New Anne Coulter Book On Racism By The Left Sets The Record Straight. Read It.

you cant name one incident of racism in the last thirty years that is valid?
 
this thread is not about the rights lies about clinton.

Its about Mann Cultwhores book.


Prove there is no racism in this country and that blacks are just lying about it
 
this thread is not about the rights lies about clinton.

Its about Mann Cultwhores book.


Prove there is no racism in this country and that blacks are just lying about it

So....we agree that the dog is a rapist?

Great.


But...if you bring up Nixon, you can bet I can find 'lower-lifes' on the Left.

After all, Marxism is based on theft.....
 
So there is NO racism towards blacks in this country?

None?

None that can be documented. The idea that whites are keeping down blacks is the craziest conspiracy theory of all. The most coveted job in america is to play in the MLB or NFL or NHL and blacks are way over-represented there. You really think whites have conspired to keep blacks from getting a factory job but will let them make $20 million in the NBA?

Blacks are free to go as far as their skills will take them. In athletics that's very far; in intellectual areas they can't cut it.
 
Prove there is no racism in this country and that blacks are just lying about it

Tons of racism in america but it's all affirmative action and is directed against whites. Blacks are given special treatment both in going to college and getting a job. And yet they're still failures!!
 
Prove there is no racism in this country and that blacks are just lying about it

Tons of racism in america but it's all affirmative action and is directed against whites. Blacks are given special treatment both in going to college and getting a job. And yet they're still failures!!



How 'bout you, failure? Are you saying that you are a failure because you're a victim? Is that it, failure?
 
when was he ever convicted of rape?


Are all rapists convicted?



Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:

And he's the most popular Democrat out there. Makes "The GOP War On Women" look like a joke.

But the left is swimming in hypocrisy. Seems whenever Obama is caught doing something he just acts like they got the wrong man and then accuses his opposition of the same crime.

Like when he brought his taxible income below a million by giving his daughter thousands of dollars then accuses Romney of manipulating his taxes.
 
She should have used a pen name in order to get more than 10% of the country to take it seriously.

Naw. It will easily top the best seller's list and stay there for some time even as the leftists frantically trash it and she is laughing all the way to the bank. She has already been making the interview circuits hoping the leftist media will pluck one of her comments out of context and emblazon it as the outrageous horrible person they want her to be. That always gives a huge boost to her book sales. :)
 
And excellent topic Mudwhistle and good for Ann. This is a discussion that America desperately needs to have before the Marxists in Washington are able to completely restore the class caste system in America and before black people are pushed into a permanent underclass by the Democrats and other leftists who pretend to care about them. Ann will tell it like it is, however outrageous, satirical, and/or entertaining she makes the case, and hopefully maybe just a few more numbnuts will be encouraged to think instead of react by rote.
 
She should have used a pen name in order to get more than 10% of the country to take it seriously.



I assume you are suggesting that of Ms. Coulter, as your post is infused with your usual incoherence, and this makes it difficult to determine the target of your attack.

If so, I wonder if you'd share exactly how many of her best-sellers your read.

Surely, you wouldn't be one of those anencephalic posters who have strong opinions about subjects about which they have no actual knowledge.
 
ht_ann_coulter_book_jt_120922_wblog.jpg

Obama supporters thought that electing a black president would end race as a major issue in politics once and for all.....but instead Obama and friends had other ideas.

Instead they used and continue to use race as a weapon more than ever before.

Now this country is more racially divided then just about any point in our history.

Chapter 1: Race Wars of Convenience, Not Necessity

The Democrats’ slogan during the Bush years was: “Dissent is patriotic.”
Under Obama, it’s: “Dissent is racist.”

Liberals luxuriate in calling other people “racists” out of pure moral
preening. They seem to imagine that in African American households
throughout the land you’ll find mantel portraits of Martin Luther King Jr.,
Robert Kennedy and Keith Olbermann. (More likely, those mantels would
have portraits of Bernie Goetz.)

Beginning in the seventies, there was constant racial turmoil in this
country, stirred up by the media, academia and Hollywood to promote
their fantasy of America as “Mississippi Burning.”

This was madness. There had been a real fight over civil rights for a century,
especially in the previous two decades, but by the end of the sixties, it
was over. Segregationist violence was gone, and all public places integrated.
But in their minds, liberals lived in a heroic past, where they were the ones
manning the barricades and marching against segregation. Liberals were
hallucinating—about the present and the past.

Contrary to the myth Democrats told about themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

Web Extra: Read an Exclusive Excerpt of Ann Coulter’s New Book - ABC News

I would never, ever let an extreme ideologue political hack from either side of the extreme fringe influence my mode of thinking while "telling like it is". God help America if people rely on that sector of the political spectrum to guide them to conclusive trains of thought. :eusa_hand:
 
ht_ann_coulter_book_jt_120922_wblog.jpg

Obama supporters thought that electing a black president would end race as a major issue in politics once and for all.....but instead Obama and friends had other ideas.

Instead they used and continue to use race as a weapon more than ever before.

Now this country is more racially divided then just about any point in our history.

Chapter 1: Race Wars of Convenience, Not Necessity

The Democrats’ slogan during the Bush years was: “Dissent is patriotic.”
Under Obama, it’s: “Dissent is racist.”

Liberals luxuriate in calling other people “racists” out of pure moral
preening. They seem to imagine that in African American households
throughout the land you’ll find mantel portraits of Martin Luther King Jr.,
Robert Kennedy and Keith Olbermann. (More likely, those mantels would
have portraits of Bernie Goetz.)

Beginning in the seventies, there was constant racial turmoil in this
country, stirred up by the media, academia and Hollywood to promote
their fantasy of America as “Mississippi Burning.”

This was madness. There had been a real fight over civil rights for a century,
especially in the previous two decades, but by the end of the sixties, it
was over. Segregationist violence was gone, and all public places integrated.
But in their minds, liberals lived in a heroic past, where they were the ones
manning the barricades and marching against segregation. Liberals were
hallucinating—about the present and the past.

Contrary to the myth Democrats told about themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

Web Extra: Read an Exclusive Excerpt of Ann Coulter’s New Book - ABC News

I would never, ever let an extreme ideologue political hack from either side of the extreme fringe influence my mode of thinking while "telling like it is". God help America if people rely on that sector of the political spectrum to guide them to conclusive trains of thought. :eusa_hand:


An analogy?

Truth is to you, what a cross is to vampires.
 
ht_ann_coulter_book_jt_120922_wblog.jpg

Obama supporters thought that electing a black president would end race as a major issue in politics once and for all.....but instead Obama and friends had other ideas.

Instead they used and continue to use race as a weapon more than ever before.

Now this country is more racially divided then just about any point in our history.

Chapter 1: Race Wars of Convenience, Not Necessity

The Democrats’ slogan during the Bush years was: “Dissent is patriotic.”
Under Obama, it’s: “Dissent is racist.”

Liberals luxuriate in calling other people “racists” out of pure moral
preening. They seem to imagine that in African American households
throughout the land you’ll find mantel portraits of Martin Luther King Jr.,
Robert Kennedy and Keith Olbermann. (More likely, those mantels would
have portraits of Bernie Goetz.)

Beginning in the seventies, there was constant racial turmoil in this
country, stirred up by the media, academia and Hollywood to promote
their fantasy of America as “Mississippi Burning.”

This was madness. There had been a real fight over civil rights for a century,
especially in the previous two decades, but by the end of the sixties, it
was over. Segregationist violence was gone, and all public places integrated.
But in their minds, liberals lived in a heroic past, where they were the ones
manning the barricades and marching against segregation. Liberals were
hallucinating—about the present and the past.

Contrary to the myth Democrats told about themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

Web Extra: Read an Exclusive Excerpt of Ann Coulter’s New Book - ABC News

I would never, ever let an extreme ideologue political hack from either side of the extreme fringe influence my mode of thinking while "telling like it is". God help America if people rely on that sector of the political spectrum to guide them to conclusive trains of thought. :eusa_hand:

So what unextreme folks guide your train of thought? Olbermann? Maddow? Who do you read that is offering a comprehensive and thorough history of race relations in this country and the realities that exist at this time?
 
ht_ann_coulter_book_jt_120922_wblog.jpg

Obama supporters thought that electing a black president would end race as a major issue in politics once and for all.....but instead Obama and friends had other ideas.

Instead they used and continue to use race as a weapon more than ever before.

Now this country is more racially divided then just about any point in our history.

Chapter 1: Race Wars of Convenience, Not Necessity

The Democrats’ slogan during the Bush years was: “Dissent is patriotic.”
Under Obama, it’s: “Dissent is racist.”

Liberals luxuriate in calling other people “racists” out of pure moral
preening. They seem to imagine that in African American households
throughout the land you’ll find mantel portraits of Martin Luther King Jr.,
Robert Kennedy and Keith Olbermann. (More likely, those mantels would
have portraits of Bernie Goetz.)

Beginning in the seventies, there was constant racial turmoil in this
country, stirred up by the media, academia and Hollywood to promote
their fantasy of America as “Mississippi Burning.”

This was madness. There had been a real fight over civil rights for a century,
especially in the previous two decades, but by the end of the sixties, it
was over. Segregationist violence was gone, and all public places integrated.
But in their minds, liberals lived in a heroic past, where they were the ones
manning the barricades and marching against segregation. Liberals were
hallucinating—about the present and the past.

Contrary to the myth Democrats told about themselves—that they
were hairy-chested warriors for equal rights—the entire history of civil
rights consists of Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.

Web Extra: Read an Exclusive Excerpt of Ann Coulter’s New Book - ABC News

I would never, ever let an extreme ideologue political hack from either side of the extreme fringe influence my mode of thinking while "telling like it is". God help America if people rely on that sector of the political spectrum to guide them to conclusive trains of thought. :eusa_hand:

So what unextreme folks guide your train of thought? Olbermann? Maddow? Who do you read that is offering a comprehensive and thorough history of race relations in this country and the realities that exist at this time?



He's busy...

...I'll tell you: Dr. Seuss, "The Cat In The Hat."
 
I think nobody guides the thoughts of a thinking conservative. Some of us do trust questionable sources for our facts more than we should, and any one of us can get something wrong at times. Lord knows I do. But I think most of us do fact check our information with reliable sources most of the time and we have a pretty good grasp of the truth on most things.

But one thing I have come to appreciate and admire about Ann Coulter. She goes way over the top at times, wanders into bad taste sometimes, is deliberately outrageous and provocative a lot of the time, but her scholarship is amazing. I don't think I have ever caught her in a factual error about anything of importance. If she isn't being tongue-in-cheek and says it happened, you can pretty well take it to the bank that it happened.

And Kiwiman's description of her as an extreme ideologue political hack really REALLY confirms that he has rarely, if ever, read her. One of the most blistering columns I have ever read by her--and one of the most memorable--took on George Bush and raked him over the coals in as unmitigated and scathing fashion as she has ever taken on anybody. It ended with "Press '1' for English. Press '2' for a new president." She takes on errant Republicans with every bit as much enthusiasm as she takes on the Democrats.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top