple the rate of whites,” even though “U.S. government studies consistently find that young blacks use marijuana at lower rates than young whites.”
“In Los Angeles County, with nearly ten million residents and over a quarter of California’s population, blacks are arrested at over triple the rate of whites. Blacks are less than 10 percent of L.A. County’s population, but they are 30 percent of the people arrested for marijuana possession.”
“Police in other California counties, even those with relatively few blacks or relatively low rates of marijuana arrests, still arrest blacks at much higher rates than whites. African Americans are arrested for marijuana possession at nearly three times the rate of whites in Solano County, and at three to four times the rate of whites in Sonoma, Santa Cruz, and San Francisco counties.”
The report, written by Prof. Harry Levine of Queens College, finds this overwhelming racial bias to be a “system-wide phenomenon” and not just the result of a handful of racist cops. That’s because most narcotics officers are assigned to patrol so-called “high-crime” neighborhoods that are disproportionately low-income and minority. In those neighborhoods—as in nearly all neighborhoods—the most likely, or easiest arrest an officer can make is for marijuana possession. If we want to end this racial bias, we need to end the laws that allow it to occur. Come November, California voters will have an opportunity to do just that.
 
One of the reasons is mostly because when white people smoke pot they make it out to be some secret agent crap. Indoors, closed locked door, towel under the door, using a spoof. binds drawn.

My black buddies laugh at that like crazy. Most of them smoke in the open, on the porch, in front of the house, in thier freaking cars, etc.

The only time I blaze up outside is when I'm at my friends summer house on 1/2 an acre of property, with plenty of cover, and even then we sneak into the toolshed to do it.
 
In other news....

A study by Kansas University shows that people who are married are much more likely to get a divorce than a single person.
 
I think that Blacks are more likely to come under the eye of cops in every case, not just in the case marijuana.

It's in the nature of the places where they live for this to happen.

White Kids are also much more likely to get busted for possession than White adults, too.

Again, it has to do with how likely a cop is to check you out under one pretense or the other.
 
racial profiling
Prop 19 in Cali could be the trigger to an ecnomic and social freedom boom.
 
racial profiling
Prop 19 in Cali could be the trigger to an ecnomic and social freedom boom.
Prop 19:
Existing law provides that the punishment for the murder in the second degree of specified peace officers is life without the possibility of parole if the crime occurs while the officer is on duty and aggravating factors are present. This measure specifies these enhanced sentence provisions would also apply when the victim is a peace officer employed by the Bay Area Rapid Transit District or the California State University System.

CA Secretary of State - Primary Election 2000 - Proposition 19

What does prop 19 have to do with economic and social freedom....exactly?
 
Proposition 19, the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010, an initiated state statute, is on the November 2, 2010 ballot in California.[1]
Richard Lee, who organized and helped fund the effort to put Proposition 19 on the November ballot, says that his fight to legalize marijuana is spurred by the belief that it is a civil rights issue: "I put this in the class of a civil rights issue. It's unfair and unjust to lock people up for using cannabis when it's safer than alcohol. ... I got into this because of my support of law enforcement. People are losing respect for the law."[2]

Supporters of legalization are focusing on the benefits they say would flow to the state from taxing cannabis; when cannabis is illegal, it is not taxed. If it were legal, the government would be able to impose a tax on it. This would add money to California's coffers during a time that the budget is out-of-balance.[3]
 
Proposition 19, the Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010, an initiated state statute, is on the November 2, 2010 ballot in California.[1]
Richard Lee, who organized and helped fund the effort to put Proposition 19 on the November ballot, says that his fight to legalize marijuana is spurred by the belief that it is a civil rights issue: "I put this in the class of a civil rights issue. It's unfair and unjust to lock people up for using cannabis when it's safer than alcohol. ... I got into this because of my support of law enforcement. People are losing respect for the law."[2]

Supporters of legalization are focusing on the benefits they say would flow to the state from taxing cannabis; when cannabis is illegal, it is not taxed. If it were legal, the government would be able to impose a tax on it. This would add money to California's coffers during a time that the budget is out-of-balance.[3]

I'm inclined to agree wth you on this. Having said that, I just can't believe how disengenuous the state is on trying to get this pushed through and the gov. signing it. It all comes down to money with them. It's been illegal forever and now that they need money they will embrace it with open arms.
 
freedom is freedom, I'm good with anybody supporting not jailing kids for something less harmful than beer regardless of the reason for the support.
 
So all of you potheads are going to stop going to your supplier, where you would pay no taxes, and start going to a government supplier where you pay probably very high taxes?

Ya right.
 
So all of you potheads are going to stop going to your supplier, where you would pay no taxes, and start going to a government supplier where you pay probably very high taxes?

Ya right.

Not that you've shown the first clue about economics but: yes we will pay the tax. Cig companies wil put the street seller out of business by follinging the cigaretter model.
say $20 pack with $10 being tax.
 
So all of you potheads are going to stop going to your supplier, where you would pay no taxes, and start going to a government supplier where you pay probably very high taxes?

Ya right.

Not that you've shown the first clue about economics but: yes we will pay the tax. Cig companies wil put the street seller out of business by follinging the cigaretter model.
say $20 pack with $10 being tax.

Ya right.

So that guy that doesn't work but sells pot.... hates authority, hates cops and hates working for "the man" is going to stop selling pot and start working a real job?

Ummmmm... doubt it. He will just lower the prices to make his pot worth the risk of not buying from government dealer.
 
just like the bootlegger is still doing, jezz take an economics class just one
 

Forum List

Back
Top