CDZ Myth of the Racist Southern Strategy by Nixon in 1972

And they began voting Republican when they started talking about "state's rights"

The racist south wasn't--and isn't--a myth.

The Todd family gave up editorial control of Abraham Lincoln's papers around 1947 or so, and the new scholarship of the 1950's proved the Real Lincoln was not even remotely their 'friend', new books were written, the GOP imagery was lessened, and another factor was the invention of mechanical cotton pickers in the late 1940's leaving a lot of black people unemployed.

Republicans had long taken their votes for granted and offered them nothing, so they shifted to Democrats and independents, like George Wallace to name one, in the 1950's. JB already explained the shifts in northern black votes, via the Roosevelts dominating the Party. The rest after that is very easy to follow, except for those who refuse to read history and prefer ideological nonsense.

Nixon began trying to win them back almost the very day he was first inaugurated, reviving the defunct quota system over affirmative action, defeated just weeks before by Moynihan and others, and also began the 'War On Drugs' in black communities, at the behest of Charles Rangel and the Black Caucus. It was too late, as LBJ and Sam Rayburn had already beat them by the time of Rayburn's death in 1962 or so, via the Civil Rights Acts and other legislation.

And to this day yankees and neo-liberal vermin can't stand the fact that it took 'southerners' like LBJ to get it done, while their darlings the Kennedys and all the other northeastern Democrats never got squat done, hence the Camelot Myth and the incessant LBJ bashing spewing from academia and the northeastern pseudo-liberal establishment ever since. The South adapted much better to integration than the North did, another embarrassment heaped on yankees by those 'ignorant rednecks' down south as well. See the school busing wars in the north during 1970's and 80's that re-segregated northern schools to levels the South hadn't seen in decades. lol

Real history is messy, and almost everybody who attempts to try and use it to make ideological points is going to be disappointed and end up relying on selective cherry picking gibberish in trying to force it to conform to some trope or other.
 
So two leaders of the Republican National Committee have made national apologies over a myth? I bet they feel kinda stupid now.


They should.....they are typical establishment morons who feel compelled to bow down to the democrat party to repent against charges that are false.......Trump is showing them that you don't have to do that anymore...
 
So two leaders of the Republican National Committee have made national apologies over a myth? I bet they feel kinda stupid now.


They should.....they are typical establishment morons who feel compelled to bow down to the democrat party to repent against charges that are false.......Trump is showing them that you don't have to do that anymore...

Bolded for truth.
 
Johnson worked for 15 years, waiting for the right time to try and push it through; he was no idiot, very pragmatic about politics and knew almost within a single vote who would vote for or against any bill at any time. He was a master politician, better than most at beating the northeastern establishment at their own game; that's why he is so hated by them now and they obsess over peddling the Camelot Myth. The Johnson wing is also the wing that fought tooth and nail against turning Affirmative Action into a racist quota system. It's a measure of just how stupid the faux 'Left' was in bashing the Democratic Party and getting Nixon elected, thus shooting themselves in the foot, like the buffoons they were. They've only gotten much dumber and more insane since.
 
It's a measure of just how stupid the faux 'Left' was in bashing the Democratic Party and getting Nixon elected, thus shooting themselves in the foot, like the buffoons they were.

Why the use of past tense?
 
It's a measure of just how stupid the faux 'Left' was in bashing the Democratic Party and getting Nixon elected, thus shooting themselves in the foot, like the buffoons they were.

Why the use of past tense?

The modern ones are truly much dumber, so a distinction needs to be made; the older ones never left college or the education system, and proceeded to dumb down the rest of the country as 'academic' careerists.
 
It's a measure of just how stupid the faux 'Left' was in bashing the Democratic Party and getting Nixon elected, thus shooting themselves in the foot, like the buffoons they were.

Why the use of past tense?

The modern ones are truly much dumber, so a distinction needs to be made; the older ones never left college or the education system, and proceeded to dumb down the rest of the country as 'academic' careerists.

The fragmentation of the Democratic Party probably did get Nixon elected of course.

This is a neat thing though in an odd way. Think of it, people voting for their believes (even if it was for George Wallace) instead of voting for a "team", er political party.

Could you further explain the "faux left" part of your statement?
 
Could you further explain the "faux left" part of your statement?

The vast majority of them were middle class and wealthy kids, and anti-liberal in both rhetoric and social behaviors, and very class conscious snobs of the worst sort; not to be confused with the 'Hippy Movement', which was very apolitical and again very much a bourgeois fashion movement than a real leftist movement; not many poor and working class kids could afford the 'lifestyle' of either 'set', and of course the fashion went away and many went on to Wall Street, cocaine, and disco after it got boring and repetitive, moved on the the newest fashions and pop culture trends. A few of the 'hippies' are still around, though. Many of both 'sets' camped out in academia, and continue to peddle their sociopathic crap to the later generations, who seem to glorify them for some reason, I guess because of all the fake stories about how wonderful n stuff they all were 'back in da day' or something. The reality of course was very different and whole lot sleazier.
 
Could you further explain the "faux left" part of your statement?

The vast majority of them were middle class and wealthy kids, and anti-liberal in both rhetoric and social behaviors, and very class conscious snobs of the worst sort; not to be confused with the 'Hippy Movement', which was very apolitical and again very much a bourgeois fashion movement than a real leftist movement; not many poor and working class kids could afford the 'lifestyle' of either 'set', and of course the fashion went away and many went on to Wall Street, cocaine, and disco after it got boring and repetitive, moved on the the newest fashions and pop culture trends. A few of the 'hippies' are still around, though. Many of both 'sets' camped out in academia, and continue to peddle their sociopathic crap to the later generations, who seem to glorify them for some reason, I guess because of all the fake stories about how wonderful n stuff they all were 'back in da day' or something. The reality of course was very different and whole lot sleazier.

The faux left was essentially Marxist and anti classic liberalism.

Senator Patrick Moynahan would not recognize the left of our time as liberal at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top