yes, you are ignorant. even if the reasons for the dossier are suspect to easily duped conspiracy theorists, it is the info that matters. do you really think the FBI just takes in info from sources and just starts investigations based on whatever it says without any sort of verification from other sources or other known facts that make that info credible? Of course they do not know the minute they get any info from any source if it is credible or not!! That is why they vet it, check it out, you know, do the stuff INVESTIGATORS ROUTINELY DO, from the local cop to the local investigative news reporters. you have no clue how the whole investigative process works!!Who else would have inside info on what was going on in Russia because he was a FORMER SPY who was head of the British spy group in Moscow that could be nearly as credible at face value? Just some guy on the street? Do you not know that Steele had been considered a reliable source for other Russian info in other cases for years? The FBI uses paid informants all the time, ever see an FBI Wanted Poster? It offers huge rewards...get it? But your assumption that a donation to the Clinton Foundation somehow influences the Clintons is ignorant. They get no penny, no Clinton gets a penny, from the Foundation. 87 cents of every dollar goes to helping folks, not overhead. It has a higher charity watch rating than the Red Cross. What does someone getting paid to provide information that may or may not be verifiable, but can be vetted and checked against other info to prove it is reliable, have to do with that process? Police get paid to investigate, reporters get paid to investigate, spies get paid to provide inside information ordinary people do not have access to. That is why they get paid. Get it?Just a question, as I was always suspicious of this.
Maybe I am wrong and the global socialists lead by the UK didn't try to interfere, but with massive donations from Ukraine, England and yes, my favourite country Canada, having being sent to the Clinton Foundation, I can't take it at face value.
Knowingly or unknowingly, giving $5M to an apparent former spy is not prudent, at very least.
Yes, I admit, i do think large donations to the Clinton Foundation encourages influence. You can call me ignorant, I might call you naive for thinking differently.
What "info" is it that you're referring to? A series of dossiers paid for by the political opposition of the accused? Seriously? There isn't a prosecutor ANYWHERE who should have taken that "info" as credible proof of wrong doing! Let alone use those totally unverified allegations as the basis to obtain FISA warrants to spy on a Presidential campaign without making it completely clear to the FISA court judge where those "dossiers" came from!
People SHOULD be going to jail as a result of "Russian Collusion" but it isn't the people who were accused of it...the people who should be doing time behind bars are the ones that perverted our justice system and wasted millions of dollars in tax payer money on an investigation based on a political "dirty trick"!