New companies in their first year create 150% of new jobs in the USA!!!

KissMy

Free Breast Exam
Oct 10, 2009
19,536
5,483
255
In your head
From chapter seven of the 2011 Economic Report of the President of the USA & the Kauffman Foundation's series on job creation.

Democrats historically look out for workers, while Republicans tend to look out for corporations. The problem is, entrepreneurs are neither and/or both at once.

Large successful corporations usually invest in job eliminating cost cuts to reduce their exposure to employee entitlements, increase profits. Not so much in risk taking entrepreneurs. Overpaying union employees kills more large corporate jobs & guaranteeing them their safe job prevents them from becoming entrepreneurs.

American companies in their first year of existence create 150 percent of new jobs in the U.S. How can that be? Easy, since existing firms lose jobs, across the board. Startups create an average of 3 million jobs. Existing firms lose an average of 1 million.

You can have all the facts on your side, but if you don't have a lobbyist, the deck is stacked against you. Unlike big business and big labor, newly birthed firms will never be organized enough to lobby for their point of view in the halls of Congress. Startups will never have the capacity to throw fundraisers for incumbents in 2012. How could they, since next year's startups don't even exist yet?

To understand the barriers to startups, put yourself in the shoes of a potential American entrepreneur. Half a million Americans start a new company each year. They typically hire five employees, in addition to themselves. At its heart, this startup leap is a choice between safe employment and risky adventure. While the myth that most startups fail dissuades many, the loss of stability, of steady pay, of health insurance, are not. But every ounce of policy that makes employment at a steady job even more of a comfort zone makes the startup choice less likely.

Reduce small business exposure to employee entitlements & reward them for hiring employees. Improving small business access to credit, capital & encourage equity investments in small businesses. We need more SBA-backed loan approvals. We must reduce the taxes & regulations on small business.

ipo-history1.png
 
2011 Economic Report of the President. Chapter 7 Supporting America's Small Businesses
Impact of the Recession on Small Businesses Job Creation

One particularly important contribution of small firms to the Nation’s well-being is the jobs they create. According to the SBA’s Office of Advocacy, small firms accounted for 9.8 million of the 15 million net new private sector jobs created between 1993 and 2009—nearly two out of every three of the period’s net new jobs. In normal times, new small businesses account disproportionately for employment growth. Although many new firms fail, surviving firms create enough jobs to offset those lost to firm exits, so that most jobs created by firm births persist. A recent Kauffman Foundation study, for example, shows that startup firms created 3.1 million gross jobs in the United States in 2000. By 2005, about half of the initial firms had failed, but the survivors still employed 2.4 million people (Kane 2010).

During the recession, small businesses hired fewer workers than usual. According to Business Employment Dynamics statistics, between 2001 and 2007, businesses with fewer than 250 employees hired an average of 18.2 million workers a year, but those numbers fell to 16.5 million and 15.1 million in 2008 and 2009. Furthermore, some evidence suggests that small businesses have found it harder to recover from this recession than from past downturns. According to a Bureau of Labor Statistics report released in November 2010, new firms created a seasonally adjusted 1.1 million jobs during the three quarters before March 2010, or 31 percent fewer than during the comparable period after the 2001 recession.
 
I believe the new business create a lot of the jobs and the Democratic machine is good at making it impossible to start a new biz nowadays.
 

That is not a loan or grant program. That is a BS Government Affirmative Action Reparations Program to give government money away to certain groups. How did that work out for those groups who were given home loans?

What does race, ethnicity, gender, disabilities have to do with who has the next great new innovation, best job creating business, life saving breakthrough all for the betterment of society as a whole? I guess if you are a blue eyed white male who wants to create & employ people for betterment of society, it's to bad for everyone.

While financial necessity is obviously important; you could also qualify for certain grants based on race, ethnicity, gender, disabilities, and much more.

From governmentgrants.com
 
Last edited:
So what has the republicans done to help small and startup business that creates all these jobs?
 
So what has the republicans done to help small and startup business that creates all these jobs?

I don't believe the Republican leadership sees small business as making less than 500 million to a billion a year.

Anyone making less than that is inconsequential.
 
Don't most startups fail after a few years?
Oh yeah, don't buy an IPO either on the basis of buy and hold either. The permanence of corporations and businesses is an artifact of perception. The average listed corporation lasts less than I believe it is 10 years.
 

Forum List

Back
Top