Myth #1..... Israel is "Stolen Land"

A United Nations document from June 30, 1990 titled "The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem: 1917-1988, Part I 1917-1947," contained the following:

"In 1936, the Palestinian resistance to foreign rule and to foreign colonization broke out into a major rebellion that lasted virtually until the outbreak of the Second World War. Palestinian demands for independence drew impetus from the simultaneous nationalist agitations in Egypt and Syria which had forced Great Britain and France to open treaty negotiations with those two Arab countries neighboring Palestine.

What were the Arab Revolts of 1936 - 1939? - Israeli-Palestinian Conflict - ProCon.org

There was no civil war.


Sorry, you're a bogus hack and a liar.

"1947-1948 Civil War In Mandatory Palestine"
1948 Arab?Israeli War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From what I can find, the "civil war" thing is promoted by Israel. Since the acquisition of land is illegal in an offensive war, Israel has to bend the truth to make all wars "defensive." Of course Israel ALWAYS emphasizes that its wars are defensive.

The so called civil war was a war of aggression against Palestine.

You "find" whatever suits your bogus purpose. You are uninformed on the matter and, thus, must try to find.

Historian Benny Morris, theauthority on the '48 War, is the correct find, dopey.
In defiance of the will of the international community, as embodied in the UN General Assembly Resolution of November 29th, 1947 (No. 181), they [Arabs] launched hostilities against the Jewish community in Palestine in the hope of aborting the emergence of the Jewish state and perhaps destroying that community. But they lost; and one of the results was the displacement of 700,000 of them from their homes.

Israel has fought and won three major wars in its 61-year existence. The best-known today are the Six-day War of 1967 and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. The first war it fought as a nation was in 1948, today referred to by Israelis as the "War of Independence" and by Palestinian Arabs as "al-Nakba," the catastrophe. But perhaps the most important clashes in Israel's relatively brief history took place in the months preceding its declaration of statehood on May 14, 1948, when the Haganah, the predecessor of the Israel Defense Forces—aided in a minor way by the dissident groups, the IZL and the LHI—battled Arab militias in the towns and villages of Palestine and along the roads linking them. At the time, Great Britain, while nominally charged with maintaining order as it disengaged from the Palestinian territory it had ruled since 1917, focused mainly on withdrawing with minimal casualties and with its political prestige in the Middle East intact, and only occasionally intervened in the fighting.

At stake in this civil war was Israel's existence, and in the early months the Arabs appeared to be winning. By the end of March 1948, most of the Haganah's armored car fleet lay in ruins, and Jewish West Jerusalem, with 100,000 residents, was under siege. Had the run of successful Arab convoy ambushes continued, and had Jerusalem gone under, it seems certain that the armies of the Arab states that invaded the country seven weeks later would have aborted the tiny state before its birth.

"1947-'48 Civil War In Palestine"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_A...E2.80.931948_Civil_War_in_Mandatory_Palestine

You've been made a fool of.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, you're a bogus hack and a liar.

"1947-1948 Civil War In Mandatory Palestine"
1948 Arab?Israeli War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From what I can find, the "civil war" thing is promoted by Israel. Since the acquisition of land is illegal in an offensive war, Israel has to bend the truth to make all wars "defensive." Of course Israel ALWAYS emphasizes that its wars are defensive.

The so called civil war was a war of aggression against Palestine.

You "find" whatever suits your bogus purpose. You are uninformed on the matter and, thus, must try to find.

Historian Benny Morris, theauthority on the '48 War, is the correct find, dopey.
In defiance of the will of the international community, as embodied in the UN General Assembly Resolution of November 29th, 1947 (No. 181), they [Arabs] launched hostilities against the Jewish community in Palestine in the hope of aborting the emergence of the Jewish state and perhaps destroying that community. But they lost; and one of the results was the displacement of 700,000 of them from their homes.

Israel has fought and won three major wars in its 61-year existence. The best-known today are the Six-day War of 1967 and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. The first war it fought as a nation was in 1948, today referred to by Israelis as the "War of Independence" and by Palestinian Arabs as "al-Nakba," the catastrophe. But perhaps the most important clashes in Israel's relatively brief history took place in the months preceding its declaration of statehood on May 14, 1948, when the Haganah, the predecessor of the Israel Defense Forces—aided in a minor way by the dissident groups, the IZL and the LHI—battled Arab militias in the towns and villages of Palestine and along the roads linking them. At the time, Great Britain, while nominally charged with maintaining order as it disengaged from the Palestinian territory it had ruled since 1917, focused mainly on withdrawing with minimal casualties and with its political prestige in the Middle East intact, and only occasionally intervened in the fighting.

At stake in this civil war was Israel's existence, and in the early months the Arabs appeared to be winning. By the end of March 1948, most of the Haganah's armored car fleet lay in ruins, and Jewish West Jerusalem, with 100,000 residents, was under siege. Had the run of successful Arab convoy ambushes continued, and had Jerusalem gone under, it seems certain that the armies of the Arab states that invaded the country seven weeks later would have aborted the tiny state before its birth.

"1947-'48 Civil War In Palestine"
1948 Arab?Israeli War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You've been made a fool of.

Do you believe everything they tell you even if it makes no sense?

You have to look at it in context. The Zionist plan was to take over all of Palestine. The Palestinians knew about it. It was no secret. It was in the newspapers.

How was this to take place? The Palestinians were not going to just get on a bus and leave. Aggression by the Zionists was necessary. They needed a lot of people and the Palestinian Jews did not want a Jewish state. They saw it as generations of death and destruction. (It seems they were right by the way.) Part of implementing this plan was to import Jews from around the world by the boatload. The Palestinians knew this and attacked those foreigners.

They "convinced" the British (see the Balfour declaration) to create a homeland for the Jews. The resulting violence caused Britain to back out of that deal. The British did not create a homeland for the Jews. They promised the Palestinians an independent state and promised the Zionists a homeland for the Jews. They were getting shot at by both sides. They threw up their hands and gave the problem to the UN.

The UN passed Resolution 181, but the violence caused the US to back out and the plan was never implemented. The Palestinians did not want to give half of their country to foreigners. The UN did not partition Palestine.

After 181 was passed, the violence increased on both sides but it was not Palestinian V Palestinian i.e. a civil war. It was between the Palestinians and those foreigners who wanted to take over their country. The aggression was on the part of the invading foreigners. The Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, and Jews, were defending their homeland.

Zionist gangs went from city to village driving the native population out of their homes and off their land. They would have taken all of Palestine (their stated goal for the last 50 years) if they were not "attacked" by 5 Arab countries.
 
From what I can find, the "civil war" thing is promoted by Israel. Since the acquisition of land is illegal in an offensive war, Israel has to bend the truth to make all wars "defensive." Of course Israel ALWAYS emphasizes that its wars are defensive.

The so called civil war was a war of aggression against Palestine.

You "find" whatever suits your bogus purpose. You are uninformed on the matter and, thus, must try to find.

Historian Benny Morris, theauthority on the '48 War, is the correct find, dopey.


Israel has fought and won three major wars in its 61-year existence. The best-known today are the Six-day War of 1967 and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. The first war it fought as a nation was in 1948, today referred to by Israelis as the "War of Independence" and by Palestinian Arabs as "al-Nakba," the catastrophe. But perhaps the most important clashes in Israel's relatively brief history took place in the months preceding its declaration of statehood on May 14, 1948, when the Haganah, the predecessor of the Israel Defense Forces—aided in a minor way by the dissident groups, the IZL and the LHI—battled Arab militias in the towns and villages of Palestine and along the roads linking them. At the time, Great Britain, while nominally charged with maintaining order as it disengaged from the Palestinian territory it had ruled since 1917, focused mainly on withdrawing with minimal casualties and with its political prestige in the Middle East intact, and only occasionally intervened in the fighting.

At stake in this civil war was Israel's existence, and in the early months the Arabs appeared to be winning. By the end of March 1948, most of the Haganah's armored car fleet lay in ruins, and Jewish West Jerusalem, with 100,000 residents, was under siege. Had the run of successful Arab convoy ambushes continued, and had Jerusalem gone under, it seems certain that the armies of the Arab states that invaded the country seven weeks later would have aborted the tiny state before its birth.

"1947-'48 Civil War In Palestine"
1948 Arab?Israeli War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You've been made a fool of.

Do you believe everything they tell you even if it makes no sense?

You have to look at it in context. The Zionist plan was to take over all of Palestine. The Palestinians knew about it. It was no secret. It was in the newspapers.

How was this to take place? The Palestinians were not going to just get on a bus and leave. Aggression by the Zionists was necessary. They needed a lot of people and the Palestinian Jews did not want a Jewish state. They saw it as generations of death and destruction. (It seems they were right by the way.) Part of implementing this plan was to import Jews from around the world by the boatload. The Palestinians knew this and attacked those foreigners.

They "convinced" the British (see the Balfour declaration) to create a homeland for the Jews. The resulting violence caused Britain to back out of that deal. The British did not create a homeland for the Jews. They promised the Palestinians an independent state and promised the Zionists a homeland for the Jews. They were getting shot at by both sides. They threw up their hands and gave the problem to the UN.

The UN passed Resolution 181, but the violence caused the US to back out and the plan was never implemented. The Palestinians did not want to give half of their country to foreigners. The UN did not partition Palestine.

After 181 was passed, the violence increased on both sides but it was not Palestinian V Palestinian i.e. a civil war. It was between the Palestinians and those foreigners who wanted to take over their country. The aggression was on the part of the invading foreigners. The Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, and Jews, were defending their homeland.

Zionist gangs went from city to village driving the native population out of their homes and off their land. They would have taken all of Palestine (their stated goal for the last 50 years) if they were not "attacked" by 5 Arab countries.

I'm more than happy to continue to show everyone what an ignoramus and idiot you are.

Eminent Middle East historian and scholar Bernard Lewis...
On 29 November, 1947, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution approving the partition of mandatory Palestine into three components: a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international zone. As the Mandate came to an end, the Jews began to form their state; the Palestinian Arab leaders and the Arab governments rejected the partition resolution and went to war to prevent its implementation.

You simply are incapable of out-debating me.
 
You "find" whatever suits your bogus purpose. You are uninformed on the matter and, thus, must try to find.

Historian Benny Morris, theauthority on the '48 War, is the correct find, dopey.




"1947-'48 Civil War In Palestine"
1948 Arab?Israeli War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You've been made a fool of.

Do you believe everything they tell you even if it makes no sense?

You have to look at it in context. The Zionist plan was to take over all of Palestine. The Palestinians knew about it. It was no secret. It was in the newspapers.

How was this to take place? The Palestinians were not going to just get on a bus and leave. Aggression by the Zionists was necessary. They needed a lot of people and the Palestinian Jews did not want a Jewish state. They saw it as generations of death and destruction. (It seems they were right by the way.) Part of implementing this plan was to import Jews from around the world by the boatload. The Palestinians knew this and attacked those foreigners.

They "convinced" the British (see the Balfour declaration) to create a homeland for the Jews. The resulting violence caused Britain to back out of that deal. The British did not create a homeland for the Jews. They promised the Palestinians an independent state and promised the Zionists a homeland for the Jews. They were getting shot at by both sides. They threw up their hands and gave the problem to the UN.

The UN passed Resolution 181, but the violence caused the US to back out and the plan was never implemented. The Palestinians did not want to give half of their country to foreigners. The UN did not partition Palestine.

After 181 was passed, the violence increased on both sides but it was not Palestinian V Palestinian i.e. a civil war. It was between the Palestinians and those foreigners who wanted to take over their country. The aggression was on the part of the invading foreigners. The Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, and Jews, were defending their homeland.

Zionist gangs went from city to village driving the native population out of their homes and off their land. They would have taken all of Palestine (their stated goal for the last 50 years) if they were not "attacked" by 5 Arab countries.

I'm more than happy to continue to show everyone what an ignoramus and idiot you are.

Eminent Middle East historian and scholar Bernard Lewis...
On 29 November, 1947, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution approving the partition of mandatory Palestine into three components: a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international zone. As the Mandate came to an end, the Jews began to form their state; the Palestinian Arab leaders and the Arab governments rejected the partition resolution and went to war to prevent its implementation.

You simply are incapable of out-debating me.

"As the Mandate came to an end, the Jews began to form their state; the Palestinian Arab leaders and the Arab governments rejected the partition resolution and went to war to prevent its implementation."

To prevent the foreigners from taking over their country. A defensive move.
 
Last edited:
Do you believe everything they tell you even if it makes no sense?

You have to look at it in context. The Zionist plan was to take over all of Palestine. The Palestinians knew about it. It was no secret. It was in the newspapers.

How was this to take place? The Palestinians were not going to just get on a bus and leave. Aggression by the Zionists was necessary. They needed a lot of people and the Palestinian Jews did not want a Jewish state. They saw it as generations of death and destruction. (It seems they were right by the way.) Part of implementing this plan was to import Jews from around the world by the boatload. The Palestinians knew this and attacked those foreigners.

They "convinced" the British (see the Balfour declaration) to create a homeland for the Jews. The resulting violence caused Britain to back out of that deal. The British did not create a homeland for the Jews. They promised the Palestinians an independent state and promised the Zionists a homeland for the Jews. They were getting shot at by both sides. They threw up their hands and gave the problem to the UN.

The UN passed Resolution 181, but the violence caused the US to back out and the plan was never implemented. The Palestinians did not want to give half of their country to foreigners. The UN did not partition Palestine.

After 181 was passed, the violence increased on both sides but it was not Palestinian V Palestinian i.e. a civil war. It was between the Palestinians and those foreigners who wanted to take over their country. The aggression was on the part of the invading foreigners. The Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, and Jews, were defending their homeland.

Zionist gangs went from city to village driving the native population out of their homes and off their land. They would have taken all of Palestine (their stated goal for the last 50 years) if they were not "attacked" by 5 Arab countries.

I'm more than happy to continue to show everyone what an ignoramus and idiot you are.

Eminent Middle East historian and scholar Bernard Lewis...
On 29 November, 1947, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted a resolution approving the partition of mandatory Palestine into three components: a Jewish state, an Arab state, and an international zone. As the Mandate came to an end, the Jews began to form their state; the Palestinian Arab leaders and the Arab governments rejected the partition resolution and went to war to prevent its implementation.

You simply are incapable of out-debating me.

"As the Mandate came to an end, the Jews began to form their state; the Palestinian Arab leaders and the Arab governments rejected the partition resolution and went to war to prevent its implementation."

To prevent the foreigners from taking over their country. A defensive move.

Keep making afool of yourself.
There was no Palestinian country, shitbrain.

Middle Eastern historian Bernard Lewis...
Palestine was not a country and had no frontiers, only administrative boundaries; it was a group of provincial subdivisions, by no means always the same, within a larger entity. For a long time organized and articulate Arab political opinion was virtually unanimous on this point.

At first, the country of which Palestine was a part was felt to be Syria. In Ottoman times, that is, immediately before the coming of the British, Palestine had indeed been a part of a larger Syrian whole from which it was in no way distinguished whether by language, culture, education, administration, political allegiance, or any other significant respect. The dividing line between British-mandated Palestine and French-mandated Syria-Lebanon was an entirely new one and for the people of the area was wholly artificial. It was therefore natural that the nationalist leadership when it first appeared should think in Syrian terms and describe Palestine as southern Syria.

Everyone sees what an ignorant fool you are.
 
I'm more than happy to continue to show everyone what an ignoramus and idiot you are.

Eminent Middle East historian and scholar Bernard Lewis...


You simply are incapable of out-debating me.

"As the Mandate came to an end, the Jews began to form their state; the Palestinian Arab leaders and the Arab governments rejected the partition resolution and went to war to prevent its implementation."

To prevent the foreigners from taking over their country. A defensive move.

Keep making afool of yourself.
There was no Palestinian country, shitbrain.

Middle Eastern historian Bernard Lewis...
Palestine was not a country and had no frontiers, only administrative boundaries; it was a group of provincial subdivisions, by no means always the same, within a larger entity. For a long time organized and articulate Arab political opinion was virtually unanimous on this point.

At first, the country of which Palestine was a part was felt to be Syria. In Ottoman times, that is, immediately before the coming of the British, Palestine had indeed been a part of a larger Syrian whole from which it was in no way distinguished whether by language, culture, education, administration, political allegiance, or any other significant respect. The dividing line between British-mandated Palestine and French-mandated Syria-Lebanon was an entirely new one and for the people of the area was wholly artificial. It was therefore natural that the nationalist leadership when it first appeared should think in Syrian terms and describe Palestine as southern Syria.

Everyone sees what an ignorant fool you are.

There was no Israel either. What were the Zionists trying to defend?

What do I mean by foreigners?

There were 37 signers of the Israel declaration of independence.

Reviewing the above list, it can be seen that only one person was born in Palestine. Thirteen were born in Russia, twelve born in Poland, three born in Rumania, two born in Germany, one born in Latvia, one born in Lithuania, one born in Austria, one born in Hungary, one born in Denmark and one born in Yemen. Two were Semitic Sephardi Jews and 35 were non-Semitic Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar origin.

Further examination of the above list shows that two came to Palestine in 1906, two in 1907, one in 1909, three in 1913, one in 1914, two in 1919, one in 1920, two in 1921, one in 1923, two in 1924, four in 1925, one in 1926, one in 1930, one in 1931, one in 1932, two in 1933, two in 1934, two in 1935, two in 1938, two in 1940 and one in 1947.

The so-called provisional government of Israel which was formed in 1948 consisted of the following:

1. David Ben Gurion who came to Palestine in 1906; 2. Moshe Sharett who came to Palestine in 1906; 3. Eliezer Kaplan who came to Palestine in 1923; 4. David Remez who came to Palestine in 1913; 5. Golda Myerson who came to Palestine in 1921; 6. Zalman Shazar who came to Palestine in 1924; 7. Dr. Dov Joseph who came to Palestine in 1921; 8. Dr. P. F. Rosenbluth who came to Palestine in 1931 ; 9. Rabbi J. L. Fishman who came to Palestine in 19 13; 10. Rabbi I. M. Levin who came to Palestine in 1940; 11. Moshe Shapiro who came to Palestine in 1925; and, 12. Bechor Shitreet, who was born in Palestine.

Chapter 8: Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem
 
"As the Mandate came to an end, the Jews began to form their state; the Palestinian Arab leaders and the Arab governments rejected the partition resolution and went to war to prevent its implementation."

To prevent the foreigners from taking over their country. A defensive move.

Keep making afool of yourself.
There was no Palestinian country, shitbrain.

Middle Eastern historian Bernard Lewis...
Palestine was not a country and had no frontiers, only administrative boundaries; it was a group of provincial subdivisions, by no means always the same, within a larger entity. For a long time organized and articulate Arab political opinion was virtually unanimous on this point.

At first, the country of which Palestine was a part was felt to be Syria. In Ottoman times, that is, immediately before the coming of the British, Palestine had indeed been a part of a larger Syrian whole from which it was in no way distinguished whether by language, culture, education, administration, political allegiance, or any other significant respect. The dividing line between British-mandated Palestine and French-mandated Syria-Lebanon was an entirely new one and for the people of the area was wholly artificial. It was therefore natural that the nationalist leadership when it first appeared should think in Syrian terms and describe Palestine as southern Syria.

Everyone sees what an ignorant fool you are.

There was no Israel either. What were the Zionists trying to defend?

What do I mean by foreigners?

There were 37 signers of the Israel declaration of independence.

Reviewing the above list, it can be seen that only one person was born in Palestine. Thirteen were born in Russia, twelve born in Poland, three born in Rumania, two born in Germany, one born in Latvia, one born in Lithuania, one born in Austria, one born in Hungary, one born in Denmark and one born in Yemen. Two were Semitic Sephardi Jews and 35 were non-Semitic Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar origin.

Further examination of the above list shows that two came to Palestine in 1906, two in 1907, one in 1909, three in 1913, one in 1914, two in 1919, one in 1920, two in 1921, one in 1923, two in 1924, four in 1925, one in 1926, one in 1930, one in 1931, one in 1932, two in 1933, two in 1934, two in 1935, two in 1938, two in 1940 and one in 1947.

The so-called provisional government of Israel which was formed in 1948 consisted of the following:

1. David Ben Gurion who came to Palestine in 1906; 2. Moshe Sharett who came to Palestine in 1906; 3. Eliezer Kaplan who came to Palestine in 1923; 4. David Remez who came to Palestine in 1913; 5. Golda Myerson who came to Palestine in 1921; 6. Zalman Shazar who came to Palestine in 1924; 7. Dr. Dov Joseph who came to Palestine in 1921; 8. Dr. P. F. Rosenbluth who came to Palestine in 1931 ; 9. Rabbi J. L. Fishman who came to Palestine in 19 13; 10. Rabbi I. M. Levin who came to Palestine in 1940; 11. Moshe Shapiro who came to Palestine in 1925; and, 12. Bechor Shitreet, who was born in Palestine.

Chapter 8: Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem

You're babbling gibberish, now, fool. You said there was no '47 Civil War. I proved you wrong. Then, you said the Jews started the war. I proved you wrong, again. Then, you said Palestine was the country of the Palestinians. I proved you wrong, again.

I love beating the shit out of you.
 
Last edited:
Keep making afool of yourself.
There was no Palestinian country, shitbrain.

Middle Eastern historian Bernard Lewis...


Everyone sees what an ignorant fool you are.

There was no Israel either. What were the Zionists trying to defend?

What do I mean by foreigners?

There were 37 signers of the Israel declaration of independence.

Reviewing the above list, it can be seen that only one person was born in Palestine. Thirteen were born in Russia, twelve born in Poland, three born in Rumania, two born in Germany, one born in Latvia, one born in Lithuania, one born in Austria, one born in Hungary, one born in Denmark and one born in Yemen. Two were Semitic Sephardi Jews and 35 were non-Semitic Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar origin.

Further examination of the above list shows that two came to Palestine in 1906, two in 1907, one in 1909, three in 1913, one in 1914, two in 1919, one in 1920, two in 1921, one in 1923, two in 1924, four in 1925, one in 1926, one in 1930, one in 1931, one in 1932, two in 1933, two in 1934, two in 1935, two in 1938, two in 1940 and one in 1947.

The so-called provisional government of Israel which was formed in 1948 consisted of the following:

1. David Ben Gurion who came to Palestine in 1906; 2. Moshe Sharett who came to Palestine in 1906; 3. Eliezer Kaplan who came to Palestine in 1923; 4. David Remez who came to Palestine in 1913; 5. Golda Myerson who came to Palestine in 1921; 6. Zalman Shazar who came to Palestine in 1924; 7. Dr. Dov Joseph who came to Palestine in 1921; 8. Dr. P. F. Rosenbluth who came to Palestine in 1931 ; 9. Rabbi J. L. Fishman who came to Palestine in 19 13; 10. Rabbi I. M. Levin who came to Palestine in 1940; 11. Moshe Shapiro who came to Palestine in 1925; and, 12. Bechor Shitreet, who was born in Palestine.

Chapter 8: Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem

You're babbling gibberish, now, fool. You said there was no '47 Civil War. I proved you wrong. Then, you said the Jews started the war. I proved you wrong, again. I love beating the shit out of you.

Were my lists incorrect?
 
There was no Israel either. What were the Zionists trying to defend?

What do I mean by foreigners?

There were 37 signers of the Israel declaration of independence.

Reviewing the above list, it can be seen that only one person was born in Palestine. Thirteen were born in Russia, twelve born in Poland, three born in Rumania, two born in Germany, one born in Latvia, one born in Lithuania, one born in Austria, one born in Hungary, one born in Denmark and one born in Yemen. Two were Semitic Sephardi Jews and 35 were non-Semitic Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar origin.

Further examination of the above list shows that two came to Palestine in 1906, two in 1907, one in 1909, three in 1913, one in 1914, two in 1919, one in 1920, two in 1921, one in 1923, two in 1924, four in 1925, one in 1926, one in 1930, one in 1931, one in 1932, two in 1933, two in 1934, two in 1935, two in 1938, two in 1940 and one in 1947.

The so-called provisional government of Israel which was formed in 1948 consisted of the following:

1. David Ben Gurion who came to Palestine in 1906; 2. Moshe Sharett who came to Palestine in 1906; 3. Eliezer Kaplan who came to Palestine in 1923; 4. David Remez who came to Palestine in 1913; 5. Golda Myerson who came to Palestine in 1921; 6. Zalman Shazar who came to Palestine in 1924; 7. Dr. Dov Joseph who came to Palestine in 1921; 8. Dr. P. F. Rosenbluth who came to Palestine in 1931 ; 9. Rabbi J. L. Fishman who came to Palestine in 19 13; 10. Rabbi I. M. Levin who came to Palestine in 1940; 11. Moshe Shapiro who came to Palestine in 1925; and, 12. Bechor Shitreet, who was born in Palestine.

Chapter 8: Encyclopedia of the Palestine Problem

You're babbling gibberish, now, fool. You said there was no '47 Civil War. I proved you wrong. Then, you said the Jews started the war. I proved you wrong, again. I love beating the shit out of you.

Were my lists incorrect?

You're so fucking dazed and confused, even you don't know what the fuck you're posting, now. You're a nervous Nellie, desperately Googling whatever the fuck you can grasp on to, but, you look pathetic. Do yourself a favor and move on.
 
You're babbling gibberish, now, fool. You said there was no '47 Civil War. I proved you wrong. Then, you said the Jews started the war. I proved you wrong, again. I love beating the shit out of you.

Were my lists incorrect?

You're so fucking dazed and confused, even you don't know what the fuck you're posting, now. You're a nervous Nellie, desperately Googling whatever the fuck you can grasp on to, but, you look pathetic. Do yourself a favor and move on.

you're projecting again, cable guy.

:eusa_whistle:
 
You're babbling gibberish, now, fool. You said there was no '47 Civil War. I proved you wrong. Then, you said the Jews started the war. I proved you wrong, again. I love beating the shit out of you.

Were my lists incorrect?

You're so fucking dazed and confused, even you don't know what the fuck you're posting, now. You're a nervous Nellie, desperately Googling whatever the fuck you can grasp on to, but, you look pathetic. Do yourself a favor and move on.

IOW, you do not know the answer do you Mr. Scholar?
 
Were my lists incorrect?

You're so fucking dazed and confused, even you don't know what the fuck you're posting, now. You're a nervous Nellie, desperately Googling whatever the fuck you can grasp on to, but, you look pathetic. Do yourself a favor and move on.

IOW, you do not know the answer do you Mr. Scholar?

You have no self-respect, in addition to being completely uninformed about the Middle East, as I have shown.

You make it too easy, loser.
 
You're so fucking dazed and confused, even you don't know what the fuck you're posting, now. You're a nervous Nellie, desperately Googling whatever the fuck you can grasp on to, but, you look pathetic. Do yourself a favor and move on.

IOW, you do not know the answer do you Mr. Scholar?

You have no self-respect, in addition to being completely uninformed about the Middle East, as I have shown.

You make it too easy, loser.

OK, so you don't know.
 
OK, so you don't know.

Move on to another subject, dope, so I can kick your dumbass around the block further. You've run out of gas on this one, moron.

In your dreams!

Let me give you some much-needed advice: You are totally uninformed and mis-informed on Middle East affairs, as I have demonstrated. Instead of wasting your time posting inane statements in Internet chat rooms, do some serious scholarship. Otherwise, you'll continue to be made a fool of and a laughing stock by those, such as myself, who have the facts at their fingertips and who can demolish you like a ton of bricks.
 
Move on to another subject, dope, so I can kick your dumbass around the block further. You've run out of gas on this one, moron.

In your dreams!

Let me give you some much-needed advice: You are totally uninformed and mis-informed on Middle East affairs, as I have demonstrated. Instead of wasting your time posting inane statements in Internet chat rooms, do some serious scholarship. Otherwise, you'll continue to be made a fool of and a laughing stock by those, such as myself, who have the facts at their fingertips and who can demolish you like a ton of bricks.

Says the guy who ducks all the questions.
 
Do you believe everything they tell you even if it makes no sense?

You have to look at it in context. The Zionist plan was to take over all of Palestine. The Palestinians knew about it. It was no secret. It was in the newspapers.

How was this to take place? The Palestinians were not going to just get on a bus and leave. Aggression by the Zionists was necessary. They needed a lot of people and the Palestinian Jews did not want a Jewish state. They saw it as generations of death and destruction. (It seems they were right by the way.) Part of implementing this plan was to import Jews from around the world by the boatload. The Palestinians knew this and attacked those foreigners.

They "convinced" the British (see the Balfour declaration) to create a homeland for the Jews. The resulting violence caused Britain to back out of that deal. The British did not create a homeland for the Jews. They promised the Palestinians an independent state and promised the Zionists a homeland for the Jews. They were getting shot at by both sides. They threw up their hands and gave the problem to the UN.

The UN passed Resolution 181, but the violence caused the US to back out and the plan was never implemented. The Palestinians did not want to give half of their country to foreigners. The UN did not partition Palestine.

After 181 was passed, the violence increased on both sides but it was not Palestinian V Palestinian i.e. a civil war. It was between the Palestinians and those foreigners who wanted to take over their country. The aggression was on the part of the invading foreigners. The Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, and Jews, were defending their homeland.

Zionist gangs went from city to village driving the native population out of their homes and off their land. They would have taken all of Palestine (their stated goal for the last 50 years) if they were not "attacked" by 5 Arab countries.
And you pull this Laughable sh*t fom your hat- or the other end.

in 1948 The Arab states Invaded Israel to prevent the implementation of resolution 181 creating BOTH Israel AND Palestine.
Isreal accepted , arabs didn't.
Resolution 181 entailed not a single Arab having to move nor land change hands.
It was their war that created refugees.

Indeed from 1948-1967 when Arabs controlled the land in question, there was still NO 'Palestine' nor really even 'palestinians'. Just an Egypt run Gaza and and a Jordanian ANNEXED West Bank.

Had the Arabs not lost the 1967 war, there would still be no 'palestnians'.. as Arab countries never really bought the 'palestine' thing.
-
 
Last edited:
Do you believe everything they tell you even if it makes no sense?

You have to look at it in context. The Zionist plan was to take over all of Palestine. The Palestinians knew about it. It was no secret. It was in the newspapers.

How was this to take place? The Palestinians were not going to just get on a bus and leave. Aggression by the Zionists was necessary. They needed a lot of people and the Palestinian Jews did not want a Jewish state. They saw it as generations of death and destruction. (It seems they were right by the way.) Part of implementing this plan was to import Jews from around the world by the boatload. The Palestinians knew this and attacked those foreigners.

They "convinced" the British (see the Balfour declaration) to create a homeland for the Jews. The resulting violence caused Britain to back out of that deal. The British did not create a homeland for the Jews. They promised the Palestinians an independent state and promised the Zionists a homeland for the Jews. They were getting shot at by both sides. They threw up their hands and gave the problem to the UN.

The UN passed Resolution 181, but the violence caused the US to back out and the plan was never implemented. The Palestinians did not want to give half of their country to foreigners. The UN did not partition Palestine.

After 181 was passed, the violence increased on both sides but it was not Palestinian V Palestinian i.e. a civil war. It was between the Palestinians and those foreigners who wanted to take over their country. The aggression was on the part of the invading foreigners. The Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, and Jews, were defending their homeland.

Zionist gangs went from city to village driving the native population out of their homes and off their land. They would have taken all of Palestine (their stated goal for the last 50 years) if they were not "attacked" by 5 Arab countries.
And you pull this Laughable sh*t fom your hat- or the other end.

in 1948 The Arab states Invaded Israel to prevent the implementation of resolution 181 creating BOTH Israel AND Palestine.
Isreal accepted , arabs didn't.
Resolution 181 entailed not a single Arab having to move nor land change hands.
It was their war that created refugees.

Indeed from 1948-1967 when Arabs controlled the land in question, there was still NO 'Palestine' nor really even 'palestinians'. Just an Egypt run Gaza and and a Jordanian ANNEXED West Bank.

Had the Arabs not lost the 1967 war, there would still be no 'palestnians'.. as Arab countries never really bought the 'palestine' thing.
-

wow, Tinmore...when you get things wrong you sure like to go all the way....

First of all, you conveniently keep omitting the fact that the arab forces that began the attack, not israel (and it was 7 states, not five, plus the armies of the local population, the arab legion and the muslim brotherhood).

Second, the plan to bring jews from the diaspora was not only not a secret, but the whoke sense of the partition plan, as Israel was to be a home to all jews, including those left with nothing after the holocaust. the arab forces did not attack only these newcomers, but attcked every jew the could. And when you mention the balfour declaration, please don't forget that the british had ALREADY partitioned the land into a future arab and jewish states - it is not by chance the 70% of jordanian population today is palestinian.

Third, maybe, if after 181 was passed, arabs hadn't tried to drive the jews from their ancestral land (you can cry "foreigners" as long as you want. it won't make it true), maybe they would have a state to defend today. And again, you keep omitting the fact that the arab assault on israel was what prevented 181 from being discussed by the security council - not anything else.
 
Do you believe everything they tell you even if it makes no sense?

You have to look at it in context. The Zionist plan was to take over all of Palestine. The Palestinians knew about it. It was no secret. It was in the newspapers.

How was this to take place? The Palestinians were not going to just get on a bus and leave. Aggression by the Zionists was necessary. They needed a lot of people and the Palestinian Jews did not want a Jewish state. They saw it as generations of death and destruction. (It seems they were right by the way.) Part of implementing this plan was to import Jews from around the world by the boatload. The Palestinians knew this and attacked those foreigners.

They "convinced" the British (see the Balfour declaration) to create a homeland for the Jews. The resulting violence caused Britain to back out of that deal. The British did not create a homeland for the Jews. They promised the Palestinians an independent state and promised the Zionists a homeland for the Jews. They were getting shot at by both sides. They threw up their hands and gave the problem to the UN.

The UN passed Resolution 181, but the violence caused the US to back out and the plan was never implemented. The Palestinians did not want to give half of their country to foreigners. The UN did not partition Palestine.

After 181 was passed, the violence increased on both sides but it was not Palestinian V Palestinian i.e. a civil war. It was between the Palestinians and those foreigners who wanted to take over their country. The aggression was on the part of the invading foreigners. The Palestinians, Muslims, Christians, and Jews, were defending their homeland.

Zionist gangs went from city to village driving the native population out of their homes and off their land. They would have taken all of Palestine (their stated goal for the last 50 years) if they were not "attacked" by 5 Arab countries.
And you pull this Laughable sh*t fom your hat- or the other end.

in 1948 The Arab states Invaded Israel to prevent the implementation of resolution 181 creating BOTH Israel AND Palestine.
Isreal accepted , arabs didn't.
Resolution 181 entailed not a single Arab having to move nor land change hands.
It was their war that created refugees.

Indeed from 1948-1967 when Arabs controlled the land in question, there was still NO 'Palestine' nor really even 'palestinians'. Just an Egypt run Gaza and and a Jordanian ANNEXED West Bank.

Had the Arabs not lost the 1967 war, there would still be no 'palestnians'.. as Arab countries never really bought the 'palestine' thing.
-

If you research the points I have presented you will find that I am correct.
 

Forum List

Back
Top