Nancy Pelosi Ain’t The Good Samaritan

So you're saying that once Obama took the reigns in 2009 they couldn't do shit?

How the hell did they get the ACA passed and signed without one vote from the GOP?

you need to go and look up how they passed it what ever I tell you you well not understand it...
p.s. 173 republicans voted for it 243 dems voted for it thats how it got passed
in the house... 60 dem senators voted for it and 39 republicans said nay
how we got the 60th vote was al frankin was sworn in ... hehehehehehehe ... up until then they didn't have control of the congress... then kennedy died or did you accidently forget that one too !!!!

Poor **** boy.....NO Republican Voted for it ;)

He's thinking that the House version was what they put into law. The Senate version was the only one that saw the light of day, and not one Repug in the House voted for it. The vote was 219-212. Even some of the Democrats had a problem with the Senate version.
 
Last edited:
Apparently Typhoid Nancy believes that lying, and betraying the country’s sovereignty, makes her significant while anyone who tells the truth is insignificant. I think everybody knows what a foul creature Pelosi is. Now listen to Rep. Marino and decide for yourself who you want governing the country in Congress.


its people like you who have this delusional perseption of who Pelosi is we can't really take you for real
 
Apparently Typhoid Nancy believes that lying, and betraying the country’s sovereignty, makes her significant while anyone who tells the truth is insignificant. I think everybody knows what a foul creature Pelosi is. Now listen to Rep. Marino and decide for yourself who you want governing the country in Congress.


its people like you who have this delusional perseption of who Pelosi is we can't really take you for real

The perception is she's an idiot that relies on a radical left base to stay in office. She's corrupt, incompetent, greedy, and a liar. Not even a good one at that. Her lies are always obvious.
 
Last edited:
I hate to be a really wet blanket but....I don't think it's a matter of people falling for her act, or Obama's and it wont be people falling for Hillary's. I think the people who put her in office are well aware of what she is and don't care. I think the people who elected her and those like her do so out of partisan political ideology, and that she could do a porn film on the House floor and they wouldn't care. In other words she can be as rude, immature, irresponsible and/or wrong about everything as she pleases and they will still vote for her because they see it as "our side versus the enemy" and are probably even now (if they even follow this story) making up excuses for her behavior.

People will say that the right isn't any better, that people on the right support their politicians no matter what they do, but I call Bravo Sierra on that thinking. The right is a lot more willing to flog it's political leaders than the left has ever been, and the media pounces a lot more forcefully when the right does anything that can be made into something wrong. If the roles in this case had been reversed the story would have had Marino practically assaulting "poor" Nasty Pelousy.
 
Last edited:
Nope. I never said she implied it either. I said she said it without any implications.

Is English your second language?

is moron your second language??? it seem to fit you ...you repeated what she said out of context... you can't honestly say what she said that the congress didn't know about it ... where you have to agree that the media she was talking to in the interview didn't know what was in it totally... it hadn't been released to the public yet... you want us to believe that nobody knew what was in it ... you want us to beleive she was trying to pass something with out anyone knowing what was in it ... that is a lie... all of congress knew what was in it ... the media didn't ... thats where your statements falls by the waste side.... stop your lying

Dude, for someone who can't use capitals or punctuation worth a damn you sure have room to talk.

thats because I choose not to worry about shit as silly as capitals or punctuation .... here's what I know ... when a poster is caught lying or like in your case you are distorting what has been said, and you haven't a leg to stand on, all of a sudden its," you can't spoell" your grammar is wrong ...your capitals or punctuation is wrong ... and yet you couldn't dispute my facts as your sources as being out right lies ... when you are now caught out right lying, you use your shiny objects ploy ...
 
Apparently Typhoid Nancy believes that lying, and betraying the country’s sovereignty, makes her significant while anyone who tells the truth is insignificant. I think everybody knows what a foul creature Pelosi is. Now listen to Rep. Marino and decide for yourself who you want governing the country in Congress.


its people like you who have this delusional perseption of who Pelosi is we can't really take you for real

The perception is she's an idiot that relies on a radical left base to stay in office. She's corrupt, incompetent, greedy, and a liar. Not even a good one at that. Her lies are always obvious.

how she stays in office is real simple she keeps passing laws that her voters want ... unlike yiour hero john Boehner whose a chicken shit ... he can't even bring a bill to the floor without half of his party turning on him ...saying they will vote him out of the speaker ship ... Pelosi could care less if her party was against her ... If she felt a bill should come to the floor she will bring it ...where you and your republican party members are a bunch of chicken shits ... that's why you hate Pelosi ... she could care less what the right wants ...if the people want it she will do it ...

radical Idea's ... health care for all
funny how you think whats a radical Idea ... protecting the people from greed companies ... ob boy is that a radical Idea ...
 
Last edited:
I hate to be a really wet blanket but....I don't think it's a matter of people falling for her act, or Obama's and it wont be people falling for Hillary's. I think the people who put her in office are well aware of what she is and don't care. I think the people who elected her and those like her do so out of partisan political ideology, and that she could do a porn film on the House floor and they wouldn't care. In other words she can be as rude, immature, irresponsible and/or wrong about everything as she pleases and they will still vote for her because they see it as "our side versus the enemy" and are probably even now (if they even follow this story) making up excuses for her behavior.

People will say that the right isn't any better, that people on the right support their politicians no matter what they do, but I call Bravo Sierra on that thinking. The right is a lot more willing to flog it's political leaders than the left has ever been, and the media pounces a lot more forcefully when the right does anything that can be made into something wrong. If the roles in this case had been reversed the story would have had Marino practically assaulting "poor" Nasty Pelousy.

To Intolerant: Well said.

Judi McLeod over at Canada Free Press reminds us there is a touch of insanity in Nutso Nancy’s shaky personality:


. . . recent antics of their star performers Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid et al may indicate that they’re plain crazy too.

Barack Hussein Obama, who has recently taken up repeating “The Bear is Loose’ during his random, royal walkabouts in lunchtime D.C., must have been thinking of Nancy Pelosi, who came on like a screeching banshee, not once but twice chasing down Republican Representative Tom Marino of Pennsylvania through the House Chamber.

You can put that loose bear in a screech-proof muzzle and chains, Mr. Obama.

Despite the display of crazed behaviour, there’ll be no Act of Contrition offered by Pelosi, an abortion-boosting ‘Catholic’.

XXXXX


“Now, this isn’t the worst break in decorum, but Pelosi isn’t exactly at the height of mental stability as far as I can tell, and she wasn’t done yet.

“After Marino concluded his remarks and as many Republicans applauded their colleague, Pelosi crossed the chamber again in view of cameras, enraged, pointing and sticking her finger at Marino.”

Somewhere in the high pitch of her banshee screeches, Pelosi could be heard asserting to a largely uncaring world: “I was Speaker!”

XXXXX

Actor James Woods may not be in the minority in pondering whether Pelosi has a mental issue:

Woods: “Pelosi may actually be mentally ill. Her behaviour is becoming unhinged. This is no laughing matter.

Nor is it a laughing matter that Pelosi’s frail sanity seems to have already spread to a dementia-suspected Senator Harry Reid.

Evil and plain crazy not a healthy combination
By Judi McLeod August 5, 2014

Evil and plain crazy not a healthy combination
Dennis Miller’s observations are the best of all. Move the cursor to 7:55 for the Pelosi bit.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hate to be a really wet blanket but....I don't think it's a matter of people falling for her act, or Obama's and it wont be people falling for Hillary's. I think the people who put her in office are well aware of what she is and don't care. I think the people who elected her and those like her do so out of partisan political ideology, and that she could do a porn film on the House floor and they wouldn't care. In other words she can be as rude, immature, irresponsible and/or wrong about everything as she pleases and they will still vote for her because they see it as "our side versus the enemy" and are probably even now (if they even follow this story) making up excuses for her behavior.

(BR) it amazes me your choice of wording ... when I vote for a person if I can accept what a person is saying 70% of the time, I will vote for that person ... in your case you refer to it as falling for her act... or obama's act... or hillery act ... when doing what you want 70% of the time isn't falling for their act ... its doing what you want to happen ... in your case you call that partison politics ... just becasue it doesn't fit your view of what she or any liberals is doing...

People will say that the right isn't any better, that people on the right support their politicians no matter what they do, but I call Bravo Sierra on that thinking. The right is a lot more willing to flog it's political leaders than the left has ever been, and the media pounces a lot more forcefully when the right does anything that can be made into something wrong. If the roles in this case had been reversed the story would have had Marino practically assaulting "poor" Nasty Pelousy.

finally your second parragraph tell us how partison you really are .. you couldn't say one negative thing against anyone on the right... just poor nasty Pelousy ... pretty much says it all about you
 
I hate to be a really wet blanket but....I don't think it's a matter of people falling for her act, or Obama's and it wont be people falling for Hillary's. I think the people who put her in office are well aware of what she is and don't care. I think the people who elected her and those like her do so out of partisan political ideology, and that she could do a porn film on the House floor and they wouldn't care. In other words she can be as rude, immature, irresponsible and/or wrong about everything as she pleases and they will still vote for her because they see it as "our side versus the enemy" and are probably even now (if they even follow this story) making up excuses for her behavior.

People will say that the right isn't any better, that people on the right support their politicians no matter what they do, but I call Bravo Sierra on that thinking. The right is a lot more willing to flog it's political leaders than the left has ever been, and the media pounces a lot more forcefully when the right does anything that can be made into something wrong. If the roles in this case had been reversed the story would have had Marino practically assaulting "poor" Nasty Pelousy.

To Intolerant: Well said.

Judi McLeod over at Canada Free Press reminds us there is a touch of insanity in Nutso Nancy’s shaky personality:


. . . recent antics of their star performers Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid et al may indicate that they’re plain crazy too.

Barack Hussein Obama, who has recently taken up repeating “The Bear is Loose’ during his random, royal walkabouts in lunchtime D.C., must have been thinking of Nancy Pelosi, who came on like a screeching banshee, not once but twice chasing down Republican Representative Tom Marino of Pennsylvania through the House Chamber.

You can put that loose bear in a screech-proof muzzle and chains, Mr. Obama.

Despite the display of crazed behaviour, there’ll be no Act of Contrition offered by Pelosi, an abortion-boosting ‘Catholic’.

XXXXX


“Now, this isn’t the worst break in decorum, but Pelosi isn’t exactly at the height of mental stability as far as I can tell, and she wasn’t done yet.

“After Marino concluded his remarks and as many Republicans applauded their colleague, Pelosi crossed the chamber again in view of cameras, enraged, pointing and sticking her finger at Marino.”

Somewhere in the high pitch of her banshee screeches, Pelosi could be heard asserting to a largely uncaring world: “I was Speaker!”

XXXXX

Actor James Woods may not be in the minority in pondering whether Pelosi has a mental issue:

Woods: “Pelosi may actually be mentally ill. Her behaviour is becoming unhinged. This is no laughing matter.

Nor is it a laughing matter that Pelosi’s frail sanity seems to have already spread to a dementia-suspected Senator Harry Reid.

Evil and plain crazy not a healthy combination
By Judi McLeod August 5, 2014

Evil and plain crazy not a healthy combination
Dennis Miller’s observations are the best of all. Move the cursor to 7:55 for the Pelosi bit.

Dennis Miller is one of the worst commics out there to date ...thats why saturday night live kick him off ... nobody wanted to watch him... so now he suck people like you on the right to buy his tickets these days ... he can barely fill a 1000 seat theater ... Its just Like Ted nugent ... here in town he couldn't fill a 500 seat theater with his act .... barley sold 200 tickets ... I heard they canceled his show ... you loser sure pick losers for entertainment
 
I hate to be a really wet blanket but....I don't think it's a matter of people falling for her act, or Obama's and it wont be people falling for Hillary's. I think the people who put her in office are well aware of what she is and don't care. I think the people who elected her and those like her do so out of partisan political ideology, and that she could do a porn film on the House floor and they wouldn't care. In other words she can be as rude, immature, irresponsible and/or wrong about everything as she pleases and they will still vote for her because they see it as "our side versus the enemy" and are probably even now (if they even follow this story) making up excuses for her behavior.

People will say that the right isn't any better, that people on the right support their politicians no matter what they do, but I call Bravo Sierra on that thinking. The right is a lot more willing to flog it's political leaders than the left has ever been, and the media pounces a lot more forcefully when the right does anything that can be made into something wrong. If the roles in this case had been reversed the story would have had Marino practically assaulting "poor" Nasty Pelousy.

Or spitting on her........
 
is moron your second language??? it seem to fit you ...you repeated what she said out of context... you can't honestly say what she said that the congress didn't know about it ... where you have to agree that the media she was talking to in the interview didn't know what was in it totally... it hadn't been released to the public yet... you want us to believe that nobody knew what was in it ... you want us to beleive she was trying to pass something with out anyone knowing what was in it ... that is a lie... all of congress knew what was in it ... the media didn't ... thats where your statements falls by the waste side.... stop your lying

Dude, for someone who can't use capitals or punctuation worth a damn you sure have room to talk.

thats because I choose not to worry about shit as silly as capitals or punctuation .... here's what I know ... when a poster is caught lying or like in your case you are distorting what has been said, and you haven't a leg to stand on, all of a sudden its," you can't spoell" your grammar is wrong ...your capitals or punctuation is wrong ... and yet you couldn't dispute my facts as your sources as being out right lies ... when you are now caught out right lying, you use your shiny objects ploy ...

Well you actually ARE an illiterate Billy Boy....and perhaps a bit unbalanced just like Nancy.

She is spiraling off the deep end.
 
Instead of invoking the Good Samaritan, Nutso Nancy should have cited the rule she lives by: Charity begins at home.

The top Democrat in the House of Representatives steered more than a billion dollars in subsidies to a light rail project that benefitted a company run by a high-dollar Democratic donor and in which her husband is a major investor.

XXXXX

Pelosi has worked for more than a decade to steer taxpayer funds to a light rail project in San Francisco’s Mission Bay neighborhood, where Salesforce had planned a new campus. Experts say the project boosted the value of Mission Bay real estate.

The company’s CEO, Marc Benioff, is a high-dollar Democratic donor. Pelosi and her leadership PAC are among the recipients of his generous campaign contributions. Pelosi’s husband is also a major Salesforce investor.

XXXXX

In Salesforce’s case, Pelosi’s work appears to have financially benefitted not just a Democratic mega-donor, but also a company in which Pelosi’s direct family owns a large stake as well as valuable real estate holdings in her husband’s portfolio.

Pelosi Subsidies Benefit Husband’s Investment in Dem Mega-Donor’s Company
CEO donated to Pelosi, bundled for Obama, as Dem leader boosted his real estate holdings
BY: Lachlan Markay
August 15, 2014 12:00 pm

Pelosi Subsidies Benefit Husband?s Investment in Dem Mega-Donor?s Company | Washington Free Beacon
 
Forgive me on this one. When liars like Pelosi talk about caring for the children I tend to get a bit testy.

Every theology that succeeds in codifying the morality of one group over another is a violation of the First Amendment. Socialism does just that. It is beyond ludicrous when characters like Nancy Pelosi invoke a Supreme Deity religion in order to justify her Socialist beliefs:



Typhoid Nancy loves the children, yet there was a nary a word from her when Kermit Gosnell was butchering live infants. In fact, she and her fellow Democrats funded the murders with tax dollars. To this day she fights like hell to fund Planned Parenthood and the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of infants annually.

If you listened to Pelosi in the video you heard her tell the House what America is:


Instead of bringing legislation forward that could solve this problem really and truly, it has resisted the appeals of humanitarian and religious leaders across all faiths. Evangelicals call on us to strengthen our country's position to providing safety and refuge to the vulnerable. This legislation we have before us does not do that. It is wrong. don't take my word for it. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops urges members to oppose
5230, and work together to craft legislation that is more befitting the United States of America and the American people's history of compassion, and generosity to vulnerable children and refugees.



NOTE: Congresswoman Barbara Lee also tells us what America is. I am wondering if she got it from Pelosi? Neil Cavuto in this brief video could have been talking to Pelosi with his brilliant response to Lee:



Typhoid Nancy’s comments about America takes the prize coming from a UN-loving Communist who has been betraying this country since she first went to Congress:

. . . a career politician who decades ago sold out the United States of America to the United Nations.

XXXXX

.

Those who think Good Samaritan laws are necessary should get their sermons in the church of their choice. In that way they can VOLUNTARILY submit to any punishment their “spiritual leader” metes out. Do not force me to come along.

Basically, Socialists/Communists are using “you have a duty to help” as an engine to change the meaning of law itself. You can see more proof of the Socialist/Communist agenda in so-called hate crimes laws.

Incidentally, the most vile brutal criminals are not punished by Good Samaritan laws.

Dismiss all of my arguments and I still have Eric Hoffer. See the quotation following my signature. Dismiss all opposing arguments and there is nothing to support the government telling law-abiding Americans what they must do?

Trying to blend voluntary and involuntary charity does not standup to scrutiny any more than it works in blending Socialism and capitalism. Good Samaritan laws order involuntary behavior pure and simple. Every other interpretation amounts to verbal calisthenics.


Let me close with a brief clip from the final episode of the Jerry Seinfeld show which was actually titled The Good Samaritan? To me, that show used humor to promote coerced charity:[/B]


[ame=[MEDIA=youtube]zPnK0NCn_MQ[/MEDIA] Good Samaritan? - YouTube[/ame]​


You may get as 'testy' as you want or as testy as the moderators will allow; but at least do not lower your self to a politicians level by using the word "AINT".
 
You may get as 'testy' as you want or as testy as the moderators will allow; but at least do not lower your self to a politicians level by using the word "AINT".

To dadsgm: I didn’t. I used the word ain’t. My emphasis in the usage note:
ain't
Non-Standard.

1. Am not.

2. Used also as a contraction for are not, is not, has not, and have not.

Usage Note: The use of ain't as a contraction of am not, are not, is not, has not, and have not has a long history, but ain't has come to be regarded as a mark of illiteracy and has by now acquired such a stigma that it is beyond any possibility of rehabilitation. However, it is used by educated speakers, for example, when they want to strike a jocular or demotic note, as in fixed expressions like Say it ain't so or You ain't just whistling Dixie. The stigmatization of ain't leaves us with no happy alternative for use in first-person questions. The widely used aren't I?, though illogical, was found acceptable for use in speech by a majority of the Usage Panel in an earlier survey, but in writing there is no acceptable substitute for the admittedly stilted am I not?
 
She also lied about Tea Party patriots spitting on her.

To Bush 92: She lies about everything. I think this is her biggest lie:



[ame=[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=hV-05TLiiLU]Pelosi"]YouTube[/url] "We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It" - YouTube[/ame]​

She knew damn well what was in it. She did not want the American people to know before it passed; so she lied to give herself and Democrats cover. It was better to take the heat for a stupid remark than it was to have the bill fail.

Basically, she called Obamadon'tcare a stool sample.
 
Don't you just love it when politicians that scream bloody murder when someone wants Washington to follow God's Word also loudly and piously drape themselves in His authority when it suits them?
 

Forum List

Back
Top