Murdoch's Watergate?

Political Junky

Gold Member
May 27, 2009
25,793
3,990
280
Carl Bernstein: Is Phone-Hacking Scandal Murdoch's Watergate? - Newsweek

The hacking scandal currently shaking Rupert Murdoch’s empire will surprise only those who have willfully blinded themselves to that empire’s pernicious influence on journalism in the English-speaking world. Too many of us have winked in amusement at the salaciousness without considering the larger corruption of journalism and politics promulgated by Murdoch Culture on both sides of the Atlantic.
The facts of the case are astonishing in their scope. Thousands of private phone messages hacked, presumably by people affiliated with the Murdoch-owned News of the World newspaper, with the violated parties ranging from Prince William and actor Hugh Grant to murder victims and families of soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. The arrest of Andy Coulson, former press chief to Prime Minister David Cameron, for his role in the scandal during his tenure as the paper’s editor. The arrest (for the second time) of Clive Goodman, the paper’s former royals editor. The shocking July 7 announcement that the paper would cease publication three days later, putting hundreds of employees out of work. Murdoch’s bid to acquire full control of cable-news company BSkyB placed in jeopardy. Allegations of bribery, wiretapping, and other forms of lawbreaking—not to mention the charge that emails were deleted by the millions in order to thwart Scotland Yard’s investigation.
All of this surrounding a man and a media empire with no serious rivals for political influence in Britain—especially, but not exclusively, among the conservative Tories who currently run the country. Almost every prime minister since the Harold Wilson era of the 1960s and ’70s has paid obeisance to Murdoch and his unmatched power. When Murdoch threw his annual London summer party for the United Kingdom’s political, journalistic, and social elite at the Orangery in Kensington Gardens on June 16, Prime Minister Cameron and his wife, Sam, were there, as were Labour leader Ed Miliband and assorted other cabinet ministers.
<more>
 
Carl Bernstein: Is Phone-Hacking Scandal Murdoch's Watergate? - Newsweek

The hacking scandal currently shaking Rupert Murdoch’s empire will surprise only those who have willfully blinded themselves to that empire’s pernicious influence on journalism in the English-speaking world. Too many of us have winked in amusement at the salaciousness without considering the larger corruption of journalism and politics promulgated by Murdoch Culture on both sides of the Atlantic.
The facts of the case are astonishing in their scope. Thousands of private phone messages hacked, presumably by people affiliated with the Murdoch-owned News of the World newspaper, with the violated parties ranging from Prince William and actor Hugh Grant to murder victims and families of soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. The arrest of Andy Coulson, former press chief to Prime Minister David Cameron, for his role in the scandal during his tenure as the paper’s editor. The arrest (for the second time) of Clive Goodman, the paper’s former royals editor. The shocking July 7 announcement that the paper would cease publication three days later, putting hundreds of employees out of work. Murdoch’s bid to acquire full control of cable-news company BSkyB placed in jeopardy. Allegations of bribery, wiretapping, and other forms of lawbreaking—not to mention the charge that emails were deleted by the millions in order to thwart Scotland Yard’s investigation.
All of this surrounding a man and a media empire with no serious rivals for political influence in Britain—especially, but not exclusively, among the conservative Tories who currently run the country. Almost every prime minister since the Harold Wilson era of the 1960s and ’70s has paid obeisance to Murdoch and his unmatched power. When Murdoch threw his annual London summer party for the United Kingdom’s political, journalistic, and social elite at the Orangery in Kensington Gardens on June 16, Prime Minister Cameron and his wife, Sam, were there, as were Labour leader Ed Miliband and assorted other cabinet ministers.
<more>

Think they haven't been hacking American politicians, too? It'll be funny to see the scramble on the board when that finally comes out. :lol:
 
The right will just call it a made up hit job.

They love rupert.

Yeah...they REALLY love him.

They treat him VERY loving and gentle.

butt-kisser.jpg
 
Why is the number of angles covering this fantastic and bombastic scandal driving you RWers so crazy?

Aren't you in favor of the law?
 
So what dummy, who gives a rat?

Law is law.

I love to see the law being carried out in all Western Cultures.

Don't you?
 
OMFRIGGENGAWD...

How many more threads do we need on this idiot topic.:eusa_hand::eusa_hand:

Aren't the FIRST TWO ENOUGH for you libs to CREAM YOUR JEANS OVER?
 
It seems that the left still clings to the pipe dream of silencing FOX so that media sources will be back to "normal" liberal propaganda. Around Christmas 1996 Democrat Rep. James McDermott released illegally obtained tapes of a cell phone conversation between Speaker Gingrich and John Boehner and others to the NY Times and the Atlanta Journal.. You almost gotta laugh that McDermott was ranking democrat on the ethics committee at the time and wasn't charged with ethics violations for releasing illegally hacked tapes not to mention a crime. The hackers were given a slap on the wrist. ....So I ask you how the hell the hacking of a cell phone conversation in the UK which may or may not be a criminal violation rise to the level of Watergate? Only in the fevered minds of libs.
 
I have yet to see anyone who constantly accuses Fox News, (charging Murdoch, in many people's minds is saying the same thing about Fox News,) show a single matter wherein Fox has lied in their reporting on a matter. Such people are often shown to have lied in their very accusations, when the real facts are presented. (A very hate-filled, not-too-well-spun-lie-filled anti-Fox website gets tax exempt status, by the way. Media Matters.)

Fox has been shown in studies and polls to be more fair and balanced in its handling of most matters than what's referred to as "Main Stream Media." The media that, in those studies and polls, has proved to be seen as in the can for the liberal side of everything.

As far as opinion goes, that's not the same as news reporting. Fox definitely dangles to the right where their highly rated opinionators are concerned. And, for some reason, they still have higher ratings than all other media.

It seems most critics blur the important distinction.

There is a site called Media Research that shows the facts, citing critics and the lies they're going so far as to use tax payer dollars to spread. Liberals will only see far right rhetoric there, since the facts tend to obfuscate reality in their heads as they still go on and on and on as if opinion equals real news reporting.

Truth be told, without varying opinions, the world would be a very dull place. But when one opinion is intertwined inside what is supposedly "news," the public can be fooled enough to make grievous mistakes when it comes to so many matters. It's not necessary that everyone agree with both sides. But it would sure be nice if some folks could at least allow the opponents a voice, and a level playing field, without a bunch of mud throwing.

I know that some reporters who worked in one of the many businesses Murdoch has a hand in did despicable and illegal things. For the longest time even the law seemed to let it slide. I suppose the fact that they got seen doing it to some dead child made all the difference to the torch and pitchfork Murdoch haters that brought about the big interest, now. Some folks use children for all manner of agenda. Usually, it's just to take money from those who've earned it, so they can buy the votes of the folks who don't bother to earn anything. This time it seems they're using it to attack Fox News by its mere association with Murdoch.

I wonder why those folks never seem to speak up about all that George Soros has his proved-dirty hands in. Surely his associates are as guilty as he is for attempting to topple more governments.

I'll await a jury verdict on Murdoch's connection to this. As someone who appreciates clean air, I'd rather not stand by with a smoking lit torch while the facts have yet to come in.

T.
 
I must have missed where anyone elected Rupert Murdoch to political office.

What does that have to do with anything? :doubt:

In order to have a Watergate, IE a scandal that drives one from political office, one would have to have a political office wouldn't they?

In terms of the fallout and damage to the man in charge.

Stop being so willfully obtuse.

You people are really showing your colors.
 
What does that have to do with anything? :doubt:

In order to have a Watergate, IE a scandal that drives one from political office, one would have to have a political office wouldn't they?

In terms of the fallout and damage to the man in charge.

Stop being so willfully obtuse.

You people are really showing your colors.

Not being obtuse at all. I just disagree that a personal scandal is the equivalant to a political scandal that drives a sitting President from office when the person involved is a not a public official.
 
In order to have a Watergate, IE a scandal that drives one from political office, one would have to have a political office wouldn't they?

In terms of the fallout and damage to the man in charge.

Stop being so willfully obtuse.

You people are really showing your colors.

Not being obtuse at all. I just disagree that a personal scandal is the equivalant to a political scandal that drives a sitting President from office when the person involved is a not a public official.

Where did someone state or portray it as a political scandal?

Can you pin-point the post/posts?
 

Forum List

Back
Top