Now THIS is telling! If Muslims aren't for forcing sharia on the country, why would they object to a measure banning sharia? Muslim Sues Oklahoma Over Anti-Shariah Ballot Measure - FoxNews.com Two things I notice? The law banning sharia is "unnecessary?" Well then why worry about banning it? It would be like OK banning opening umbrellas during a zombie apocalypse. If you don't think there will ever BE a zombie apocalypse, why worry then about the law? It will never effect you, so let the electorate look silly voting for such a law. BUT, if you intend to FORCE sharia to be the law of the land, THAT is why you object. And he cites the first amendment as a reason to object to such a law? HOW is the first amendment served by FORCING a religious law on ANYONE? I mean if YOU choose to privately live by sharia (where it doesn't violate already known law, like I don't think we are going to let ANYONE stone someone to death), well goody for you! But sharia isn't about voluntary compliance. It's about FORCING people to live under the edicts of Islam. THAT is the only reason to object to such a law. CAIR reveals what they are really about with this law suit. And people thought OK was being silly putting this on the ballot. That CAIR objects reveals they weren't being silly. THIS is very telling.