New EPA head Scott Pruitt rejects CO2 as primary cause of global warming

Surely you jest

Atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_concentrations_and_global_annual_average_temperatures_over_the_years_1880_to_2009.png

Which is a mere instant over the past six BILLION years.

How did the Vikings colonize Greenland? How did they raise crops and animals to restock their ships on the way to North America?
 
Besides being either false or irrelevant, none of that addresses ANY of the evidence presented in "The Physical Science Basis". Read it unless you enjoy looking an ignorant fool.
 
Surely you jest

Atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_concentrations_and_global_annual_average_temperatures_over_the_years_1880_to_2009.png

Which is a mere instant over the past six BILLION years.

How did the Vikings colonize Greenland? How did they raise crops and animals to restock their ships on the way to North America?

Has human culture been around six billion years? The fucking sun hasn't been here that long. Homo sapiens appeared 200,000 years ago. Human culture appeared slightly more than 5,000 years ago. That is the climate in which we have developed. That is the climate to which we are accustomed. Those are the conditions for which our infrastructure, our food supplies, our water supplies and our homes have been built. Who gives a rat's ass what the climate was like "six billion years ago"
 
Got anything else?

No Global Warming For 25 Years
Posted on February 3, 2017 by tonyheller
Satellites show that other than some non-climate fluctuations around the mean, global temperatures are about the same now as they were 25 years ago.

Screen-Shot-2017-02-03-at-5.49.49-AM.gif

Read more:
No Global Warming For 25 Years | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
UAH_LT_1979_thru_February_2017_v6.jpg


http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_February_2017_v6.jpg

Run a line on the mean from the beginning of the graph to the end of the graph, and you can see a definite warming for the whole period, including the last 25 years. That you are so stupid that you did not check that out just indicates what a gullible fool you are.
 
Scott Pruitt still doesn't care about the CO2.

But that is because he is almost as retarded as you are, kooookles. And he's also a stooge for the fossil fuel industry, just like you.


yep.....all the Trump voters who think this climate change stuff if total bs........all stooges for the fossil fuel industry as well!:coffee:

How about the science hasn't made its case yet!! duh.....if it did, significant climate legislation would be dominating the public policy landscape. Instead, about 117 people have called their representative in the last 10 years to demand bills to make global warming go away.

Which is exactly why Scott Pruitt gets to drop a tactical nuke into the foxhole of the alarmists!!:bye1:

Trust me s0n.........we skeptics are having a fucking ball out here in the blogosphere......could not be funner.:fu:


And if you bozo's were winning..........why all the angst, anger and misery when posting in here?:popcorn:
 
The warming of our planet is just one more thing that is going to smack the feckless minions of the orange clown in the face. Of course, with the Russian cloud hanging over him, those minions might not be there very long, in any case.
 
The warming of our planet is just one more thing that is going to smack the feckless minions of the orange clown in the face. Of course, with the Russian cloud hanging over him, those minions might not be there very long, in any case.



lol......"the Russian cloud".........biggest fake story in 50 years. Places like CNN are for the suckers of the world. For months before the election ( dots progressives still cant connect ), the Obama admin knew about Russian meddling. They didn't do dick....:oops-28:.....until November 9th 2016.:2up::popcorn::popcorn:. And what do we know after a year......that the incoming defense secretary was illegally monitored as stated by the outgoing asst defense secretary a few days ago. Stated.........on live TV.:spinner:. I could hardly believe my ears!:happy-1:. Somebody(s) are going to jail when it all falls out.

The orange clown will get smacked in the face by global warming...........but ONLY if Miami is under water within the next 4 years. Otherwise.........the EPA becomes a relic of a former era........climate science research is done WITH skeptics or not done at all........and fossil fuel energy soars like a meteor in the coming years, all this while the UN gets the bumpy cucumber with any climate change efforts. How awesome is all of this if you are a member of the alarmist religion?

The landscape sure does look sweet for guys like me in here..........:rock::rock::rock::deal:





Oh.....for those who are still confused about the whole "Russia" thing, here is some real journalism.

'Russiagate' Is Failing And Its Supporters Are Getting Concerned | Zero Hedge

Connect all the dots on what is really happening......not the fake msm version.
The real story is the surveillance carried out during the election of Donald Trump and his campaign team......."Russiagate" is the fakery. Just read the NY Times......all you have to know.
 
Last edited:
He says it is very difficult to measure actual human influence and that the research and the debate need to carry on.

Then he canned the entire climate research department and explained to his interviewer why the EPA itself should be disbanded.

"Giving pink slips to scientists across the federal government, including 43% of EPA scientists, and proposing to eliminate the US Climate Global Research Program in its entirety makes one question who this administration will rely on for scientific research and facts." --Gina McCarthy, former EPA head

"Pruitt loves baseball so put it this way: An EPA head denying science is like [Derek] Jeter refusing to use a bat. He'd be fired and so should Pruitt," -- Michael Brune, Executive Head of the Sierra Club.

What an admirable bunch are American conservatives under the leadership of an ignorant, mentally unstable fool like Donald Trump. Exceptionally so. Eh?

He says it is very difficult to measure actual human influence and that the research and the debate need to carry on.

Excellent point.

Then he canned the entire climate research department and explained to his interviewer why the EPA itself should be disbanded.

Excellent start.

An EPA head denying science....


He denied science? Did he say "I deny science exists"?
Did he said science was like astrology and shouldn't be believed?
How about some specifics?
 
I saw Pruitt last night on FOX........he looked very weak. Very weak. I would have completely decimated Chris Wallace if given the opportunity. He could have challenged Wallace on many science points being made by skeptics in 2017. The most obvious that he could have decimated Wallace on is the whole crap about CO2 being the only driver of climate change......he sat there like a bump on a log. Pruitt.....they need to get his ass out of there. Never spoke once about the "pause" which is now accepted by at least 50% of the people.........nor did he speak about Obama admitting "electricity prices will necessarily skyrocket under my plan"

Weak
 
Besides being either false or irrelevant, none of that addresses ANY of the evidence presented in "The Physical Science Basis". Read it unless you enjoy looking an ignorant fool.

There is nothing in the "physical science basis" which supports AGW over natural variability, other than suppositions, flawed computer models, and blatant bad science...but hey, if you think something is there that amounts to actual observed, measured, quantified empirical evidence supporting AGW over natural variability, by all means, lets see it..

I predict no such evidence will be forthcoming.
 

Forum List

Back
Top