Neil Cavuto punks liberal moron Alan Grayson!

[Wicked Jester]

Friggin' classic!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP6LZVHbUw0]YouTube - Cavuto Slams Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) Over Bill to Restrict Worker's Pay[/ame]

 

[Wicked Jester]

FOX news is holding these idiot liberals accountable!

And that, is a very good thing!

 

[ba1614]

You can't nail these bastards down on anything anymore, and if they do give a number, you can be relatively sure that it came out of their ass.

 

[California Girl]

I hate politicians. Most of them would lie about the time of day.

 

[Jay Canuck]

Neil Cavuto has just been so on the money with his commentary over the last 8 years......even right up to Wall St meltdown.

 

[rdean]

Friggin' classic!

YouTube - Cavuto Slams Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) Over Bill to Restrict Worker's Pay

The idiot here is Neil Cavuto. The right thinks that if someone screams and yells on TV and interrupts their guests over and over again, then they are "punking" the guests.

It takes clowns to really appreciate a clown.

You go Alan. You keep showing the monkeys what class is and someday, they might even learn how to behave, but I doubt it.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Neil Cavuto has just been so on the money with his commentary over the last 8 years......even right up to Wall St meltdown.

Clearly you have never watched him, or paid attention, or even watched this video.

Just your typical trolling.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Friggin' classic!

YouTube - Cavuto Slams Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) Over Bill to Restrict Worker's Pay

The idiot here is Neil Cavuto. The right thinks that if someone screams and yells on TV and interrupts their guests over and over again, then they are "punking" the guests.

It takes clowns to really appreciate a clown.

You go Alan. You keep showing the monkeys what class is and someday, they might even learn how to behave, but I doubt it.

Yes, the appropriate way to behave is to just be a meek little submissive lapdog, and allow the guest to spew the pat talking points and go on his merry way, unchallenged!

 

[Sarah G]

FOX news is holding these idiot liberals accountable!

And that, is a very good thing!

Fox News is irrelevant so nobody cares what they are doing. Fox has to stoop to following congresspeople around now like a bunch of ambulance chasers.

 

[Wicked Jester]

FOX news is holding these idiot liberals accountable!

And that, is a very good thing!

Fox News is irrelevant so nobody cares what they are doing. Fox has to stoop to following congresspeople around now like a bunch of ambulance chasers.

Yeah, FOX news is irrelevant alright.

That is why they were solely responsible for getting Obama's communist buddy Van Jones tossed under the bus when they exposed him with FACTS!

That is why they exposed Anita Dunne for being the anti-american, MAO loving piece of shit she truly is, with FACTS!

That is why they were solely responsible for exposing your beloved LIBERAL ACORN and their abject willingness to help facilitate the exploitation and abuse of innocent MINOR children. They did that too with FACTS.

FACTS, that the liberal MSM absolutely will not touch.

That is why their ratings are goin through the roof, while the LIBERAL MSM's are going in the tank!

Christ, liberals are friggin' idiots!

 

[Zoom-boing]

FOX news is holding these idiot liberals accountable!

And that, is a very good thing!

Fox News is irrelevant so nobody cares what they are doing. Fox has to stoop to following congresspeople around now like a bunch of ambulance chasers.

So you're ok with Grayson's dodging the questions 'what is excessive pay, how do you define it, what is the range'?

The only reason Fox followed Grayson around (I'm assuming you're talking about Griff Jenkins' encounter with Grayson 'The Factor' Confronts Rep. Alan Grayson Over His Outrageous Comments - Bill O'Reilly | The O'Reilly Factor - FOXNews.com ) is because Grayson ducked and dodged at every turn avoiding Fox --- because Fox was asking questions that he "couldn't, wouldn't or felt that he shouldn't" answer . . . . . . . just like he did in this clip.

 

[Wicked Jester]

FOX news is holding these idiot liberals accountable!

And that, is a very good thing!

Fox News is irrelevant so nobody cares what they are doing. Fox has to stoop to following congresspeople around now like a bunch of ambulance chasers.

So you're ok with Grayson's dodging the questions 'what is excessive pay, how do you define it, what is the range'?

The only reason Fox followed Grayson around (I'm assuming you're talking about Griff Jenkins' encounter with Grayson 'The Factor' Confronts Rep. Alan Grayson Over His Outrageous Comments - Bill O'Reilly | The O'Reilly Factor - FOXNews.com ) is because Grayson ducked and dodged at every turn avoiding Fox --- because Fox was asking questions that he "couldn't, wouldn't or felt that he shouldn't" answer . . . . . . . just like he did in this clip.

Hey Zoom!

Just wanted to remind you that you should add Harold Kho, Anita Dunne, and gaffin Joe Biden to your list of Obama's dirtbag buddies in your signature!

 

[Xenophon]

What a douche Grayson is.

 

[Jay Canuck]

Neil Cavuto has just been so on the money with his commentary over the last 8 years......even right up to Wall St meltdown.

Clearly you have never watched him, or paid attention, or even watched this video.

Just your typical trolling.

I don't get it?....... are you trying to say that Neil isn't on the money with his razor sharp insights about business and the market?

 

[Sarah G]

FOX news is holding these idiot liberals accountable!

And that, is a very good thing!

Fox News is irrelevant so nobody cares what they are doing. Fox has to stoop to following congresspeople around now like a bunch of ambulance chasers.

So you're ok with Grayson's dodging the questions 'what is excessive pay, how do you define it, what is the range'?

The only reason Fox followed Grayson around (I'm assuming you're talking about Griff Jenkins' encounter with Grayson 'The Factor' Confronts Rep. Alan Grayson Over His Outrageous Comments - Bill O'Reilly | The O'Reilly Factor - FOXNews.com ) is because Grayson ducked and dodged at every turn avoiding Fox --- because Fox was asking questions that he "couldn't, wouldn't or felt that he shouldn't" answer . . . . . . . just like he did in this clip.

Do you remember when Ron Paul supporters chased Sean Hannity down the street in January 2008 trying to get him to interview them? How was that in your opinion, was it a good way to approach the opposition? I doubt Rs liked it at all.

But it's ok for fox news channel to harass Grayson tho right?

Ron Paul supporters were yelling " FOX News Sucks" and chasing after Sean Hannity the other night. "Hey Hannity, how about an interview?" "We're not falling for it anymore" "You suck Sean"...FNC shut out Ron Paul from their Republican Presidential forum on Sunday which angered many supporters of his campaign.

Ron Paul got 10% of the vote in Iowa. That's not chump change and Paul is at 10% in NH polls at this point so there really was no excuse for Chris Wallace to cut him out. And how would that extra 10% look on Fredrick of Hollywood or Huckabee's totals in NH?

 

[Zoom-boing]

Fox News is irrelevant so nobody cares what they are doing. Fox has to stoop to following congresspeople around now like a bunch of ambulance chasers.

So you're ok with Grayson's dodging the questions 'what is excessive pay, how do you define it, what is the range'?

The only reason Fox followed Grayson around (I'm assuming you're talking about Griff Jenkins' encounter with Grayson 'The Factor' Confronts Rep. Alan Grayson Over His Outrageous Comments - Bill O'Reilly | The O'Reilly Factor - FOXNews.com ) is because Grayson ducked and dodged at every turn avoiding Fox --- because Fox was asking questions that he "couldn't, wouldn't or felt that he shouldn't" answer . . . . . . . just like he did in this clip.

Do you remember when Ron Paul supporters chased Sean Hannity down the street in January 2008 trying to get him to interview them? How was that in your opinion, was it a good way to approach the opposition? I doubt Rs liked it at all.

But it's ok for fox news channel to harass Grayson tho right?

Ron Paul supporters were yelling " FOX News Sucks" and chasing after Sean Hannity the other night. "Hey Hannity, how about an interview?" "We're not falling for it anymore" "You suck Sean"...FNC shut out Ron Paul from their Republican Presidential forum on Sunday which angered many supporters of his campaign.

Ron Paul got 10% of the vote in Iowa. That's not chump change and Paul is at 10% in NH polls at this point so there really was no excuse for Chris Wallace to cut him out. And how would that extra 10% look on Fredrick of Hollywood or Huckabee's totals in NH?

You're comparing Ron Paul supporters chasing down talking head Sean Hannity to Fox News trying to get answers from Congressman Alan Grayson? That's not even apples and oranges, it's more like asparagus and marbles.

Did you watch/read what I linked? How was Griff Jenkins 'harassing' Grayson? He was asking questions and Grayson refused to answer, just giving a 'contact my office for an appointment' b.s. Jenkins DID contact his office - repeatedly. Grayson never returned a single call or email. Conclusion? Grayson -- who works for us and is answerable to us - ducked and dodged. Apparently you're ok with that.

 

[saveliberty]

Excessive executive pay was an issue at the time of the bailout. Congress chose to not define it then, because they didn't want to appear too socialist. So instead of penalizing the people who contributed to the problem, they go after the people who cleaned up the mess. Two entirely different groups. So you slap the wrists of these guys and prove your a socialist at the same time.

Grayson, tap danced as hard as he could. Did he go back and issue a press release stating the amount he considered excessive? Cavuto wasn't the problem in that exchange. Grayson wants all the media attention, but then can't deal with the fallout. Man up.

 

[Sarah G]

So you're ok with Grayson's dodging the questions 'what is excessive pay, how do you define it, what is the range'?

The only reason Fox followed Grayson around (I'm assuming you're talking about Griff Jenkins' encounter with Grayson 'The Factor' Confronts Rep. Alan Grayson Over His Outrageous Comments - Bill O'Reilly | The O'Reilly Factor - FOXNews.com ) is because Grayson ducked and dodged at every turn avoiding Fox --- because Fox was asking questions that he "couldn't, wouldn't or felt that he shouldn't" answer . . . . . . . just like he did in this clip.

Do you remember when Ron Paul supporters chased Sean Hannity down the street in January 2008 trying to get him to interview them? How was that in your opinion, was it a good way to approach the opposition? I doubt Rs liked it at all.

But it's ok for fox news channel to harass Grayson tho right?

Ron Paul supporters were yelling " FOX News Sucks" and chasing after Sean Hannity the other night. "Hey Hannity, how about an interview?" "We're not falling for it anymore" "You suck Sean"...FNC shut out Ron Paul from their Republican Presidential forum on Sunday which angered many supporters of his campaign.

Ron Paul got 10% of the vote in Iowa. That's not chump change and Paul is at 10% in NH polls at this point so there really was no excuse for Chris Wallace to cut him out. And how would that extra 10% look on Fredrick of Hollywood or Huckabee's totals in NH?

You're comparing Ron Paul supporters chasing down talking head Sean Hannity to Fox News trying to get answers from Congressman Alan Grayson? That's not even apples and oranges, it's more like asparagus and marbles.

Did you watch/read what I linked? How was Griff Jenkins 'harassing' Grayson? He was asking questions and Grayson refused to answer, just giving a 'contact my office for an appointment' b.s. Jenkins DID contact his office - repeatedly. Grayson never returned a single call or email. Conclusion? Grayson -- who works for us and is answerable to us - ducked and dodged. Apparently you're ok with that.

He doesn't work for you unless you live in his district. You aren't his constituency. Same with senators, they work for the people of their state. As a body, they come together but individually, you don't have any say unless he is your representative.

That's the thing about you Rs. You think that even though you lost your elections, you still get to tell Democrats what to do and say. You don't. When you win something come back and we'll try this again.

 

[California Girl]

I have to say I am impressed with the ability of some to be so incredibly partisan that they think it is okay for a member of congress - the guys who are supposed to answer to 'we, the people' not answering legitmate questions from the press - even if that 'press' is Fox.

 

[Sarah G]

I have to say I am impressed with the ability of some to be so incredibly partisan that they think it is okay for a member of congress - the guys who are supposed to answer to 'we, the people' not answering legitmate questions from the press - even if that 'press' is Fox.

When your side wins something, maybe we'll be concerned with what impresses you. What it means when you lose everything is that you are not connecting with the rest of the country.

Fox works for republicans, not America. They can continue down that path as long as they like. Because they're wrong on just about every issue is of no consequence to those of us who don't listen to them anyway.