New Orleans diocese hid child abusers

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2016
46,494
20,027
2,300
Y Cae Ras

They hid them shuffled them around and kept them away from the police. They were so successful that none of the paedo priests failed a background vheck.

I think that we need to see some bishops locked up as part of the solution to this grooming ring. They have a duty of care to the vulnerable and not their perverted clerics.

Meanwhile parents should never leave their kids in the care of a priest. They arent all paedos but better safe than sorry.
 

They hid them shuffled them around and kept them away from the police. They were so successful that none of the paedo priests failed a background vheck.

I think that we need to see some bishops locked up as part of the solution to this grooming ring. They have a duty of care to the vulnerable and not their perverted clerics.

Meanwhile parents should never leave their kids in the care of a priest. They arent all paedos but better safe than sorry.
another reason to ban gays from anything that allows them access to young children,,
 
You never even read the link.. We should ban priests from coming into contact with kids.
There is too much evidence to ignore.
that would be unfair and illogical,, its the gays pretending to be priest that are molesting children,, priest is just an occupation,,

thats like saying truck drivers should be banned because a few truck driver molested children,,
 

They hid them shuffled them around and kept them away from the police. They were so successful that none of the paedo priests failed a background vheck.

I think that we need to see some bishops locked up as part of the solution to this grooming ring. They have a duty of care to the vulnerable and not their perverted clerics.

Meanwhile parents should never leave their kids in the care of a priest. They arent all paedos but better safe than sorry.

This happens all the time in places run by people like you.
 
that would be unfair and illogical,, its the gays pretending to be priest that are molesting children,, priest is just an occupation,,

thats like saying truck drivers should be banned because a few truck driver molested children,,
I know that you are as thick as shit But.
Apply that argument to drag shows. The have caused nowhere near the harm that priests have.
Meanwhile you are here deflecting for actual groomers.
 
I know that you are as thick as shit But.
Apply that argument to drag shows. The have caused nowhere near the harm that priests have.
Meanwhile you are here deflecting for actual groomers.
of course they have,, they have conditioned and groomed children into accepting what we all know is perversion,,
 

They hid them shuffled them around and kept them away from the police. They were so successful that none of the paedo priests failed a background vheck.

I think that we need to see some bishops locked up as part of the solution to this grooming ring. They have a duty of care to the vulnerable and not their perverted clerics.

Meanwhile parents should never leave their kids in the care of a priest. They arent all paedos but better safe than sorry.


As did the British government....they should go to jail. Meanwhile....clean up your own country and we will clean up ours....

The Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal consists of the organised child sexual abuse that occurred in the town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, Northern England from the late 1980s until present and the failure of local authorities to act on reports of the abuse throughout most of that period.[9]
---
The Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal consists of the organised child sexual abuse that occurred in the town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, Northern England from the late 1980s until present and the failure of local authorities to act on reports of the abuse throughout most of that period.[9]

-----
The abuse included gang rape, forcing children to watch rape, dousing them with petrol and threatening to set them on fire, threatening to rape their mothers and younger sisters, as well as trafficking them to other towns.[20] There were pregnancies (one at age 12), pregnancy terminations, miscarriages, babies raised by their mothers, in addition to babies removed, causing further trauma.[21][22][23][24]

The failure to address the abuse was attributed to a combination of factors revolving around race, class, religion and gender—contemptuous and sexist attitudes toward the mostly working-classvictims; lack of a child-centred focus; a desire to protect the town's reputation; and lack of training and resources.[25][26][9]

Rotherham Council's chief executive, its director of children's services, as well as the Police and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire Police all resigned.[27]

 

Forum List

Back
Top