Most Red States Take More Money From Washington Than They Put In

believe me, he's special. :cool:

From the OP link.
New Mexico: Low population density and most of the land mass is owned by the feds.
West Virginia: Insert socialist elitist dickweed snob joke here.
Mississippi: Major agriculture state...You don't hate farmers, do you?
District of Criminals: So, THAT'S where all of America's tax dollars are being pissed away!
Hawaii: Run by liberoidals since day one...No surprise.
Alabama: See Mississippi.
Alaska: What, you think that administering to a state twice the size of Texas (the feds own most of the land, BTW) is going to be cheap?
Montana: Two words; Population density.

One word: RETARD.
 
From the OP link.
New Mexico: Low population density and most of the land mass is owned by the feds.
West Virginia: Insert socialist elitist dickweed snob joke here.
Mississippi: Major agriculture state...You don't hate farmers, do you?
District of Criminals: So, THAT'S where all of America's tax dollars are being pissed away!
Hawaii: Run by liberoidals since day one...No surprise.
Alabama: See Mississippi.
Alaska: What, you think that administering to a state twice the size of Texas (the feds own most of the land, BTW) is going to be cheap?
Montana: Two words; Population density.

One word: RETARD.
This topic, complete with the same brain dead colored charts and graphs, has been covered and debunked numerous times before you arrived here.

Yet you seem to believe that you're the first one to have brought up the subject.

You are truly a stupid, stupid individual...Best scamper back to DU, Ed Schultz, Daily Kooks, or wherever it was you came from.
 
Another factor to consider is the regressive tax structures of the states, It seems that the states getting the most from the government also tax their poor and middle class at astoundingly higher rates than their 1%.

Are they smart enough,
Are they wise enough,
To regulate their taxes,
So the poor can pay the rich,
To keep the poor flat on their asses.
 
Another factor to consider is the regressive tax structures of the states, It seems that the states getting the most from the government also tax their poor and middle class at astoundingly higher rates then their 1%.

Like California and New York that have the highest sales taxes, higher alcohol and tobacco taxes, and and income tax brackets that start at less than $10,000 a year?
 
New Mexico: Low population density and most of the land mass is owned by the feds.
West Virginia: Insert socialist elitist dickweed snob joke here.
Mississippi: Major agriculture state...You don't hate farmers, do you?
District of Criminals: So, THAT'S where all of America's tax dollars are being pissed away!
Hawaii: Run by liberoidals since day one...No surprise.
Alabama: See Mississippi.
Alaska: What, you think that administering to a state twice the size of Texas (the feds own most of the land, BTW) is going to be cheap?
Montana: Two words; Population density.

One word: RETARD.
This topic, complete with the same brain dead colored charts and graphs, has been covered and debunked numerous times before you arrived here.

Yet you seem to believe that you're the first one to have brought up the subject.

You are truly a stupid, stupid individual...Best scamper back to DU, Ed Schultz, Daily Kooks, or wherever it was you came from.

Another true blue Kochsucker chimes in:lol:
 
Aid to states IS direct funding.

There are national resources and national programs and there are national priorities. All states benefit from national programs in any given state.

gawd, deceit, deception, and lying through omission still? :eek:

Ordering new planes from McDonnell Douglass is aid to the states?

Gawd, the stupidity, idiocy, and outright lying is back in full force. Did anyone miss Dante?

Anyone?

hello? :lol:

Ordering new planes from McDonnell Douglass is - aid to all states. National program of defense. The orders are NOT aid to any one state per se, duh?

They do, however, indirectly benefit the state that puts the planes together, hence my reference to indirect spending.
 
One word: RETARD.
This topic, complete with the same brain dead colored charts and graphs, has been covered and debunked numerous times before you arrived here.

Yet you seem to believe that you're the first one to have brought up the subject.

You are truly a stupid, stupid individual...Best scamper back to DU, Ed Schultz, Daily Kooks, or wherever it was you came from.

Another true blue Kochsucker chimes in:lol:
How much of Oregon do the feds control?

G'head....Look it up.
 
Another factor to consider is the regressive tax structures of the states, It seems that the states getting the most from the government also tax their poor and middle class at astoundingly higher rates than their 1%.

Your saying that people in W. Virginia or Alabama pay higher taxes than people in blue states? I don't think so. Got any proof of that?
 
Another factor to consider is the regressive tax structures of the states, It seems that the states getting the most from the government also tax their poor and middle class at astoundingly higher rates than their 1%.

Are they smart enough,
Are they wise enough,
To regulate their taxes,
So the poor can pay the rich,
To keep the poor flat on their asses.

My own state, Alabama, Taxes the bottom 10% while the top 1% pay 4%.
 
Try this on for size, and try using more than one brain cell at a time.

Social Security money is by far the largest portion of the money the Feds send out.

Every blue state that pays in more than it gets is in the snow belt, except California, which has one of the highest cost of living in the country.

Retirees flock to states with better climates and lower costs of living.

End thread.
 
Ordering new planes from McDonnell Douglass is aid to the states?

Gawd, the stupidity, idiocy, and outright lying is back in full force. Did anyone miss Dante?

Anyone?

hello? :lol:

Ordering new planes from McDonnell Douglass is - aid to all states. National program of defense. The orders are NOT aid to any one state per se, duh?

They do, however, indirectly benefit the state that puts the planes together, hence my reference to indirect spending.

indirect, and all the other states get direct protection (defense) so add yet another parameter to the data.

how do you value the benefits received? There is a reason conservatives want to speak about anything BUT direct aid to states
 
Another factor to consider is the regressive tax structures of the states, It seems that the states getting the most from the government also tax their poor and middle class at astoundingly higher rates than their 1%.

Are they smart enough,
Are they wise enough,
To regulate their taxes,
So the poor can pay the rich,
To keep the poor flat on their asses.

My own state, Alabama, Taxes the bottom 10% while the top 1% pay 4%.
Source?

Link or it didn't happen.
 
I had no idea so many cons were sucking from the government. No wonder Obama can't rebalance Bush's unbalanced budget.
 
I had no idea so many cons were sucking from the government. No wonder Obama can't rebalance Bush's unbalanced budget.
I had no idea that you were really this stupid. No wonder you fall for any pabulum that leftist hack sites shove into your unanalytical maw.

You're a real credit to the right. I'm sure they're very proud of you...
 
trickle-down-please-8.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top