Netanyahu Calls Kerry's Defense of Betrayal 'UN-BALANCED'

Spectacular victory my ass. Watch what happens when Trump gets in. The vote gets rescinded, and Jerusalem becomes capital. And that's just for starters. Ain't seen nothing yet. This will be the most Zionist admin. in US history.

How can the vote get rescinded you idiot. No one will vote for rescinding the resolution except the U.S. LOL
Very easily.

Ted Cruz: No US funding for UN until Israel vote 'reversed'

Graham revealed Saturday that he plans to introduce a measure to cut funding to the U.N. unless it repeals the resolution about the Israeli settlements.
 
That's funny. The resolution will never be repealed. The EU and its member states pay the lion's share of the UN budget. The U.S. contribution is less than 3 billion dollars, less than it pays Israel. The EU can easily come up with 3 billion, but they should insist that the UN HQ be moved to Europe.
 
That's funny. The resolution will never be repealed. The EU and its member states pay the lion's share of the UN budget. The U.S. contribution is less than 3 billion dollars, less than it pays Israel. The EU can easily come up with 3 billion, but they should insist that the UN HQ be moved to Europe.




And watch the EU deny them the same deal they have in the US. Could be the straw that breaks the camels back and sees the UN fold


How Much Does the UN Cost Us?

That changed when Senator Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) asked former OMB director Rob Portman for a comprehensive report on total U.S. contributions to the U.N. system for fiscal years 2001 through 2005. Because OMB is in charge of overseeing the preparation of the president’s budget, it was in a position to require all parts of the U.S. government to report the requested information.
The first report was an eye-opener. The OMB calculated that U.S. contributions totaled $4.115 billion in 2004 and $5.327 billion in 2005. The State Department had estimated 2004 contributions at “well over $3 billion” — only about 75 percent of the actual amount.
 
That's funny. The resolution will never be repealed. The EU and its member states pay the lion's share of the UN budget. The U.S. contribution is less than 3 billion dollars, less than it pays Israel. The EU can easily come up with 3 billion, but they should insist that the UN HQ be moved to Europe.
So the US pays more than 185 nations combined, for a corrupt, inefficient, croniestic, hypocritical organization that bashes it?

Doesn't even matter if the resolution is repealed, as nothing the UN does has any meaning anyhow. All of this will be nullified by the actions of the incoming administration come January 20, when one of its first moves will be to move the US embassy to Jerusalem. :clap2:
 
'Netanyahu just called Kerry 'Dain Bramaged'!'

:lmao:

Netanyahu slams Kerry's speech defending UN vote as 'unbalanced'

"Netanyahu, speaking in Jerusalem just over an hour after Kerry’s speech had ended, said Kerry's rhetoric was "as unbalanced as the anti-Israel resolution passed [at the United Nations] last week."

"Secretary Kerry paid lip service to the unrelenting campaign of terror that has been waged by the Palestinians against the Jewish State," he said, later adding: "Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by foreign leaders."
Jews give a rats ass about what you goyim think about Israel
 
'Netanyahu just called Kerry 'Dain Bramaged'!'

:lmao:

Netanyahu slams Kerry's speech defending UN vote as 'unbalanced'

"Netanyahu, speaking in Jerusalem just over an hour after Kerry’s speech had ended, said Kerry's rhetoric was "as unbalanced as the anti-Israel resolution passed [at the United Nations] last week."

"Secretary Kerry paid lip service to the unrelenting campaign of terror that has been waged by the Palestinians against the Jewish State," he said, later adding: "Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by foreign leaders."
Jews give a rats ass about what you goyim think about Israel

Speak for yourself, Guno Kapo.
 
'Netanyahu just called Kerry 'Dain Bramaged'!'

:lmao:

Netanyahu slams Kerry's speech defending UN vote as 'unbalanced'

"Netanyahu, speaking in Jerusalem just over an hour after Kerry’s speech had ended, said Kerry's rhetoric was "as unbalanced as the anti-Israel resolution passed [at the United Nations] last week."

"Secretary Kerry paid lip service to the unrelenting campaign of terror that has been waged by the Palestinians against the Jewish State," he said, later adding: "Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by foreign leaders."
Jews give a rats ass about what you goyim think about Israel

Speak for yourself, Guno Kapo.
did you take that Christmas tree down and clean up the pork at your place, JINO
 
'Netanyahu just called Kerry 'Dain Bramaged'!'

:lmao:

Netanyahu slams Kerry's speech defending UN vote as 'unbalanced'

"Netanyahu, speaking in Jerusalem just over an hour after Kerry’s speech had ended, said Kerry's rhetoric was "as unbalanced as the anti-Israel resolution passed [at the United Nations] last week."

"Secretary Kerry paid lip service to the unrelenting campaign of terror that has been waged by the Palestinians against the Jewish State," he said, later adding: "Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by foreign leaders."
Jews give a rats ass about what you goyim think about Israel

Speak for yourself, Guno Kapo.
did you take that Christmas tree down and clean up the pork at your place, JINO
Guno the Kapo once again proving he isn't a Jew.
 
'Netanyahu just called Kerry 'Dain Bramaged'!'

:lmao:

Netanyahu slams Kerry's speech defending UN vote as 'unbalanced'

"Netanyahu, speaking in Jerusalem just over an hour after Kerry’s speech had ended, said Kerry's rhetoric was "as unbalanced as the anti-Israel resolution passed [at the United Nations] last week."

"Secretary Kerry paid lip service to the unrelenting campaign of terror that has been waged by the Palestinians against the Jewish State," he said, later adding: "Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by foreign leaders."
Jews give a rats ass about what you goyim think about Israel

Speak for yourself, Guno Kapo.
did you take that Christmas tree down and clean up the pork at your place, JINO
Guno the Kapo once again proving he isn't a Jew.

I agree he's a weirdo, but he has a point. When hearing about this 2334 resolution, most Israelis were like "f** them".

Still, he's a weirdo.
 
That's funny. The resolution will never be repealed. The EU and its member states pay the lion's share of the UN budget. The U.S. contribution is less than 3 billion dollars, less than it pays Israel. The EU can easily come up with 3 billion, but they should insist that the UN HQ be moved to Europe.
So the US pays more than 185 nations combined, for a corrupt, inefficient, croniestic, hypocritical organization that bashes it?

Doesn't even matter if the resolution is repealed, as nothing the UN does has any meaning anyhow. All of this will be nullified by the actions of the incoming administration come January 20, when one of its first moves will be to move the US embassy to Jerusalem. :clap2:

The embassy will not move to Jerusalem. The resolution is quite powerful and is intended to force the 2-state solution. That's what the world wants. But since Israel will not abide by the resolution the consequences are clear:

1.The resolution has left no doubt as to the legality of the settlements, stating that Israel's settlements have "no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law."

2. The resolution requires that countries recognize a difference between Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories when dealing with Israel. This will lead to sanctions against products from Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

3. If Israel does not abide by the resolution. Cases can be can pursued against Israeli leaders at the International Criminal Court (ICC) under the Geneva Convention. The ICC is already conducting an ongoing investigation into Israeli actions in the Palestinian territories. The leaders will be subject to arrest in all ICC member states.

As far as repeal, it is unlikely to impossible. There is an international consensus that settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal and that they constitute an obstacle to peace. Even if Trump was able to get a revocatory resolution to a vote he would be unable to find eight other nations on the Security Council willing to support revoking the new resolution. Even if he could get 8 UNSC members to vote for the revocation, Russia, China and France would veto it.
 
That's funny. The resolution will never be repealed. The EU and its member states pay the lion's share of the UN budget. The U.S. contribution is less than 3 billion dollars, less than it pays Israel. The EU can easily come up with 3 billion, but they should insist that the UN HQ be moved to Europe.
So the US pays more than 185 nations combined, for a corrupt, inefficient, croniestic, hypocritical organization that bashes it?

Doesn't even matter if the resolution is repealed, as nothing the UN does has any meaning anyhow. All of this will be nullified by the actions of the incoming administration come January 20, when one of its first moves will be to move the US embassy to Jerusalem. :clap2:

The embassy will not move to Jerusalem. The resolution is quite powerful and is intended to force the 2-state solution. That's what the world wants. But since Israel will not abide by the resolution the consequences are clear:

1.The resolution has left no doubt as to the legality of the settlements, stating that Israel's settlements have "no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law."

2. The resolution requires that countries recognize a difference between Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories when dealing with Israel. This will lead to sanctions against products from Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

3. If Israel does not abide by the resolution. Cases can be can pursued against Israeli leaders at the International Criminal Court (ICC) under the Geneva Convention. The ICC is already conducting an ongoing investigation into Israeli actions in the Palestinian territories. The leaders will be subject to arrest in all ICC member states.

As far as repeal, it is unlikely to impossible. There is an international consensus that settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal and that they constitute an obstacle to peace. Even if Trump was able to get a revocatory resolution to a vote he would be unable to find eight other nations on the Security Council willing to support revoking the new resolution. Even if he could get 8 UNSC members to vote for the revocation, Russia, China and France would veto it.

The UN is a morally bankrupt organization with absolutely no power to do anything. Non of this will be remembered once president Trump announces he will be moving the US embassy to Jerusalem and starts bitchslaping the UN for the corrupt, inept organization that it is. As far as the settlements the policy will be build it and they will come. Nothing wrong with Jewish desire to live in their ancient ancestral and religious homeland. And if the racist, intolerant, terroristic Arab IslamoNazi savages don't like it, tough shit.
 
'Netanyahu just called Kerry 'Dain Bramaged'!'

:lmao:

Netanyahu slams Kerry's speech defending UN vote as 'unbalanced'

"Netanyahu, speaking in Jerusalem just over an hour after Kerry’s speech had ended, said Kerry's rhetoric was "as unbalanced as the anti-Israel resolution passed [at the United Nations] last week."

"Secretary Kerry paid lip service to the unrelenting campaign of terror that has been waged by the Palestinians against the Jewish State," he said, later adding: "Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by foreign leaders."
Jews give a rats ass about what you goyim think about Israel

Speak for yourself, Guno Kapo.
did you take that Christmas tree down and clean up the pork at your place, JINO
Guno the Kapo once again proving he isn't a Jew.

I agree he's a weirdo, but he has a point. When hearing about this 2334 resolution, most Israelis were like "f** them".

Still, he's a weirdo.
Yes of course, so did many of Israel's non Jewish supporters say that. He's a mentally ill troll, that's for sure.
 
That's funny. The resolution will never be repealed. The EU and its member states pay the lion's share of the UN budget. The U.S. contribution is less than 3 billion dollars, less than it pays Israel. The EU can easily come up with 3 billion, but they should insist that the UN HQ be moved to Europe.
So the US pays more than 185 nations combined, for a corrupt, inefficient, croniestic, hypocritical organization that bashes it?

Doesn't even matter if the resolution is repealed, as nothing the UN does has any meaning anyhow. All of this will be nullified by the actions of the incoming administration come January 20, when one of its first moves will be to move the US embassy to Jerusalem. :clap2:

The embassy will not move to Jerusalem. The resolution is quite powerful and is intended to force the 2-state solution. That's what the world wants. But since Israel will not abide by the resolution the consequences are clear:

1.The resolution has left no doubt as to the legality of the settlements, stating that Israel's settlements have "no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law."

2. The resolution requires that countries recognize a difference between Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories when dealing with Israel. This will lead to sanctions against products from Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

3. If Israel does not abide by the resolution. Cases can be can pursued against Israeli leaders at the International Criminal Court (ICC) under the Geneva Convention. The ICC is already conducting an ongoing investigation into Israeli actions in the Palestinian territories. The leaders will be subject to arrest in all ICC member states.

As far as repeal, it is unlikely to impossible. There is an international consensus that settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal and that they constitute an obstacle to peace. Even if Trump was able to get a revocatory resolution to a vote he would be unable to find eight other nations on the Security Council willing to support revoking the new resolution. Even if he could get 8 UNSC members to vote for the revocation, Russia, China and France would veto it.

The UN is a morally bankrupt organization with absolutely no power to do anything. Non of this will be remembered once president Trump announces he will be moving the US embassy to Jerusalem and starts bitchslaping the UN for the corrupt, inept organization that it is. As far as the settlements the policy will be build it and they will come. Nothing wrong with Jewish desire to live in their ancient ancestral and religious homeland. And if the racist, intolerant, terroristic Arab IslamoNazi savages don't like it, tough shit.

Trump won't move the embassy to Jerusalem, forget about it. And, if the Israelis continue the building of settlements Israeli leaders will only be able to travel to the U.S. and Naru. LOL
 
That's funny. The resolution will never be repealed. The EU and its member states pay the lion's share of the UN budget. The U.S. contribution is less than 3 billion dollars, less than it pays Israel. The EU can easily come up with 3 billion, but they should insist that the UN HQ be moved to Europe.
So the US pays more than 185 nations combined, for a corrupt, inefficient, croniestic, hypocritical organization that bashes it?

Doesn't even matter if the resolution is repealed, as nothing the UN does has any meaning anyhow. All of this will be nullified by the actions of the incoming administration come January 20, when one of its first moves will be to move the US embassy to Jerusalem. :clap2:

The embassy will not move to Jerusalem. The resolution is quite powerful and is intended to force the 2-state solution. That's what the world wants. But since Israel will not abide by the resolution the consequences are clear:

1.The resolution has left no doubt as to the legality of the settlements, stating that Israel's settlements have "no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law."

2. The resolution requires that countries recognize a difference between Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories when dealing with Israel. This will lead to sanctions against products from Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

3. If Israel does not abide by the resolution. Cases can be can pursued against Israeli leaders at the International Criminal Court (ICC) under the Geneva Convention. The ICC is already conducting an ongoing investigation into Israeli actions in the Palestinian territories. The leaders will be subject to arrest in all ICC member states.

As far as repeal, it is unlikely to impossible. There is an international consensus that settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal and that they constitute an obstacle to peace. Even if Trump was able to get a revocatory resolution to a vote he would be unable to find eight other nations on the Security Council willing to support revoking the new resolution. Even if he could get 8 UNSC members to vote for the revocation, Russia, China and France would veto it.

The UN is a morally bankrupt organization with absolutely no power to do anything. Non of this will be remembered once president Trump announces he will be moving the US embassy to Jerusalem and starts bitchslaping the UN for the corrupt, inept organization that it is. As far as the settlements the policy will be build it and they will come. Nothing wrong with Jewish desire to live in their ancient ancestral and religious homeland. And if the racist, intolerant, terroristic Arab IslamoNazi savages don't like it, tough shit.

Trump won't move the embassy to Jerusalem, forget about it. And, if the Israelis continue the building of settlements Israeli leaders will only be able to travel to the U.S. and Naru. LOL
Dream on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top