CurveLight
Rookie
- Oct 16, 2009
- 9,768
- 317
- 0
- Banned
- #21
The buildings had asemetric damage to them, there is no reason they should have fallen straight down at nearly freefall speed.
The Bush admin lied us into war. Why would anyone be surprized that they likely lied to us about what really happened on 911.
A new investigation would settle the questions of those who find the official story lacking.
If you believe the official story you should welcome a reinvestigation because you know it would settle the issue once and for all.
I do believe the 9/11 Commission Report. No major inaccuracy has EVER been brought forward. Until one is brought forward, there is no reason to re-open the investigation.
As for your "If you believe the official story you should welcome a reinvestigation because you know it would settle the issue once and for all", we had a complete, bi-partisan, thorough investigation into the attacks involving 12 public hearings, over 1,000 hours of interviews, and an examination of 2.5 million documents and you still have crackpots claiming there were command bunkers in WTC7, phone calls were faked, FDNY firefighters were complicit in the deaths of 343 of their brothers, and cruise missiles were used.
When a new investigation arrives at the same conclusions as the old one, what makes you think that these nutjobs will be satisfied with the findings? What, because they will have 14 public hearings, 1,500 hours of interviews?
You have to understand that truthers are, by and large, attention whores; nothing more and nothing less.
If it is such a complete investigation can you link for us:
Bush's testimony
Cheney's testimony
Mineta's testimony
Solid evidence proving any phone calls from flight 77 were made post 8:56 am.
Evidence flight 77 was tracked for its entire flight on that day.
WTC 7.
How's that for a start?