Navy Seals Say False Flag to be Blamed on Iran May Happen at Anytime: Ed Asner

Because the burden is on him (and you) to prove what's being asserted, dipshit.

So, he's a 'liar' because you say so? Well, that's not proof. Try again.
Where did I say he is a "liar"? You're alleging I used that word since you put it in quotes. Link to it.

Do you understand what the burden of proof is?

You're a child molester. Prove I'm lying.

Oh, so he's not a liar? Well, why didn't you just say that?
 
So, he's a 'liar' because you say so? Well, that's not proof. Try again.
Where did I say he is a "liar"? You're alleging I used that word since you put it in quotes. Link to it.

Do you understand what the burden of proof is?

You're a child molester. Prove I'm lying.

Oh, so he's not a liar? Well, why didn't you just say that?
Do you understand the idea that a proposition cannot be judged at face value and requires more evidence before such a determination can be made?

Probably not, since you believe every dumbshit conspiracy out there.

Again, you're a child molester. Prove I'm wrong.
 
Where did I say he is a "liar"? You're alleging I used that word since you put it in quotes. Link to it.

Do you understand what the burden of proof is?

You're a child molester. Prove I'm lying.

Oh, so he's not a liar? Well, why didn't you just say that?
Do you understand the idea that a proposition cannot be judged at face value and requires more evidence before such a determination can be made?

Probably not, since you believe every dumbshit conspiracy out there.

Again, you're a child molester. Prove I'm wrong.

So is he a liar or not? SHEESH! :confused:
 
Oh, so he's not a liar? Well, why didn't you just say that?
Do you understand the idea that a proposition cannot be judged at face value and requires more evidence before such a determination can be made?

Probably not, since you believe every dumbshit conspiracy out there.

Again, you're a child molester. Prove I'm wrong.

So is he a liar or not? SHEESH! :confused:
You know, I can't tell if you're intentionally obtuse or just dumber than shit.

Either way, I've made my opinion on the matter abundantly clear to those who understand English.
 
Do you understand the idea that a proposition cannot be judged at face value and requires more evidence before such a determination can be made?

Probably not, since you believe every dumbshit conspiracy out there.

Again, you're a child molester. Prove I'm wrong.

So is he a liar or not? SHEESH! :confused:
You know, I can't tell if you're intentionally obtuse or just dumber than shit.

Either way, I've made my opinion on the matter abundantly clear to those who understand English.

No you haven't. You've done the exact opposite. But ok, whatever. :lol:
 
You know, I can't tell if you're intentionally obtuse or just dumber than shit.

Either way, I've made my opinion on the matter abundantly clear to those who understand English.

No you haven't. You've done the exact opposite. But ok, whatever. :lol:
You're a child molester. Prove me wrong.

The man made a statement about what he was told would be coming in the future. If it doesn't happen, you're more than welcome to come back and call him a liar. But right now it's just too early to condemn him as a liar. So stay tuned i guess.
 
No you haven't. You've done the exact opposite. But ok, whatever. :lol:
You're a child molester. Prove me wrong.

The man made a statement about what he was told would be coming in the future. If it doesn't happen, you're more than welcome to come back and call him a liar. But right now it's just too early to condemn him as a liar. So stay tuned i guess.
So we just have to assume he's telling the truth?

How about if no assumptions are made without additional corroborating evidence?
 
You're a child molester. Prove me wrong.

The man made a statement about what he was told would be coming in the future. If it doesn't happen, you're more than welcome to come back and call him a liar. But right now it's just too early to condemn him as a liar. So stay tuned i guess.
So we just have to assume he's telling the truth?

How about if no assumptions are made without additional corroborating evidence?

No, you don't have to believe anything he said. That's your call. But you not believing him, doesn't make him a liar.
 
The man made a statement about what he was told would be coming in the future. If it doesn't happen, you're more than welcome to come back and call him a liar. But right now it's just too early to condemn him as a liar. So stay tuned i guess.
So we just have to assume he's telling the truth?

How about if no assumptions are made without additional corroborating evidence?

No, you don't have to believe anything he said. That's your call. But you not believing him, doesn't make him a liar.
And I called him a liar ... where?
 

Forum List

Back
Top