New and Improved Version of 'Bush Did It"

[NYcarbineer]

Rummy buggered Iraq, forgot afghanistan, and is famous for "Known unknowns".

You really want to take that guy seriously?

Honestly..

When unarmoured hummers are patrolling every day. When "Hillbilly Armour" is on the menu...Of course this guy feels safe in Iraq. He's in a Rhino.

All be it begrudgingly, Obama admited the surge worked to Iraq. I believe that was under some guy whose name starts with R as Secretary of Defense? As far as forgetting Afghanistan, seems he had limited reources to deploy. Has to answer to a Democratic Congress for his funding. Stuff like that.

Honestly? I think you'd be better off breathing some helium and singing Christmas songs.

And General Petraeus admitted the surge may not have been necessary.

 

[gautama]

Rummy buggered Iraq, forgot afghanistan, and is famous for "Known unknowns".

You really want to take that guy seriously?

Honestly..

When unarmoured hummers are patrolling every day. When "Hillbilly Armour" is on the menu...Of course this guy feels safe in Iraq. He's in a Rhino.

Alvin, anyone "buggering" Iraq, etc., are the HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS Dems.

Yep. Clinton and his Adm., plus 99% of the Congressional Dems, including Pelosi, Reid, The Chappaquidick Murderer, the Pathological Liar Kerry, etc.....ALL CLAMOURED for the violent removal of the Baghdad Monster.

Bush, using his judgment, agreed with these HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS Dems.

USING THE IDENTICAL VERBIAGE of the HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS Dems (including their IDENTICAL VERBIAGE re WMDs), Bush WITH THE EXPLICIT BACKING of the Sex Maniac and Hellary, plus 99% of the Congressional Dems went to War against Iraq ........and using Rumsfeld, YES, RUMSFELD..... annihilated the FOURTH LARGEST ARMY IN THE WORLD in TWENTY TWO DAYS !!!

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED !!!

However......The HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS Dems realizing that their chances in the Upcoming Elections were DOOMED..........made a MONOLITHIC 180 degree about face, and using their 24/7 Lib Controlled National Media ANNIHILATED Bush (and Rumsfeld) by blowing up every minor glitch in the mop up operations a THOUSAND TIMES OVER, sending an UNEQUIVOCAL GREEN LIGHT to Iran, and the other Islamofascist Swine to start the IRAQI QUAGMIRE.

Iran and the Islamofascist Swine are off the wall Whackjobs, but they are NOT STUPID. Every one of their TENTATIVE initial successes were greeted with an AVALANCHE of VITRIOLIC CRITICISMS of Bush......POLITICALLY tying his (and Rumsfeld's) hands behind their back.

Iran just recently had a bloody war with Iraq. After some FOUR YEARS, with OVER A MILLION DEAD, the war was fought to a standstill.

DO YOU THINK IRAN, WITHOUT THE TACIT AGREEMENT WITH THE DEMS SENDING THEIR UNMISTAKABLE "GREEN LIGHT" ENCOURAGEMENT (with the Dems' OBVIOUS interest in the Upcoming Elections) WENT UNNOTICED BY IRAN and the other ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE ?!?!?

DO YOU THINK THAT WITHOUT THIS TACIT "GO AHEAD" FROM THE HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS DEMS......IRAN and the other ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE woulda attacked THE MOST POWERFUL MILITARY FORCE IN THIS PLANET'S HISTORY ?????THAT JUST WIPED OUT IRAQ IN TWENTY TWO DAYS ?????

And, don't try to weasle out by using the example of Vietnam where America had to withdraw because CHINA, and maybe even RUSSIA had their back. Iran is a completely different scenario where their GEOGRAPHY is ideally suited for Blitzkrieg, tank and armour troops movement.

However, Vietnam did show to the Iranians and the Islamofascist Swine the power of the LIEBTARDS in swaying the issue in their favour as an adjunct exemplified by the HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS Dems quest for victory in the UPCOMING ELECTIONS !!!!

The ANNIHILATION of Bush over IRAQ was the GREATEST POLITICAL SCAM IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.

The 24/7 POWER of the Technological superiority of the Dems mouthiece, The National Media, made Nazi Germany Goebbel's Propaganda Machine an insignificant fart.

The 24/7 Lib Controlled National Media, the mouthpiece of the HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS DEMS, did their damage not only with the continuance of the IRAQ QUAGMIRE, AFGHANISTAN and the aggravated troubles in the Mid East.......BUT ALSO .......by making Bush a Lameduck President with his hands POLITICALLY TIED behind his back......the Congress and the Senate was EFFECTIVELY in control by these DEM SCUMBAGS.

The Congressional HOUSE Honcho in charge of Finances was Barney Frank. The SENATE Honcho in charge of Finances was Chris Dodd. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were under the control of the CORRUPT CEOS (in both cases) strongly tied to the WHIMS of the abovementioned Congressional Honchos.

Was it surprising that these abovementioned CEOs (Fannie and Freddie) were BOTH APPOINTED AS "TOP FINANCIAL ADVISORS" in MARXIST Obami Salami's INITIAL CABINET.....but then SUDDENLY EVAPORATED, with rapid resignations, as soon as the spotlight was turned on them ?????

NO WONDER WE ARE WHERE WE ARE FINANCIALLY ......NOT BECAUSE OF BUSH (or RUMSFELD).....but because of the HYPOCRISY and TREACHERY of the CORRUPT DEMS !!!!

So, you fucking LIEBTARD POS, don't ry to pull the wool over the eyes with your CRAP about Bush (and, in this case Rumsfeld) in "buggering up" anything.

I hate to bust your delusional bubble sprite, but Republicans held both houses, the presidency and had a majority in the Supreme court. All information supplied by the CIA was by Cheney's direction. Everything that happened was on the Republicans. So why ARE the Republicans delusional? Is it the God thing?

Deanie Beanie, No one is disputing the fact that ON PAPER both houses were factually held by the Reps.

However the POLITICAL POWER shifted DRASTICALLY to the Dems. The Repubs were, for all intents and purposes, PARALYZED by the country's disaffection with Bush over Iraq.

IRONICALLY THE SAME THING IS HAPPENING.....THIS TIME TO THE MARXIST Obami Salami, whose control of BOTH of the houses of Congress means diddly-squat because Obami Salami's, Pelosi's and/or Holder's MARXIST CRAP is TRANSPARENT and being rejected (this time CORRECTLY) by the Citizens of America....putting the Dem congress people in a position where they have to go against their own parties wishes.

And, everything I stated in my last post is SPOT ON......verified with IRREFUTABLE HISTORICAL FACTS re the MONOLITHIC HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS 180 degree about face of the Dems once they realized that their chances in the UPCOMING ELECTIONS were DOOMED....and the subsequent GREEN LIGHT to Iran and the other Islamofascist Swine where they were, in effect, ENCOURAGED by the HYPOCRITICAL and TREACHEROUS Dems to GUARANTEE their Dem election by stabbing Bush (Rumsfeld) in the back.

As to the CIA info....AGAIN YOU'RE FULL OF UMINITIGATED and UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT.

You can go to the Library and easily verify the following:

ALL THE MAJOR COUNTRIES INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES and CLINTON'S CIA WERE CONVINCED OF THE BAGHDAD MONSTER'S POSSESSION OF THE WMDS and THE BAGHDAD PSYCHO's WAR LIKE INTENTIONS and the INEVITABLE POSSESSION of THE NUKES a la IRAN. The only major country that was mum on this issue was China.

"God thing" my arse.

If anything is a "God thing" it is the MusLame's "ALLAH thing".

And, whose MusLAME doodoo about their PEACEFUL INTENTIONS to swallow up the World with their OBVIOUS BARBARITY you Liebtards are standing in line, eager to swallow.

Wise up, you brainless Liebtard.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Really?? Then the following people where lost in the same fantasy......

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

You need to see it from all sides, however many there are.....

Obviously they were wrong too. That doesn't make Bush and Cheney any less wrong. Bush pulled the trigger.

 

[gautama]

Really?? Then the following people where lost in the same fantasy......

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

.....

.....

Trotting out long stream of cherry-picked out-context-quotes might look damning but is essentially meaningless without the context.

This list is probably the most overused cut and paste job I've seen endlessly presented as some sort of "proof".

Coyote, you are the typical Liebtard Idiot that can be hit with IRREFUTABLE FACTUAL EVIDENCE up the GAZOO, and you will STILL be the brainless LIEBTARD IDIOT that you are.

You are fucking HOPELESS.

 

[gautama]

Obviously they were wrong too. That doesn't make Bush and Cheney any less wrong. Bush pulled the trigger.

NYLiebtard Idiot, So far it's obvious that the Liebtard idiots like you and coyote are hopeless idiots unswayed by the FACTS and the irrefutably logical conclusions that must be drawn from these FACTS.

Hopefully the other Liebtards will not follow your suit......but I doubt it.

Once a Liebtard Idiot......ALWAYS a Liebtard idiot.

 

[Coyote]

Really?? Then the following people where lost in the same fantasy......

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

.....

.....

Trotting out long stream of cherry-picked out-context-quotes might look damning but is essentially meaningless without the context.

This list is probably the most overused cut and paste job I've seen endlessly presented as some sort of "proof".

Coyote, you are the typical Liebtard Idiot that can be hit with IRREFUTABLE FACTUAL EVIDENCE up the GAZOO, and you will STILL be the brainless LIEBTARD IDIOT that you are.

You are fucking HOPELESS.

IRREFUTABLE FACTUAL EVIDENCE up the GAZOO sounds HOPELESSLY erotic my dear Guano.

Seek help. It's out there

 

[rdean]

I am of the mind that had our civilian leadership been on the ball, that the insurgency would have been very small and very short lived. But then I could be wrong.

I certainly think we could have done better. Why in the fuck did we dismantle the Army?

That was the first major mistake. followed by many more.

I think that was more than a "mistake". Bush was counseled against disbanding the Iraqi Military. Even today, many Republicans feel that was a "good" thing and still can't grasp the ramifications. Or maybe "refuse" to grasp the ramifications.

More than a hundred and fifty thousand men "with weapons" suddenly unemployed in a country we had just leveled. Men, get this, "with families" who suddenly can't feed their families.

All we had to do was keep "paying them". And Bush, "the decider", had a "gut" feeling that told him "no". This is what comes of believing your "gut" over "facts" and "reading" and "information".

Put a Chicken Hawke in charge and what you get is scrambled eggs.

 

[gautama]

Really?? Then the following people where lost in the same fantasy......

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

.....

.....

Trotting out long stream of cherry-picked out-context-quotes might look damning but is essentially meaningless without the context.

This list is probably the most overused cut and paste job I've seen endlessly presented as some sort of "proof".

Hey Coyote, you stupid Liebtard fuck, do you STILL think that:

"Trotting out long stream of cherry-picked out-context-quotes might look damning but is essentially meaningless without the context."

I'm just wondering HOW FUCKING STUPID YOU CAN BE WHEN FACED WITH THESE SUPPOSEDLY "cherry-picked out-context-quotes" ???????

Do you realize that you can take that list and multiply it by 20, or 30 (or whatever...no time to compute) to INCLUDE 99% of the Congressional Dems who voted for "Bush's" War in Iraq and EXPRESSED THE IDENTICAL VERBIAGE (including the WMDs) that BUSH used for the CORRECTLY JUSTIFIED WAR IN IRAQ preventing THE BAGHDAD MONSTER in addition to IRAN's CRAZED THEOLOGICAL PSYCHO AHMADINEJAD from getting NUKES ?????

Even with this hindsight, ARE YOU STILL SO STUPID, as the other Liebtards are, about this issue ??????

Have you, at least, even in your demented state, REALIZE THE HYPOCRISY and the TREACHERY of the CORRUPT DEMS TO MAKE THEIR MONOLITHIC 180 degree about face and thus give the GREEN LIGHT to IRAN, and the other ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE to start the IRAQI QUAGMIRE..... WHERE WE ARE STILL SUFFERING FROM THE DEM'S HYPOCRISY and TREACHERY FROM THAT DISASTROUS DEM DECISION ????

AND, THE CATASTROPHIC AFTERMATH NOT ONLY IN IRAQ....BUT ITS EFFECT ON AFGHANISTAN, MID EAST IN GENERAL ?!?!?

AND, CARRYING THIS EVEN FURTHER...... TO THE POSSIBLE REAL RUIN OF OUR COUNTRY IN LETTING THE DEMS CONTROL THE FINANCES IN BOTH CONGRESSIONAL HOUSES IN SPITE OF THE POLITICALLY INEFFECTIVE MAJORITY OF THE REPS......that which is NOW HAPPENING, IRONICALLY TO The MARXIST Obami Salami, where this MARXIST and his crazed stooges Pelosi and Holder's actions, THIS TIME CORRECTLY.......ARE PARALYZING Obami's Adm even though he is in NOMINAL CONTROL OF BOTH HOUSES ...... BUT CAN'T PASS DIDDLY SQUAT because the AMERICAN PUBLIC IS IN OPEN REVOLT and CORRECTLY INTIMIDATING SOME OF THE DEMS TO DISAVOW MARXIST Obami Salami's TRANSPARENT MARXISM, and IDIOTIC APPEASEMENT of MusLAME'S SENSIBILITIES IN THE BIZARRE NY TRIAL INSTEAD OF THE MILITARY TRIBUNAL ??????

HAVE YOU NO SHAME, YOU FUCKING LIEBTARD SCUMBAGS ?!?!?

 

[gautama]

You have to hand it to Republicans. They are really easy to laugh at. If they say in a "satiric" tone, "Bush did it", then, in their tiny minds, it's somehow means, wink, wink, that Bush can either be excused or that he didn't really "do it". Besides, Obama owns it now. Somehow, in their minds, all the disasters are now Obama's as if he somehow created them.

The truth is, Bush wasn't really the problem. He was the "symptom".

The Republican Party has been subjugated by the Religious Right. Kooks, one and all. They have a litany of disaster and dangerous ignorant ideology.

The fact that a formally mainstream political party could push "magical creation" as a viable alternative to "science" profoundly demonstrates that these people truly live in an alternative universe.

It's no wonder that a group that would push such an over the top, destructive and ridiculous concept in spite of the startling amount of contrary physical and scientific evidence amply proves, beyond a doubt, that they will never believe anything other than what they want to believe. This is a political party that has turned it back on reason. The list of Republican disasters over the last 10 years is endless.

Is it any wonder they refuse even the tiniest bit of responsibility? Instead of a shred of introspection, they shift the blame for their massive ideological failure to those they feel, "refuse to understand". You can almost hear them crying, "It's not us, we're right, it's them who refuse to see "our" truth".

They are so blinded, they see Iraq in one of two ways. Either a "stunning success in democracy" or "ungrateful" for what we did to them.

Every comment made by Republicans reinforce my feelings.

What can one say in response to this TOTAL BULLSHIT if not refer these Liebtard idiots, and their followers to the TRUTH already clearly expressed in the countering posts.

I get the distinct feeling that I am in contact with people who are POLITICALLY INSANE !!!!

 

[gautama]

Trotting out long stream of cherry-picked out-context-quotes might look damning but is essentially meaningless without the context.

This list is probably the most overused cut and paste job I've seen endlessly presented as some sort of "proof".

Coyote, you are the typical Liebtard Idiot that can be hit with IRREFUTABLE FACTUAL EVIDENCE up the GAZOO, and you will STILL be the brainless LIEBTARD IDIOT that you are.

You are fucking HOPELESS.

IRREFUTABLE FACTUAL EVIDENCE up the GAZOO sounds HOPELESSLY erotic my dear Guano.

Seek help. It's out there

Coyotepuke, Just saw your avatar.

How appropriate.

A shit-fer-brained coyote WITH WINGS (obviously a figment of a demented mind not limited to politics) flip-flopping around in La La Land.

Oh well.....

 

[Article 15]

A considerable majority of Dems in the House voted against the AUMF Iraq. Nearly half of the Dem Senators voted against it as well.

 

[geauxtohell]

Rummy buggered Iraq, forgot afghanistan, and is famous for "Known unknowns".

You really want to take that guy seriously?

Honestly..

When unarmoured hummers are patrolling every day. When "Hillbilly Armour" is on the menu...Of course this guy feels safe in Iraq. He's in a Rhino.

All be it begrudgingly, Obama admited the surge worked to Iraq. I believe that was under some guy whose name starts with R as Secretary of Defense? As far as forgetting Afghanistan, seems he had limited reources to deploy. Has to answer to a Democratic Congress for his funding. Stuff like that.

Honestly? I think you'd be better off breathing some helium and singing Christmas songs.

And General Petraeus admitted the surge may not have been necessary.

The surge was necessary to keep the American people from storming the White House with pitchforks and torches.

It was a political delaying movement.

The real difference came when Gates and Petreaus took over. It was a leadership issue, not a troop quantity issue.

 

[geauxtohell]

Deanie Beanie, No one is disputing the fact that ON PAPER both houses were factually held by the Reps.

However the POLITICAL POWER shifted DRASTICALLY to the Dems. The Repubs were, for all intents and purposes, PARALYZED by the country's disaffection with Bush over Iraq.

Now that's some beautiful circular logic, right there.

The Democrats turned the American people against Bush which in turn paralyzed the Republicans which gave the Democrats power to turn the American people against Bush.

Though, the Democrats supported the war, until they didn't and decided to flip their "God switch".

Do you have to work at this, or does it come naturally?

 

[Article 15]

Deanie Beanie, No one is disputing the fact that ON PAPER both houses were factually held by the Reps.

However the POLITICAL POWER shifted DRASTICALLY to the Dems. The Repubs were, for all intents and purposes, PARALYZED by the country's disaffection with Bush over Iraq.

Now that's some beautiful circular logic, right there.

The Democrats turned the American people against Bush which in turn paralyzed the Republicans which gave the Democrats de facto power over the country.

Do you have to work at this, or does it come naturally.

He reminds me of rhet2 on crack.

 

[Modbert]

Now that's some beautiful circular logic, right there.

The Democrats turned the American people against Bush which in turn paralyzed the Republicans which gave the Democrats de facto power over the country.

Do you have to work at this, or does it come naturally.

The Art of Bullshit is one that one is born with.

 

[Dr Grump]

Coyote, you are the typical Liebtard Idiot that can be hit with IRREFUTABLE FACTUAL EVIDENCE up the GAZOO, and you will STILL be the brainless LIEBTARD IDIOT that you are.

You are fucking HOPELESS.

And you're a fucking ijit..(apologies for the pos rep, it was supposed to be neg, but I'll make up for it later...;O)

 

[jeffrockit]

You have to hand it to Republicans. They are really easy to laugh at. If they say in a "satiric" tone, "Bush did it", then, in their tiny minds, it's somehow means, wink, wink, that Bush can either be excused or that he didn't really "do it". Besides, Obama owns it now. Somehow, in their minds, all the disasters are now Obama's as if he somehow created them.

The truth is, Bush wasn't really the problem. He was the "symptom".

The Republican Party has been subjugated by the Religious Right. Kooks, one and all. They have a litany of disaster and dangerous ignorant ideology.

The fact that a formally mainstream political party could push "magical creation" as a viable alternative to "science" profoundly demonstrates that these people truly live in an alternative universe.

It's no wonder that a group that would push such an over the top, destructive and ridiculous concept in spite of the startling amount of contrary physical and scientific evidence amply proves, beyond a doubt, that they will never believe anything other than what they want to believe. This is a political party that has turned it back on reason. The list of Republican disasters over the last 10 years is endless.

Is it any wonder they refuse even the tiniest bit of responsibility? Instead of a shred of introspection, they shift the blame for their massive ideological failure to those they feel, "refuse to understand". You can almost hear them crying, "It's not us, we're right, it's them who refuse to see "our" truth".

They are so blinded, they see Iraq in one of two ways. Either a "stunning success in democracy" or "ungrateful" for what we did to them.

Based on your post, it is not Republicans that bother you rather it is those "dangerous" Christians. Hatred is such a wasteful way to go through life.

 

[Political Junky]

Rummy has been caught in so many lies. He's a truly evil man.

 

[Mike458877]

Obama reeked of political BS!

He is still running for office!

Mike

 

[Darkwind]

As much as I disagreed with Rumsfeld in a lot of his decisions, I simply cannot tolerate it when the President Flat out lies on national television. This joker has got to leave Washington. The sooner the better.

There is an old saying.
"Amatures discuss tactics, professionals discuss logistics" Obama is discussing logistics.

Funny.

Mr. Obama's logistics bear a remarkable resemblance to Bushes and Rumsfield's logistics.

And frankly, Mr. Obama has already been caught out in several lies. So, you have the lies of Mr. Obama vs the Lies of Mr. Rumsfield.

So, we bottom line this to say that you are going to believe your side no matter what.