Muslim Sues Oklahoma Over Anti-Shariah Ballot Measure

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by teapartysamurai, Nov 5, 2010.

  1. teapartysamurai
    Offline

    teapartysamurai Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2010
    Messages:
    18,916
    Thanks Received:
    2,282
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,889
    Now THIS is telling!

    If Muslims aren't for forcing sharia on the country, why would they object to a measure banning sharia?

    Muslim Sues Oklahoma Over Anti-Shariah Ballot Measure - FoxNews.com

    Two things I notice?

    The law banning sharia is "unnecessary?"

    Well then why worry about banning it?

    It would be like OK banning opening umbrellas during a zombie apocalypse.

    If you don't think there will ever BE a zombie apocalypse, why worry then about the law? It will never effect you, so let the electorate look silly voting for such a law.

    BUT, if you intend to FORCE sharia to be the law of the land, THAT is why you object.

    And he cites the first amendment as a reason to object to such a law?

    HOW is the first amendment served by FORCING a religious law on ANYONE?

    I mean if YOU choose to privately live by sharia (where it doesn't violate already known law, like I don't think we are going to let ANYONE stone someone to death), well goody for you!

    But sharia isn't about voluntary compliance. It's about FORCING people to live under the edicts of Islam.

    THAT is the only reason to object to such a law.

    CAIR reveals what they are really about with this law suit.

    And people thought OK was being silly putting this on the ballot.

    That CAIR objects reveals they weren't being silly.

    THIS is very telling.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2010
  2. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    you know what i notice?

    you're a fucking idiot
     
  3. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    I noticed that too.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,580
    Thanks Received:
    5,905
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,000
    Bury that head even deeper you fucking retard.
     
  5. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    kiss my hairy white ass you fucking bigot
     
  6. chanel
    Offline

    chanel Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    12,130
    Thanks Received:
    2,746
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    People's Republic of NJ
    Ratings:
    +2,749
    The CAIR people are professional litigators. It keeps them in business. In fact, I believe lawsuits are their business. If Sharia Law is instituted, they will have even more people to sue.

    The Religion of Perpetual Outrage.
     
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,580
    Thanks Received:
    5,905
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,000
    Better work on that conversion and learning Arabic my stupid friend.
     
  8. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    It's 'much ado about nothing'. OK voted on banning both International and Sharia law from it's courts decision making process. A Muslim representative of CAIR is challenging the law.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    better saddle soap your triceratops harness, my dimwitted acquaintance.
     
  10. Sunshine
    Offline

    Sunshine Trust the pie. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    19,377
    Thanks Received:
    3,036
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +3,045

    The problem with allowing someone to 'privately' live under Sharia law is that it would be illegal for, say, a Catholic or a Baptist to beat his wife, but a muslim would be legally beating his wife in 'private.' Our law is today makes it illegal for anyone to beat his wife.

    Allowing the practice of Sharia in private would give them the right to stone to death any woman ajudicated, in private of course, of adultery. Keep it private and you can stone one another to death under Sharia.

    Your logic is a little skewed.

    Believe it or not, the courts have gone around on this one before. If you don't believe it have a big camp meeting that involves the handling or snakes, or refuse to allow your sick child a blood transfusion for religious reasons. You will see how fast the courts will get involved with the 'private' pratice of your religion.
     
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2010

Share This Page