National Geographic debunks 9/11 troofers

[Ravi]

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

 

[jillian]

EOTS will be heartbroken.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

EOTS will be heartbroken.

No he won't, he has already said everyone is in on it except his merry little band.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

well its a must see for you then.your a conspiracy nut,you fall for the fairy tales of the 9/11 commission report about their conspiracy THEORY that Bin Laden and muslims were behind the attacks. I've seen enough already from looking at it that its just another propaganda piece with that same old line of proven B.S by the government that the planes brought the towers down,I've posted videos of suprressed footage the coroporate controlled media never airs that proves explosives brought the towers down but you Bush dupes only see what you WANT to see and never wacth the videos though of course. the only thing this National Geographic thing debunks is the official version that the planes brought down the towers.It debunks THAT all right.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

EOTS will be heartbroken.

Heartbroken over what? the same proven B.S the government and the media keep sprouting off? I highly doubt so since their explanations are so laughable and so easy to prove it was an inside job.

 

[Terral]

Hi Ravi:

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

Posting links is a LONG way from making a 911Truth case for ANYTHING. Everyone look at this Official Govt Evidence and tell us what you see:

My Flight 93 Topic:

I see an EMPTY HOLE. What say you? :0)

Okay sports fans: How many of you see the EMPTY HOLE (see the video clip) just like I do? Click "HERE" to see the US Geological Survey Photograph taken on April 20, 1994 showing the SAME EMPTY HOLE.

My Pentagon Topic:

This is the West Wedge Wall at the Pentagon where the Official Cover Story says a real 100-ton Jetliner crashed going 530 miles per hour.

Somebody please point out the location where the 100-ton Jetliner is hiding. These are only two of the top ten reasons that the USA is worthy of utter destruction (my Topic), because We The Sheeple are just that STUPID . . .

GL,

Terral

 

[Jay Canuck]

of course the 9-11 report was gospel....and you weren't lied to about anything that took place after it either....

 

[LA RAM FAN]

EOTS will be heartbroken.

Heartbroken over what? the same proven B.S the government and the media keep sprouting off? I highly doubt so since their explanations are so laughable and so easy to prove it was an inside job.

THIS here below is more truthful than the line of B.S Ravi is sprouting off.

Tonight on National Geographic: Rupert Murdoch presents his Orwellian propaganda: "9/11: Science and Conspiracy" plays twice on cable television. Will National Geographic report on the Bentham Physics Chemistry Journal study PROVING nanothermite was used, in abundance, to turn the Twin Towers into dust? Past National Geographic specials on 9/11 obey the enforced official myths put forth by NIST and the 9/11 Commission. Sadly, National Geographic has become a propaganda tool--abandoning its historic role as a trustworthy source of reporting on far away places and differing cultures. Trace the ownership of National Geographic and we find National Geographic is owned by News Corp--which is owned by Rupert Murdoch. I don't expect Rupert Murdoch's 90-minute piece to explain why BBC, CNN and FOXNEWS knew to announce that Building 7 had already collapsed--before it collapsed. I don't expect Murdoch's propaganda to deal with WTC7's symmetrical, freefall-rate controlled demolition, or to explain 'scientifically' why molten iron was found in the basements of all three buildings.


All assets of media conglomerates such as News Corp--which have conspired in the crimes of 9/11--should be seized for the public good and divested like the Big Bells were broken apart not so long ago. Rupert Murdoch should be tried and convicted using RICO statutes--along with thousands of others who are complicit in in the cover up.


Also, there's plenty of room in the FEMA camps for the likes of Rupert Murdoch and many others who have conspired, racketeering style, to commit and cover up the crimes of 9/11. The list of co-conspirators is long.






Will you submit to a mandatory flu vaccine should the President and World Health Organization require that we each take the vaccine?


There's always something new to learn ... "animal" influenzas that "jump" to humans are a way to get governments to destroy small farmers' flocks and bring in agribusiness to take over food production ...

Agribusiness and Animal Flu

The Rabbit Hole | 911 We Know (scroll down a couple of articles)

 

[DiveCon]

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

well its a must see for you then.your a conspiracy nut,you fall for the fairy tales of the 9/11 commission report about their conspiracy THEORY that Bin Laden and muslims were behind the attacks. I've seen enough already from looking at it that its just another propaganda piece with that same old line of proven B.S by the government that the planes brought the towers down,I've posted videos of suprressed footage the coroporate controlled media never airs that proves explosives brought the towers down but you Bush dupes only see what you WANT to see and never wacth the videos though of course. the only thing this National Geographic thing debunks is the official version that the planes brought down the towers.It debunks THAT all right.

hey numbskull, this has NOTHING to do with the 9/11 commission
LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

ah old DITZCON "the frady cat Bush dupe" who STILL thinks Oswald killed Kennedy joined in.

 

[DiveCon]

ah old DITZCON "the frady cat Bush dupe" who STILL thinks Oswald killed Kennedy joined in.

LOL
wow, you are so fucking stupid

 

[goldcatt]

ah old DITZCON "the frady cat Bush dupe" who STILL thinks Oswald killed Kennedy joined in.

LOL
wow, you are so fucking stupid

 

[DiveCon]

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

i saw this, DVR'd it last night
its a great show with tons of scientific facts
it also tests what the troofers claim and proves it to be total bunk

 

[DiveCon]

ah old DITZCON "the frady cat Bush dupe" who STILL thinks Oswald killed Kennedy joined in.

LOL
wow, you are so fucking stupid

careful you bush dupe

 

[goldcatt]

LOL
wow, you are so fucking stupid

careful you bush dupe

Hey! Tham be fightin' words! Next you'll accuse me of believing people actually landed on the Moon. The horror!

 

[DiveCon]

careful you bush dupe

hey! Tham be fightin' words! Next you'll accuse me of believing people actually landed on the moon. The horror!

lol

 

[eots]

A must see for the conspiracy nuts.

9/11: Science and Conspiracy | National Geographic Channel

National Geographic is now part of the conspiracy!

oh look nasa is part of the conspiracy lol lol llol yuk yuk



Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Before this appointment, he served as Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Award and the Presidential Meritorious Rank Award in the Senior Executive Service (1988). Selected presenter of the Wright Brothers Lectureship in Aeronautics, a distinguished speaking engagement sponsored by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) (1986). Included in "Who's Who in Science and Engineering" 1993 - 2000. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee of the Society of Automotive Engineers. Former Member, AIAA Committee on Society and Aerospace Technology. 37 year NASA career.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:


"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]." AE911Truth


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 750 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." Sign the Petition


oh look NORAD tac directors are part of the conspiracy... u.s fighter pilots and eyewitnesses military hall of fame generals ..lol yuk yuuk...ravi ...pfttt,,,what a dipstick


Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director. Decorated with the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal for bravery under fire and the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in Viet Nam. Also served in the Army Air Defense Command as Nike Missile Battery Control Officer for the Chicago-Milwaukee Defense Area. Founder and former CEO of Turbine Technology Services Corp., a turbine (jet engine) services and maintenance company (15 years). Former Senior Manager at General Electric Turbine (jet) Engine Division (15 years). Private pilot.

Statement to this website 3/23/07: "As a former General Electric Turbine engineering specialist and manager and then CEO of a turbine engineering company, I can guarantee that none of the high tech, high temperature alloy engines on any of the four planes that crashed on 9/11 would be completely destroyed, burned, shattered or melted in any crash or fire. Wrecked, yes, but not destroyed. Where are all of those engines, particularly at the Pentagon? If jet powered aircraft crashed on 9/11, those engines, plus wings and tail assembly, would be there.


Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force career. Member adjunct faculty, Political Science Department, James Madison University. Instructor, University of Maryland University College and American Public University System. Author of African Crisis Response Initiative: Past Present and Future (2000) and Expeditionary Air Operations in Africa: Challenges and Solutions (2001).
Contributor to 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out 8/23/06: Account of Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon employee and eyewitness to the events at the Pentagon on 9/11. "I believe the Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research. ...

It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...

There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile". ...

I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.

The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.

The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. ...

More information is certainly needed regarding the events of 9/11 and the events leading up to that terrible day."


Editor's note: For more information on the impact at the Pentagon, see General Stubblebine, Colonel Nelson, Commander Muga, Lt. Col. Latas, Major Rokke, Capt. Wittenberg, Capt. Davis, Barbara Honegger, April Gallop, Colonel Bunel, and Steve DeChiaro.


Member: Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven Association Statement: "We have found solid scientific grounds on which to question the interpretation put upon the events of September 11, 2001 by the Office of the President of the United States of America and subsequently propagated by the major media of western nations."


Bio: militaryweek.com


Additionally, in my experience as an officer in NORAD as a Tactical Director for the Chicago-Milwaukee Air Defense and as a current private pilot, there is no way that an aircraft on instrument flight plans (all commercial flights are IFR) would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control. No way! With very bad luck, perhaps one could slip by, but no there's no way all four of them could!

Finally, going over the hill and highway and crashing into the Pentagon right at the wall/ground interface is nearly impossible for even a small slow single engine airplane and no way for a 757. Maybe the best pilot in the world could accomplish that but not these unskilled "terrorists".

Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a "Conspiracy Theory" does not change the truth. It seems, "Something is rotten in the State."


Editor's note: For more information on the impact at the Pentagon, see General Stubblebine, Colonel Nelson, Commander Muga, Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski, Lt. Col. Latas, Major Rokke, Capt. Wittenberg, Barbara Honegger, April Gallop, Colonel Bunel, and Steve DeChiaro.


Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"The government conspiracy theory does not hold up to scrutiny. As a professional with over 30 years experience working with gas turbines (jet engines) and fuels - kerosene (jet fuel) does not burn in any open flame hot enough to effect steel - well under 1000 deg F. Also bogus are the explanations regarding why no planes were intercepted. SOP [Standard Operating Procedure] is they are always, always intercepted if they stray off course and/or turn off the transponder like these flights all did. No command decision needed. Has our government ever been untruthful to us?" AE911Truth


Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 - 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.

Member, Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.
Video interview 6/28/09:

General Stubblebine: I am Major General Albert Stubblebine. I am retired Army Major-General. In my last assignment -- my last command -- I was responsible for all of the Army's strategic intelligence forces around the world. I had responsibility for the Signals Intelligence, Photo Intelligence, Counter Intelligence, Human Intelligence. They all belonged to me, in my last assignment. …

I was supposed to find out what the enemy was doing, before the enemy did it so that we could take action against the enemy. That's Intelligence, OK, before the fact. So, we always -- always -- rely not on a single piece of data, before we make a statement, but on multiple and the more pieces of data that you have that correlate, the better you know exactly what is going on. …

So I have had a lot of experience looking at photographs. I have looked at many, many different kinds of photographs, from many, many different platforms on many, many different countries, around the world.

Interviewer: OK. So on September the 11th, in 2001, what hit the Pentagon?

General Stubblebine: I don't know exactly what hit it, but I do know, from the photographs that I have analyzed and looked at very, very carefully, it was not an airplane.

Interviewer: What made you believe that?

General Stubblebine: Well, for one thing, if you look at the hole that was made in the Pentagon, the nose penetrated far enough so that there should have been wing marks on the walls of the Pentagon. I have been unable to find those wing marks. So where were they? Did this vessel -- vehicle, or whatever it was -- have wings? Apparently not, because if it had had wings, they would have made marks on the side of the Pentagon.

One person counteracted my theory, and said, "Oh, you've got it all wrong. And the reason that it's wrong is that as the airplane came across, one wing tipped down and hit the ground and broke off." I said, "Fine, that's possible, one wing could have broken off." But if I understand airplanes correctly, most airplanes have two wings. I haven't met an airplane with only one wing. So where was the mark for the second wing? OK, one broke off -- there should have been a mark for the second wing. I could not find that in any of the photographs that I've analyzed. Now I've been very careful to not say what went in there. Why? Because you don't have that evidence. …

I did -- I've never believed that it was an airplane since I've looked at the photographs. Up until the time I looked at the photographs, I accepted what was being said. After I looked at it -- NO WAY! …

We pride ourselves with the "free press." I do not believe the "free press" is free any more. It's very expensive. It's very expensive. And the press is saying what they have been told to say about this.

Now, do I have proof of that? No. But I believe that what is being -- what certainly the -- the stories that were told -- all about 9/11 were false. I mean, you take a look at the buildings falling down. They didn't fall down because airplanes hit them. They fell down because of explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7, for God's sake. It didn't fall down to its side. It didn't fall to this direction or that direction; just like the two Towers. …

When you look at the temperatures that you can create with fuel in a gas tank or a fuel tank of an airplane, and then you investigate the amount of heat that would be required to melt -- to melt -- the superstructure of the buildings that came tumbling down, when you put all of that together, the one thing that shows; It does not match the facts. What is it they do not want the public to know? [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E]YouTube - General of all American Intelligence: 911 was a fraud![/ame]


Video documentary One Nation Under Siege 7/11/06: "One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?" One Nation Under Siege - A William Lewis Film


Editor's note: For more information on the impact at the Pentagon, see Colonel Nelson, Commander Muga, Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski, Lt. Col. Latas, Major Rokke, Capt. Wittenberg, Capt. Davis, Barbara Honegger, April Gallop, Colonel Bunel, and Steve DeChiaro.


Bio: Internet Archive: Wayback Machine






Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

 

[DiveCon]

except none of them are SPEAKING FOR NASA or NORAD

 

[goldcatt]

Hmmm...no wings....that can only mean....the flying saucer crashed when it came to take Rummy home. I guess aliens don't use OnStar.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

careful you bush dupe

Hey! Tham be fightin' words! Next you'll accuse me of believing people actually landed on the Moon. The horror!

You Bush dupes were just taken to school on how it was an inside job by Eots just like he always does.of course you frady cats only see what you WANT to see so of course you wont read his post.