Most don't chose to be "Poor" what an absurd ignorance.

This is how spin works.

You say that people don't choose to be poor. No one is making that argument.

However, people are poor because they make poor life choices.

Now tell Me if you understand the difference?

links/stats/etc?
.....some people are just stupid.....they are too stupid to know what to do to not be poor
college grads earn more--plain and simple
Do College Grads Really Earn More Than High School Grads?
...single college grad mothers?
...if they start out ''wrong'''--it is hard to get ''better''' .....my relative's co-workers' cars need fixing--but they don't have the $$$$ to fix them = they can't get to work = one of them got laid off and the other had to quit =cycle not getting better but worse
...getting a loan to pay off a previous loan/etc

According to Wikipedia about 15 - 20% of the populations in the developed World suffer from disabilities, that's obviously a sizable chunk of those in poverty benefits.

Disability and poverty - Wikipedia

My guess is the USA is more on the higher end, merely because of all the maimed veterans the USA created in it's wars.

So, you did not answer My question. Why is that?

We are not responsible for 15 - 20% of the worlds population that is disabled. Just our own.

Name ME one person who does not support a social safety net for those, who through not fault of their own, are disabled to the point of not being able to support themselves.

This ties directly to My first response to this thread. You are making statements against arguments that have not been made. That is called, Spin; particularly when you try to foist it off as a common occurrence in a specific ideology. I just call it lies.

I'm glad to hear you at least are in support of "safety nets" for seriously disabled Americans. Still, people can be disadvantaged in ways that can't be diagnosed by a doctor. Like growing up in a dysfunctional family. They're probably going to turn out dysfunctional adults who struggle to find a place in society, especially if they're male and even more so if they're white and male. The latter category is held to an extremely high standard and are judged more harshly than anyone else by both the political left and the right (who are supposedly the side that represents them). Lefties call maladjusted white boys potential mass shooter incels and the right calls them lazy, entitled millennials.

It's really no wonder so many of them seem to be hopeless and self destructive.
That is not for us to correct. Nor is it our responsibility.

Life gives you a shit hand. Life is hard and not fair.

Be pissed off if it helps, but the simple fact remains. Unless you have a disability that prevents you from earning a living (Having shit parents and a shit life isn't one of them) then you have to get up every day, go to work, and try to advance your life.

I am skeptical of people who say that "well, they have a disability that even a doctor can't diagnose, and they should be given some kind of advantage because of it.

Talk about a set up for abuse.

Slap the fuck upside the head, tell him or her that life isn't fair and that you are not owed anything, and if you want to eat tomorrow, then you better learn to get along and go earn a paycheck.

I'm not necessarily even suggesting handout programs. More like a sense of community and not making people feel like pariahs who have no place where they belong. To me, addressing the lack of unity in this country is an essential component to making America great again.
That needs to be addressed long before the child is even eligible to work. Perhaps not giving kids self-esteem but having them earn it. Who knows.

What I do know is that you must participate in your own life, otherwise it will be a failure.
 
How many plumbers can an economy demand, exactly?
More plus one.

The job market will ALWAYS need cashiers, law mowers, burger flippers, toilet scrubbers, etc.

That's the thing, even when you make "ALL Americans elite" you'd still need to import foreigners to do those menial jobs.

Republicans aren't very bright, to say the very least. (Neither are Democrats for that matter)

Pick a side, are you for Capitalism, or for Nationalism?
No you don't.

Ya know, you should hold off on calling people names with regard to their intelligence when you show a marked deficiency in the department.

cashiers, lawn mowers, burger flippers, toilet scrubbers, and other no skill menial tasks are the perfect job for kids in high school. Most of those jobs are done in a short work week (perfect for allowing them to continue in school and prep for a trade school) and they have minimal expenses, living at home and everything.

Why they could even save up enough money to buy a used car (a one time expense) and get a great bonding opportunity with dad...oh, wait..does your alleged collective society allows for fathers? I never know what crazy shit you people believe in.

Hey, by the time they finish high school, they will have developed a couple of years or work experience and will have learned what some of the responsibilities are that a responsible adult is expected to have by the time they go out on their own.

Now they can move into a better job, maybe even a job that is apprenticed to a trade they are learning about in school and their pay increases as they work toward a journeyman skill level.

Why, by that point, they have likely been helping out mom and dad, are getting tired of mom and dad charging them room and board and still having to live under THEIR rules, so they'll have money saved up for a small apartment that they can share with a roommate or two.

Hell, five years after leaving high school, most of these kids will be making between 18 and 27 dollars an hour and able to afford a girlfriend, a better car, maybe even a few luxuries. If they are smart, they will have been putting money into a 401k AND into a mortgage downpayment fund so that they can own their first home by the time they are 30 to 35. That gives them a perfect opportunity to have a 30-year mortgage paid off before retirement and they can then enjoy their golden years.

It really isn't that fucking hard to figure out.

A person just needs to be responsible for themselves and put forth just a little effort.

Poverty is clearly systematic of the poverty wages of minimum wage.

The high school kids aren't going into menial jobs enough, that's why illegal Mexicans are being lured into these jobs. Duh.

A lot of high school kids think they shall work smart, or not work at all. (Unfortunately)
Now you're just making excuses to justify your position.

The kids are taught that they do what they need to do to survive, or they don't survive.

Poverty is a mindset and if you don't want to work, you will be impoverished.

I've given you the American blueprint that works each time it is applied.

Anything else is just whining.

Haha, oh my goodness.

A.) The job market will pay poverty wages the way we have it.
B.) There's a ton of people with disabilities.
C.) There's a ton of low IQ people who can't make it.

Republicans don't seem to grasp a heck of a lot, be it Capitalism, or genetic predispositions.

Nationalists my dupa.
 
This is how spin works.

You say that people don't choose to be poor. No one is making that argument.

However, people are poor because they make poor life choices.

Now tell Me if you understand the difference?

links/stats/etc?
.....some people are just stupid.....they are too stupid to know what to do to not be poor
college grads earn more--plain and simple
Do College Grads Really Earn More Than High School Grads?
...single college grad mothers?
...if they start out ''wrong'''--it is hard to get ''better''' .....my relative's co-workers' cars need fixing--but they don't have the $$$$ to fix them = they can't get to work = one of them got laid off and the other had to quit =cycle not getting better but worse
...getting a loan to pay off a previous loan/etc

According to Wikipedia about 15 - 20% of the populations in the developed World suffer from disabilities, that's obviously a sizable chunk of those in poverty benefits.

Disability and poverty - Wikipedia

My guess is the USA is more on the higher end, merely because of all the maimed veterans the USA created in it's wars.

So, you did not answer My question. Why is that?

We are not responsible for 15 - 20% of the worlds population that is disabled. Just our own.

Name ME one person who does not support a social safety net for those, who through not fault of their own, are disabled to the point of not being able to support themselves.

This ties directly to My first response to this thread. You are making statements against arguments that have not been made. That is called, Spin; particularly when you try to foist it off as a common occurrence in a specific ideology. I just call it lies.

I'm glad to hear you at least are in support of "safety nets" for seriously disabled Americans. Still, people can be disadvantaged in ways that can't be diagnosed by a doctor. Like growing up in a dysfunctional family. They're probably going to turn out dysfunctional adults who struggle to find a place in society, especially if they're male and even more so if they're white and male. The latter category is held to an extremely high standard and are judged more harshly than anyone else by both the political left and the right (who are supposedly the side that represents them). Lefties call maladjusted white boys potential mass shooter incels and the right calls them lazy, entitled millennials.

It's really no wonder so many of them seem to be hopeless and self destructive.
That is not for us to correct. Nor is it our responsibility.

Life gives you a shit hand. Life is hard and not fair.

Be pissed off if it helps, but the simple fact remains. Unless you have a disability that prevents you from earning a living (Having shit parents and a shit life isn't one of them) then you have to get up every day, go to work, and try to advance your life.

I am skeptical of people who say that "well, they have a disability that even a doctor can't diagnose, and they should be given some kind of advantage because of it.

Talk about a set up for abuse.

Slap the fuck upside the head, tell him or her that life isn't fair and that you are not owed anything, and if you want to eat tomorrow, then you better learn to get along and go earn a paycheck.

The minimum wage should be based on what a business can afford.

Microsoft's minimum wage maybe should be 25 dollars an hour.

The landscaper down the street maybe can only a 5 dollars an hour. (So supplement the government to pay their wage up to 15 dollars an hour.

Plain, and simple the elite are running rampant.
Why Republicans complain about outsourced jobs, and hired illegals, but don't grasp it's Capitalists who hire them, it merely boggles the mind.
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha
 
From what I've seen it seems about 1/3rd of the poor are poor because of disabilities, physical, or mental. this includes many Veterans , Another 1/3rd are either are ex convicts tarnishing their records, or literally aren't intelligent enough to make it. The final 1/3rd are mostly single mothers, younger generations attempting to move up in it's ranks, and people working menial jobs with little pay.

I don't know how anyone couldn't get that in a Capitalist system of nature, how there wouldn't be poor exactly?

Just as well, such a unnatural system of Communism also leads to poor.

Literally, the hybrid system is the only real fair solution.
I choose to be white, poor and underclass?. I choose that. Yeah right. Is the new racism one to blame whites for everything all the time no mater what? All those rich neurotic whites that are afflicted with self hatred syndrome, well, kill yourselves. Stop putting your shit on the rest of us.
 
According to Wikipedia about 15 - 20% of the populations in the developed World suffer from disabilities, that's obviously a sizable chunk of those in poverty benefits.

Disability and poverty - Wikipedia

My guess is the USA is more on the higher end, merely because of all the maimed veterans the USA created in it's wars.

So, you did not answer My question. Why is that?

We are not responsible for 15 - 20% of the worlds population that is disabled. Just our own.

Name ME one person who does not support a social safety net for those, who through not fault of their own, are disabled to the point of not being able to support themselves.

This ties directly to My first response to this thread. You are making statements against arguments that have not been made. That is called, Spin; particularly when you try to foist it off as a common occurrence in a specific ideology. I just call it lies.

I'm glad to hear you at least are in support of "safety nets" for seriously disabled Americans. Still, people can be disadvantaged in ways that can't be diagnosed by a doctor. Like growing up in a dysfunctional family. They're probably going to turn out dysfunctional adults who struggle to find a place in society, especially if they're male and even more so if they're white and male. The latter category is held to an extremely high standard and are judged more harshly than anyone else by both the political left and the right (who are supposedly the side that represents them). Lefties call maladjusted white boys potential mass shooter incels and the right calls them lazy, entitled millennials.

It's really no wonder so many of them seem to be hopeless and self destructive.
That is not for us to correct. Nor is it our responsibility.

Life gives you a shit hand. Life is hard and not fair.

Be pissed off if it helps, but the simple fact remains. Unless you have a disability that prevents you from earning a living (Having shit parents and a shit life isn't one of them) then you have to get up every day, go to work, and try to advance your life.

I am skeptical of people who say that "well, they have a disability that even a doctor can't diagnose, and they should be given some kind of advantage because of it.

Talk about a set up for abuse.

Slap the fuck upside the head, tell him or her that life isn't fair and that you are not owed anything, and if you want to eat tomorrow, then you better learn to get along and go earn a paycheck.

The minimum wage should be based on what a business can afford.

Microsoft's minimum wage maybe should be 25 dollars an hour.

The landscaper down the street maybe can only a 5 dollars an hour. (So supplement the government to pay their wage up to 15 dollars an hour.

Plain, and simple the elite are running rampant.
Why Republicans complain about outsourced jobs, and hired illegals, but don't grasp it's Capitalists who hire them, it merely boggles the mind.
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
 
From what I've seen it seems about 1/3rd of the poor are poor because of disabilities, physical, or mental. this includes many Veterans , Another 1/3rd are either are ex convicts tarnishing their records, or literally aren't intelligent enough to make it. The final 1/3rd are mostly single mothers, younger generations attempting to move up in it's ranks, and people working menial jobs with little pay.

I don't know how anyone couldn't get that in a Capitalist system of nature, how there wouldn't be poor exactly?

Just as well, such a unnatural system of Communism also leads to poor.

Literally, the hybrid system is the only real fair solution.
I choose to be white, poor and underclass?. I choose that. Yeah right. Is the new racism one to blame whites for everything all the time no mater what? All those rich neurotic whites that are afflicted with self hatred syndrome, well, kill yourselves. Stop putting your shit on the rest of us.

I support Whites, more so poor Whites than rich Whites, especially not rich Liberal Jews.
Where did I say anything about not supporting Whites?

The poor Whites aren't hiring illegals to cut the throats of poor Whites, the poor Whites aren't outsourcing the jobs to China, Mexico, Vietnam, and India to cut the throats of poor Whites.
Who's doing that?
Plain, and simple, Capitalist elites!

Well, maybe not all Whites, I have a particular disdain for Germanics, especially Anglos & Saxons.
 
So, you did not answer My question. Why is that?

We are not responsible for 15 - 20% of the worlds population that is disabled. Just our own.

Name ME one person who does not support a social safety net for those, who through not fault of their own, are disabled to the point of not being able to support themselves.

This ties directly to My first response to this thread. You are making statements against arguments that have not been made. That is called, Spin; particularly when you try to foist it off as a common occurrence in a specific ideology. I just call it lies.

I'm glad to hear you at least are in support of "safety nets" for seriously disabled Americans. Still, people can be disadvantaged in ways that can't be diagnosed by a doctor. Like growing up in a dysfunctional family. They're probably going to turn out dysfunctional adults who struggle to find a place in society, especially if they're male and even more so if they're white and male. The latter category is held to an extremely high standard and are judged more harshly than anyone else by both the political left and the right (who are supposedly the side that represents them). Lefties call maladjusted white boys potential mass shooter incels and the right calls them lazy, entitled millennials.

It's really no wonder so many of them seem to be hopeless and self destructive.
That is not for us to correct. Nor is it our responsibility.

Life gives you a shit hand. Life is hard and not fair.

Be pissed off if it helps, but the simple fact remains. Unless you have a disability that prevents you from earning a living (Having shit parents and a shit life isn't one of them) then you have to get up every day, go to work, and try to advance your life.

I am skeptical of people who say that "well, they have a disability that even a doctor can't diagnose, and they should be given some kind of advantage because of it.

Talk about a set up for abuse.

Slap the fuck upside the head, tell him or her that life isn't fair and that you are not owed anything, and if you want to eat tomorrow, then you better learn to get along and go earn a paycheck.

The minimum wage should be based on what a business can afford.

Microsoft's minimum wage maybe should be 25 dollars an hour.

The landscaper down the street maybe can only a 5 dollars an hour. (So supplement the government to pay their wage up to 15 dollars an hour.

Plain, and simple the elite are running rampant.
Why Republicans complain about outsourced jobs, and hired illegals, but don't grasp it's Capitalists who hire them, it merely boggles the mind.
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
yes--Germany did real well with hitler--you pick a fine example there
bh165xx.jpg

36986240-b41b-47c2-a46e-b3d468218106-2060x1236.jpeg
 
So, you did not answer My question. Why is that?

We are not responsible for 15 - 20% of the worlds population that is disabled. Just our own.

Name ME one person who does not support a social safety net for those, who through not fault of their own, are disabled to the point of not being able to support themselves.

This ties directly to My first response to this thread. You are making statements against arguments that have not been made. That is called, Spin; particularly when you try to foist it off as a common occurrence in a specific ideology. I just call it lies.

I'm glad to hear you at least are in support of "safety nets" for seriously disabled Americans. Still, people can be disadvantaged in ways that can't be diagnosed by a doctor. Like growing up in a dysfunctional family. They're probably going to turn out dysfunctional adults who struggle to find a place in society, especially if they're male and even more so if they're white and male. The latter category is held to an extremely high standard and are judged more harshly than anyone else by both the political left and the right (who are supposedly the side that represents them). Lefties call maladjusted white boys potential mass shooter incels and the right calls them lazy, entitled millennials.

It's really no wonder so many of them seem to be hopeless and self destructive.
That is not for us to correct. Nor is it our responsibility.

Life gives you a shit hand. Life is hard and not fair.

Be pissed off if it helps, but the simple fact remains. Unless you have a disability that prevents you from earning a living (Having shit parents and a shit life isn't one of them) then you have to get up every day, go to work, and try to advance your life.

I am skeptical of people who say that "well, they have a disability that even a doctor can't diagnose, and they should be given some kind of advantage because of it.

Talk about a set up for abuse.

Slap the fuck upside the head, tell him or her that life isn't fair and that you are not owed anything, and if you want to eat tomorrow, then you better learn to get along and go earn a paycheck.

The minimum wage should be based on what a business can afford.

Microsoft's minimum wage maybe should be 25 dollars an hour.

The landscaper down the street maybe can only a 5 dollars an hour. (So supplement the government to pay their wage up to 15 dollars an hour.

Plain, and simple the elite are running rampant.
Why Republicans complain about outsourced jobs, and hired illegals, but don't grasp it's Capitalists who hire them, it merely boggles the mind.
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
USSR is no more
 
I'm glad to hear you at least are in support of "safety nets" for seriously disabled Americans. Still, people can be disadvantaged in ways that can't be diagnosed by a doctor. Like growing up in a dysfunctional family. They're probably going to turn out dysfunctional adults who struggle to find a place in society, especially if they're male and even more so if they're white and male. The latter category is held to an extremely high standard and are judged more harshly than anyone else by both the political left and the right (who are supposedly the side that represents them). Lefties call maladjusted white boys potential mass shooter incels and the right calls them lazy, entitled millennials.

It's really no wonder so many of them seem to be hopeless and self destructive.
That is not for us to correct. Nor is it our responsibility.

Life gives you a shit hand. Life is hard and not fair.

Be pissed off if it helps, but the simple fact remains. Unless you have a disability that prevents you from earning a living (Having shit parents and a shit life isn't one of them) then you have to get up every day, go to work, and try to advance your life.

I am skeptical of people who say that "well, they have a disability that even a doctor can't diagnose, and they should be given some kind of advantage because of it.

Talk about a set up for abuse.

Slap the fuck upside the head, tell him or her that life isn't fair and that you are not owed anything, and if you want to eat tomorrow, then you better learn to get along and go earn a paycheck.

The minimum wage should be based on what a business can afford.

Microsoft's minimum wage maybe should be 25 dollars an hour.

The landscaper down the street maybe can only a 5 dollars an hour. (So supplement the government to pay their wage up to 15 dollars an hour.

Plain, and simple the elite are running rampant.
Why Republicans complain about outsourced jobs, and hired illegals, but don't grasp it's Capitalists who hire them, it merely boggles the mind.
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
yes--Germany did real well with hitler--you pick a fine example there
bh165xx.jpg

36986240-b41b-47c2-a46e-b3d468218106-2060x1236.jpeg


As if the British empire (Capitalists) killed less?????
 
That is not for us to correct. Nor is it our responsibility.

Life gives you a shit hand. Life is hard and not fair.

Be pissed off if it helps, but the simple fact remains. Unless you have a disability that prevents you from earning a living (Having shit parents and a shit life isn't one of them) then you have to get up every day, go to work, and try to advance your life.

I am skeptical of people who say that "well, they have a disability that even a doctor can't diagnose, and they should be given some kind of advantage because of it.

Talk about a set up for abuse.

Slap the fuck upside the head, tell him or her that life isn't fair and that you are not owed anything, and if you want to eat tomorrow, then you better learn to get along and go earn a paycheck.

The minimum wage should be based on what a business can afford.

Microsoft's minimum wage maybe should be 25 dollars an hour.

The landscaper down the street maybe can only a 5 dollars an hour. (So supplement the government to pay their wage up to 15 dollars an hour.

Plain, and simple the elite are running rampant.
Why Republicans complain about outsourced jobs, and hired illegals, but don't grasp it's Capitalists who hire them, it merely boggles the mind.
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
yes--Germany did real well with hitler--you pick a fine example there
bh165xx.jpg

36986240-b41b-47c2-a46e-b3d468218106-2060x1236.jpeg


As if the British empire (Capitalists) killed less?????
O--I see now--
you need to learn history --not fairytales
 
The minimum wage should be based on what a business can afford.

Microsoft's minimum wage maybe should be 25 dollars an hour.

The landscaper down the street maybe can only a 5 dollars an hour. (So supplement the government to pay their wage up to 15 dollars an hour.

Plain, and simple the elite are running rampant.
Why Republicans complain about outsourced jobs, and hired illegals, but don't grasp it's Capitalists who hire them, it merely boggles the mind.
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
yes--Germany did real well with hitler--you pick a fine example there
bh165xx.jpg

36986240-b41b-47c2-a46e-b3d468218106-2060x1236.jpeg


As if the British empire (Capitalists) killed less?????
O--I see now--
you need to learn history --not fairytales

Because the British Empire just spread tea parties. (rolls eyes)

But, that's besides the point, the Authoritarian hybrid system has a ton of success stories in generating economic growth too.

So, we don't have to be bound to Capitalism, this is just another fabrication.
 
That is not for us to correct. Nor is it our responsibility.

Life gives you a shit hand. Life is hard and not fair.

Be pissed off if it helps, but the simple fact remains. Unless you have a disability that prevents you from earning a living (Having shit parents and a shit life isn't one of them) then you have to get up every day, go to work, and try to advance your life.

I am skeptical of people who say that "well, they have a disability that even a doctor can't diagnose, and they should be given some kind of advantage because of it.

Talk about a set up for abuse.

Slap the fuck upside the head, tell him or her that life isn't fair and that you are not owed anything, and if you want to eat tomorrow, then you better learn to get along and go earn a paycheck.

The minimum wage should be based on what a business can afford.

Microsoft's minimum wage maybe should be 25 dollars an hour.

The landscaper down the street maybe can only a 5 dollars an hour. (So supplement the government to pay their wage up to 15 dollars an hour.

Plain, and simple the elite are running rampant.
Why Republicans complain about outsourced jobs, and hired illegals, but don't grasp it's Capitalists who hire them, it merely boggles the mind.
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
yes--Germany did real well with hitler--you pick a fine example there
bh165xx.jpg

36986240-b41b-47c2-a46e-b3d468218106-2060x1236.jpeg


As if the British empire (Capitalists) killed less?????

No shortage of atrocities made prior to and during the industrial revolution. Plenty of blame to go around, if blaming people for stuff that happened before any of us were ever born is your thing.
 
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
yes--Germany did real well with hitler--you pick a fine example there
bh165xx.jpg

36986240-b41b-47c2-a46e-b3d468218106-2060x1236.jpeg


As if the British empire (Capitalists) killed less?????
O--I see now--
you need to learn history --not fairytales

Because the British Empire just spread tea parties. (rolls eyes)

But, that's besides the point, the Authoritarian hybrid system has a ton of success stories in generating economic growth too.

So, we don't have to be bound to Capitalism, this is just another fabrication.
Germany had a good economy for a few years--then it went down hill--a little
hahahahhahahahahhahaha
the-destroyed-berlin-in-1945-40.jpg
 
the USSR is no more -socialism
NKorea sucks--socialism
Japan, SKorea , etc good to go
so the Dems are smart/smarter--------?????!!!!!!!! !!!!??? =DUMBSHIT right there
hhhhahahhaha

Franco = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 European economic growth in 20th Century Europe.

FDR = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 American economic growth in 20th Century America.

Nazis = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic turn around during the Great Depression.

Modern China = Authoritarian hybrid system = #1 Economic growth for 30 years.

USSR was way more Russian, and White, a lot less Muslim, and believe it or not, not a heck of a lot different in purchasing power vs modern Russia.
yes--Germany did real well with hitler--you pick a fine example there
bh165xx.jpg

36986240-b41b-47c2-a46e-b3d468218106-2060x1236.jpeg


As if the British empire (Capitalists) killed less?????
O--I see now--
you need to learn history --not fairytales

Because the British Empire just spread tea parties. (rolls eyes)

But, that's besides the point, the Authoritarian hybrid system has a ton of success stories in generating economic growth too.

So, we don't have to be bound to Capitalism, this is just another fabrication.
the Brits were not destroyed like the Germans were
 
Back on AOL in 2008, I pointed this out, we are speaking ENGLISH here and now. Diversity is great, but you have to speak ENGLISH on this board. If you really want to reach the heart of America, you aren't going to do so speaking Española . Diversity? That is liberal construct like something from the matrix.
 
From what I've seen it seems about 1/3rd of the poor are poor because of disabilities, physical, or mental. this includes many Veterans , Another 1/3rd are either are ex convicts tarnishing their records, or literally aren't intelligent enough to make it. The final 1/3rd are mostly single mothers, younger generations attempting to move up in it's ranks, and people working menial jobs with little pay.

I don't know how anyone couldn't get that in a Capitalist system of nature, how there wouldn't be poor exactly?

Just as well, such a unnatural system of Communism also leads to poor.

Literally, the hybrid system is the only real fair solution.

From what you’ve seen?? Do you realize how stupid that sounds?? Why don’t you come back to us when you have facts that you can site to back up your assertions.


Now IQ, family life, opportunity all factor into to whether a person is going to be successful or not, but the number one precursor of success is hard work.
 
From what I've seen it seems about 1/3rd of the poor are poor because of disabilities, physical, or mental. this includes many Veterans , Another 1/3rd are either are ex convicts tarnishing their records, or literally aren't intelligent enough to make it. The final 1/3rd are mostly single mothers, younger generations attempting to move up in it's ranks, and people working menial jobs with little pay.

I don't know how anyone couldn't get that in a Capitalist system of nature, how there wouldn't be poor exactly?

Just as well, such a unnatural system of Communism also leads to poor.

Literally, the hybrid system is the only real fair solution.

From what you’ve seen?? Do you realize how stupid that sounds?? Why don’t you come back to us when you have facts that you can site to back up your assertions.


Now IQ, family life, opportunity all factor into to whether a person is going to be successful or not, but the number one precursor of success is hard work.

Nearly 1 in 5 Americans are registered with a disability.

Nearly 1 in 5 People Have a Disability in the U.S., Census Bureau Reports - Miscellaneous - Newsroom - U.S. Census Bureau

So, the facts are actually supporting my assertion.

As for low IQ, that's a disability, which isn't counted, (Often times)

As for hard work? What?
A lot of Illegal Mexicans, Guatemalans, Salvadorians, and Guatemalans are working back-breaking hours, landscaping, in masonry, in construction, in farming, etc.

Yet, barely make over minimum wage, sometimes even less.

It's no different for Whites, or Blacks working similar back breaking hours in such jobs.

Are you sure you don't have a low IQ?
 
From what I've seen it seems about 1/3rd of the poor are poor because of disabilities, physical, or mental. this includes many Veterans , Another 1/3rd are either are ex convicts tarnishing their records, or literally aren't intelligent enough to make it. The final 1/3rd are mostly single mothers, younger generations attempting to move up in it's ranks, and people working menial jobs with little pay.

I don't know how anyone couldn't get that in a Capitalist system of nature, how there wouldn't be poor exactly?

Just as well, such a unnatural system of Communism also leads to poor.

Literally, the hybrid system is the only real fair solution.

From what you’ve seen?? Do you realize how stupid that sounds?? Why don’t you come back to us when you have facts that you can site to back up your assertions.


Now IQ, family life, opportunity all factor into to whether a person is going to be successful or not, but the number one precursor of success is hard work.

Nearly 1 in 5 Americans are registered with a disability.

Nearly 1 in 5 People Have a Disability in the U.S., Census Bureau Reports - Miscellaneous - Newsroom - U.S. Census Bureau

So, the facts are actually supporting my assertion.

As for low IQ, that's a disability, which isn't counted, (Often times)

As for hard work? What?
A lot of Illegal Mexicans, Guatemalans, Salvadorians, and Guatemalans are working back-breaking hours, landscaping, in masonry, in construction, in farming, etc.

Yet, barely make over minimum wage, sometimes even less.

It's no different for Whites, or Blacks working similar back breaking hours in such jobs.

Are you sure you don't have a low IQ?

You’re not accounting for people that are gaming the system.

Remedial jobs require hard work, but being successful typically requires multifaceted approach to your particular line of business. Having a high IQ always helps in life, but it’s not the sole determining factor. My ex best friend is a Mensa genius, yet he lives with his parents while he’s in his forties. He lacked the confidence to apply himself. He tried to be a traitor and failed, then tried to be a stockbroker and failed. Had he applied himself there’s no doubt in my mind he would have been successful, but he didn’t. If you take a look at every success story, the key ingredients are hard work and perseverance. Maybe you can’t relate to that and feel all the chips are stacked against you, but you can’t be afraid to fail, or if you are afraid to fail, use that as motivation, and definitely do your best to rise above the crowd. I know complete idiots that are very successful because of determination and hard work. Capitalism is survival of the fittest, and to your point they’ll always be losers, but the majority of those losers are underachievers. Anyone can poke holes at the system and say it’s not perfect or is unfair, but no system has taken mankind further and dragged more people out of poverty.
 

Forum List

Back
Top