National Geographic debunks 9/11 troofers

[DiveCon]

careful you bush dupe

Hey! Tham be fightin' words! Next you'll accuse me of believing people actually landed on the Moon. The horror!

You Bush dupes were just taken to school on how it was an inside job by Eots just like he always does.of course you frady cats only see what you WANT to see so of course you wont read his post.

i've read his posts enough to know he just copies and pastes the same bullshit over and over and still doesnt support your moronic bullshit

 

[Toro]

Hey! Tham be fightin' words! Next you'll accuse me of believing people actually landed on the Moon. The horror!

You Bush dupes were just taken to school on how it was an inside job by Eots just like he always does.of course you frady cats only see what you WANT to see so of course you wont read his post.

i've read his posts enough to know he just copies and pastes the same bullshit over and over and still doesnt support your moronic bullshit

Hush. Don't blaspheme their religion.

 

[Bern80]

Watched this too. One thing is brutally obvious. The 'Truthers' are NOT interested in the truth. The one FACT in all of this is that what the truthers are after is some way to keep the hope of proving an inside job. The evidence of this is in their horribly flawed science. It was evident on the program just as it is evident with the truthers here; they can not even begin to be considered an objective group of people. They were shown evidence after piece of evidence substatiating the official story. Their responses to the Purdue University models and ERTC (I think that's right) experiments are telling, they were anything but open minded. Instead every piece of evidence became a squirming challenge to retain a glimmer that an inside job was plausible. It was hilarious watching the claims that 'SUPER" thermite was used even though they admit it's a substance they know absolutely nothing about.

It's funny that they call themselves truthers really. It's a name meant to make people think are be objective and scientific, when their approach is anything but. Any good scientist knows you don't work backwards, like the truthers are. You don't start out with a conclusion and hunt for the evidence that proves it. Guess what you'll probably find if you do things that way?

While this is long I won't waste time going back and forth over the actual evidence. It is oh so crystal clear that it is irrelevant to the truthers. The problem with finding the actual truth of 9/11 for these looney tunes is not government cover ups, or disregarding evidence. The road block is their fucked up heads. For a group of people to discuss and weigh evidence for the purpose of finding the truth one has to deal with open minded, rationale individuals. That type of mind does not exist among the truthers.

 

[eots]

what is britaly obvious is national geographic did not even mention patriots question 9/11 truth or pilot for 9/11 truth or the testimony of any first responder that did not fit their agenda


Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTp77iDM_As]YouTube - 911 Molten Metal- Who do YOU trust FDNY or NIST[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

what is britaly obvious is national geographic did not even mention patriots question 9/11 truth or pilot for 9/11 truth or the testimony of any first responder that did not fit their agenda


Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report


YouTube - 911 Molten Metal- Who do YOU trust FDNY or NIST

then you didn't watch it
because they did

 

[eots]

bullshit..

 

[Bern80]

what is britaly obvious is national geographic did not even mention patriots question 9/11 truth or pilot for 9/11 truth or the testimony of any first responder that did not fit their agenda


Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report


YouTube - 911 Molten Metal- Who do YOU trust FDNY or NIST

Can you honestly claim that YOU objectively weigh the evidence that doesn't fit YOUR agenda? Are you even capable of being honest enough to admit that you HAVE an agenda?

 

[DiveCon]

bullshit..

nope, they directly responded to each group
including have people comment
of course your conspiracy nutters still didnt face the facts when the overwhelming proof was shown
typical for delusional people such as yourself

 

[JakeStarkey]

When did National Geo get taken over by the enemies of troof?

 

[eots]

bullshit..

nope, they directly responded to each group
including have people comment
of course your conspiracy nutters still didnt face the facts when the overwhelming proof was shown
typical for delusional people such as yourself

post a clip of them talking to anyone from NASA or or U.S General or of first responders that witnessed molten metal....

 

[DiveCon]

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

right here Eots

 

[eots]

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

right here Eots

no such interview exist at this link

 

[BasicGreatGuy]

The troofers are Reynolds employees and children of employees. There is no other explanation for all the tinfoil sales.

 

[eots]

The troofers are Reynolds employees and children of employees. There is no other explanation for all the tinfoil sales.

to a thinking person this site would bring that inane belief into question


Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

 

[DiveCon]

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

right here Eots

no such interview exist at this link

then you didn't watch it

 

[Bern80]

bullshit..

nope, they directly responded to each group
including have people comment
of course your conspiracy nutters still didnt face the facts when the overwhelming proof was shown
typical for delusional people such as yourself

post a clip of them talking to anyone from NASA or or U.S General or of first responders that witnessed molten metal....

This is an interesting one, because the truthers on the the national geographic program were actually using the evidence that there was NO molten metal to support the notion that burning jet fuel could not have caused the beams to fail.

 

[DiveCon]

nope, they directly responded to each group
including have people comment
of course your conspiracy nutters still didnt face the facts when the overwhelming proof was shown
typical for delusional people such as yourself

post a clip of them talking to anyone from NASA or or U.S General or of first responders that witnessed molten metal....

This is an interesting one, because the truthers on the the national geographic program were actually using the evidence that there was NO molten metal to support the notion that burning jet fuel could not have caused the beams to fail.

and then after the demonstration, where jet fuel was able to cause steel to lose its structual integrity they then complained that couldn't happen
it was funny as hell

 

[eots]

you still have not produced a single clip diviot...and national geographic and their editing
and selectivity interviews with so called truthers is done as the support the bush/Cheney story a real scientific investigation of 9/11 is not going to be done by magazines like popular mechanics or national geographic....a independent team of scientist engineers and military personal with full disclosure of all evidence and subpoena power is required

 

[DiveCon]

you still have not produced a single clip diviot...and national geographic and their editing
and selectivity interviews with so called truthers is done as the support the bush/Cheney story a real scientific investigation of 9/11 is not going to be done by magazines like popular mechanics or national geographic....a independent team of scientist engineers and military personal with full disclosure of all evidence and subpoena power is required

one question, did you actually watch the show on natgeo?
yes or no?

 

[eots]

you still have not produced a single clip diviot...and national geographic and their editing
and selectivity interviews with so called truthers is done as the support the bush/Cheney story a real scientific investigation of 9/11 is not going to be done by magazines like popular mechanics or national geographic....a independent team of scientist engineers and military personal with full disclosure of all evidence and subpoena power is required

one question, did you actually watch the show on natgeo?
yes or no?

yes and there was not a single interview with high ranking military experts that did not believe the official story or even a mention of their existence

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report