New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hold In Global Warming Alarmism

Discussion in 'Environment' started by aplcr0331, Jul 28, 2011.

  1. aplcr0331
    Offline

    aplcr0331 ConvenientHeuristic

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    563
    Thanks Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +86
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. GWV5903
    Offline

    GWV5903 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,367
    Thanks Received:
    892
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Ratings:
    +1,294
    Can you imagine how those voters (idiots) feel now about Al Whore Gore, just think of those (idiots) people that made him worth how much????
     
  3. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,674
    How can you believe an article that's obviously biased? The fact that they use the word "alarmism" and "gaping hole" indicates an agenda rather than a dispassionate assessment of the data.
     
  4. Dr.House
    Offline

    Dr.House Lives on in syndication!

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,800
    Thanks Received:
    3,482
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Princeton/Plainsboro
    Ratings:
    +3,488
    Because NASA's data confirms it...

    The data is not biased....
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. aplcr0331
    Offline

    aplcr0331 ConvenientHeuristic

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    563
    Thanks Received:
    80
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +86
    Like the other side's dispassionate assessment of the data? Really? You alarmist started this slippery slope back in the 70's making dire predictions based on models and not facts. You guys play loose and fast with (falsified) data and now you want some decorum?

    Sciencific fraud of this magnitude would have completely and totally invalidated any arguement people were trying to propose:

    1. Manipulate the data supporting the claims of a sudden and dangerous increase in the earth’s temperature;

    2. Not disclose private doubts about whether the world was actually heating up;
    Suppress evidence that contradicted the hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming (AGW);

    3. Disguise the facts around the Medieval Warm Period, when the earth was warmer that it is today;

    4. Suppress opposition by squeezing dissenting scientists out of the peer review process.

    You got a lot of nerve man.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  6. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,674
    Have you analyzed the data yourself or just swallowed what an obviously biased author laid out for you? All I saw in that article was a "hit piece", but since you obviously have inside information or already did extensive research, show it to us, please.
     
  7. R.D.
    Offline

    R.D. Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,445
    Thanks Received:
    2,374
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,375
    :cuckoo:
     
  8. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,674
    I've got nerve? You're the that ascribes to a position that doesn't meet the logic test!!!

    The energy-trapping properties of CO2 and the other GHGs are well documented.

    The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has risen 30-40%, since the advent of the Industrial Revolution.

    Therefore, if the trend continues, how can we expect anything but warming?



    That's the logic behind AGW. If you notice in the article, it doesn't say that energy isn't being trapped, just that the rate is slower than some expect. Well, that's really a go-hum conclusion, since AGW proponents aren't unanimous in their predictions of how fast warming is coming, anyway. Just that it's coming.
     
  9. Big Fitz
    Offline

    Big Fitz User Quit *****

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,917
    Thanks Received:
    2,473
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,475
    Oh the little paragon of virtue turns on the chicken little. Now the 'no true scotsman' defense comes out to discredit this.

    You beat me to this punch Dr. House.
     
  10. Bigfoot
    Offline

    Bigfoot NRA

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,070
    Thanks Received:
    467
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +467
    Actually global cooling is on it's way in. But I could use some warming after three unusually cold winters and short summers in a row.
     

Share This Page