New paper finds the data do not support the theory of man-made global warming [AGW]

Discussion in 'Environment' started by SSDD, Dec 30, 2012.

  1. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    10,053
    Thanks Received:
    1,031
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +4,189
    In response to the barrage of recent posts by a certain member of this board, the vast majority of which reflect, and discuss nothing more than the output of computer models, I am going to post some recently published papers based on actual observation. The contrast is remarkable.

    http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/3/173/2012/esd-3-173-2012.pdf

    This paper, recently published in the European Geosciences Union journal Earth System Dynamics demonstrated that there is "no relationship bewteen temperature and the anthropogenic greenhouse gas anomoly once the warming effect of solar irradiance is taken into consideration".
     
  2. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,224
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,239
    that is not what that study says
     
  3. SSDD
    Offline

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    10,053
    Thanks Received:
    1,031
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +4,189
    Of course it is. They said:

    So they are saying that in the entire universe of possibilities, there is not even a statistically signifigant chance that our contribution to a trace gas in the atmosphere is causing global warming.
     
  4. RollingThunder
    Offline

    RollingThunder Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    4,818
    Thanks Received:
    505
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,222
    The only "contrast" that is "remarkable" here is the one between a normal working brain and your pathetically faulty semi-brain.

    In your usual cluelessly delusional way, you claim that: "I am going to post some recently published papers based on actual observation." and then you point to a paper that is actually entirely based on mathematical models.

    Abstract. We use statistical methods for nonstationary time series to test the anthropogenic interpretation of global warming (AGW), according to which an increase in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations raised global temperature in the 20th century.

    Moreover it is a paper where the two lead authors are not climate scientists but rather members of the Department of Economics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. But in your delusional and very retarded little pea brain, this one paper somehow completely discredits and disproves the thousands of peer reviewed papers in major science journals that specifically support the the scientific conclusions on anthropogenic global warming. LOLOLOLOLOL....you poor, poor confused little half-wit.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2012
  5. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,857
    Thanks Received:
    1,127
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,722
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2012

Share This Page