NATURE Pulls Slanderous Article claiming scientist who disagree with AGW are "Deniers" + other slurs

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Billy_Bob, Aug 18, 2019.

  1. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    18,547
    Thanks Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +19,542
    NATURE Pulls Slanderous Article claiming scientist who disagree with AGW "Deniers" and claiming their credentials or work is substandard.

    Now this is damn funny. The journal NATURE has been caught with their pants down and jerking off. It seems that some faculty memebers from the University of California @ Merced think their slander is OK... Now they and Nature face criminal prosecution in the UK, USA, GERMANY, among many other countries..

    Its about damn time we started playing their game and dragging their sorry asses into court..

    Looks like the attorneys have already prepared the cases and are simply waiting for UCM to not answer their letter of retraction demand to their public and printed slander and criminal defamation of character.

    So far 8 well respected and well known scientists have signed on to Monckton's criminal slander suit.. I expect more in the next day or so...

    The Nature Communications hate list – a fast-moving story
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2019
  2. GLASNOST
    Offline

    GLASNOST VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    4,182
    Thanks Received:
    326
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Location:
    Salle d'attente de la gare
    Ratings:
    +1,779
    National Geographic has been publishing sublime American propaganda for decades but (as far as I know) they've never been called out on it. It's about time we started dragging their sorry asses into court too.
     
  3. SSDD
    Online

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    15,837
    Thanks Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +9,427
    [​IMG]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  4. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    18,547
    Thanks Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +19,542
    Joanne did a smashing job with this propaganda rag's front cover...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    18,547
    Thanks Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +19,542
    LOL...

    The list of potential law suits and criminal defamation suits is growing... Nature really stepped in the dog crap on this one... Where were its unbiased reviewers that allowed this paper to be published in the first place? This exposes the rampant bias and gate keeping of PAL REVIEW this publication is openly practicing.

    Just taking the article down may not shield them from prosecution.. There are other hit pieces still in open publication.
     
  6. SSDD
    Online

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    15,837
    Thanks Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +9,427
    I seriously think that they need to make the reviewers who approved that piece of crap for publication public as well.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2019
  7. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    18,547
    Thanks Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +19,542
    Just WOW....

    The Journal of Nature is in deep doo doo...

    OUCH!... This also violates these same similar laws in the US. Liable, Slander, Criminal Defamation of Character... And the list of violations goes on...

    They think that if its a "peer reviewed work" that their criminal acts can not be charged against them, as courts do not normally deal in scientific maters, but that is a grievous error. The writers have now placed this in the courts purview and will now have to prove their accusations they placed in writing.

    Nature is not out of the woods for pulling the article as their reviewing staff is paid for by them which places them liable for all content. This is not going to end well for UCM or Nature...

    Fraud, breach of right of privacy and libel by Nature Communications @NatureComms
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2019
  8. SSDD
    Online

    SSDD Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2012
    Messages:
    15,837
    Thanks Received:
    1,706
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +9,427
    It is about time these people started getting called on their fraud.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    18,547
    Thanks Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +19,542
    Willis Eschenbach exposes the fraud that passed for "peer reviewed" work published in Nature....

    You cant make this stuff up.. These people are outright liars and frauds.

    "Grrr … these jokers write a “scientific” paper and then they don’t release the code or the data for six months after publication? That’s not science, that a buncha guys engaged in what we used to call “hitchhiking to Chicago” accompanied by the appropriate obscene one-handed gesture with the thumb extended…"

    links to dead web sites, double counting papers, and the list goes on and on...

    Inside The Sausage Factory

    I do not see how Nature avoids civil, let alone potential criminal liability, from their publishing of this article/paper..
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Sunsettommy
    Offline

    Sunsettommy Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2018
    Messages:
    3,047
    Thanks Received:
    601
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,459
    The clinching statement:

    "I first took a look at the media mentions of St. Greta of Thunberg, the Patron Saint of the Easily Led. Since she burst on the scene a few months ago, she has gotten no less than 36,517 mentions in the media, about 60% of the total of all the “contrarians” listed in their study.

    I then looked at the man who has made more money out of climate hysteria than any living human being, the multimillionaire Climate Goracle, Mr. Al Gore himself. A search of Mediacloud for ‘”Al Gore” AND climate’ returned a total of 92,718 hits.

    So while the clueless authors of this paper are so concerned about how much air time we “contrarians” get, between them just Al Gore and Greta Thunberg alone got twice the number of media mentions as all of us climate “contrarians” combined …"

    bolding mine

    :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1

Share This Page