1839
1873
1929
"Should have" according to what metric? Something you just pulled out of your ass?
Here:
United States GDP Growth Rate
Recession of 1947-8 had 3.1% decline in GDP, followed by strong growth, about 15%
1960 had only 1.7% decline, followed by less strong growth
73-75 had 3.2% decline, followed by nearly 10% growth
81-81 saw 2.7% decline followed by 8% growth
This one had a 5% decline and has been followed by 3.5% max growth.
Which one is the oddball in this picture?
You said sharp recession is ALWAYS followed by sharp recovery.
I pointed out three cases where that is not true:
1839
1873
1929
Then you respond with a list of cases where it is true.
I suspect we're operating on different definitions of the word "ALWAYS".
EDIT: Besides, isn't it the right wing mantra that we can't judge today's President by yesterday's? Or is it only Bush we're not allowed to talk about?
Every one of those cases was pre WW2. The economy post war is very different from pre war.
Your argument is a fail.