More security may not have prevented the fire

LilOlLady

Gold Member
Apr 20, 2009
10,017
1,312
190
Reno, NV
MORE SECURITY MAY NOT HAVE PREVENTED THE FIRE
THAT KILLED FOUR AMERICANS IN LIBYA.


There was U.S. and Libyan security in place and Americans were evacuated. There was a protest going on because of the anti-Muslim video and fires were started by protestors. Fact is terrorists used the protesting against the video as a cover to attack the consulate on the memorial of 911. The 4 Americans did not evacuate with the other Americans and could not be found by security. Question is, why didn’t they evacuate? There is doubt if more security would have prevented the fire because it was the smoke from the fire that killed the four Americans. How was the fire started and by whom? Protestors or terrorists? An investigation is ongoing and we do not yet have all the facts and Rice, Clinton and Obama made statements based on the information they had at the time and as more information came in, it was reported also. No cover up and incompetence on the part of the Obama administration a politicised by radical right wing priority from day one has been to nail Obama to the stake and set it afire.

If you want to place blame, place it where is rightfully belong and that would have to be Bush and his Middle East policies and actions that created these terrorists and their attacks on U.S. interest and allies.

Putting the Blame Where It Belongs
"The overriding story of the past few years is not Mr. Obama’s mistakes but the scorched-earth opposition of Republicans, who have done everything they can to get in his way — and who now, having blocked the president’s policies, hope to win the White House by claiming that his policies have failed"
fromtheeditr: Quote of the Day: Putting the Blame Where It Belongs
 

Forum List

Back
Top