MSM Makes It Clear, The Cartoon Restraint Has Nothing To Do With 'Sensibilities'

[Annie]

The top link will take you to 'google hits', there are more in the posted link with the 'quote'. If you are so inclined, drop a line to the publications:

http://news.google.com/news?ned=us&...960BE3A-DC17-478C-8DF1-C12D7067FD65.htm&hl=en

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/004566.htm

THE QUESTION EVERYONE'S ASKING
By Michelle Malkin · February 15, 2006 05:03 PM

Watching the news in my hotel room before my speech, I just saw CNN air a few of the new, highly inflammatory Abu Ghraib photos now making the rounds.

No pixelation of the nude prisoners in the photos. No disclaimers about paying respect to members of the US military who will be endangered by publication of the pics. The Washington Post used the opportunity to republish Abu Ghraib photos and video it obtained in April 2004.

Readers have been e-mailing all day the question the MSM needs to answer:

Why the Abu Ghraib photos, but not the Mohammed Cartoons?

We're listening...

***

Judith Apter Klinghoffer recommends doing something show your displeasure. No, not burning down buildings.

 

[Gunny]

Leftist p*ssies. The criminals from the incident are in jail. There is no point to posting more pics other than to inflame the morons that dig out their indignation hats every time this story has been regurgitated ad nauseum.