New Anne Coulter Book On Racism By The Left Sets The Record Straight. Read It.

[PoliticalChic]

hey, polly.

do you really like ann coulter?

and her "books"?

please say you are just playing a role.

Read any, birdie?

just excerpts, and some of her columns.

enough to weigh her and find her oh so wanting.

do you think she was taken out of context, wuff?

"do you think she was taken out of context,"

Not in the least. e.e.

 

[NoNukes]

If Anne Coulter said it, it must be true. She is as objective as Mudwhistle.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Set the record straight on racism? Why not ask black people, or is their voice unqualified?

African Americans Return to Congress, 1929–1970

The Civil Rights Movement And The Second Reconstruction, 1945—1968

A Herblock cartoon from March 1949 depicts a glum-looking President Harry S. Truman and “John Q. Public” inspecting worm-ridden apples representing Truman’s Fair Deal policies such as civil rights and rent controls. The alliance of conservative southern Democrats and Republicans in Congress who successfully blocked many of Truman’s initiatives is portrayed by the worm labeled “Coalition.”

The broad period from the end of World War II until the late 1960s, often referred to as the “Second Reconstruction,” consisted of a grass-roots civil rights movement coupled with gradual but progressive actions by the Presidents, the federal courts, and Congress to provide full political rights for African Americans and to begin to redress longstanding economic and social inequities. While African-American Members of Congress from this era played prominent roles in advocating for reform, it was largely the efforts of everyday Americans who protested segregation that prodded a reluctant Congress to pass landmark civil rights legislation in the 1960s.

During the 1940s and 1950s, executive action, rather than legislative initiatives, set the pace for measured movement toward desegregation. President Harry S. Truman “expanded on Roosevelt’s limited and tentative steps toward racial moderation and reconciliation.” Responding to civil rights advocates, Truman established the President’s Committee on Civil Rights. Significantly, the committee’s October 1947 report, To Secure These Rights, provided civil rights proponents in Congress a legislative blueprint for much of the next two decades. Among its recommendations were the creation of a permanent FEPC, the establishment of a permanent Civil Rights Commission, the creation of a civil rights division in the U.S. Department of Justice, and the enforcement of federal anti-lynching laws and desegregation in interstate transportation. In 1948, President Truman signed Executive Order 9981, desegregating the military. Truman’s civil rights policies contributed to the unraveling of the solid Democratic South. Alienated by the administration’s race policies, a faction of conservative southerners split to form the Dixiecrats, a racially conservative party that nominated South Carolina Governor (and future U.S. Senator) Strom Thurmond as its presidential candidate in 1948. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, though more cautious, also followed his predecessor’s pattern—desegregating Washington, DC, overseeing the integration of blacks to the military, and promoting minority rights in federal contracts.

more MUCH more...

"The liberal line is that poverty is caused by a vicious brew of “institutional” racism — conservative policies promoted by racist Republicans — combined with high incarceration rates of black males. In the fashion typical of bamboozlers, these liberals have it exactly backwards. Conservative policy prescriptions aren’t the cause of underachievement for minorities and the poor, they’re the cure. And furthermore, Republicans advocate policies that recognize the innate value of all humans, as opposed to the liberal policies that demean the poor and disadvantaged by encouraging victimhood.” — P.8
From Angela McGlowan’s Bamboozled: How Americans are being Exploited by the Lies of the Liberal Agenda."

 

[mudwhistle]

Set the record straight on racism? Why not ask black people, or is their voice unqualified?

African Americans Return to Congress, 1929–1970

The Civil Rights Movement And The Second Reconstruction, 1945—1968

A Herblock cartoon from March 1949 depicts a glum-looking President Harry S. Truman and “John Q. Public” inspecting worm-ridden apples representing Truman’s Fair Deal policies such as civil rights and rent controls. The alliance of conservative southern Democrats and Republicans in Congress who successfully blocked many of Truman’s initiatives is portrayed by the worm labeled “Coalition.”

The broad period from the end of World War II until the late 1960s, often referred to as the “Second Reconstruction,” consisted of a grass-roots civil rights movement coupled with gradual but progressive actions by the Presidents, the federal courts, and Congress to provide full political rights for African Americans and to begin to redress longstanding economic and social inequities. While African-American Members of Congress from this era played prominent roles in advocating for reform, it was largely the efforts of everyday Americans who protested segregation that prodded a reluctant Congress to pass landmark civil rights legislation in the 1960s.

During the 1940s and 1950s, executive action, rather than legislative initiatives, set the pace for measured movement toward desegregation. President Harry S. Truman “expanded on Roosevelt’s limited and tentative steps toward racial moderation and reconciliation.” Responding to civil rights advocates, Truman established the President’s Committee on Civil Rights. Significantly, the committee’s October 1947 report, To Secure These Rights, provided civil rights proponents in Congress a legislative blueprint for much of the next two decades. Among its recommendations were the creation of a permanent FEPC, the establishment of a permanent Civil Rights Commission, the creation of a civil rights division in the U.S. Department of Justice, and the enforcement of federal anti-lynching laws and desegregation in interstate transportation. In 1948, President Truman signed Executive Order 9981, desegregating the military. Truman’s civil rights policies contributed to the unraveling of the solid Democratic South. Alienated by the administration’s race policies, a faction of conservative southerners split to form the Dixiecrats, a racially conservative party that nominated South Carolina Governor (and future U.S. Senator) Strom Thurmond as its presidential candidate in 1948. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, though more cautious, also followed his predecessor’s pattern—desegregating Washington, DC, overseeing the integration of blacks to the military, and promoting minority rights in federal contracts.

more MUCH more...

You speak of black people like they're all one entity like a big blob or something. They all have differing opinions. One cannot speak for all.

No, YOU are the one who uses those words. You and people like Coulter speak of Democrats and Republicans like they're all one entity like a big blob or something.

Why don't you try education instead of obfuscation?

Contrary to the myth Democrats told about themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

That statement is a lie. Let me correct that for you...

Contrary to the myth revisionist conservatives keep telling themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of liberals battling conservatives to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

When people like Coulter try to revise the history of the civil rights movement, they talk about 'Democrats', but they never reveal that the Dixiecrats who opposed the civil rights movement were staunch conservatives. Or that the Republican Party had liberal Senators like Jacob Javits.

Were there conservatives who had the moral courage and decency to support John F. Kennedy's Civil Rights Bill in 1964?...Yes...great Republicans like Everett Dirksen who were integral in passing that legislation deserve credit. But not Coulter's bullshit 'Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people'

"In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human. In all those things which deal with people's money, or their economy, or their form of government, be conservative."
President Dwight D. Eisenhower

You argue that I'm wrong yet you quote Ike provig I'm right.

Weak.

 

[mudwhistle]

Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew were painted by the media as crooks.....but they both did a lot for race relations in this country when it wasn't popular.

An old Nixon speech almost sounds like an Obama speech:

Nixon had said, “people in the ghetto have to
have more than an equal chance. They should be given a dividend.”

One of the main reasons Nixon chose a rookie like Spiro Agnew as his
vice presidential nominee was Agnew’s sterling civil rights record. Agnew
had passed some of the first bans on racial discrimination in public housing
in the nation—before the federal laws—and then beaten segregationist
George Mahoney for governor of Maryland in 1966. That was the Mahoney
in “Maddox, Mahoney and Wallace.”

With the segregationist vote split between Democrat Hubert Humphrey
and George Wallace in the 1968 presidential election, Nixon won.
In his inaugural address, he said, “No man can be fully free while his
neighbor is not. To go forward at all is to go forward together. This means
black and white together, as one nation, not two. The laws have caught up
with our conscience. What remains is to give life to what is in the law: to
ensure at last that as all are born equal in dignity before God, all are born
equal in dignity before man.”

President Nixon proceeded to desegregate the public schools with lightning
speed. Just within Nixon’s first two years, black students attending
segregated schools in the South declined from nearly 70 percent to 18.4
percent. There was more desegregation of American schools in Nixon’s
first term than in any historical period before or since.

During the campaign, Nixon had said, “people in the ghetto have to
have more than an equal chance. They should be given a dividend.” As
president, he followed through by imposing formal racial quotas and timelines on the building trades. The construction industry got a lot of business from the federal government and yet had doggedly refused to hire blacks. They had been given long enough do so voluntarily. Nixon was fed up with the union’s foot dragging and demanded results.

Web Extra: Read an Exclusive Excerpt of Ann Coulter’s New Book - ABC News

This shows what has happened to the Republican Party since then.

Civil Rights is a dead issue but with the help of a biased maintream media the Democrats keep it alive.

This not the GOP's doing. We are being lied to.

 

[Bfgrn]

Set the record straight on racism? Why not ask black people, or is their voice unqualified?

African Americans Return to Congress, 1929–1970

The Civil Rights Movement And The Second Reconstruction, 1945—1968

A Herblock cartoon from March 1949 depicts a glum-looking President Harry S. Truman and “John Q. Public” inspecting worm-ridden apples representing Truman’s Fair Deal policies such as civil rights and rent controls. The alliance of conservative southern Democrats and Republicans in Congress who successfully blocked many of Truman’s initiatives is portrayed by the worm labeled “Coalition.”

The broad period from the end of World War II until the late 1960s, often referred to as the “Second Reconstruction,” consisted of a grass-roots civil rights movement coupled with gradual but progressive actions by the Presidents, the federal courts, and Congress to provide full political rights for African Americans and to begin to redress longstanding economic and social inequities. While African-American Members of Congress from this era played prominent roles in advocating for reform, it was largely the efforts of everyday Americans who protested segregation that prodded a reluctant Congress to pass landmark civil rights legislation in the 1960s.

During the 1940s and 1950s, executive action, rather than legislative initiatives, set the pace for measured movement toward desegregation. President Harry S. Truman “expanded on Roosevelt’s limited and tentative steps toward racial moderation and reconciliation.” Responding to civil rights advocates, Truman established the President’s Committee on Civil Rights. Significantly, the committee’s October 1947 report, To Secure These Rights, provided civil rights proponents in Congress a legislative blueprint for much of the next two decades. Among its recommendations were the creation of a permanent FEPC, the establishment of a permanent Civil Rights Commission, the creation of a civil rights division in the U.S. Department of Justice, and the enforcement of federal anti-lynching laws and desegregation in interstate transportation. In 1948, President Truman signed Executive Order 9981, desegregating the military. Truman’s civil rights policies contributed to the unraveling of the solid Democratic South. Alienated by the administration’s race policies, a faction of conservative southerners split to form the Dixiecrats, a racially conservative party that nominated South Carolina Governor (and future U.S. Senator) Strom Thurmond as its presidential candidate in 1948. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, though more cautious, also followed his predecessor’s pattern—desegregating Washington, DC, overseeing the integration of blacks to the military, and promoting minority rights in federal contracts.

more MUCH more...

"The liberal line is that poverty is caused by a vicious brew of “institutional” racism — conservative policies promoted by racist Republicans — combined with high incarceration rates of black males. In the fashion typical of bamboozlers, these liberals have it exactly backwards. Conservative policy prescriptions aren’t the cause of underachievement for minorities and the poor, they’re the cure. And furthermore, Republicans advocate policies that recognize the innate value of all humans, as opposed to the liberal policies that demean the poor and disadvantaged by encouraging victimhood.” — P.8
From Angela McGlowan’s Bamboozled: How Americans are being Exploited by the Lies of the Liberal Agenda."

Angela McGlowan is a revisionist, just like Coulter. See post 79 for guidance and education on your false premises.

 

[Bfgrn]

You speak of black people like they're all one entity like a big blob or something. They all have differing opinions. One cannot speak for all.

No, YOU are the one who uses those words. You and people like Coulter speak of Democrats and Republicans like they're all one entity like a big blob or something.

Why don't you try education instead of obfuscation?

Contrary to the myth Democrats told about themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

That statement is a lie. Let me correct that for you...

Contrary to the myth revisionist conservatives keep telling themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of liberals battling conservatives to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

When people like Coulter try to revise the history of the civil rights movement, they talk about 'Democrats', but they never reveal that the Dixiecrats who opposed the civil rights movement were staunch conservatives. Or that the Republican Party had liberal Senators like Jacob Javits.

Were there conservatives who had the moral courage and decency to support John F. Kennedy's Civil Rights Bill in 1964?...Yes...great Republicans like Everett Dirksen who were integral in passing that legislation deserve credit. But not Coulter's bullshit 'Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people'

"In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human. In all those things which deal with people's money, or their economy, or their form of government, be conservative."
President Dwight D. Eisenhower

You argue that I'm wrong yet you quote Ike provig I'm right.

Weak.

You are either dense or dishonest, which is it? You continue to miss the point of what I said. I will repeat it one more time for you.

"Contrary to the myth revisionist conservatives keep telling themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of liberals battling conservatives to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people"

Because I quoted a 'Republican', it doesn't mean he was a conservative. Ike was a social liberal. But, you and people like Coulter speak of Democrats and Republicans like they're all one entity like a big blob or something.

 

[NoNukes]

Anne Coulter is similar to FOX NEWS. When you first hear them you think that you are witnessing brilliant political satire. Then you realize that they are serious. I will read the book though.

 

[NoNukes]

Set the record straight on racism? Why not ask black people, or is their voice unqualified?

African Americans Return to Congress, 1929–1970

The Civil Rights Movement And The Second Reconstruction, 1945—1968

A Herblock cartoon from March 1949 depicts a glum-looking President Harry S. Truman and “John Q. Public” inspecting worm-ridden apples representing Truman’s Fair Deal policies such as civil rights and rent controls. The alliance of conservative southern Democrats and Republicans in Congress who successfully blocked many of Truman’s initiatives is portrayed by the worm labeled “Coalition.”

The broad period from the end of World War II until the late 1960s, often referred to as the “Second Reconstruction,” consisted of a grass-roots civil rights movement coupled with gradual but progressive actions by the Presidents, the federal courts, and Congress to provide full political rights for African Americans and to begin to redress longstanding economic and social inequities. While African-American Members of Congress from this era played prominent roles in advocating for reform, it was largely the efforts of everyday Americans who protested segregation that prodded a reluctant Congress to pass landmark civil rights legislation in the 1960s.

During the 1940s and 1950s, executive action, rather than legislative initiatives, set the pace for measured movement toward desegregation. President Harry S. Truman “expanded on Roosevelt’s limited and tentative steps toward racial moderation and reconciliation.” Responding to civil rights advocates, Truman established the President’s Committee on Civil Rights. Significantly, the committee’s October 1947 report, To Secure These Rights, provided civil rights proponents in Congress a legislative blueprint for much of the next two decades. Among its recommendations were the creation of a permanent FEPC, the establishment of a permanent Civil Rights Commission, the creation of a civil rights division in the U.S. Department of Justice, and the enforcement of federal anti-lynching laws and desegregation in interstate transportation. In 1948, President Truman signed Executive Order 9981, desegregating the military. Truman’s civil rights policies contributed to the unraveling of the solid Democratic South. Alienated by the administration’s race policies, a faction of conservative southerners split to form the Dixiecrats, a racially conservative party that nominated South Carolina Governor (and future U.S. Senator) Strom Thurmond as its presidential candidate in 1948. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, though more cautious, also followed his predecessor’s pattern—desegregating Washington, DC, overseeing the integration of blacks to the military, and promoting minority rights in federal contracts.

more MUCH more...

Black people are not intelligent enough to voice an opinion on Black issues. Republicans have to tell them what they should think.

 

[Bfgrn]

Anne Coulter is similar to FOX NEWS. When you first hear them you think that you are witnessing brilliant political satire. Then you realize that they are serious. I will read the book though.

Read the introduction...it starts out on the same false premises Coulter and others on this thread must rely on to make their case. But, I will give her credit for acknowledging that Thomas Jefferson was a liberal...

BN.com | Read Sample of Bamboozled: How Americans are being Exploited by the Lies of the Liberal Agenda by Angela McGlowan

 

[mudwhistle]

No, YOU are the one who uses those words. You and people like Coulter speak of Democrats and Republicans like they're all one entity like a big blob or something.

Why don't you try education instead of obfuscation?

Contrary to the myth Democrats told about themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

That statement is a lie. Let me correct that for you...

Contrary to the myth revisionist conservatives keep telling themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of liberals battling conservatives to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

When people like Coulter try to revise the history of the civil rights movement, they talk about 'Democrats', but they never reveal that the Dixiecrats who opposed the civil rights movement were staunch conservatives. Or that the Republican Party had liberal Senators like Jacob Javits.

Were there conservatives who had the moral courage and decency to support John F. Kennedy's Civil Rights Bill in 1964?...Yes...great Republicans like Everett Dirksen who were integral in passing that legislation deserve credit. But not Coulter's bullshit 'Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people'

"In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human. In all those things which deal with people's money, or their economy, or their form of government, be conservative."
President Dwight D. Eisenhower

You argue that I'm wrong yet you quote Ike provig I'm right.

Weak.

You are either dense or dishonest, which is it? You continue to miss the point of what I said. I will repeat it one more time for you.

"Contrary to the myth revisionist conservatives keep telling themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of liberals battling conservatives to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people"

Because I quoted a 'Republican', it doesn't mean he was a conservative. Ike was a social liberal. But, you and people like Coulter speak of Democrats and Republicans like they're all one entity like a big blob or something.

Now you're plagiarizing me.

It's difficult for you to take both sides of an issue and not sound idiotic, and you can't say I am making sweeping generalizations, then make one yourself and sound rational at the same time.

 

[Bfgrn]

You argue that I'm wrong yet you quote Ike provig I'm right.

Weak.

You are either dense or dishonest, which is it? You continue to miss the point of what I said. I will repeat it one more time for you.

"Contrary to the myth revisionist conservatives keep telling themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of liberals battling conservatives to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people"

Because I quoted a 'Republican', it doesn't mean he was a conservative. Ike was a social liberal. But, you and people like Coulter speak of Democrats and Republicans like they're all one entity like a big blob or something.

Now you're plagiarizing me.

It's difficult for you to take both sides of an issue and not sound idiotic, and you can't say I am making sweeping generalizations, then make one yourself and sound rational at the same time.

I am not making any sweeping generalizations that aren't based in fact. Show me an advocate for minority rights, and you will always find a liberal, not a conservative. There are no conservative advocates for minorities.

We don't have to go back to 1964, we can look at TODAY.

Gay rights...name a conservative advocate?

Conservatives advocate for the right to hate. Liberals advocate for the right to love who you choose.

Muslim rights in America...name a conservative advocate?

Conservatives advocate for the right to make hate films that desecrate Muhammad.

Hispanic rights...name a conservative advocate?

As a matter of fact, conservatives vehemently support racists like Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio and draconian racial profiling laws like Arizona SB 1070.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Set the record straight on racism? Why not ask black people, or is their voice unqualified?

African Americans Return to Congress, 1929–1970

The Civil Rights Movement And The Second Reconstruction, 1945—1968

A Herblock cartoon from March 1949 depicts a glum-looking President Harry S. Truman and “John Q. Public” inspecting worm-ridden apples representing Truman’s Fair Deal policies such as civil rights and rent controls. The alliance of conservative southern Democrats and Republicans in Congress who successfully blocked many of Truman’s initiatives is portrayed by the worm labeled “Coalition.”

The broad period from the end of World War II until the late 1960s, often referred to as the “Second Reconstruction,” consisted of a grass-roots civil rights movement coupled with gradual but progressive actions by the Presidents, the federal courts, and Congress to provide full political rights for African Americans and to begin to redress longstanding economic and social inequities. While African-American Members of Congress from this era played prominent roles in advocating for reform, it was largely the efforts of everyday Americans who protested segregation that prodded a reluctant Congress to pass landmark civil rights legislation in the 1960s.

During the 1940s and 1950s, executive action, rather than legislative initiatives, set the pace for measured movement toward desegregation. President Harry S. Truman “expanded on Roosevelt’s limited and tentative steps toward racial moderation and reconciliation.” Responding to civil rights advocates, Truman established the President’s Committee on Civil Rights. Significantly, the committee’s October 1947 report, To Secure These Rights, provided civil rights proponents in Congress a legislative blueprint for much of the next two decades. Among its recommendations were the creation of a permanent FEPC, the establishment of a permanent Civil Rights Commission, the creation of a civil rights division in the U.S. Department of Justice, and the enforcement of federal anti-lynching laws and desegregation in interstate transportation. In 1948, President Truman signed Executive Order 9981, desegregating the military. Truman’s civil rights policies contributed to the unraveling of the solid Democratic South. Alienated by the administration’s race policies, a faction of conservative southerners split to form the Dixiecrats, a racially conservative party that nominated South Carolina Governor (and future U.S. Senator) Strom Thurmond as its presidential candidate in 1948. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, though more cautious, also followed his predecessor’s pattern—desegregating Washington, DC, overseeing the integration of blacks to the military, and promoting minority rights in federal contracts.

more MUCH more...

"The liberal line is that poverty is caused by a vicious brew of “institutional” racism — conservative policies promoted by racist Republicans — combined with high incarceration rates of black males. In the fashion typical of bamboozlers, these liberals have it exactly backwards. Conservative policy prescriptions aren’t the cause of underachievement for minorities and the poor, they’re the cure. And furthermore, Republicans advocate policies that recognize the innate value of all humans, as opposed to the liberal policies that demean the poor and disadvantaged by encouraging victimhood.” — P.8
From Angela McGlowan’s Bamboozled: How Americans are being Exploited by the Lies of the Liberal Agenda."

Angela McGlowan is a revisionist, just like Coulter. See post 79 for guidance and education on your false premises.

OMG!!!

You mean you don't agree with Coulter????
...and not Ms. McGlowan, either??

Any other paragons whose work you have never inspected, but with whom you vehemently disagree???


As usual...just be prepared for sarcasm and egregious vituperativeness.


"Angela McGlowan is a revisionist, just like Coulter."
What we have here is the Liberal's verbal equivalent of 'talk to the hand.'

Both of the above are insightful, brilliant....and correct.


Here's some more McGlowan....examples that I'm certain you'll agree with:

1. . "The bamboozlers' mantra became: "We liberals are here to help you. Don't let those evil conservatives judge you. You're the victim! You shouldn't have to work. Your standard of living isn't your responsibility. It's ours. You don't need to marry your baby's daddy. Uncle Sam is your baby's daddy, and will be as long as you keep voting for us." -- P.13


2. "I grew up in segregation," says New York Times best-selling conservative author Shelby Steele, "so I really know what racism is. I went to a segregated school. I bow to no one in my knowledge of racism, which is one of the reasons why I say white privilege is not a problem....Racism is about eighteenth on a list of problems black America faces." -- P.38-39


3. "Without any scientific justification, liberals hoodwink black and Latino parents into believing that having more minorities teach their children will improve their performance. When Wallace, Lester Maddox, and Bull Connor supported doing this, we called them racists. Isn't it ironic that many of the advocates of this policy today belong to the same party as George Wallace and Lester Maddox?" -- P.60



All true......right?

 

[mudwhistle]

You are either dense or dishonest, which is it? You continue to miss the point of what I said. I will repeat it one more time for you.

"Contrary to the myth revisionist conservatives keep telling themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of liberals battling conservatives to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people"

Because I quoted a 'Republican', it doesn't mean he was a conservative. Ike was a social liberal. But, you and people like Coulter speak of Democrats and Republicans like they're all one entity like a big blob or something.

Now you're plagiarizing me.

It's difficult for you to take both sides of an issue and not sound idiotic, and you can't say I am making sweeping generalizations, then make one yourself and sound rational at the same time.

I am not making any sweeping generalizations that aren't based in fact. Show me an advocate for minority rights, and you will always find a liberal, not a conservative. There are no conservative advocates for minorities.

We don't have to go back to 1964, we can look at TODAY.

Gay rights...name a conservative advocate?

Conservatives advocate for the right to hate. Liberals advocate for the right to love who you choose.

Muslim rights in America...name a conservative advocate?

Conservatives advocate for the right to make hate films that desecrate Muhammad.

Hispanic rights...name a conservative advocate?

As a matter of fact, conservatives vehemently support racists like Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio and draconian racial profiling laws like Arizona SB 1070.

You just blew it.

A conservative that advocated Hispanic rights?

Who do you think originally pushed for amnesty?

John McCain. The Dems wouldn't touch it with a 10 meter cattle-prod at first, but like every other issue they eventually come around to talking a good game but not accomplishing dick.

As with every other issue the Dems in Washington ether invent the issue or keep it going longer than necessary just to appear compassionate.

 

[Bfgrn]

"The liberal line is that poverty is caused by a vicious brew of “institutional” racism — conservative policies promoted by racist Republicans — combined with high incarceration rates of black males. In the fashion typical of bamboozlers, these liberals have it exactly backwards. Conservative policy prescriptions aren’t the cause of underachievement for minorities and the poor, they’re the cure. And furthermore, Republicans advocate policies that recognize the innate value of all humans, as opposed to the liberal policies that demean the poor and disadvantaged by encouraging victimhood.” — P.8
From Angela McGlowan’s Bamboozled: How Americans are being Exploited by the Lies of the Liberal Agenda."

Angela McGlowan is a revisionist, just like Coulter. See post 79 for guidance and education on your false premises.

OMG!!!

You mean you don't agree with Coulter????
...and not Ms. McGlowan, either??

Any other paragons whose work you have never inspected, but with whom you vehemently disagree???


As usual...just be prepared for sarcasm and egregious vituperativeness.


"Angela McGlowan is a revisionist, just like Coulter."
What we have here is the Liberal's verbal equivalent of 'talk to the hand.'

Both of the above are insightful, brilliant....and correct.


Here's some more McGlowan....examples that I'm certain you'll agree with:

1. . "The bamboozlers' mantra became: "We liberals are here to help you. Don't let those evil conservatives judge you. You're the victim! You shouldn't have to work. Your standard of living isn't your responsibility. It's ours. You don't need to marry your baby's daddy. Uncle Sam is your baby's daddy, and will be as long as you keep voting for us." -- P.13


2. "I grew up in segregation," says New York Times best-selling conservative author Shelby Steele, "so I really know what racism is. I went to a segregated school. I bow to no one in my knowledge of racism, which is one of the reasons why I say white privilege is not a problem....Racism is about eighteenth on a list of problems black America faces." -- P.38-39


3. "Without any scientific justification, liberals hoodwink black and Latino parents into believing that having more minorities teach their children will improve their performance. When Wallace, Lester Maddox, and Bull Connor supported doing this, we called them racists. Isn't it ironic that many of the advocates of this policy today belong to the same party as George Wallace and Lester Maddox?" -- P.60



All true......right?

There is a lot of 'justification' going on, but none of it is true. It is the rhetoric of moral justification for not caring about anyone but yourself. And it is the conservative mantra that the only way people learn is by punishment. That is why conservatives vehemently support racists like Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio and draconian racial profiling laws like Arizona SB 1070. Vehemently oppose gay rights and conservatives advocate for the right to make hate films that desecrate Muhammad.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Angela McGlowan is a revisionist, just like Coulter. See post 79 for guidance and education on your false premises.

OMG!!!

You mean you don't agree with Coulter????
...and not Ms. McGlowan, either??

Any other paragons whose work you have never inspected, but with whom you vehemently disagree???


As usual...just be prepared for sarcasm and egregious vituperativeness.


"Angela McGlowan is a revisionist, just like Coulter."
What we have here is the Liberal's verbal equivalent of 'talk to the hand.'

Both of the above are insightful, brilliant....and correct.


Here's some more McGlowan....examples that I'm certain you'll agree with:

1. . "The bamboozlers' mantra became: "We liberals are here to help you. Don't let those evil conservatives judge you. You're the victim! You shouldn't have to work. Your standard of living isn't your responsibility. It's ours. You don't need to marry your baby's daddy. Uncle Sam is your baby's daddy, and will be as long as you keep voting for us." -- P.13


2. "I grew up in segregation," says New York Times best-selling conservative author Shelby Steele, "so I really know what racism is. I went to a segregated school. I bow to no one in my knowledge of racism, which is one of the reasons why I say white privilege is not a problem....Racism is about eighteenth on a list of problems black America faces." -- P.38-39


3. "Without any scientific justification, liberals hoodwink black and Latino parents into believing that having more minorities teach their children will improve their performance. When Wallace, Lester Maddox, and Bull Connor supported doing this, we called them racists. Isn't it ironic that many of the advocates of this policy today belong to the same party as George Wallace and Lester Maddox?" -- P.60



All true......right?

There is a lot of 'justification' going on, but none of it is true. It is the rhetoric of moral justification for not caring about anyone but yourself. And it is the conservative mantra that the only way people learn is by punishment. That is why conservatives vehemently support racists like Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio and draconian racial profiling laws like Arizona SB 1070. Vehemently oppose gay rights and conservatives advocate for the right to make hate films that desecrate Muhammad.

1. "... but none of it is true."
Is that fear I hear??


2. "It is the rhetoric of moral justification for not caring about anyone but yourself."

What an excellent opportunity to quote myself: "Let's be honest, for a Liberal not data, facts, proof, or even experience will matter not a bit in informing belief."


Shall we prove it? OK.


"SYRACUSE, N.Y. -- Syracuse University professor Arthur C. Brooks is about to become the darling of the religious right in America -- and it's making him nervous.

The child of academics, raised in a liberal household and educated in the liberal arts, Brooks has written a book that concludes religious conservatives donate far more money than secular liberals to all sorts of charitable activities, irrespective of income.

In the book, he cites extensive data analysis to demonstrate that values advocated by conservatives -- from church attendance and two-parent families to the Protestant work ethic and a distaste for government-funded social services -- make conservatives more generous than liberals.

The book, titled "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism" (Basic Books, $26), is due for release Nov. 24.

When it comes to helping the needy, Brooks writes: "For too long, liberals have been claiming they are the most virtuous members of American society. Although they usually give less to charity, they have nevertheless lambasted conservatives for their callousness in the face of social injustice."

For the record, Brooks, 42, has been registered in the past as a Democrat, then a Republican, but now lists himself as independent, explaining, "I have no comfortable political home."

Since 2003 he has been director of nonprofit studies for Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs.

...Another observed that liberals are having fewer babies than conservatives, which will reduce liberals' impact on politics over time because children generally mimic their parents.

Brooks is a behavioral economist by training who researches the relationship between what people do -- aside from their paid work -- why they do it, and its economic impact.

He's a number cruncher who relied primarily on 10 databases assembled over the past decade, mostly from scientific surveys. The data are adjusted for variables such as age, gender, race and income to draw fine-point conclusions.

His book, he says, is carefully documented to withstand the scrutiny of other academics, which he said he encourages.

The book's basic findings are that conservatives who practice religion, live in traditional nuclear families and reject the notion that the government should engage in income redistribution are the most generous Americans, by any measure.

Conversely, secular liberals who believe fervently in government entitlement programs give far less to charity. They want everyone's tax dollars to support charitable causes and are reluctant to write checks to those causes, even when governments don't provide them with enough money.

Such an attitude, he writes, not only shortchanges the nonprofits but also diminishes the positive fallout of giving, including personal health, wealth and happiness for the donor and overall economic growth.
All of this, he said, he backs up with statistical analysis.

"These are not the sort of conclusions I ever thought I would reach when I started looking at charitable giving in graduate school, 10 years ago," he writes in the introduction. "I have to admit I probably would have hated what I have to say in this book."

Still, he says it forcefully, pointing out that liberals give less than conservatives in every way imaginable, including volunteer hours and donated blood.

"His main finding is quite startling, that the people who talk the most about caring actually fork over the least," he said. "But beyond this finding I thought his analysis was extremely good, especially for an economist. He thinks very well about the reason for this and reflects about politics and morals in a way most economists do their best to avoid."

Philanthropy Expert Says Conservatives Are More Generous -- Beliefnet.com - Pangloss's column on Newsvine


Again?
"...the people who talk the most about caring actually fork over the least,"



Now....please...do what you were born to do: deny the truth!

 

[Foxfyre]

Also, the idea that Conservatives don't support minority rights is absurd. Conservatives see people, not minorities,. Conservatives generally view minorities as equals and treat them like everybody else and would protest if anybody, including a minority, was denied their right to compete, prosper, or embrace life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Conservatives do protest programs and initiatives that encourage dependency in any person or group.

Liberals are more likely to view minorities as poor pathetic creatures who can't make it without whitey's help via government. To me that is oppression and subjugation of minorities and encouragement of depedency (that keeps the liberals in office) rather than respect for minority rights.

 

[NoNukes]

Also, the idea that Conservatives don't support minority rights is absurd. Conservatives see people, not minorities,. Conservatives generally view minorities as equals and treat them like everybody else and would protest if anybody, including a minority, was denied their right to compete, prosper, or embrace life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Conservatives do protest programs and initiatives that encourage dependency in any person or group.

Liberals are more likely to view minorities as poor pathetic creatures who can't make it without whitey's help via government. To me that is oppression and subjugation of minorities and encouragement of depedency (that keeps the liberals in office) rather than respect for minority rights.

What a crock of shit.

 

[CausingPAIN]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Jnfg9i4IsE]ABC News Hidden camera experiments Racism in America.[/ame]

 

[Foxfyre]

ABC News Hidden camera experiments Racism in America.

Muslims hear this all the time? Stuff like in this video? I don't believe it. I think this was 100% staged for media consumption. Yes, there was a day when minorities were denied service in a restaurant or barbershop or whatever. Those times have not existed for many decades now. Even if there is a rare bigot who might be thinkiing it, no proprietor is going to risk the negative publicity by behaving that way.