Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Come on buddy can't you do better than this, now your making me feel sorry for you.Reposted for Posterity:
Socialism usually results in tyrannical rule. You and your buddies in the group where you dug up this story should be supportive of tyranny
Well, seeing the Marxist Democrats have been running black communities for the last 60 years, is it any wonder that it has resulted in Tyrannical Rule?
Your premise: Socialism results in Tyranny (true).
Fact: Democrats are Socialists (Marxists)...true.
According to your premise: Since Black Communities are ruled by Socialists, Black Communities are under Tyrannical rule (true). So why do you support Tyrannical Police States?
See, for the third time, you're exposed as an Obama Loyalist.
Can I make a suggestion? Perhaps if you go to the socialist website where your story originated they may offer a support group. Maybe after that you could return with a better effort at matching wits
Come on buddy can't you do better than this, now your making me feel sorry for you.Reposted for Posterity:
Socialism usually results in tyrannical rule. You and your buddies in the group where you dug up this story should be supportive of tyranny
Well, seeing the Marxist Democrats have been running black communities for the last 60 years, is it any wonder that it has resulted in Tyrannical Rule?
Your premise: Socialism results in Tyranny (true).
Fact: Democrats are Socialists (Marxists)...true.
According to your premise: Since Black Communities are ruled by Socialists, Black Communities are under Tyrannical rule (true). So why do you support Tyrannical Police States?
See, for the third time, you're exposed as an Obama Loyalist.
Can I make a suggestion? Perhaps if you go to the socialist website where your story originated they may offer a support group. Maybe after that you could return with a better effort at matching wits
MXdad , do you believe that Democrats are Marxists?
MXdad , do you believe that Marxists rule through tyrannical police states?
MXdad , do you agree that Democrats are currently running black cities?
MXdad , If you've said yes to all three, then shouldn't the blacks use their Second Amendment right to overthrow the Marxists that have imposed a Tyranny upon them?
Just because they were veterans doesn’t mean they were active duty or reserve. But I'll remember that when you start calling for dissent against the president.Correct me if I'm wrong, kids, but...Open letter urges "The police in Ferguson are violating the Constitution
Military Veterans Send Urgent Letter To National Guard In Ferguson Telling Them To Stand Down
There is no Rule of Law. If the Public Servants do not need to follow the Law, then why should their Masters (The People) ???
Between Obama the Usurper absorbing Congress's powers, all the way down to uniformed thugs executing shoplifters, there doesn't seem to be ANY confidence in government, nor should their be, that's not a Government, that's a Tyranny, nationalized tyranny (federal, state and local).
To our brothers and sisters in the Missouri National Guard:
We are writing to you as active-duty U.S. service members and veterans, most of us having served in the Iraq war.
You have a choice you can make right now.
The whole world is watching the Ferguson police with disgust. They killed an unarmed, college-bound Black youth in broad daylight, and subsequently responded to peaceful, constitutionally-protected protests with extreme violence and repression.
Countless constitutional and human rights violations by these police have been documented over the course of the Ferguson protests; from attacking and threatening journalists, to using tear gas against peaceful protesters, including children.
Now, Governor Nixon has again activated the National Guard to “support law enforcement.” But you don’t have to follow their orders—you can stand with the protesters instead.
Our true duty
When we signed up, we swore an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.
The police in Ferguson are violating that Constitution.
The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of the press.
These laws are, as we are taught our entire lives, our most cherished Constitutional rights—the whole basis for the “freedom” we are told makes us the greatest country on Earth.
It is undeniable that the Ferguson police has used extreme violence against peaceful protesters, suppressing the right of the people to free speech and the freedom to assemble. They have attacked crowds, with children in them, with rubber bullets, sound cannons and tear gas. People have been mass arrested for simply being at the protest. Image credit: Flickr.com
Freedom of the press has also been severely infringed upon by Ferguson police. Journalists have been arrested; photo evidence shows riot police firing tear gas directly at reporters and tearing down their camera equipment; Ferguson police have been caught on video threatening journalists with violence if they don’t leave, and declaring that they are not allowed in the protest area.
Mod edit to comply with copyright rules - please post a small to medium size portion of the article, not the entire thing.
With respect to Active Duty and currently enrolled Reserve and National Guard personnel who might have signed this...
Is not incitement to disobey the lawful orders of superior authority not a HUGE-ASS violation of the US Uniform Code of Military Justice?
Are not Active Duty and currently enrolled Reserve and National Guard personnel subject to the UCMJ?
Whoops...
Article 15, anybody?
General Court Martial, anybody?
Yikes !!!
Go back and re-read the original......Just because they were veterans doesn’t mean they were active duty or reserve. But I'll remember that when you start calling for dissent against the president.
Still don't have me mentioning any of the shit you're arguing about with me.We can start with this post that you Thanked/Agreed with:
Give me one fully armed Apache Helicopter, and I will end the protests.
The bird will be destroyed before it can deploy.
Your ignorance is a continual source of astonishment.
That you guys can't do what you want is not a statement of ignorance, only fact.
Sux to be you.
Give me one fully armed Apache Helicopter, and I will end the protests.
The bird will be destroyed before it can deploy.
Your ignorance is a continual source of astonishment.
That you guys can't do what you want is not a statement of ignorance, only fact.
Sux to be you.
That wasn't the argument idiot. You said an Apache Helicopter will be shot down before it's deployed, that just stupid. You attempt to change the subject when your stupidity shows, sucks to be you nit wit.
Give me one fully armed Apache Helicopter, and I will end the protests.
The bird will be destroyed before it can deploy.
Your ignorance is a continual source of astonishment.
That you guys can't do what you want is not a statement of ignorance, only fact.
Sux to be you.
That wasn't the argument idiot. You said an Apache Helicopter will be shot down before it's deployed, that just stupid. You attempt to change the subject when your stupidity shows, sucks to be you nit wit.
**shakes head**
That's not what he said, numbnuts.
A helicopter doesn't need to be in the air to be deployed.
de·ploy
verb\di-ˈplȯi\
: to organize and send out (people or things) to be used for a particular purpose
: to open up and spread out the parts of (something, such as a parachute)
