Nature Mag Admits Global Warming Scam is Communism

[PoliticalChic]

How long has the Right been telling the simpletons that the Global Warming scam is really just one more iteration of communism???

Well…dang, turns out we’re just as correct as when we told you that Bill Clinton was a rapist, and Hussein Obama was a total failure.




1.”STUDY in Nature: Global wealth redistribution, economic ‘degrowth’ needed to fight ‘global warming’

2. New study claims economic systems must be restructured to fit 'within planetary boundaries.'

3. Paper urges "moving beyond the pursuit of GDP growth to embrace new measures of progress. It could also involve the pursuit of ‘degrowth’ in wealthy nations and the shift towards alternative economic models such as a steady-state economy."

4. "We apply a top-down approach that distributes shares of each planetary boundary among nations based on current population “
STUDY in Nature: Global wealth redistribution, economic ‘degrowth’ needed to fight ‘global warming’



You warmists must feel like total dopes, huh?



5. “…we will have to substantially redistribute the wealth of the West to the poor, so that the entire globe can live in a substantially lower (for us) but relatively equal standard of living.


6….forget creating a world with freedom of opportunity, but tilt at Utopian windmills to force equal outcomes: To each according to his needs, from each according to his ability.” Environmentalists Push Global Wealth Redistribution





Here's the music that goes with that view:

 

[Moonglow]

I am sure you smart folks can describe why it is communistc from the book that Marx and Engels wrote.....

 

[del]

the only time i feel like a total dope is when i open one of her threads.

i really should know better

 

[Deno]

Can you say carbon credits

liberals are stupid and gullible beyond belief.

If I didn’t have a conscience I could make a bazillion

dollars off scamming the dip shits…

 

[Deno]

the only time i feel like a total dope is when i open one of her threads.

i really should know better

You are a liberal...

Feel it or not you are a total dope....

 

[Old Rocks]

As usual, PC goes to a doper site for information, instead of the source article. So here is the original article, judge for yourself;

A good life for all within planetary boundaries | Nature Sustainability

Now there are ways for people in poverty to work their way out with some seed money from the rest of us. Work their way out, and create an area that is a resource for food for the rest of us.



Now PC will neither read the source article, nor will she bother to see how a vast badlands area in China is now a fertile area, producing food for themselves and others, and now leaving poverty. This lesson is now being applied in Africa and other places.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As usual, PC goes to a doper site for information, instead of the source article. So here is the original article, judge for yourself;

A good life for all within planetary boundaries | Nature Sustainability

Now there are ways for people in poverty to work their way out with some seed money from the rest of us. Work their way out, and create an area that is a resource for food for the rest of us.



Now PC will neither read the source article, nor will she bother to see how a vast badlands area in China is now a fertile area, producing food for themselves and others, and now leaving poverty. This lesson is now being applied in Africa and other places.

The Global Warming Scam has never been science: it has always been a political ploy designed to rope in the mindless and the simpletons.....like you.


Now,...you appear to be attempting to claim that what I posted does not represent the original article....



This is what I posted.....I challenge you to dispute that this represents the communism of the original article"

1.”STUDY in Nature: Global wealth redistribution, economic ‘degrowth’ needed to fight ‘global warming’

2. New study claims economic systems must be restructured to fit 'within planetary boundaries.'

3. Paper urges "moving beyond the pursuit of GDP growth to embrace new measures of progress. It could also involve the pursuit of ‘degrowth’ in wealthy nations and the shift towards alternative economic models such as a steady-state economy."

4. "We apply a top-down approach that distributes shares of each planetary boundary among nations based on current population “



Well....how about it, you dunce!!!!!!!!




How about this????

“…we will have to substantially redistribute the wealth of the West to the poor, so that the entire globe can live in a substantially lower (for us) but relatively equal standard of living.


6….forget creating a world with freedom of opportunity, but tilt at Utopian windmills to force equal outcomes: To each according to his needs, from each according to his ability.”



Get your foot out of your mouth, and speak up!!!!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Old Coprolite couldn't refute what I posted above....so let me destroy the dunce with more proof that Global Warming is simply a disguise for communism:



7. The Global Warming Scam is simply one more communist plot to ensure the global confiscation of all revenues and resources….with the claim that it is to produce Utopia on earth…..a ‘worker’s paradise.’
From the article:

“We apply a top-down approach that distributes shares of each planetary boundary among nations based on current population (a per capita biophysical boundary approach). While the environmental justice literature emphasizes the need for differentiated responsibilities in practice, a per capita approach allows us to explore what quality of life could be universally achieved if resources were distributed equally.

It is an important question to address given that it is often claimed that all people could live well if only the rich consumed less, so that the poor could consume more.”
A good life for all within planetary boundaries | Nature Sustainability



8. Sounds like this, doesn’t it:

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need (or needs) is a slogan that Karl Marx made popular in his writing Critique of the Gotha program, published in 1875. The German original is Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen.” From each according to his ability, to each according to his need - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. “The theory of human needs developed by the above authors…visualizes sustainability in terms of a doughnut-shaped space where resource use is high enough to meet people’s basic needs (the inner boundary), but not so high as to transgress planetary boundaries (the outer boundary).

In other words, growth is out. We must live within economic and social systems strictly limited by arbitrary boundaries on the use of resources established by “the experts.””
Ibid.




10. Somehow, the Left has convinced the truly stupid that there are bureaucrats, experts, technocrats who know better how to engineer society than people do their own lives.
Certainly not true for me.


" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.

It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review



And politics before science….as we find in the Global Warming Scam.

 

[badger2]

Yes, #3, and the anus-barer in #2 finally flashes the correct response. OP hasn't the cahones to compare the similarities twixt capitalism and communism.

 

[Moonglow]

Is the capital credits the communal property or is it the pollution?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes, #3, and the anus-barer in #2 finally flashes the correct response. OP hasn't the cahones to compare the similarities twixt capitalism and communism.

Compare???

Sure, you fool....

Those slaughtered by those, like you....who demand the bending of the neck and the knee to government.

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000 men, women and children.

#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium




112 million human beings.


...versus this:

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.



Gads, you're an imbecile....but you must get tired of everyone telling you that, huh?

 

[Moonglow]

Yes, #3, and the anus-barer in #2 finally flashes the correct response. OP hasn't the cahones to compare the similarities twixt capitalism and communism.

Compare???

Sure, you fool....

Those slaughtered by those, like you....who demand the bending of the neck and the knee to government.

Stalin....42,672,000

Mao.....37,828,000

Hitler....20,946,000

Lenin....4,017,000

Pol Pot...2,397,000

Tojo.....3,990,000

Total......111,850,000 men, women and children.

#14 Liberal Demagoguery, Hate and Violence – A Compendium




112 human beings.


...versus this:

"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.



Gads, you're an imbecile....but you must get tired of everyone telling you that, huh?

How many have been massacreed in the purge for capital credits?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

the only time i feel like a total dope is when i open one of her threads.

i really should know better

But you can't rebut the points made.

Inner-esting

 

[PoliticalChic]

11. How long has the Right been telling the simpletons that the Global Warming scam is really just one more iteration of communism???
Well…dang, turns out we’re just as correct as when we told you that Bill Clinton was a rapist, and Hussein Obama was a total failure.
And now we have the words right of Nature Magazine!!!!


Although the dunces that I regularly infuriate with the truth, are incapable of learning, lots of folks have caught on to the Left’s ‘environmentalism.’

It’s been re-named the ‘Watermelon Movement.’



“Why ‘Environmentalists’ Are Called ‘Watermelons’

Because they’re green on the outside and red on the inside, of course.
This is not just a clever joke; it’s true with regard to the professional “environmentalists,” if not most of the rank and file. All of their frauds and ruses, from acid rain to cellphone cancer scares, to global cooling, global warming, the “ozone hole,” “climate change,” etc., have one common denominator: They are used to make a case for a massive redistribution of worldwide wealth and central planning of the entire world’s economy. Communism, in other words.

…. his arguments always came down to this: All of our environmental problems will disappear if only we would adopt socialism.

Anyway, Murray once asked him the following at an informal lunch (paraphrasing from memory): “You environmentalists are opposed to nuclear power, hydroelectric power, coal-fired power plants, natural gas, and all other forms of energy. But energy is the lifeblood of capitalism. Without energy our capitalist economy will be destroyed.”

According to Murray Weidenbaum, who was the Chairman of President Reagan’s Council of Economic advisers in 1981, Commoner just smiled and nodded approvingly.”
Why 'Environmentalists' Are Called 'Watermelons' - LRC Blog LewRockwell.com




Communism, environmentalism, Liberalism.......Cretinous Primitivism

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As usual, PC goes to a doper site for information, instead of the source article. So here is the original article, judge for yourself;

A good life for all within planetary boundaries | Nature Sustainability

Now there are ways for people in poverty to work their way out with some seed money from the rest of us. Work their way out, and create an area that is a resource for food for the rest of us.



Now PC will neither read the source article, nor will she bother to see how a vast badlands area in China is now a fertile area, producing food for themselves and others, and now leaving poverty. This lesson is now being applied in Africa and other places.

IPCC has been on record for almost a decade that global warming is a wealth redistribution scheme and has nothing to do with science

 

[PoliticalChic]

Communism, and that 'paradise' that it has always promised…

....here it comes again.



12.” If all people are to lead a good life within planetary boundaries, then our results suggest that provisioning systems must be fundamentally restructured to enable basic needs to be met at a much lower level of resource use.

How are you going to do that, fellows? Confiscation of wealth? Increased socialism? Destruction of democracy for those countries not willing to strip their walls bare? In so many words, all of the above:

Based on our findings, two broad strategies may help move nations closer to a safe and just space. The first is to focus on achieving ‘sufficiency’ in resource consumption…
[The elites will tell you how much you are entitled to....]


A focus on sufficiency would involve recognizing that over-consumption burdens societies with a variety of social and environmental problems, and moving beyond the pursuit of GDP growth to embrace new measures of progress.
[How many million did Stalin starve to death in pursuit of that new measure of progress???]

It could also involve the pursuit of ‘degrowth’ in wealthy nations and the shift towards alternative economic models such as a steady-state economy.

[...the shift towards alternative economic models ...Michael Moore tells CNN's Anderson Cooper that capitalism “is an evil system set up to benefit the few at the expense of the many…. "So, what system do you want?" Anderson Cooper asked Moore. "Well there's no system right now that exists. We're going to create that system.” Michael Moore: We're Going To Replace Capitalism As We Know It | RealClearPolitics]


We must also destroy the evil fossil fuel companies and redistribute, redistribute, redistribute!” STUDY in Nature: Global wealth redistribution, economic ‘degrowth’ needed to fight ‘global warming’



And if any disagree…or even question????


Over 100 million men, women and children have been slaughtered by these totalitarians in the last century.

 

[PoliticalChic]

13. The Bolsheviks behind the Global Warming Scam are planning on telling you how much of anything you can use:

“Remaining within the 2 °C climate change boundary is a particular challenge, requiring the majority of energy generation to be decarbonized by 2050. While the cost of wind and solar energy is falling dramatically, which could lead to a major shift in infrastructure the fossil fuel industry remains remarkably resilient, subsidized, and still capable of tipping us over the limit.



Moreover, improvements in resource efficiency are unlikely to be enough on their own, in part because more efficient technologies tend to lower costs, freeing up money that is inevitably spent on additional consumption (the so-called rebound effect). For this reason, improvements in social provisioning are also required, in particular to reduce income inequality and enhance social support.”
A good life for all within planetary boundaries | Nature Sustainability





Get that term…”social provisioning”?

Rationing……

And the commissars will decide how much of anything you deserve.



That’s what a vote for Democrats endorses.

 

[PoliticalChic]

How long has the Right been telling the simpletons that the Global Warming scam is really just one more iteration of communism???
Well…dang, turns out we’re just as correct as when we told you that Bill Clinton was a rapist, and Hussein Obama was a total failure.
And now we have the words right of Nature Magazine!!!!

And this….




14. “On the excellent webcast Uncommon Knowledge, Czech president Václav Klaus recently compared “two ideologies” that were “structurally very similar. They are against individual freedom. They are in favor of centralistic masterminding of our fates. They are both very similar in telling us what to do, how to live, how to behave, what to eat, how to travel, what we can do and what we cannot do.” The first of Klaus’s “two ideologies” was Communism—a system with which he was deeply familiar, having participated in the Velvet Revolution in 1989. The second was environmentalism. “
The Varieties of Liberal Enthusiasm





15. . It is no accident that April 22, Earth Day, is also the birth date of Vladimir Lenin, an acolyte of Karl Marx, the lunatic who invented communism as an alternative to capitalism. Earth Day is naked communism. To begin, it substitutes a worship of the Earth, Gaia, for the worship of God, creator of the universe and the instructor of moral behavior for mankind. The Earth does not demand a moral code of personal behavior. While America was established to ensure “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”, environmentalism exists to exert more and more control over our lives by limiting our choices, our liberty.
Warning Signs: The Naked Communism of Earth Day
Warning Signs: The Naked Communism of Earth Day

 

[edthecynic]

8. Sounds like this, doesn’t it:

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need (or needs) is a slogan that Karl Marx made popular in his writing Critique of the Gotha program, published in 1875.

So you attack Marx for being more Christian than you could ever hope to be.
Got it.

Acts 4:32 Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common.
4:34 There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold.
4:35 They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.
(New Revised Standard version)