Murder By Multiculturalists

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
He's been described as the "Buddhist Bin Laden," but Ashin Wirathu thinks he has more in common with the world's most famous fictional spy.​

Put a derby on Wirathu and he is more like Oddjob than he is James Bond:

images

650x366

Joking aside, Oddjob is only doing to Muslims what they do to everybody else; convert, flee, or be killed.

Wirathu, 46, might bear as much responsibility as any individual for the desperate exodus of Muslims from Myanmar aboard overcrowded fishing boats bound for Thailand and Malaysia.​

I have to wonder if Wirathu knows he is fighting an insidious enemy more deadly than Islam —— multiculturalism —— Socialism’s curse on the world. Oddjob might not know it yet, but he is fighting a global government concept.

Murder done by multiculturalists


We Are All Multiculturalists Now
Nathan Glazer

We Are All Multiculturalists Now Nathan Glazer Harvard University Press

During Clinton’s Balkan Adventures, he ordered the murder of Christians because they were driving Muslims out. Christians were not engaging in genocide as the Clinton lies said. Clinton’s killing was about forcing Christians and Muslims to live together.

NOTE: Joe Biden originally took “credit” for Clinton’s policy in the Balkans. He later retracted his claim.

Clinton & Company were pure evil when they were in the White House, and they are pure evil today. They always knew that Muslims benefit the most from multiculturalism, yet they advocate every one of multiculturalism’s evils. They have to know that Muslims will kill everybody and everything. In short: Multiculturalism is an invitation to jihadists through open-borders yet the Clintons continue to support current immigration policies as does Taqiyya the Liar.

Recruiting tool

Multiculturalism recruits Muslim combatants more than does any other policy. They see infiltrating through multiculturalism as a strategy for total victory. To hear the stuff Democrats spread around it is cruelty like waterboarding, detaining enemy soldiers in Gitmo, and so on, that gives Islam its most successful recruiting tools. Presumably, to Democrats mass executions are acts of kindness not recruiting tools.

Ever time a few Muslims pay the price for their cruelty, the Democrat spin machine crank out the garbage —— That is Islam’s best recruiting toll.

NOTE: Global government religious freaks in our government deserve the blame for spreading multiculturalism worldwide. Abolishing national borders is essential to spreading the gospel of multiculturalism.

My solution. Give Muslims a year or two to pack their balloons and migrate to a Muslim country. Stay and receive the same treatment Muslims dole out to non-Muslims. Once gone, they can then concentrate on killing their own kind. That is not a bad idea when you see Muslims killing more Muslims in the Middle East than they kill non-Muslims.

Here’s the link to events in Burma that is not getting the media coverage it deserves. Media decision-makers are deathly afraid the public will see Burma’s Buddhists fighting back as a positive turn of events for a change:


Monk dubbed 'Buddhist Bin Laden' targets Myanmar's persecuted Muslims
By Shashank Bengali
May 24, 2015, 7:00 AM

Monk dubbed apos Buddhist Bin Laden apos targets Myanmar apos s persecuted Muslims - LA Times
 

My solution. Give Muslims a year or two to pack their balloons and migrate to a Muslim country. Stay and receive the same treatment Muslims dole out to non-Muslims.


Stay where "and receive"...blah, blah, blah?
 
NOTE: Global government religious freaks in our government deserve the blame for spreading multiculturalism worldwide. Abolishing national borders is essential to spreading the gospel of multiculturalism.



John Bolton’s views on foreign policy is usually right on the money. In this exchange between Bolton and Chris Wallace they are not talking about abolishing national borders in the same sense the global government crowd mean it:

WALLACE: You have laid out some controversial ideas about what to do. One of the things you say is that the state, these are your words, the state of Iraq has ceased to exist. You also say that we need a sizable increase in U.S. troops on the ground in Iraq -- not a reinvasion. But you make it clear more than just an injection of some special forces. So explain. What is your plan for victory?

BOLTON: I think that Turkey and the Arab states nearby have a huge stake in working with us to destroy ISIS before it really consolidates its control over the territory it holds, rips up the post-World War I map of the Middle East, and creates a new state, which is its objective.​

The New World Order sees the world operating like our 50 states with the United Nations governing like an omnipotent federal government without a Constitution protecting States’ Rights. Basically, each state retains a meaningless border in that anybody can go to any state without breaking a law, showing a passport, etc. Basically, the debate about protecting our national borders is really about eliminating the need for immigration laws.

NOTE: Anybody that advocates a fence is conning the troops. A fence, if possible, does nothing to enforce immigration laws.

In this next exchange Bolton is only partially correct. Taqiyya the Liar’s “ideology” does not include winning the war:


WALLACE: So, I mean, if we are losing, and you see what happened in Ramadi, in Palmyra, and the border crossing, the last border crossing that ISIS didn't control, what is it that they're not seeing? And how do you explain their not seeing it?

BOLTON: I think they're blinded by their own ideology. I think they see this as something that would inevitably lead to more American involvement and they don't want to do it. And they just simply will not acknowledge that ISIS is a threat, not simply in the region, although it certainly is to the oil-producing monarchies of the Arabian Peninsula, but with thousands of American citizens, citizens of European countries, joining ISIS in Iraq and Syria, that poses a direct terrorist threat in the very near future right here in America.​

Multiculturalists do not want to defend borders of any kind. Defeating an ideology that opposes multiculturalism is the last thing the United Nations wants. And that is assuming the US military is committed to fighting for a worldwide multiculturalism ideology.

ISIS winning the war means drawing the boundaries for their nation. That’s why I love ISIS running Taqiyya’s balls through the wringer. If he wins the war he gets stuck with protecting every existing national border in the Middle East. A policy he finds so offensive he chokes on the very thought.

NOTE: If the US does not protect national borders, Communist China will do it after it draws them.

Incidentally, the genocide Muslim Turks committed on Christian Armenians was the first bloody attempt at separating a group was achieved with extreme measures. Less than 50 years after Turkey’s genocide, India’s Partition separated millions because different groups simply could not, or want to, live together.

My point. Opposing multiculturalism is hardly new, nor has the final separation been a failure. Not completing the separation peacefully is the failure. Indeed, forced multiculturalism is the bigger failure.

One final observation. In a brief time period, India moved millions of people with partitions. Do a minimum of research if you are interested in the details.

The US does not have to partition territory to accomplish separation before immigration laws can be enforced. Sending millions of illegal aliens back to their homelands should be a helluva lot easier than India had with partitions.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top