Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
of course the 9-11 report was gospel....and you weren't lied to about anything that took place after it either....
ah, so because they didn't interview YOUR guys, that invalidates itone question, did you actually watch the show on natgeo?you still have not produced a single clip diviot...and national geographic and their editing
and selectivity interviews with so called truthers is done as the support the bush/Cheney story a real scientific investigation of 9/11 is not going to be done by magazines like popular mechanics or national geographic....a independent team of scientist engineers and military personal with full disclosure of all evidence and subpoena power is required
yes or no?
yes and there was not a single interview with high ranking military experts that did not believe the official story or even a mention of their existence
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
ah, so because they didn't interview YOUR guys, that invalidates itone question, did you actually watch the show on natgeo?
yes or no?
yes and there was not a single interview with high ranking military experts that did not believe the official story or even a mention of their existence
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
except it didntah, so because they didn't interview YOUR guys, that invalidates ityes and there was not a single interview with high ranking military experts that did not believe the official story or even a mention of their existence
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
because it leaves out high ranking military experts..first responders..and the criticism of NIST REPORT...from the scientist involved and 9/11 commission members that information was not forthcomming from the government and this data was presented as gospel.. it is completly invalid
ah yeshow can anyone not see that mainstream media crafts an image to discredit questions surrounding 9/11 ...the controlled media repeats the connection to Rosie o'donnell endlessly but finds it completely un-news worthy to report on bowman or general Subline...because the don't want to connect questioning 9/11 with people of such credibility and desire to associate 9/11 truth with overweight lesbian comedians.. that the they intentional report as if the 9/11 commission report and NIST report are supported by those involved..but in reality this is not the case...they much prefer to create an image of people of no expertise..who believe in big foot and slander and threaten those that question
Watched this too. One thing is brutally obvious. The 'Truthers' are NOT interested in the truth. The one FACT in all of this is that what the truthers are after is some way to keep the hope of proving an inside job. The evidence of this is in their horribly flawed science. It was evident on the program just as it is evident with the truthers here; they can not even begin to be considered an objective group of people. They were shown evidence after piece of evidence substatiating the official story. Their responses to the Purdue University models and ERTC (I think that's right) experiments are telling, they were anything but open minded. Instead every piece of evidence became a squirming challenge to retain a glimmer that an inside job was plausible. It was hilarious watching the claims that 'SUPER" thermite was used even though they admit it's a substance they know absolutely nothing about.
It's funny that they call themselves truthers really. It's a name meant to make people think are be objective and scientific, when their approach is anything but. Any good scientist knows you don't work backwards, like the truthers are. You don't start out with a conclusion and hunt for the evidence that proves it. Guess what you'll probably find if you do things that way?
While this is long I won't waste time going back and forth over the actual evidence. It is oh so crystal clear that it is irrelevant to the truthers. The problem with finding the actual truth of 9/11 for these looney tunes is not government cover ups, or disregarding evidence. The road block is their fucked up heads. For a group of people to discuss and weigh evidence for the purpose of finding the truth one has to deal with open minded, rationale individuals. That type of mind does not exist among the truthers.
Hey fool,if the planes caused the towers to fall,then how come in these suppressed videos that the corporate controlled media NEVER shows when they talk about it on fox news and everywhere else,how come they never show the suppressed footage these videos show of black smoke rising from the street below with the sounds and sights of explosions going off way BEFORE the tower has even collapsed? again THESE videos here below show some SUPPRESSED videos the corporate controlled media wont show of explosions going off which backs uo witness testimonys.LOLwhat is britaly obvious is national geographic did not even mention patriots question 9/11 truth or pilot for 9/11 truth or the testimony of any first responder that did not fit their agenda
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
YouTube - 911 Molten Metal- Who do YOU trust FDNY or NIST
Can you honestly claim that YOU objectively weigh the evidence that doesn't fit YOUR agenda? Are you even capable of being honest enough to admit that you HAVE an agenda?
no one is going to waste nearly 90 hours of their time on stupidity you would supportWatched this too. One thing is brutally obvious. The 'Truthers' are NOT interested in the truth. The one FACT in all of this is that what the truthers are after is some way to keep the hope of proving an inside job. The evidence of this is in their horribly flawed science. It was evident on the program just as it is evident with the truthers here; they can not even begin to be considered an objective group of people. They were shown evidence after piece of evidence substatiating the official story. Their responses to the Purdue University models and ERTC (I think that's right) experiments are telling, they were anything but open minded. Instead every piece of evidence became a squirming challenge to retain a glimmer that an inside job was plausible. It was hilarious watching the claims that 'SUPER" thermite was used even though they admit it's a substance they know absolutely nothing about.
It's funny that they call themselves truthers really. It's a name meant to make people think are be objective and scientific, when their approach is anything but. Any good scientist knows you don't work backwards, like the truthers are. You don't start out with a conclusion and hunt for the evidence that proves it. Guess what you'll probably find if you do things that way?
While this is long I won't waste time going back and forth over the actual evidence. It is oh so crystal clear that it is irrelevant to the truthers. The problem with finding the actual truth of 9/11 for these looney tunes is not government cover ups, or disregarding evidence. The road block is their fucked up heads. For a group of people to discuss and weigh evidence for the purpose of finding the truth one has to deal with open minded, rationale individuals. That type of mind does not exist among the truthers.
yeah thats what you 9/11 apologists are NOT Interested in.the truth.If you were,you wouldnt avoid watching these 47 videos like you always do that prove beyond a doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.
How come national geographich omitted like all the corporate controlled media does,the witness testimonys of people who heard explosions in the BASEMENT 'BEFORE" the plane struck the tower above? you need to look in the mirror when calling people who have fucked up heads and loony tunes.
Canada 9/11 Truth - Videos
you might actually do some research for once in your life and actually WATCH these videos.
no one is going to waste nearly 90 hours of their time on stupidity you would supportWatched this too. One thing is brutally obvious. The 'Truthers' are NOT interested in the truth. The one FACT in all of this is that what the truthers are after is some way to keep the hope of proving an inside job. The evidence of this is in their horribly flawed science. It was evident on the program just as it is evident with the truthers here; they can not even begin to be considered an objective group of people. They were shown evidence after piece of evidence substatiating the official story. Their responses to the Purdue University models and ERTC (I think that's right) experiments are telling, they were anything but open minded. Instead every piece of evidence became a squirming challenge to retain a glimmer that an inside job was plausible. It was hilarious watching the claims that 'SUPER" thermite was used even though they admit it's a substance they know absolutely nothing about.
It's funny that they call themselves truthers really. It's a name meant to make people think are be objective and scientific, when their approach is anything but. Any good scientist knows you don't work backwards, like the truthers are. You don't start out with a conclusion and hunt for the evidence that proves it. Guess what you'll probably find if you do things that way?
While this is long I won't waste time going back and forth over the actual evidence. It is oh so crystal clear that it is irrelevant to the truthers. The problem with finding the actual truth of 9/11 for these looney tunes is not government cover ups, or disregarding evidence. The road block is their fucked up heads. For a group of people to discuss and weigh evidence for the purpose of finding the truth one has to deal with open minded, rationale individuals. That type of mind does not exist among the truthers.
yeah thats what you 9/11 apologists are NOT Interested in.the truth.If you were,you wouldnt avoid watching these 47 videos like you always do that prove beyond a doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.
How come national geographich omitted like all the corporate controlled media does,the witness testimonys of people who heard explosions in the BASEMENT 'BEFORE" the plane struck the tower above? you need to look in the mirror when calling people who have fucked up heads and loony tunes.
Canada 9/11 Truth - Videos
you might actually do some research for once in your life and actually WATCH these videos.
not just meno one is going to waste nearly 90 hours of their time on stupidity you would supportyeah thats what you 9/11 apologists are NOT Interested in.the truth.If you were,you wouldnt avoid watching these 47 videos like you always do that prove beyond a doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.
How come national geographich omitted like all the corporate controlled media does,the witness testimonys of people who heard explosions in the BASEMENT 'BEFORE" the plane struck the tower above? you need to look in the mirror when calling people who have fucked up heads and loony tunes.
Canada 9/11 Truth - Videos
you might actually do some research for once in your life and actually WATCH these videos.
no one.?.you must be referring to ...yourself
no one is going to waste nearly 90 hours of their time on stupidity you would supportyeah thats what you 9/11 apologists are NOT Interested in.the truth.If you were,you wouldnt avoid watching these 47 videos like you always do that prove beyond a doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.
How come national geographich omitted like all the corporate controlled media does,the witness testimonys of people who heard explosions in the BASEMENT 'BEFORE" the plane struck the tower above? you need to look in the mirror when calling people who have fucked up heads and loony tunes.
Canada 9/11 Truth - Videos
you might actually do some research for once in your life and actually WATCH these videos.
no one.?.you must be referring to ...yourself
Natonal Geographic used to be for lookin at the titties of african chicks.
What happened to the good old days?
Natonal Geographic used to be for lookin at the titties of african chicks.
What happened to the good old days?
dude!....that's gross!......those chicks need bras for those droopers.
EOTS will be heartbroken.
Heartbroken over what? the same proven B.S the government and the media keep sprouting off? I highly doubt so since their explanations are so laughable and so easy to prove it was an inside job.
Natonal Geographic used to be for lookin at the titties of african chicks.
What happened to the good old days?
dude!....that's gross!......those chicks need bras for those droopers.
NOT true!
59 - Women from the Mursi tribe on Flickr - Photo Sharing!
oh yeah....that's so hot.Natonal Geographic used to be for lookin at the titties of african chicks.
What happened to the good old days?
