More racism of Ron Paul

[bigrebnc1775]

The New York times?

Extremist groups? AS IN
(based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration. Belief in a Constitutional Republic pushing for a smaller effective government tea party member

This is the extremist group they are talking about.

See you feed the libs who claim the "tea Party" is racist which is total bullshit and the Tea party does not support Ron Paul...

Ron Paul is surging in the Republican presidential race. Just not among Republicans.

The Texas congressman is leading some polls in Iowa and is in a tie for second in New Hampshire. A candidacy once dismissed as sideshow is now being taken very seriously; the front page of Monday's Des Moines Register featured a huge spread under the headline "COULD RON PAUL WIN?"

Given Paul's views on the Fed, the gold standard and social issues, not to mention his isolationist foreign policy, the polls have left some politicos wondering whether Republican voters have somehow swerved off the rails. But there's another question that should be asked first: Who are Ron Paul's supporters? Are they, in fact, Republicans?

In an analysis accompanying his most recent survey in Iowa, pollster Scott Rasmussen noted, "Romney leads, with Gingrich in second, among those who consider themselves Republicans. Paul has a wide lead among non-Republicans who are likely to participate in the caucus."

The same is true in New Hampshire. A poll released Monday by the Boston Globe and the University of New Hampshire shows Paul leading among Democrats and independents who plan to vote in the January 10 primary. But among Republicans, Paul is a distant third -- 33 points behind leader Mitt Romney.

In South Carolina, "Paul's support is higher among those who usually don't vote in GOP primary elections," notes David Woodard, who runs the Palmetto Poll at Clemson University.

In a hotly-contested Republican race, it appears that only about half of Paul's supporters are Republicans. In Iowa, according to Rasmussen, just 51 percent of Paul supporters consider themselves Republicans. In New Hampshire, the number is 56 percent, according to Andrew Smith, head of the University of New Hampshire poll.

The same New Hampshire survey found that 87 percent of the people who support Romney consider themselves Republicans. For Newt Gingrich, it's 85 percent.

So who is supporting Paul? In New Hampshire, Paul is the choice of just 13 percent of Republicans, according to the new poll, while he is the favorite of 36 percent of independents and 26 percent of Democrats who intend to vote in the primary. Paul leads in both non-Republican categories.

'Mischief' voters push Paul to front of GOP race | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

Really?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bNiDx7qTjA]The Tea Party Started In 2007 And Ron Paul Is The Godfather - YouTube[/ame]

OH thats right fuck the the tea party the party of a bunch of fucking hypocrites, if they can support newt getrich

 

[Jroc]

The New York times?

Extremist groups? AS IN
(based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration. Belief in a Constitutional Republic pushing for a smaller effective government tea party member

This is the extremist group they are talking about.

See you feed the libs who claim the "tea Party" is racist which is total bullshit and the Tea party does not support Ron Paul...

Ron Paul is surging in the Republican presidential race. Just not among Republicans.

The Texas congressman is leading some polls in Iowa and is in a tie for second in New Hampshire. A candidacy once dismissed as sideshow is now being taken very seriously; the front page of Monday's Des Moines Register featured a huge spread under the headline "COULD RON PAUL WIN?"

Given Paul's views on the Fed, the gold standard and social issues, not to mention his isolationist foreign policy, the polls have left some politicos wondering whether Republican voters have somehow swerved off the rails. But there's another question that should be asked first: Who are Ron Paul's supporters? Are they, in fact, Republicans?

In an analysis accompanying his most recent survey in Iowa, pollster Scott Rasmussen noted, "Romney leads, with Gingrich in second, among those who consider themselves Republicans. Paul has a wide lead among non-Republicans who are likely to participate in the caucus."

The same is true in New Hampshire. A poll released Monday by the Boston Globe and the University of New Hampshire shows Paul leading among Democrats and independents who plan to vote in the January 10 primary. But among Republicans, Paul is a distant third -- 33 points behind leader Mitt Romney.

In South Carolina, "Paul's support is higher among those who usually don't vote in GOP primary elections," notes David Woodard, who runs the Palmetto Poll at Clemson University.

In a hotly-contested Republican race, it appears that only about half of Paul's supporters are Republicans. In Iowa, according to Rasmussen, just 51 percent of Paul supporters consider themselves Republicans. In New Hampshire, the number is 56 percent, according to Andrew Smith, head of the University of New Hampshire poll.

The same New Hampshire survey found that 87 percent of the people who support Romney consider themselves Republicans. For Newt Gingrich, it's 85 percent.

So who is supporting Paul? In New Hampshire, Paul is the choice of just 13 percent of Republicans, according to the new poll, while he is the favorite of 36 percent of independents and 26 percent of Democrats who intend to vote in the primary. Paul leads in both non-Republican categories.

'Mischief' voters push Paul to front of GOP race | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

Really?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bNiDx7qTjA]The Tea Party Started In 2007 And Ron Paul Is The Godfather - YouTube[/ame]

OH thats right fuck the the tea party the party of a bunch of fucking hypocrites, if they can support newt getrich

Your a fucking idiot Ron Paul didn't start any fucking "Tea party" here's your fucking Ron Paul supporter vid get your head out of your ass people like you help get Obama reelected

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kc5E-MnDBVk&feature=related]Dedicated to all Neocons that booed Ron Paul - YouTube[/ame]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

See you feed the libs who claim the "tea Party" is racist which is total bullshit and the Tea party does not support Ron Paul...




'Mischief' voters push Paul to front of GOP race | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

Really?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bNiDx7qTjA]The Tea Party Started In 2007 And Ron Paul Is The Godfather - YouTube[/ame]

OH thats right fuck the the tea party the party of a bunch of fucking hypocrites, if they can support newt getrich

Your a fucking idiot Ron Paul didn't start any fucking "Tea party" here's your fucking Ron Paul supporter vid get your head out of your ass people like you help get Obama reelected

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kc5E-MnDBVk&feature=related]Dedicated to all Neocons that booed Ron Paul - YouTube[/ame]

I posted an old video of the past can you refute what was done or said in the past? Can you refute those tea party rallies with those Ron Paul signs?

 

[Jroc]

Really?

The Tea Party Started In 2007 And Ron Paul Is The Godfather - YouTube

OH thats right fuck the the tea party the party of a bunch of fucking hypocrites, if they can support newt getrich

Your a fucking idiot Ron Paul didn't start any fucking "Tea party" here's your fucking Ron Paul supporter vid get your head out of your ass people like you help get Obama reelected

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kc5E-MnDBVk&feature=related]Dedicated to all Neocons that booed Ron Paul - YouTube[/ame]

I posted an old video of the past can you refute what was done or said in the past? Can you refute those tea party rallies with those Ron Paul signs?

Yeah those were Ron Paul suppoters thats it. they were not the tea party, and the tea party does not support him. Most Ron Paul supporters are a bunch of loons, as shown in the vid I posted. thats who they are, you want to be part of the blame America first crowd, go ahead but don't say that is the view of the tea party. It is however the view of most Liberals

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Your a fucking idiot Ron Paul didn't start any fucking "Tea party" here's your fucking Ron Paul supporter vid get your head out of your ass people like you help get Obama reelected

Dedicated to all Neocons that booed Ron Paul - YouTube

I posted an old video of the past can you refute what was done or said in the past? Can you refute those tea party rallies with those Ron Paul signs?

Yeah those were Ron Paul suppoters thats it. they were not the tea party, and the tea party does not support him. Most Ron Paul supporters are a bunch of loons, as shown in the vid I posted. thats who they are, you want to be part of the blame America first crowd, go ahead but don't say that is the view of the tea party. It is however the view of most Liberals

Did you watch any of the video?
They were tea party members
Tea party ron paul 07

 

[Jroc]

I posted an old video of the past can you refute what was done or said in the past? Can you refute those tea party rallies with those Ron Paul signs?

Yeah those were Ron Paul suppoters thats it. they were not the tea party, and the tea party does not support him. Most Ron Paul supporters are a bunch of loons, as shown in the vid I posted. thats who they are, you want to be part of the blame America first crowd, go ahead but don't say that is the view of the tea party. It is however the view of most Liberals

Did you watch any of the video?
They were tea party members
Tea party ron paul 07

07? They were Ron Paul loons the Tea Party was started during the Obamacare debate. Obama had more to do with the founding of the Tea Party then that whack job Ron Paul. He claims them, but they don't claim him. Take your Ron Paul sympathizer video and shove it, doesn't mean anything. Ron Paul propaganda video "Boston Tea Party" not the current Tea Party movement

 

[dblack]

07? They were Ron Paul loons the Tea Party was started during the Obamacare debat.e Obama had more to do with the founding of the Tea Party then that whack job Ron Paul. He claims them, but they don't claim him. Take your Ron Paul sympathizer video and shove it, doesn't mean anything.

Not sure if you're actually trying to make a coherent point here, but the facts disagree with you. The Tea Party movement was founded by the Ron Paul grassroots people. It's fair to point out that it was quickly co-opted by mainstream Republocrats looking do distance themselves from the Bush fiasco, but that doesn't change history. Sorry 'bout them facts.

 

[Jroc]

07? They were Ron Paul loons the Tea Party was started during the Obamacare debat.e Obama had more to do with the founding of the Tea Party then that whack job Ron Paul. He claims them, but they don't claim him. Take your Ron Paul sympathizer video and shove it, doesn't mean anything.

Not sure if you're actually trying to make a coherent point here, but the facts disagree with you. The Tea Party movement was founded by the Ron Paul grassroots people. It's fair to point out that it was quickly co-opted by mainstream Republocrats looking do distance themselves from the Bush fiasco, but that doesn't change history. Sorry 'bout them facts.

Your facts are bullshit Ron Paul loons are not the current Tea Party sorry your full of shit. Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin Michele Bachmann, Mark Levin ect these are not Ron Paul people they are against him as with most all of conservative talk Radio

 

[dblack]

Your facts are bullshit Ron Paul loons are not the current Tea Party sorry your full of shit. Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin Michele Bachmann, Mark Levin ect these are not Ron Paul people they are against him as with most all of conservative talk Radio

You're reading comprehension is weak. I said Ron Paul people started the Tea Party movement. It was soon overrun by morons. Thus, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, and the rest of your neo-con slime.

 

[Jroc]

Your facts are bullshit Ron Paul loons are not the current Tea Party sorry your full of shit. Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin Michele Bachmann, Mark Levin ect these are not Ron Paul people they are against him as with most all of conservative talk Radio

You're reading comprehension is weak. I said Ron Paul people started the Tea Party movement. It was soon overrun by morons. Thus, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, and the rest of your neo-con slime.

They started shit. Most of you Ron Paul Wackos have mental problems, a bunch of cult followers. I'll be so glad when he's done this time, we won't have to put up with you people anymore. He'll be done with his old ass

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It’s unfortunate Paul is forced to defend himself from unfounded accusations of ‘racism’ rather than focus on the issues.

By focusing on the issues one would realize Paul is comprehensively ignorant of the Constitution and its case law, and that his advocacy of the myth of ‘states’ rights’ would jeopardize every Americans’ civil liberties and violate the rule of law.

Paul should be rejected because of his dangerous ignorance, not due to false allegations of ‘racism.’

 

[dblack]

It’s unfortunate Paul is forced to defend himself from unfounded accusations of ‘racism’ rather than focus on the issues.

By focusing on the issues one would realize Paul is comprehensively ignorant of the Constitution and its case law, and that his advocacy of the myth of ‘states’ rights’ would jeopardize every Americans’ civil liberties and violate the rule of law.

Paul should be rejected because of his dangerous ignorance, not due to false allegations of ‘racism.’

Christ... more with the 'case law'? It is possible to disagree with the decisions of the court. In your view, what is a person supposed to do if they think the justices have erred in their judgments? Sit down and shut up?

 

[dblack]

They started shit. Most of you Ron Paul Wackos have mental problems, a bunch of cult followers. I'll be so glad when he's done this time, we won't have to put up with you people anymore. He'll be done with his old ass

So, in other words, you got nuthin'?