More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

[Geaux4it]

How much did ya'll win? A car? Washer dryer? What'd ya win?

Oh..."winning"...when do you actually win? How will you know?

Its called dominating the forum s0n. Peeps come in here to find a barometer on this stuff and don't get the typical msm BS.....and what do they find? A thread that has 150+ links displaying how stoopid hopeless the plight of the AGW k00ks is......and knowing that is a hoot!!! Yep......they see bomb thrower thread after bomb thrower thread dry up and die in a few days!! Too......they see in here......an ENVIRONMENT forum mind you.....epic levels of misery and anger in the tone of the AGW climate crusaders. Why? Because for all the "consensus science" for the past 15 years, it hasn't moved the ball even one yard in terms of the policy makers in all the world governments. Fossil fuels still DOMINATE and every single solitary projection shows that through 2040, renewables will still be a tiny sliver on the energy graph. IDK? Skeptic winning........AGW k00k losing......in any case, this forum is a playground of fun for the skeptics. For the AGW crowd? Not so much!!

Hey Skooks. These AGW whack-jobs ride unicorns. Its all real world stuff

The leftist nut jobs who are bleeding 'green' this and that, have latched onto the GW fringe in hopes of derailing our energy needs. But wait, the last 17 years what has been going on?

Um, its not warming

-Geaux



Global Warming Pause Puts 'Crisis' In Perspective

Much has been written and argued, from all sides in the global warming debate, about the meaning of the asserted 17-year pause in global warming. Is a 17-year pause significant? Is a pause even occurring? Does the pause signal a longer-term halt to global warming or even a long-term cooling trend? Would a resumption of global warming to pre-pause rates end the global warming debate? A look at recent temperatures and their appropriate context provides helpful meaning to the much-discussed global warming pause.

a plateau of temperatures, with absolutely no warming, from 1979 through 1997
a large temperature spike in 1998
a return to the 1979-1997 mean in 1999-2000
a modest escalation of temperatures in 2001
an elevated plateau of essentially flat temperatures from 2002-2014

If we choose a starting point of mid-1998, the planet has cooled during the past 16 years. If we choose a starting point of late 1997 or early 1999, temperatures have been flat during the past 15 and 17 years. Examining the totality of the 35-year temperature record, we see approximately 1/3 of 1 degree Celsius warming during the period. Accordingly, global warming has occurred at a pace of approximately 1 degree Celsius per century over the duration of the satellite record.

Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) also compiles data from the satellite instruments, though RSS measures a slightly different range of the lower atmosphere. RSS reports a similar temperature history, available here. In the RSS compilation, we see not just a recent temperature plateau, but actual cooling.

Again, the pace of warming throughout the entirety of the record is approximately 1 degree Celsius per century.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2014/08/07/global-warming-pause-puts-crisis-in-perspective/

 

[itfitzme]

How much did ya'll win? A car? Washer dryer? What'd ya win?

Oh..."winning"...when do you actually win? How will you know?

Its called dominating the forum s0n. Peeps come in here to find a barometer on this stuff and don't get the typical msm BS.....and what do they find? A thread that has 150+ links displaying how stoopid hopeless the plight of the AGW k00ks is......and knowing that is a hoot!!! Yep......they see bomb thrower thread after bomb thrower thread dry up and die in a few days!! Too......they see in here......an ENVIRONMENT forum mind you.....epic levels of misery and anger in the tone of the AGW climate crusaders. Why? Because for all the "consensus science" for the past 15 years, it hasn't moved the ball even one yard in terms of the policy makers in all the world governments. Fossil fuels still DOMINATE and every single solitary projection shows that through 2040, renewables will still be a tiny sliver on the energy graph. IDK? Skeptic winning........AGW k00k losing......in any case, this forum is a playground of fun for the skeptics. For the AGW crowd? Not so much!!

Oh, yeah, trolling and spamming.

Yep, I'd say you win at that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Uh oh. Skooks it might be time for you know who to make an appearance

 

[jc456]

How much did ya'll win? A car? Washer dryer? What'd ya win?

Oh..."winning"...when do you actually win? How will you know?

What we win? We win at domination over those who lie and yell the sky is falling. See riding unicorns all day and sipping tea with the Queen of Hearts isn't in our plans. Ours is to provide facts that demonstrate the k00k behavior and s0n, we are kicking royal butt on this. See, we've asked over and over and over and over again for one of you unicorn riding, tea sippin k00ks to prove 120PPM of CO2 causes an increase in temperature or does anything to the PH levels in the oceans. And as of right now, there hasn't been one. Yeah winning and if you didn't hear that let me turn it up.....WiNnInG

And it is time for.........dunt da da da da, dunt da da da da, dunt da da da da, dunt da da da..............................................

 

[skookerasbil]

I love this forum!!!!!


Meanwhile, the EPA continues its intended role in 2014.....destroying American capitalism. Anybody in this country who thinks the EPA is about the environment is beyond gone naïve. They regulate against the will of the public......but like all bureaucracies, they will grow and grow. Make no mistake. OF COURSE they are going to take the tragic view of science.....its ensures their existence sons!!! People who don't understand government bureaucracies wont get that of course.


How the EPA ignores the public and science | New York Post

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The AGW models predict AGW "hot spots" once you factor in the AGW causing the deep Pacific Ocean to warm and turn to AGW gastric juice'

AGW, it's everywhere

 

[Geaux4it]

The AGW nutjobs are all about the government dole

-Geaux


How a Club of Billionaires and Their

Foundations Control the Environmental

Movement and Obama’s EPA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

July 30, 2014

In his 2010 State of the Union Address, President Obama famously chided the Supreme
Court for its recent campaign finance decision by proclaiming, “With all due deference to the
separation of powers, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for
special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections."1

In another speech he further lamented, “There aren’t a lot of functioning democracies around the
world that work this way where you can basically have millionaires and billionaires bankrolling
whoever they want, however they want, in some cases undisclosed. What it means is ordinary
Americans are shut out of the process.”2

These statements are remarkable for their blatant hypocrisy and obfuscation of the fact
that the President and his cadre of wealthy liberal allies and donors embrace the very tactics he
publically scorned.

In reality, an elite group of left wing millionaires and billionaires, which this
report refers to as the “Billionaire’s Club,” who directs and controls the far-left environmental
movement, which in turn controls major policy decisions and lobbies on behalf of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Even more unsettling, a dominant organization in this
movement is Sea Change Foundation, a private California foundation, which relies on funding
from a foreign company with undisclosed donors. In turn, Sea Change funnels tens of millions
of dollars to other large but discreet foundations and prominent environmental activists who
strive to control both policy and politics.

http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/in...Store_id=8af3d005-1337-4bc3-bcd6-be947c523439

 

[skookerasbil]

The AGW nutjobs are all about the government dole

-Geaux


How a Club of Billionaires and Their

Foundations Control the Environmental

Movement and Obama’s EPA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

July 30, 2014

In his 2010 State of the Union Address, President Obama famously chided the Supreme
Court for its recent campaign finance decision by proclaiming, “With all due deference to the
separation of powers, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for
special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections."1

In another speech he further lamented, “There aren’t a lot of functioning democracies around the
world that work this way where you can basically have millionaires and billionaires bankrolling
whoever they want, however they want, in some cases undisclosed. What it means is ordinary
Americans are shut out of the process.”2

These statements are remarkable for their blatant hypocrisy and obfuscation of the fact
that the President and his cadre of wealthy liberal allies and donors embrace the very tactics he
publically scorned.

In reality, an elite group of left wing millionaires and billionaires, which this
report refers to as the “Billionaire’s Club,” who directs and controls the far-left environmental
movement, which in turn controls major policy decisions and lobbies on behalf of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Even more unsettling, a dominant organization in this
movement is Sea Change Foundation, a private California foundation, which relies on funding
from a foreign company with undisclosed donors. In turn, Sea Change funnels tens of millions
of dollars to other large but discreet foundations and prominent environmental activists who
strive to control both policy and politics.

http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/in...Store_id=8af3d005-1337-4bc3-bcd6-be947c523439

Indeed.


Socialist/far left activist groups have, at the top of their agenda's, use of the environmental movement to achieve their goals. It is one of the prime vehicles. Use of environmental regulations is devastating to small business which generates 70% of the jobs in America. Many bozo's think "green" has something to do with the environment...........duh. Its a way to grow government. None of these cheesedick green industries could stand on their own without huge government subsidies............they'd fall like a stone in water without big government support. Both Bush and Obama = big green regulation guys.

Thankfully, green energy is still fringe............because its too expensive. Thankfully too, the states are embracing natural gas in recent years and oil production is BOOMING......which will continue for decades by the way. Green energy will line the pockets of a few but remain in the single digits in terms of overall US energy production.

 

[Kosh]

Here is the chart that the AGW will denounce and ignore as this chart proves they are losing:

 

[skookerasbil]

COOLEST SUMMER IN SCOTLAND IN 100 YEARS


Snow set to blast Scotland as forecasters warn of 'coldest August spell in a century' | Mail Online

More k00k losing........looks like its not only in the USA where people are freezing their balls off in summer!!! Hmmm......but that's what the AGW crowd has been saying, "Well.......its just in the US.....they rest of the world is frying!!!"


fAiL

 

[skookerasbil]

More skeptic wiNiNg!!!!


Turns out......new study says, Atlantic ocean temepratures DROPPING and explains the haitus in warming!!! According to the study, it is part of a naturally occurring cycle. Translation? Exactly what skeptics ahve always said......the man-made part of climate change is totally bogus!!!

Following rapid warming in the late 20th century, this century has so far seen surprisingly little increase in the average temperature at the Earth’s surface. At first this was a blip, then a trend, then a puzzle for the climate science community.

 

[skookerasbil]

Hmmm......record snows in August!!! Not thinking this is good news for the global warming obsessed.


Cold summer US daily record minimums outnumbering record maximums 3 to 1 in the last 30 days Watts Up With That




And snow tonight in Montana >>> Montana Wyoming Brace for Snow Cold Temps While Much of the U.S. Sizzles Weather Underground


OK!!!!!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

More epic k00k losing for the AGW alarmist nutters.........

Judith Curry.......leading climate science person often referenced by the AGW obsessed says, among other things.........




"Even if we believe the climate models, nothing that we do in terms of emissions reductions will have much of an impact on climate until the late 21st century."


"Climate science communication hasn’t been very effective in my opinion. This strategy hasn’t worked for a lot of reasons. The chief one that concerns me as a scientist is that strident advocacy and alarmism is causing the public to lose trust in scientists."

"While some of the smartest people on the planet are university professors, most of them simply don’t matter in today’s great debates."

"Drivers for the growing number of layers in the climate debate are the implications of the 21st century hiatus in warming, the growing economic realities of attempting to transition away from fossil fuels, and a growing understanding of the clash of values involved."

"Since 1998, there have been periods exceeding a decade when there has been no statistically significant warming."

".....although solar cooling is also contributing to an extent that is uncertain."


"This is in spite of the assessment of the IPCC that doesn’t find much evidence linking extreme weather events to global warming......"

The Kardashians And Climate Change Interview With Judith Curry Zero Hedge




Highly damning to the climate alarmists in this forum, namely, Crick, Mamooth and Rolling Thunder.........EVERYTHING they say runs counter to the worlds leading expert!!!




not winning ........more proof, the Skeptics are not losing.

 

[skookerasbil]

Ooooooooooooooooooops

More k00k losing..............



Well......well.......well........the great uncertainty of science: Scientists have discovered hundreds of natural methane sea-floor seeps that had not been predicted by theory.


Significant problem for most climate theory assholes, as they now have to account for this additional greenhouse gas, naturally produced.


Natural methane plumes found on the sea floor Behind The Black

 

[skookerasbil]

another Gigantor victory lap..........


[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/gigantor2.gif.html][/URL]

 

[skookerasbil]

Even more k00k losing......turns out, the whole Arctic Ice Cap melting was nothing but a myth. Gore promised it'd be GONE by now.

Nope.......its growing like a sonofabitch. Check the satellite photos >>>

Stunning satellite images show summer ice cap is thicker and covers 1.7million square kilometres MORE than 2 years ago...despite Al Gore s prediction it would be ICE-FREE by now Mail Online

As Ive been saying for 20 years.......this whole "global warming" crap is nonsense.......always has been.......always will be. We see evidence of it on almost a daily basis, and much of it is posted up in this thread.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Even more k00k losing......turns out, the whole Arctic Ice Cap melting was nothing but a myth. Gore promised it'd be GONE by now.

Nope.......its growing like a sonofabitch. Check the satellite photos >>>

Stunning satellite images show summer ice cap is thicker and covers 1.7million square kilometres MORE than 2 years ago...despite Al Gore s prediction it would be ICE-FREE by now Mail Online

As Ive been saying for 20 years.......this whole "global warming" crap is nonsense.......always has been.......always will be. We see evidence of it on almost a daily basis, and much of it is posted up in this thread.

Melting, er, we misread the model, we meant to say "Growing by leaps and bounds, just as predicted by the AGWCult Model"

 

[skookerasbil]

Frank.......posted up a link on the massive growth of the polar ice cap and the cheesedicks respond with.......ready for this........graphs from the "Polar Science Center".


I think Im taking the data from the Danish Meteorological Institute. and backed by satellite images.

 

[skookerasbil]

Hey JC....Frank.....yet another study concluding NO WARMING IN 19 YEARS


http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/no_warming_for_19_years

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hey JC....Frank.....yet another study concluding NO WARMING IN 19 YEARS


http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/no_warming_for_19_years

No warming...because of manmade global warming, DENIER!!!