Networks refuse to cover senates "no Russia collusion report"

Of course the MSM is biased. They don't even care if the ratings are 1/2 what they could be if they were honest. They are going to push an agenda and lie.
Which brings up the make up or the actual character that is found running and controlling the media. Who is the media now ?
 
So....is the mainstream media biased or not?

Why is MSM doing this?

Is it because it doesn't go with their disinformation campaign? are they covering their asses?

FAKE! FAKE FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!SHAME !!


Nolte: Networks Refuse to Cover Senate's 'No Russia Collusion' Report

I've seen lots of coverage of the Senate's Report in both WAPO, and MSNBC. Yet another piece of "Fake News" from the right wing blogosphere.
Fair and balanced coverage or biased left leaning coverage ? Big difference.

I thought the coverage was fair and balanced. It's really hard to find collusion when you deliberately avoid calling the people who were involved in it. The Senate didn't hear from Michael Cohen (he would have lied if they had), Junior (ditto), Stone, Manafort, Kuchner, or any of the members of the campaign or the Administration who Mueller indicted.

But then the Senate Report did connect the dots and say that while they saw no direct evidence of collusion, there was a great deal of circumstantial evidence. Like: It's hard to believe that everyone around Trump was meeting with Russians, coordinating their testimony and lies about Russia before Congress and Mueller, and Trump knew nothing about it. Very hard. But they have no direct evidence that he did.

I found the Senate Report very interesting. No direct connections between Trump and Russia, but then they didnt interview anybody who had direct connections with Trump and the Russians so why are we surprised. But very clearly implicating Trump in everything that's gone on.
 
So....is the mainstream media biased or not?

Why is MSM doing this?

Is it because it doesn't go with their disinformation campaign? are they covering their asses?

FAKE! FAKE FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!SHAME !!


Nolte: Networks Refuse to Cover Senate's 'No Russia Collusion' Report

I've seen lots of coverage of the Senate's Report in both WAPO, and MSNBC. Yet another piece of "Fake News" from the right wing blogosphere.
Fair and balanced coverage or biased left leaning coverage ? Big difference.

I thought the coverage was fair and balanced. It's really hard to find collusion when you deliberately avoid calling the people who were involved in it. The Senate didn't hear from Michael Cohen (he would have lied if they had), Junior (ditto), Stone, Manafort, Kuchner, or any of the members of the campaign or the Administration who Mueller indicted.

But then the Senate Report did connect the dots and say that while they saw no direct evidence of collusion, there was a great deal of circumstantial evidence. Like: It's hard to believe that everyone around Trump was meeting with Russians, coordinating their testimony and lies about Russia before Congress and Mueller, and Trump knew nothing about it. Very hard. But they have no direct evidence that he did.

I found the Senate Report very interesting. No direct connections between Trump and Russia, but then they didnt interview anybody who had direct connections with Trump and the Russians so why are we surprised. But very clearly implicating Trump in everything that's gone on.
I am still waiting for how many people the Clinton's killed.
 
So....is the mainstream media biased or not?

Why is MSM doing this?

Is it because it doesn't go with their disinformation campaign? are they covering their asses?

FAKE! FAKE FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!SHAME !!


Nolte: Networks Refuse to Cover Senate's 'No Russia Collusion' Report

I've seen lots of coverage of the Senate's Report in both WAPO, and MSNBC. Yet another piece of "Fake News" from the right wing blogosphere.
Fair and balanced coverage or biased left leaning coverage ? Big difference.

I thought the coverage was fair and balanced. It's really hard to find collusion when you deliberately avoid calling the people who were involved in it. The Senate didn't hear from Michael Cohen (he would have lied if they had), Junior (ditto), Stone, Manafort, Kuchner, or any of the members of the campaign or the Administration who Mueller indicted.

But then the Senate Report did connect the dots and say that while they saw no direct evidence of collusion, there was a great deal of circumstantial evidence. Like: It's hard to believe that everyone around Trump was meeting with Russians, coordinating their testimony and lies about Russia before Congress and Mueller, and Trump knew nothing about it. Very hard. But they have no direct evidence that he did.

I found the Senate Report very interesting. No direct connections between Trump and Russia, but then they didnt interview anybody who had direct connections with Trump and the Russians so why are we surprised. But very clearly implicating Trump in everything that's gone on.
Implicating him, yet NO COLLUSION. lol

After the "No COLLUSION" conclusion, why isn't the tainted hoax ending ??? Maybe to keep rehashing the same results, but expecting or hoping for different outcomes ?

It's over, now let's Make America Great Again shall we ?
 
Of course the MSM is biased. They don't even care if the ratings are 1/2 what they could be if they were honest. They are going to push an agenda and lie.
Which brings up the make up or the actual character that is found running and controlling the media. Who is the media now ?


MSM. controlled media ....sadly is CIA ....and that is why we call it propaganda...

That's why the president calls them FAKE NEWS!

Because that's exactly what they are at this moment! F-A-K-E !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FAKE NEWS!
 
Senate report has been covered by all the media, including CNN, Washington Post, New York Times, NBC etc. Big fake is the thread title. A simple Google search shows how fake this thread is.
 
Senate report has been covered by all the media, including CNN, Washington Post, New York Times, NBC etc. Big fake is the thread title. A simple Google search shows how fake this thread is.


Read the link I posted again.


"...........
The Media Research Center (MRC) did the research and found that between January 21, 2017, and February 10, 2019, “ABC’s World News Tonight, the CBS Evening News, and the NBC Nightly News [spent] 2,202 minutes on the Russia investigation [, which] accounted for nearly 19 percent of all Trump-related reporting [, and now] none of those three shows have even mentioned the investigation since NBC’s report came out on February 12.”

The same is true elsewhere on the left-wing networks.

“Neither CBS This Morning nor NBC’s Today have even acknowledged this new information from Senate investigators since the news broke on February 12,” MRC reports. “ABC’s Good Morning America briefly touched on it in a news brief totaling less than one minute on February 13.”

What’s especially fascinating is that NBC’s Ken Dilanian broke the original news of the Senate report, and NBC is still refusing to cover the story......................................."



Your hatred towards the President blinds you, it seems.
 
You mean the GOP's report about their fake investigation. Their interference for Trump is neither truth nor news. Democrats on the committee say it will be several weeks before they release their report, though they were handcuffed by the republicunts on the committee. The House is beginning a real investigation, and of course we are still waiting on Mueller.

No kidding, is that what bipartisan means to you...dumbass.

There is nothing bipartisan about the report the Senate put out.
 
Sorry bout that,

  1. Time for the wave to revert back onto whom created it.
  2. That would be the Democratic Party.
  3. And the; FAKE MEDIA NEWS CORPS.
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
You mean the GOP's report about their fake investigation. Their interference for Trump is neither truth nor news. Democrats on the committee say it will be several weeks before they release their report, though they were handcuffed by the republicunts on the committee. The House is beginning a real investigation, and of course we are still waiting on Mueller.

No kidding, is that what bipartisan means to you...dumbass.

There is nothing bipartisan about the report the Senate put out.

Sounds like someone didn't read the link.
 
The Russia investigation... the excuse for why Hillary lost.

What lie will they come up with when Trump wins in 2020?
 
So....is the mainstream media biased or not?

Why is MSM doing this?

Is it because it doesn't go with their disinformation campaign? are they covering their asses?

FAKE! FAKE FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!SHAME !!


Nolte: Networks Refuse to Cover Senate's 'No Russia Collusion' Report

I've seen lots of coverage of the Senate's Report in both WAPO, and MSNBC. Yet another piece of "Fake News" from the right wing blogosphere.

There is only ONE piece of Fake News

And that is the Main Stream Media News.

Not only does your post make no sense. It isn't even English.

"Fake News" is anything that tells the truth about Donald Trump's lies, distortions, and half truths. When Jim Accosta pointed out that the crime statistics given to the media by the White House Press Office, did not support his assertions, he asked "Why was that?". Trump sniped at Accosta's sources, and Accosta pointed out that these statistics came from the the Department of Homeland Security, and were released by his own office. Trump got angry and called Accosta "Fake News".

Anything Trump has no answer for is "Fake News". Except every single story in the Main Stream Media, that Trump has called "fake news" has turned out to be true. Everything in the Steele Dossier, has turned out to be true. Every White House staffer who it was rumoured that Trump was about to fire, was fired. Every one of the things that Trump called "fake news" were true.

The only Fake News in Washington is the shit and garbage coming out of this White House.
 
So....is the mainstream media biased or not?

Why is MSM doing this?

Is it because it doesn't go with their disinformation campaign? are they covering their asses?

FAKE! FAKE FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!SHAME !!


Nolte: Networks Refuse to Cover Senate's 'No Russia Collusion' Report

I've seen lots of coverage of the Senate's Report in both WAPO, and MSNBC. Yet another piece of "Fake News" from the right wing blogosphere.
Fair and balanced coverage or biased left leaning coverage ? Big difference.

I thought the coverage was fair and balanced. It's really hard to find collusion when you deliberately avoid calling the people who were involved in it. The Senate didn't hear from Michael Cohen (he would have lied if they had), Junior (ditto), Stone, Manafort, Kuchner, or any of the members of the campaign or the Administration who Mueller indicted.

But then the Senate Report did connect the dots and say that while they saw no direct evidence of collusion, there was a great deal of circumstantial evidence. Like: It's hard to believe that everyone around Trump was meeting with Russians, coordinating their testimony and lies about Russia before Congress and Mueller, and Trump knew nothing about it. Very hard. But they have no direct evidence that he did.

I found the Senate Report very interesting. No direct connections between Trump and Russia, but then they didnt interview anybody who had direct connections with Trump and the Russians so why are we surprised. But very clearly implicating Trump in everything that's gone on.
Implicating him, yet NO COLLUSION. lol

After the "No COLLUSION" conclusion, why isn't the tainted hoax ending ??? Maybe to keep rehashing the same results, but expecting or hoping for different outcomes ?

It's over, now let's Make America Great Again shall we ?

American will never be great again until Trump is out of the White House and the damage he's done has been mitigated somewhat.

Acutally "collusion" and "conspiracy" have both been clearly identified. The evidence is in the Roger Stone emails referenced in court filings in Stone's case on Friday. It's also in the redacted filings in the Manaforte case. Junior's Trump Tower meeting was the very definition of "collusion". Was it a criminal conspiracy thought. The question has become did the President know it was going on at the time, or did he entire senior staff go rogue on him and were conducting this conspiracy with the Russians without his knowledge. HIghly unlikely.

But while we know some of the evidence Mueller has to prove the conspiracy, we don't yet know what he has or doesn't have in regard's to Trump's role in it. We do have direct evidence of Trump's role in campaign finance violations in the payments made by to Stormy Daniels, and Karen McDougall. And then there's his public witness tampering, dangling of pardons, threats, intimidation of witnesses, and obstruction of justice which the entire world has been witness to via his twitter feed.
 
^^^


Interesting we are not the only ones who prefer Breitbart, as opposed to MSM.....million of others do as well.:thup:



18 Feb 2019

Lara Logan, foreign correspondent for CBS’s 60 Minutes, said Breitbart News offers “the other side” of news media relative to what she described as a mostly left-wing and partisan Democrat news landscape in the U.S. and abroad.




She offered her remarks in an interview published last Friday with the Mike Drop podcast, hosted by retired Navy SEAL Mike Ritland.

Ritland characterized U.S. news media as “absurdly left-leaning” and supportive of Democrats, further describing the status quo of American news media’s left-wing and partisan Democrat biases as a “huge fucking problem” and “disaster for this country.”

Logan concurred, “I agree with that. That’s true.” She described U.S. and international news media as “mostly liberal,” adding, “most” journalists are left.

“The media everywhere is mostly liberal, not just the U.S.,” assessed Logan.

WATCH:






 
So....is the mainstream media biased or not?

Why is MSM doing this?

Is it because it doesn't go with their disinformation campaign? are they covering their asses?

FAKE! FAKE FAKE NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!SHAME !!


Nolte: Networks Refuse to Cover Senate's 'No Russia Collusion' Report

I've seen lots of coverage of the Senate's Report in both WAPO, and MSNBC. Yet another piece of "Fake News" from the right wing blogosphere.
Fair and balanced coverage or biased left leaning coverage ? Big difference.

I thought the coverage was fair and balanced. It's really hard to find collusion when you deliberately avoid calling the people who were involved in it. The Senate didn't hear from Michael Cohen (he would have lied if they had), Junior (ditto), Stone, Manafort, Kuchner, or any of the members of the campaign or the Administration who Mueller indicted.

But then the Senate Report did connect the dots and say that while they saw no direct evidence of collusion, there was a great deal of circumstantial evidence. Like: It's hard to believe that everyone around Trump was meeting with Russians, coordinating their testimony and lies about Russia before Congress and Mueller, and Trump knew nothing about it. Very hard. But they have no direct evidence that he did.

I found the Senate Report very interesting. No direct connections between Trump and Russia, but then they didnt interview anybody who had direct connections with Trump and the Russians so why are we surprised. But very clearly implicating Trump in everything that's gone on.
Implicating him, yet NO COLLUSION. lol

After the "No COLLUSION" conclusion, why isn't the tainted hoax ending ??? Maybe to keep rehashing the same results, but expecting or hoping for different outcomes ?

It's over, now let's Make America Great Again shall we ?

American will never be great again until Trump is out of the White House and the damage he's done has been mitigated somewhat.

Acutally "collusion" and "conspiracy" have both been clearly identified. The evidence is in the Roger Stone emails referenced in court filings in Stone's case on Friday. It's also in the redacted filings in the Manaforte case. Junior's Trump Tower meeting was the very definition of "collusion". Was it a criminal conspiracy thought. The question has become did the President know it was going on at the time, or did he entire senior staff go rogue on him and were conducting this conspiracy with the Russians without his knowledge. HIghly unlikely.

But while we know some of the evidence Mueller has to prove the conspiracy, we don't yet know what he has or doesn't have in regard's to Trump's role in it. We do have direct evidence of Trump's role in campaign finance violations in the payments made by to Stormy Daniels, and Karen McDougall. And then there's his public witness tampering, dangling of pardons, threats, intimidation of witnesses, and obstruction of justice which the entire world has been witness to via his twitter feed.
Maybe you would like to clarify to all of us, exactly what damage Trump has caused since he has been our president ??? Be specific please. Try not to run on your own personal emotions, and for once think about the entire nation when you try to explain this damage that will need to be mitigated after he has gone. Thanks.
 

Forum List

Back
Top