Net Neutrality Requires Data Providers To Bill For Data And Not For Information

[Monk-Eye]

" Net Neutrality Requires Data Providers To Bill For Data And Not For Information "

* Introduction : Internet Backbone Definition For Net Neutrality Debate *

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_backbone

The Internet backbone might be defined by the principal data routes between large, strategically interconnected computer networks and core routers on the Internet. These data routes are hosted by commercial, government, academic and other high-capacity network centers, the Internet exchange points and network access points, that exchange Internet traffic between the countries, continents and across the oceans. Internet service providers, often Tier 1 networks, participate in Internet backbone traffic by privately negotiated interconnection agreements, primarily governed by the principle of settlement-free peering.

* Information Agnostic Data Transfer *

Net neutrality directs that the business model of data backbone providers bill subscribers based upon bandwidth use of the data .

Net neutrality directs that the business model of data backbone providers not bill subscribers based upon information within the data .

For example , suppose online business models A and B where each purchase similar contracts for bandwidth .

Suppose that a backbone provider is biased against business model B by disagreeing with its content or information , then conceivably an ISP could bill B more than A .

Suppose that a backbone provider is biased against business model A because it makes more money than business model B , then conceivably an ISP could bill A more than B .

Should net neutrality be legislated with specific language stipulating that internet backbone providers remain indifferent to information content contained in data transmissions and strictly bill subscribers based upon bandwidth ?


* Opinions Legislated Expression *

In theory , a basis for commerce taxation by government is in fulfilling its administrative role to implement public policy that ensures safety and security of commerce .

Consistencies between ethical business practices and public policies are expected to satisfy needs to safeguard and secure the negative liberties of individual citizens .

Net neutrality language has passed the us senate but has not been presented for a vote in the us house and , as related , in part because the practices of traffic throttling became shunned in the industry and usually affected rural areas where alternative backbone access was limited .

* Challenged Two Call Out *

Which would be your own recommendations on net neutrality legislation ?

 

[sparky]

NN is all about legislating the bigger dog wins

jmho

~S~

 

[Darkwind]

" Net Neutrality Requires Data Providers To Bill For Data And Not For Information "

* Introduction : Internet Backbone Definition For Net Neutrality Debate *

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_backbone

The Internet backbone might be defined by the principal data routes between large, strategically interconnected computer networks and core routers on the Internet. These data routes are hosted by commercial, government, academic and other high-capacity network centers, the Internet exchange points and network access points, that exchange Internet traffic between the countries, continents and across the oceans. Internet service providers, often Tier 1 networks, participate in Internet backbone traffic by privately negotiated interconnection agreements, primarily governed by the principle of settlement-free peering.

* Information Agnostic Data Transfer *

Net neutrality directs that the business model of data backbone providers bill subscribers based upon bandwidth use of the data .

Net neutrality directs that the business model of data backbone providers not bill subscribers based upon information within the data .

For example , suppose online business models A and B where each purchase similar contracts for bandwidth .

Suppose that a backbone provider is biased against business model B by disagreeing with its content or information , then conceivably an ISP could bill B more than A .

Suppose that a backbone provider is biased against business model A because it makes more money than business model B , then conceivably an ISP could bill A more than B .

Should net neutrality be legislated with specific language stipulating that internet backbone providers remain indifferent to information content contained in data transmissions and strictly bill subscribers based upon bandwidth ?


* Opinions Legislated Expression *

In theory , a basis for commerce taxation by government is in fulfilling its administrative role to implement public policy that ensures safety and security of commerce .

Consistencies between ethical business practices and public policies are expected to satisfy needs to safeguard and secure the negative liberties of individual citizens .

Net neutrality language has passed the us senate but has not been presented for a vote in the us house and , as related , in part because the practices of traffic throttling became shunned in the industry and usually affected rural areas where alternative backbone access was limited .

* Challenged Two Call Out *

Which would be your own recommendations on net neutrality legislation ?

Consistencies between ethical business practices and public policies are expected to satisfy needs to safeguard and secure the negative liberties of individual

citizens .

Can you clarify this?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Private Versus Public Threats Against Individual Protections "

* Tough Calls Keeping Despotism At Bay *

Consistencies between ethical business practices and public policies are expected to satisfy needs to safeguard and secure the negative liberties of individual citizens .
Can you clarify this?

The issues of safety and security are general focuses of risk management for nearly any activity .

A negative liberty is a freedom of individuals to not be prohibited from performing some action .

A negative liberty alludes to either independence of individuals from government by means of negative wrights , or negative liberty may allude to independence of individuals from other individuals by means of positive wrights .

An application of negative wrights would proscribe government from directing whether data or information can be biased by an internet backbone provider ; an absence of law provides a negative liberty to internet backbone providers to bill based upon data or information .

An application of positive wrights implies that government directs whether data or information can be biased by an internet backbone provider .

Where private business practices are biased against information rather than indifferent to data , a risk analysis of such business practices may indicate a threat against the safety and security of negative liberties that individuals should have from other private individuals - such as internet backbone providers - that can be address through public policy .

In other words , when internet backbone providers can charge based upon bias for information , wrights of individuals to free speech may be quashed not by government , which is prohibited through us first amendment , rather the wrights of individuals to free speech may be quashed by private industry , which is not prohibited through us first amendment .

 

[Darkwind]

" Private Versus Public Threats Against Individual Protections "

* Tough Calls Keeping Despotism At Bay *

Consistencies between ethical business practices and public policies are expected to satisfy needs to safeguard and secure the negative liberties of individual citizens .
Can you clarify this?

The issues of safety and security are general focuses of risk management for nearly any activity .

A negative liberty is a freedom of individuals to not be prohibited from performing some action .

A negative liberty alludes to either independence of individuals from government by means of negative wrights , or negative liberty may allude to independence of individuals from other individuals by means of positive wrights .

An application of negative wrights would proscribe government from directing whether data or information can be biased by an internet backbone provider ; an absence of law provides a negative liberty to internet backbone providers to bill based upon data or information .

An application of positive wrights implies that government directs whether data or information can be biased by an internet backbone provider .

Where private business practices are biased against information rather than indifferent to data , a risk analysis of such business practices may indicate a threat against the safety and security of negative liberties that individuals should have from other private individuals - such as internet backbone providers - that can be address through public policy .

In other words , when internet backbone providers can charge based upon bias for information , wrights of individuals to free speech may be quashed - not be government which is prohibited through us first amendment , rather the wrights of individuals to free speech may be quashed by private industry which is not prohibited through us first amendment .

Okay, so what are wrights?

*sigh*

Never mind. I get what you are saying. Anything that takes away liberty from the individual is a negative right. However, that really only applies to government.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Fore Getting More Than Asked Four "

* Support Available Where Possible *

Okay, so what are wrights?

Some synonymous associations appear in language by applying homonyms of the terms : rite , write , right , wright .

A lawright crafts writes of rights which are wrights having been en.wikipedia.org/wiki/wrought .

The term wright is used to describe writes of rights that have been crafted , and a concept termed en.wikipedia.org/wiki/legal_positivism stipulates that writes of rights reflect social norms that may not be consistent with perfected rights .

The term rights is often presumed to be implicit with inalienable rites paired with nomian edicts that many seek to implement as public policy even though the laws , the writes of rights , may not be consistent with perfected rights ; hence , use of the term wrights is applied with an allusion to legal positivism .

In mathematics , the term right is analogous with a norm - see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/normed_vector_space , the term right is analogous with a perpendicular to the horizon - see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/gnomon ; thus , hue mammon attributes its fate of earth dominion for having stood up perpendicular to the horizon , for having " righted " itself .

* Cluing Inn *

*sigh*
Never mind. I get what you are saying. Anything that takes away liberty from the individual is a negative right. However, that really only applies to government.

Your statement in highlight is not being related , see this - A Treatise of Legal Philosophy on Adequate Political Science Terms for Civics Pedagogy .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Information Is Biased Content "

* Backbone Data Rates Are Indifferent To Information *

NN is all about legislating the bigger dog wins
jmho
~S~

Please clarify you intended meaning .

 

[sparky]

in a word....monopolization Monk

~S~

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Private Moral Police On Parade "

* Centralized Power With Intents To Violate Us First Amendment *

Content delivery network - Wikipedia

* Divesting From Pretentious *

Okay, so what are wrights?

The term wrights refers to craftsmen .

The term wrights replaces the term rights .

The term wrights is based in Legal positivism - Wikipedia .

* Not Exactly *

*sigh*
Never mind. I get what you are saying. Anything that takes away liberty from the individual is a negative right.

The use of negative and positive as adjectives in the lexicon of negative wrights , positive wrights , negative liberties , positive liberties , can be counter intuitive to common vernacular which associates negative with adverse and positive with advantage .

By convention , a negative wright establishes negative liberty with respect to government as , by definition , a negative wright is a law phrased as a proscription ( a prohibition ) against authoritative action by government , that is it directs a non action ( a negative action ) of government .

The following link , A Treatise of Legal Philosophy on Adequate Political Science Terms for Civics Pedagogy , is a digress into more detail .

* Potential Monopolies On Who Says What *

However, that really only applies to government.

It is correct that the constitution establishes government , such that prohibitions on free speech limits only apply to it , while those same rules do not apply to private despots whose control over communication infrastructure allows them to maintain an over riding ability to determine the free flow of information .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" End To End Delivery Data Systems "

* Private Content Bias *

in a word....monopolization Monk
~S~

Do you mean that net neutrality results in monopolies ?

The purpose of net neutrality means that one pays for bandwidth over which to transport data , it does not prevent competition to provide that bandwidth at a lower cost .