Motto For Ruling Classes

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Ruling classes have been committed to ending cross-border since the day they realized they could be killed by bombs and poison gas dropped from aircraft. Instead of ending cross-border wars they are bringing the human race closer to nuclear/biological warfare.

th
https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M1e1abb7b435c76f11c7feb69c3207444o0&pid=Api&w=234&h=181

In addition to fearing cross-border wars ruling classes went life insurance against a revolution overthrowing a ruling class; hence, “One for all and all for one.” became the motto of ruling classes. The motto was adopted after the Russian Revolutions. Naturally, the motto also guarantees support for a Communist regime in danger of being overthrown by a revolution. Happily, the motto failed to kick in when the Soviet Union imploded.

There are exceptions to the motto. Deposing dictators is one exception. Choosing sides in a civil war is another exception. Hillary Clinton’s State Department was granted a waiver for overthrowing dictator Gadhafi who was no threat to the American people. Hillary’s foreign policy waiver gave Russia the green light to side with Assad in a civil war.


“So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gadhafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails.”​

Evidence backs claim that Hillary armed ISIS
Posted By Jerome R. Corsi On 12/27/2016 @ 6:09 pm

Evidence backs claim that Hillary armed ISIS

In fact, revolution is the first step in a civil war as opposed to a coup d’état. The American Revolution was actually a civil war. The American Civil War was also a revolution in that the Yankee ruling class destroyed the South’s ruling class rather then allow them to secede. Some might say that the South began with a revolution that ended in the Civil War. I am partial to the former interpretation.

NOTE: Stopping Communist expansion in the Korean War and the Vietnam War were matters of self-defense. Both were cross-borders wars between two sovereign nations. Conversely, President McKinley —— without justification —— was the first president to interfere militarily in the internal affairs of a foreign nation. President Wilson chose sides in a cross-border war fought by two empires. Between them their philosophical worldview gave the world more than a century of brutality and bloodshed. Syria is a continuation of the brutality and bloodshed McKinley and Wilson set in motion with civil wars sure to be triggered by millions of United Nations refugees. The coming civil wars will kill a much larger percentage of a nation’s population than did the America Civil War and slavery.

Finally, I put together some definitions with elements in each one that are incorporated in the New World Order’s philosophy. Nation-building (democracy) is the closest thing I could find to our federal government interfering in foreign conflicts. The Socialist faction in the United States, Islam’s worldwide caliphate, and Communist countries are guilty of nation-building by force. Each of the three preach their own diseased morality for engaging in slaughter for the greater good. Of the three only Islam’s worldwide caliphate pays benefits in the next world.


treason (noun)

1. Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.

2. A betrayal of trust or confidence.

XXXXX

traitor (noun)

One who betrays one's country, a cause, or a trust, especially one who commits treason.

XXXXX

morality (noun)
plural moralities

1. The quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct.

2. A system of ideas of right and wrong conduct: religious morality; Christian morality.

3. Virtuous conduct.

4. A rule or lesson in moral conduct.

XXXXX

sin (noun)

1. A transgression of a religious or moral law, especially when deliberate.

2. Theology. a. Deliberate disobedience to the known will of God. b. A condition of estrangement from God resulting from such disobedience.

3. Something regarded as being shameful, deplorable, or utterly wrong. See synonyms at offense.

verb, intransitive
sinned, sinning, sins

1. To violate a religious or moral law.

2. To commit an offense or a violation.

XXXXX

revolution (noun)
Abbr. rev.

1. a. Orbital motion about a point, especially as distinguished from axial rotation: the planetary revolution about the sun. b. A turning or rotational motion about an axis. c. A single complete cycle of such orbital or axial motion.

2. The overthrow of one government and its replacement with another. See synonyms at rebellion.

3. A sudden or momentous change in a situation: the revolution in computer technology.

4. Geology. A time of major crustal deformation, when folds and faults are formed.

XXXXX

rebellion (noun)

1. Open, armed, and organized resistance to a constituted government.

2. An act or a show of defiance toward an authority or established convention.

XXXXX

civil war (noun)

1. A war between factions or regions of the same country.

2. A state of hostility or conflict between elements within an organization: "The broadcaster is in the midst of a civil war that has brought it to the brink of a complete management overhaul" (Bill Powell).

3. Civil War. The war in the United States between the Union and the Confederacy from 1861 to 1865. Also called War Between the States.

4. Civil War. The war in England between the Parliamentarians and the Royalists from 1642 to 1648.

XXXXX

coup d'état (noun)
plural coups d'état or coup d'états

The sudden overthrow of a government by a usually small group of persons in or previously in positions of authority.

XXXXX

faction (noun)

1. A group of persons forming a cohesive, usually contentious minority within a larger group.

2. Conflict within an organization or nation; internal dissension: "Our own beloved country . . . is now afflicted with faction and civil war" (Abraham Lincoln).

factional adjective
factionalism noun
factionally adverb

XXXXX

mutiny (noun)
plural mutinies

Open rebellion against constituted authority, especially rebellion of sailors against superior officers. See synonyms at rebellion.

verb, intransitive
mutinied, mutinying, mutinies

To engage in mutiny.

XXXXX

agent provocateur (noun)
plural agents provocateurs

A person employed to associate with suspected individuals or groups with the purpose of inciting them to commit acts that will make them liable to punishment.​
 
the ruling class is communist lol
To PurpleOwl: If they are not a ruling class what do you call Communists in China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, and Venezuela? HUMANISTS!

When Hugo Chávez was running in his first successful presidential campaign, back in 1998, he was asked point blank in several television interviews whether or not he was a communist. His reply was identical to the one given by Fidel Castro to Princeton University students during his visit to the United States in 1959: “I am a humanist.” Years later, on consolidating total power in his own hands, Chávez again emulated Fidel and confessed to being “a convinced follower of Marxist-Leninist ideology.”

XXXXX

Since Chávez’s death, the situation has changed in Venezuela. Nicolás Maduro lacks Chavez’s brain-power and charisma and has become completely dependent on Cuban advice.​

Venezuela Finally Turns Communist
By: Enrique Standish - Nov 29, 2013, 12:05 pm

Venezuela Finally Turns Communist: Maduro Follows Leninist Dogma
 
I put together some definitions with elements in each one that are incorporated in the New World Order’s philosophy.
George Soros rants with a forked tongue.

Billionaire globalist George Soros has penned a panicked rant in which he decries President-elect Donald Trump as a “would be dictator” who threatens the future of the new world order.​

Soros: Trump is a “Would Be Dictator” Who Threatens the New World Order
Paul Joseph Watson
December 29, 2016

Soros: Trump is a “Would Be Dictator” Who Threatens the New World Order

If Soros is honest he would have said:

Donald Trump threatens the future of the New World Order crowd’s political agenda.
 

Forum List

Back
Top