Nay Sayers Wrong Again: TARP Not End Of world!!!

Dipshit Nay Sayers Wrong Again: TARP Working Out Swell!!!


"It turns out, actually, TARP -- as wildly unpopular as it has been -- has been much cheaper than any of us anticipated," President Obama said Thursday at a White House summit on creating jobs.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, who pushed for the fund's creation, made a similar point at a Senate hearing Thursday on his nomination to a second term.

"Unlike some of the scare stories about $700 billion being thrown away, I do believe . . . in the end that there'll be something close to a break-even there," Bernanke said.

The TARP fund may break even, that is, on its first and biggest use of taxpayer money: investing billions -- $205 billion as of Monday -- directly in banks.

As long as they don't try to spend the 700+ billion that the government Borrowed to fund tarp on something else I'm totally happy about this.

Now if they don't take the saved and repayed money and immediately put it as a payment toward the national defecit I'll be complaining again. For Example I heard obama talking this weekend about spending the leftover and repaid TARP money, money that we borrowed in the first place, on some other programs. That is a bad executive decision.
 
TARP worked and I am crediting everyone who supported it.
You cannot prove positive results with negative evidence.

That people are paying back the bailout is more to the credit that they don't want a bunch of imbeciles telling them how to run their businesses, than anything else.

So the "socialist" policies of setting strict controls on banks receiving TARP funds worked. Economic crisis averted, economy on the rebound

Well done Bush and Obama

sort of, but :clap2:
 
So the "socialist" policies of setting strict controls on banks receiving TARP funds worked. Economic crisis averted, economy on the rebound

Well done Bush and Obama
Once again, you're trying to claim positive results with negative evidence.

Fail now, fail always.

Which part about saving an economy in panic and on the verge of collapse is negative?

Oh yes, I remember........It is negatative to those rooting for collapse
 
Oh yes..the crash didn't happen, the stock market that was in a panic didn't rise 54%, the banks weren't saved.....

Oh the negativity
 
So the "socialist" policies of setting strict controls on banks receiving TARP funds worked. Economic crisis averted, economy on the rebound

Well done Bush and Obama
Once again, you're trying to claim positive results with negative evidence.

Fail now, fail always.

Which part about saving an economy in panic and on the verge of collapse is negative?

Oh yes, I remember........It is negatative to those rooting for collapse

Leftwinger is confused or is engaged in deliberate conflation.

Wanting President Obama to fail is not rooting for collapse. It's rooting against the radical change of our nation from a Constitutionally based Republic with a capitalist economy to a constitutionless STATIST government with a Marxist/socialist-based economy.

I don't know anybody on the right who wants a collapse. We merely recognize that some charted courses for "salvation" are actually roadmaps to tyranny.
 
Once again, you're trying to claim positive results with negative evidence.

Fail now, fail always.

Which part about saving an economy in panic and on the verge of collapse is negative?

Oh yes, I remember........It is negatative to those rooting for collapse

Leftwinger is confused or is engaged in deliberate conflation.

Wanting President Obama to fail is not rooting for collapse. It's rooting against the radical change of our nation from a Constitutionally based Republic with a capitalist economy to a constitutionless STATIST government with a Marxist/socialist-based economy.

I don't know anybody on the right who wants a collapse. We merely recognize that some charted courses for "salvation" are actually roadmaps to tyranny.

Tyranny???

How melodramatic
 
Oh yes..the crash didn't happen, the stock market that was in a panic didn't rise 54%, the banks weren't saved.....

Oh the negativity
Irrelvant to the fact that you're still claiming positive results with negative evidence.

Just because something didn't happen is no evidence at all that you prevented it, merely by sticking multi-billion dollar pins in the economic voodoo doll.
 
You're claiming that "the crash" diidn't come because of the bailout...Or, in other words, nothing happened.

That's what's known in the world of logic as neagtive evidence.

being a nitwit until the very end? :clap2:

there are some things in this world that resist change, and you my dear friend are one of them.
 
So the "socialist" policies of setting strict controls on banks receiving TARP funds worked. Economic crisis averted, economy on the rebound

Well done Bush and Obama
Once again, you're trying to claim positive results with negative evidence.

Fail now, fail always.

Which part about saving an economy in panic and on the verge of collapse is negative?

Oh yes, I remember........It is negatative to those rooting for collapse

The economy was in a panic? Washington DC maybe, but not the economy. The economy was in a recession brought on by poor decisions in Congress. Specifically CRA under Franks. Wall Street was in a panic and Congress threw our money at them. Remember the phrase Wall Street to Main Street disconnect? The economy hit the skids after that, when banks stopped lending. Then we had an employment collapse. Idiots like you think everything is fine now.
 
Once again, you're trying to claim positive results with negative evidence.

Fail now, fail always.

Which part about saving an economy in panic and on the verge of collapse is negative?

Oh yes, I remember........It is negatative to those rooting for collapse

The economy was in a panic? Washington DC maybe, but not the economy. The economy was in a recession brought on by poor decisions in Congress. Specifically CRA under Franks. Wall Street was in a panic and Congress threw our money at them. Remember the phrase Wall Street to Main Street disconnect? The economy hit the skids after that, when banks stopped lending. Then we had an employment collapse. Idiots like you think everything is fine now.

No, Phil Gramm snuck an amendment into a spending bill that deregulated the financial markets which created a $516 TRILLION DOLLAR derivative bubble. Just to put this in perspective, the GDP of all the nations on the earth in one year is just $50 trillion dollars. The derivative bubble caused the collapse of the economy. Do a little reading.

Derivatives are the new ticking time bomb Paul B. Farrell - MarketWatch

The CRA? You must be joking! Only 6% of the homes in the country were in forclosure.
 
Wow....What a stunningly fact-packed rebuttal!! :rolleyes:

You wouldn't know a fact if it hit you upside the head while you were spouting one of your nonsensical theories about liberals and America.

You really do get stuck in one gear (backwards) don't you?

Dude is the village idiot, so they made him a mod.

Makes sense.
 
PFFFTTTBWWWWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Just when I thought Chrissy's envirowhacko dreck was the stupidest and most willfully ignorant crap I've ever encountered, he forays his idiot savantery into economic issues!!
spittake.gif


I'm gonna have to shrink wrap my computer to keep from shorting it out!
roflolrhard.gif
 
PFFFTTTBWWWWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Just when I thought Chrissy's envirowhacko dreck was the stupidest and most willfully ignorant crap I've ever encountered, he forays his idiot savantery into economic issues!!
spittake.gif


I'm gonna have to shrink wrap my computer to keep from shorting it out!
roflolrhard.gif

Really Dude, your posts don't even make good arguments for the postions of the right.

They are just a series of dumb insults.

It's pretty pathetic really.
 
Wow....What a stunningly fact-packed rebuttal!! :rolleyes:

You wouldn't know a fact if it hit you upside the head while you were spouting one of your nonsensical theories about liberals and America.

You really do get stuck in one gear (backwards) don't you?
And you wouldn't know a logical fallacy if it beat you over the head.

But when you can conclusively prove that it didn't rain today because you didn't fuck your neighbor's dog yesterday, then you come get me.
 
PFFFTTTBWWWWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Just when I thought Chrissy's envirowhacko dreck was the stupidest and most willfully ignorant crap I've ever encountered, he forays his idiot savantery into economic issues!!
spittake.gif


I'm gonna have to shrink wrap my computer to keep from shorting it out!
roflolrhard.gif

Really Dude, your posts don't even make good arguments for the postions of the right.

They are just a series of dumb insults.

It's pretty pathetic really.
And you can't even come up with decent insults, let alone make any argument, let alone a pathetic one.

I suggest that you take up checkers. :lol:
 
PFFFTTTBWWWWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Just when I thought Chrissy's envirowhacko dreck was the stupidest and most willfully ignorant crap I've ever encountered, he forays his idiot savantery into economic issues!!
spittake.gif


I'm gonna have to shrink wrap my computer to keep from shorting it out!
roflolrhard.gif

Really Dude, your posts don't even make good arguments for the postions of the right.

They are just a series of dumb insults.

It's pretty pathetic really.
And you can't even come up with decent insults, let alone make any argument, let alone a pathetic one.

I suggest that you take up checkers. :lol:
that might be beyond his abilities as well
tic-tac-toe is likely the game for him
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top