New Deal: Another Name For Fascism

[JiggsCasey]

what an epic fail of a thread.... You've really gotta love how cons, who masturbate to the corporate model, attempt to do a 180 on reality and pretend that leftists are the "fascists."... in fact, they'll simultaneously label lefty leaders "communist" as well as "fascist."

Priceless.

I'm sure you must be in a great hurry...not enough time to point out all the errors in the thread....

...but not even one?

Far less than priceless: vacuous.

Don't need to. It really speaks for itself. I mean, your team is routinely trying to pin both ideological polar opposites on the political party you loathe. LOL.

Nevermind that it's the modern right wing that exhibits the tenets of fascism far more the left ever has. Afterall, fascism IS the perfect union of the corporation and state, and Moussolini himself coined the term.

 

[daveman]

Seriously?

You think 15% unemployment after 7 full years is a job well done?

As usual you facts are all fucked up, in 1920-21 Conservative crushed unemployed in 18 months dropping it from 12% to 4%, if FDR was great for 15% unemployment after 7 years Conservatives are Gods.

I prefer the Harding/Coolidge approach.

Depression of 1920

Hey Big Fizzzzzzzzzzzz...if you cut your knee as a kid and mommy took you to the doctor and he stitched you up, would you go back to be stitched up if you had cancer?

Why is it you right wing ideologues believe every cause requires the same solution? Do you EVER look at cause before you blurt out your dogma?

Was the 1929 market crash caused by a transition from a wartime economy to a peaceful economy?


The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the myth – persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
President John F. Kennedy

Yeah, Fitz, you need to look to the left for diversity of thought. I mean, their solutions to problems range from "Tax the rich!" all the way over to "Tax the rich!"

 

[daveman]

Today's conservatives want "industry" to BE the government. They want to turn over control of the country to corporations. Why they think organizations with a profit motive would be better then what we have now is beyond me.

Of course that's what they want. And on occasion, you'll get one of them to slip up and say as much.

Wrong, Utterly, stupidly, pig-headedly wrong.

You know nothing of conservatism that you didn't learn from idiot leftists.

You know what conservatives want?

The maximum amount of personal liberty compatible with civilized society. We don't want big intrusive government running our lives -- what makes you think we want big business running our lives?

Take your time. I can tell you haven't given this any thought whatsoever.

 

[daveman]

Im willing to forgive him if he will man up and support what will work instead of the backing the historically failed ideas of the right.

Government has a duty to protect our democracy from the excesses of a few people who would seek make our government into their lacky.

But you support the government making US their lackey.

 

[PoliticalChic]

what an epic fail of a thread.... You've really gotta love how cons, who masturbate to the corporate model, attempt to do a 180 on reality and pretend that leftists are the "fascists."... in fact, they'll simultaneously label lefty leaders "communist" as well as "fascist."

Priceless.

I'm sure you must be in a great hurry...not enough time to point out all the errors in the thread....

...but not even one?

Far less than priceless: vacuous.

Don't need to. It really speaks for itself. I mean, your team is routinely trying to pin both ideological polar opposites on the political party you loathe. LOL.

Nevermind that it's the modern right wing that exhibits the tenets of fascism far more the left ever has. Afterall, fascism IS the perfect union of the corporation and state, and Moussolini himself coined the term.

"Don't need to."

Means "Unable to."

1. This has been an interesting thread, with a great deal of scholarly research and analysis behind it....but I suppose one would have to read through a hundred posts...

Admitting that you didn't would be far more honest than your original post.

2. And, yes, National Socialism, Fascism and Communism, along with numerous aspects of the New Deal, belong at the same end of the spectrum, the one that invests government with unlimited powers over individual liberty, and, in the case of the New Deal, sees no restrictions imposed by the Constitution.

Garatty, in the OP, thought that his very original work, 1973, was far enough removed from the emotions of WWII to allow clear analysis...but your response proves that even now that is difficult.

3. If you have the time and interest, I suggest posts #1,6, 12, 95 and 104...
...be happy to entertain any responses you have to same.

 

[daveman]

We do keep a good number of folks in prison by any chart.

Then perhaps they shouldn't break the law, huh?

 

[JiggsCasey]

"Don't need to."

Means "Unable to."

Only in the world of the Fraulein Coulter worshipper.

You keep telling yourself what you need to hear. Either way, your thread sucks, and you're a partisan whiner.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Don't need to."

Means "Unable to."

Only in the world of the Fraulein Coulter worshipper.

You keep telling yourself what you need to hear. Either way, your thread sucks, and you're a partisan whiner.

I love exposing the anti-intellectual Left.

That would be you.

 

[JiggsCasey]

I love exposing the anti-intellectual Left.

That would be you.

LAWL. ... Based on what, exactly? The fact that every time I encounter you on this forum in my rare visits here, you're fawning all over yourself with some over-simplified, antagonistic partisan screed?

Do get over yourself, Anne Coulter disciple. You're no "intellectual," and you haven't "exposed" anything.

I mean, besides the fact that you're a joke here, and most of the forum knows it. Just like the caricature media icon you so adore.

 

[Big Fitz]

"Don't need to."

Means "Unable to."

Only in the world of the Fraulein Coulter worshipper.

You keep telling yourself what you need to hear. Either way, your thread sucks, and you're a partisan whiner.

I love exposing the anti-intellectual Left.

That would be you.

masterpiece of understatement.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I love exposing the anti-intellectual Left.

That would be you.

LAWL. ... Based on what, exactly? The fact that every time I encounter you on this forum in my rare visits here, you're fawning all over yourself with some over-simplified, antagonistic partisan screed?

Do get over yourself, Anne Coulter disciple. You're no "intellectual," and you haven't "exposed" anything.

I mean, besides the fact that you're a joke here, and most of the forum knows it. Just like the caricature media icon you so adore.

Let me get this straight...in your several posts, the best you can do is bleat 'is not, is not...."

And you deny that you are less than intellectual????

And, since you bring up Queen Ann, she pretty much had you pegged when she wrote:

"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"

Now, in total honesty, look at your posts and try to deny that you have not added one jot of data, fact, rebuttal, counter argument....or even any useful conversation.

So....intellectually....you're pretty much a zero.

The only other theory that I can come up with is that Coulter paid you to make her look prescient, and yourself like the dolt that you are.

True?