Netanyahu's response to UN's resulution.

There simply is no rational basis in histroy, logic or law for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel building communities in Judea and Samaria.
Except it is on land conquered by one signatory, Israel, from another, Jordan. You've said so yourself.
Of course none of this has anything to do with the so called Palestinians. It was land conquered by Jordan in 1948 and only two countries, Britain and Pakistan recognized it as belonging to Jordan, so the land had no legal status in 1967. It was simply an unincorporated remnant of the former Mandate. In the 1990's Jordan gave up all claim to Judea and Samaria, so again, there is no rational basis in history, law or logic for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel's communities in Judea and Samaria.

It was actually 1988 when Jordan gave up all claims to the West Bank. I was in Israel at the time.
 
There simply is no rational basis in histroy, logic or law for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel building communities in Judea and Samaria.
Except it is on land conquered by one signatory, Israel, from another, Jordan. You've said so yourself.
Of course none of this has anything to do with the so called Palestinians. It was land conquered by Jordan in 1948 and only two countries, Britain and Pakistan recognized it as belonging to Jordan, so the land had no legal status in 1967. It was simply an unincorporated remnant of the former Mandate. In the 1990's Jordan gave up all claim to Judea and Samaria, so again, there is no rational basis in history, law or logic for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel's communities in Judea and Samaria.

It was actually 1988 when Jordan gave up all claims to the West Bank. I was in Israel at the time.
Interesting since it was never theirs to begin with.

It was occupied Palestinian territory.
 
There simply is no rational basis in histroy, logic or law for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel building communities in Judea and Samaria.
Except it is on land conquered by one signatory, Israel, from another, Jordan. You've said so yourself.
Of course none of this has anything to do with the so called Palestinians. It was land conquered by Jordan in 1948 and only two countries, Britain and Pakistan recognized it as belonging to Jordan, so the land had no legal status in 1967. It was simply an unincorporated remnant of the former Mandate. In the 1990's Jordan gave up all claim to Judea and Samaria, so again, there is no rational basis in history, law or logic for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel's communities in Judea and Samaria.

It was actually 1988 when Jordan gave up all claims to the West Bank. I was in Israel at the time.
Interesting since it was never theirs to begin with.

It was occupied Palestinian territory.
Silly stuff, it has always been "occupied" since ancient times. Before 1948, "Palestinian" referred to anyone who lived there and not to any national group. Israel's communities in Judea and Samaria are neither illegal nor illegitimate or obstacles to peace and prosperity of other peole living in Judea and Samaria.
 
There simply is no rational basis in histroy, logic or law for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel building communities in Judea and Samaria.
Except it is on land conquered by one signatory, Israel, from another, Jordan. You've said so yourself.
Of course none of this has anything to do with the so called Palestinians. It was land conquered by Jordan in 1948 and only two countries, Britain and Pakistan recognized it as belonging to Jordan, so the land had no legal status in 1967. It was simply an unincorporated remnant of the former Mandate. In the 1990's Jordan gave up all claim to Judea and Samaria, so again, there is no rational basis in history, law or logic for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel's communities in Judea and Samaria.

It was actually 1988 when Jordan gave up all claims to the West Bank. I was in Israel at the time.
Interesting since it was never theirs to begin with.

It was occupied Palestinian territory.







Nor was it palestine either as that was not created until 1988, read your own links that tell you this. Start with the one you used today that was the difference created in an edited wiki article.



What you meant was occupied mandate of palestine territory as the arab muslims denied theLoN and the UN and so had no legal claims
 

Forum List

Back
Top