Muhammad Cartoons: Global Lynch Mob Attacks Free Speech

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Stephanie, Feb 4, 2006.

  1. Stephanie
    Offline

    Stephanie Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2004
    Messages:
    70,236
    Thanks Received:
    10,817
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +27,359
    by Mac Johnson
    Posted Feb 03, 2006

    If anyone in the United States questions the propriety of the federal government funding gay snuff films for distribution to schoolchildren, America’s entire mainstream media is there immediately, screaming like scalded monkeys about the end of “freedom of speech.” Why, think of the chilling effect such defunding could have on the whole snuff film industry. And from there it is a steep slippery slope to Orwell’s 1984 and then … death camps for everybody.

    “I may not agree with what you say,” they often misquote Voltaire, “but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” But when a real threat to our freedom to say what we believe without fear of prosecution or persecution comes from anyone other than the old familiar bogeymen of the left’s world, the mainstream media often has precious little to say.

    The growing global lynch mob calling for reprisal against the entire nation of Denmark for daring to let its newspapers publish whatever they want -- even about religion -- is just such a case. The Jyllands-Posten newspaper of Denmark published a group of cartoons solely to demonstrate a point about the increasing threat posed to free societies by the fear of Muslim violence.

    An author of a book on the Muslim prophet Muhammad complained that he could find no artist willing to illustrate his book, because they all feared they would be targeted for assassination by religious fanatics if the book was deemed “offensive to Islam.” When authors are afraid to write and artists are afraid to illustrate books on important topics, we are no longer a free society. Thus, the Jyllands-Posten opened its pages to local artists to send in their illustrations of Muhammad. “We will not be intimidated” was the clear message they wished to send.

    For this principled defense of freedom of speech, the artists and staff of the Jyllands-Posten began receiving death threats. Apparently, the artists that refused to illustrate the book because they believed that Islam produces more than its share of intolerant thugs were not merely drawing upon a caricature. But the situation has since rapidly devolved into caricature and self-parody.

    The governments of Muslim nations began demanding that the democratic government of Denmark punish the independent newspaper for daring to print “blasphemy” against Islam. When the Prime Minister of Denmark, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, explained to them that (unlike in their countries) the government can’t tell people what to say in Denmark, Saudi Arabia recalled its ambassador. Libya closed its embassy. Egypt refused to repay loans from Denmark. Riots broke out in the Gaza strip, where Islamic Jihad burned Danish flags and threatened to begin kidnapping and killing Danes wherever they could find them. A Pakistani group offered cash rewards for the heads of the artists -- and keep in mind that “for the heads” is not just an expression in some places.

    After every terror attack, we are reminded by spokesmen from these same Muslim nations that we must not judge all Muslims just by the action of a few thousand, or even tens of thousands, of radicals that enjoy the support of a majority of the population in many countries. True.

    But because of the free speech of one newspaper, the governments of many Muslim nations are encouraging a boycott of every company in Denmark. No butter cookies for you, Fatima! Several firms with formerly large subsidiaries in the Middle East have been put out of business in the region, and in several cases their employees have been attacked. This would be as silly as disliking the actions of the United States and deciding to burn down a Kentucky Fried Chicken and kill all its employees. Oh wait, that actually happened in Pakistan.

    Back in Denmark, the artists have gone into hiding and the Jyllands-Posten has been evacuated -- because they dared, in a free society, to say what they thought. But where is the uproar? What other media outlets have rushed to their defense? Where is the New York Times’ editorial page? Silent. What of CNN? They will report the riots over the cartoons, but refuse to show the rather tame cartoons themselves out of “respect for Islam.” A network that cannot self-censor itself to keep our soldiers safe in time of war will gladly self-censor itself to avoid offending those who would so forcefully censor Denmark. As will NBC. Other outlets are simply mute on the issue.

    And this is not a new phenomenon.

    The Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh dared to make a movie of a script by a Muslim woman in which she depicts the treatment of women in many Islamic societies. It was judged “offensive to Islam” by some -- so Van Gogh was shot, stabbed, hacked, and beat to death on the street.

    Salman Rushdie’s book, The Satanic Verses, offended Islam, according to the Ayatollah Khomeini, so he issued a death sentence against the English author to be carried out on sight anywhere in the world. Mr. Rushdie has lived in hiding in his allegedly “free” society ever since.

    Other less well-known artists are also under death threat for work published in Europe or America, but judged offensive half a world away.

    And the complaints about offense go to the smaller end of the spectrum as well. A British bar owner was forced to remove a “no porking” sign from his parking lot because it was “offensive to Islam.” Pictures of Piglet have been removed from British government offices because Piglet is allegedly “offensive to Islam.”

    Artwork was removed from a gallery in Sweden because it was “offensive to Islam.” An Italian author was brought up on hate crime charges because her opinions were “offensive to Islam.”

    Barbie dolls are offensive to Islam, Coca Cola labels are offensive to Islam, Burger King Ice Cream lids are offensive to Islam, Levi’s jeans ads are offensive to Islam. These are all actual news items.

    While the American media whines on about NSA wiretapping and the Patriot Act, they ignore a much bigger threat to free speech -- the very real prospect of being censored or even marked for death simply for expressing one’s thoughts on religion.

    A global precedent is being set here. If they are smart, other media outlets will fall in behind Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten and establish that they will be censored by neither government nor religion. Several European papers have reprinted the cartoons as an act of solidarity and defiance -- including one that declared “Yes, we have the right to blasphemy.”

    It is not just our own government that presents a threat to free speech, and if we are serious about defending it -- rather than just using the concept to bash political enemies -- then we must defend it from every threat.
    http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=12172
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. Adam's Apple
    Offline

    Adam's Apple Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,092
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +447
    Excellent article, Stephanie. Lots of good points made. If it weren't for the alternative media that has sprung up in recent years in the U.S., we would have very little information about this. And we certainly would not have been able to view the disputed cartoons.
     
  3. nosarcasm
    Offline

    nosarcasm Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    931
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Idaho
    Ratings:
    +68
    hey I supply you with the European goodies dont worry. :D
     
  4. Adam's Apple
    Offline

    Adam's Apple Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,092
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +447
    Yes, you and Canaver do a great job of that. Thank heaven for the Internet!
     
  5. Lars Mølbæk
    Offline

    Lars Mølbæk Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    3
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    YO Guys and Girls
    im danish and im pissed, we feel us alone here, were is the support of free speach
    NOT ONE american newspaper have shown any of the very funny cartoon drawings of the profet

    we have had a wery loong discussion in denmark about freedom af speach

    its damn funny to see the wery slow reactions on this

    the drawing were the end of a mostly sober discussion that ended in September 30 2005

    the only way the muslims of the world were able to find out that the drawings were printed is because of danish muslims going on a trip to the middle east to tell how evil this wonderfull little contry is

    well they found out that we are the most evil place in the world... cause of that


    we tougth we had freinds around the world, the discussion in DK were on free speach and ended of prowing that the free speace is gone

    not even little USA have the nerve to print one single drawing and even damn UK have any support

    NICE to see that a few people here support us but most of US seems that they dont care and we can sail our own sea

    so im pissed :gives: we in DENMARK are PROUD that we have free speach
    we will continue to have free speach and are sad to see that not even us have the nerve to support a FREIND in need, im now in favor of we remove the trooups in IRAK and other places were we support THE UNITED STATES OF NO FREE SPEACH

    damn you US
    no regards
     
  6. Cylinder
    Offline

    Cylinder Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    9
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +3
    The people are with you, Lars. Make no mistake about it. Our government seriously dropped the ball on this issue.

    What's the national flower for Denmark?
     
  7. insein
    Offline

    insein Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    6,096
    Thanks Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
    Ratings:
    +356
    If your going by US newspapers then your outta luck. The newspapers side with Islam being as thats the position to take that attacks Bush the most. Just know that the PEOPLE are behind you even if the media is not.
     
  8. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +618
    All 540 of em? Damn, thanks for the support! :cuckoo:
     
  9. archangel
    Online

    archangel Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Relax I would honestly say probably 80% of the US population is in support of your countries as well as others freedom of speech...I believe our news reporting agencies...which are private corporations are probably scared to death to follow suit...as they have journalist covering the war on terrorism in Muslim countries...this is not a valid excuse... but hey they bash anything conservative or Christian right here at home...and give praise to Islam at every chance...go figure... I suppose this is freedom of speech in the News Media's interpretation! :beer:


    side note: the 'Damn you US'...was not acceptable!
     
  10. Lars Mølbæk
    Offline

    Lars Mølbæk Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    3
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    well im woting for redraw of ALL 540 of them even the ones we have in Afganistan

    you are 261.000.000 people and have 100.000 troops there

    we are less than 6.000,000 and have 540 troops and have always supportet you

    tings are at perspective

    well you can have your troops by your self, take a look at your freinds

    how menny do you have left

    next time you need help go to your pall in germany or france
    ohh no you cant they dont support your war at terrorism

    we are as i say a small contry, we support were we can when needed

    and the "" damn you US "" were ment on the lack of support from your TV and news stations
     

Share This Page