More proof of anti-Christian hypocrisy!

nakedemperor said:
Its statistical. On top of being common sense.

Tell this to the tens of millions of Christian liberals.

Show me - stop making things up. But actually, you can't. You'll show names like John Kerry, for instance, because he claims to be a Christian. John Kerry knows little of Christ, or what it means to be a Christian.
 
-=d=- said:
You'll show names like John Kerry, for instance, because he claims to be a Christian. John Kerry knows little of Christ, or what it means to be a Christian.
How do you know? Maybe it is John Kerry and similar Christians that have understood what God and Christ was really trying to say, and that it is you and similar-minded Christians that are confused and deluded? Not saying that I believe this to be the case, but rather pointing out that I, at least, see no way of objectively determining this. Hence, any one who would claim to be a Christian has as much right to be so considered as anyone else, for perhaps it is he who has finally understood what God has been trying to tell us...
 
<center><img src=http://images.villagevoice.com/issues/0448/suton_01.gif>
<center><img src=http://images.villagevoice.com/issues/0448/suton_02.gif><img src=http://images.villagevoice.com/issues/0448/suton_03.gif></center>
<center><img src=http://images.villagevoice.com/issues/0448/suton_04.gif><img src=http://images.villagevoice.com/issues/0448/suton_05.gif><img src=http://images.villagevoice.com/issues/0448/suton_06.gif></center>
 
I'm keeping this one REALLY SIMPLE. If you had not figured out yet the difference between the religious liberals and the religious conservatives, here's a clue...

Conservatives- Old Testament
Liberals- New Testament
 
rei_t_ex said:
How do you know? Maybe it is John Kerry and similar Christians that have understood what God and Christ was really trying to say, and that it is you and similar-minded Christians that are confused and deluded? Not saying that I believe this to be the case, but rather pointing out that I, at least, see no way of objectively determining this. Hence, any one who would claim to be a Christian has as much right to be so considered as anyone else, for perhaps it is he who has finally understood what God has been trying to tell us...


I know because the actions they take and beliefs they claim violate standards given by Christ.

Simple, really.
 
hylandrdet said:
I'm keeping this one REALLY SIMPLE. If you had not figured out yet the difference between the religious liberals and the religious conservatives, here's a clue...

Conservatives- Old Testament
Liberals- New Testament


LMAO!! haha...wow.. NOt even CLOSE to 'reality' there, bud.
 
-=d=- said:
I know because the actions they take and beliefs they claim violate standards given by Christ.

Simple, really.
You are not answering my question, merely re-stating your position. I did not ask whether you believe them to be true Christians or not - you already stated that you believe that they are not. Clearly, this entails that you see them following different standards than those you view as Christian. My question is, how do you know that you are right? How do you know that your understanding of what the Christian standards are, is the correct one? Clearly, one must have some way to justify one's standards if one is to use those standards to criticise others.
 
-=d=- said:
LMAO!! haha...wow.. NOt even CLOSE to 'reality' there, bud.
Religion doesn't really have all that much to do with 'reality'. Granted, most religions entreat you to not harm others and live a good life, but the moral pay-off lies, not in this world, but in some mythical, metaphysical after-life. If you rigidly adhere to the dogma of your favorite religious text, you'll be rewarded with a glorious after-life...You know, streets paved with gold, a few dozen virgins. You ignore that dogma, you'll suffer eternal and unspeakble agony. Thus, as history has so often shown us, any action can be jusitified so long as it is done in the name of one's favorite deity...up to and including murder and genocide.
 
-=d=- said:
I know because the actions they take and beliefs they claim violate standards given by Christ.

Simple, really.

I'm certain Dubbyuh is a sterling example of living up to the teachings of Christ...What with the 150 some executions he has presided over as governor of Texas, the war and suffering he has sanctioned as POTUS, his phony compassionate conservatism. There is even talk amongst some Vatican officials that Dubbyuh is the anti-christ. While he talks a good talk he, in no way walks the walk.
 
Bullypulpit said:
Religion doesn't really have all that much to do with 'reality'. Granted, most religions entreat you to not harm others and live a good life, but the moral pay-off lies, not in this world, but in some mythical, metaphysical after-life. If you rigidly adhere to the dogma of your favorite religious text, you'll be rewarded with a glorious after-life...You know, streets paved with gold, a few dozen virgins. You ignore that dogma, you'll suffer eternal and unspeakble agony. Thus, as history has so often shown us, any action can be jusitified so long as it is done in the name of one's favorite deity...up to and including murder and genocide.

You really need to turn in that clergyman who abused you, Bully and maybe then you can look at spirituality with a cleaner mind.
 
rei_t_ex said:
You are not answering my question, merely re-stating your position. I did not ask whether you believe them to be true Christians or not - you already stated that you believe that they are not. Clearly, this entails that you see them following different standards than those you view as Christian. My question is, how do you know that you are right? How do you know that your understanding of what the Christian standards are, is the correct one? Clearly, one must have some way to justify one's standards if one is to use those standards to criticise others.


I know I'm 'right' because God tells me I'm 'right' via the bible. What you are attempting to do is shake foundations of Religion, or faith - you aren't asking 'me' a specific question, you are questioning religion as a whole. Christianity's very premise makes no allowances that the faith can be wrong. Id Est, a Christian cannot allow their faith is in vain, or another form of belief could ever be even partially 'right'.
 
Bullypulpit said:
I'm certain Dubbyuh is a sterling example of living up to the teachings of Christ...What with the 150 some executions he has presided over as governor of Texas, the war and suffering he has sanctioned as POTUS, his phony compassionate conservatism. There is even talk amongst some Vatican officials that Dubbyuh is the anti-christ. While he talks a good talk he, in no way walks the walk.


I always find this argument interesting. W "presided" over all those executions?

There are several things wrong with this.

The Governor of Texas cannot commute sentences for those on death row. He cannot even do more than one 30 day stay of execution. When the 30 day stay is used a three judge panel decides the fate of the person on death row. (This happened in the case of that poor retarded boy that so many liberals use to abuse the W). This all came about sometime in the early 20th a Governor in Texas abused the powers of the office and took money to commute sentences and grant stays. When that come to light the Constitution in Texas was changed to take those powers from the Governor of that state. Somehow these people expect somebody who specifically doesn't have that power by the state constitution to be able to majically use it anyway.

As for the Anti-Christ argument, there is pretty much no way the Anti-Christ would come from the US POTUS position. This person would need to hold office far longer than the POTUS is able to under our current Constitution. I also know religious scholars that say that the Anti-Christ will come from the Vatican and from within the Catholic Church, it doesn't mean that they are any more right than any Vatican scholar on this subject.
 
-=d=- said:
I know I'm 'right' because God tells me I'm 'right' via the bible.
But Kerry believes that he is right, because God tells HIM that he is right via the Bible. I am not challenging your assumption that the Bible is true. That assumption is indeed a priori accepted if one is to accept religion. I am merely pointing out the fact that there are numerous interpretations of the Bible, and without some objective reasoning that your interpretation is the correct one, belittling others as 'fake' Christians is logically wrong. After all, without such reasoning, I see nothing to preclude YOU from being the 'fake' Christian and Kerry from being a 'real' one...

-=d=- said:
What you are attempting to do is shake foundations of Religion, or faith - you aren't asking 'me' a specific question, you are questioning religion as a whole.
I am doing nothing of the sort. I am not questioning the correctness of Christianity, I am asking what makes you so sure that your interpretation of the Bible is the correct one, while differing interpretations of the Bible by other self-proclaimed Christians is wrong. Surely, you see that they can claim the same for you...
 
rei_t_ex said:
But Kerry believes that he is right, because God tells HIM that he is right via the Bible. I am not challenging your assumption that the Bible is true. That assumption is indeed a priori accepted if one is to accept religion. I am merely pointing out the fact that there are numerous interpretations of the Bible, and without some objective reasoning that your interpretation is the correct one, belittling others as 'fake' Christians is logically wrong. After all, without such reasoning, I see nothing to preclude YOU from being the 'fake' Christian and Kerry from being a 'real' one...

How do you know Kerry believes he's right? There exists only one interpretation of the Bible which is correct. The literal interpretation, contextually, of what we read. Anything beyond that is 'not a correct interpretation'. You are assuming Kerry actually BELIEVES and READS the Bible. I contend he cannot - he seems intelligent. Nobody with a modicum of intelligence can read the Bible, yet behave and support things the way he does; things which blatantly violate Biblical principles. I'm belittling nobody. I know Christians because of the 'fruits' in their lives. Christians know one-another by their conduct.

I am doing nothing of the sort. I am not questioning the correctness of Christianity, I am asking what makes you so sure that your interpretation of the Bible is the correct one, while differing interpretations of the Bible by other self-proclaimed Christians is wrong. Surely, you see that they can claim the same for you...

See, the difference is, I don't subscribe to 'my' interpretation of the Bible. I subscribe to "What God wants us to know" through the bible. No need for interpretation. I have an accurate translation for the original language, and common sense. (shrug).

People use your argument when they are afraid of conviction.
 
-=d=- said:
How do you know Kerry believes he's right?
Because he says so. How do you know that he does not?

-=d=- said:
There exists only one interpretation of the Bible which is correct.
At most one.

-=d=- said:
The literal interpretation, contextually, of what we read. Anything beyond that is 'not a correct interpretation'.
How do you know? Perhaps God intended a more inspired and looser interpretation of the Bible than the literal one, to foster creativity and free will among his followers. To separate the truly worthy - those that can actually understand His intentions in this way, from the rest?

-=d=- said:
I know Christians because of the 'fruits' in their lives. Christians know one-another by their conduct.

See, the difference is, I don't subscribe to 'my' interpretation of the Bible. I subscribe to "What God wants us to know" through the bible. No need for interpretation. I have an accurate translation for the original language, and common sense.
This is simply false. There are several major Churches out there today, that bicker vehemently over the interpretations of the Bible by each. Hear the Catholics speak of the Protestants or the Orthodox speak of the Baptists or Evangelicals or vice versa. There is no harmony among Christians, even though they all go by a similar "accurate translation" and have similar "common sense." Unless you know the true Will of God, you cannot know whether you subscribe to "what God wants us to know" or not.

-=d=- said:
People use your argument when they are afraid of conviction.
No, people use my argument when they are able to appreciate and challenge themselves with the finer underlying issues, rather than simply accepting the simplest of levels and going back to their beer. No direct implication here to anyone, of course...
 
-=d=- said:
Circular logic runs deep in this one...
Are you trying to say that you are incapable of justifying your position? Because that is certainly one way that your post can be interpreted by people with and understanding of English and common sense...
 
rei_t_ex said:
Are you trying to say that you are incapable of justifying your position? Because that is certainly one way that your post can be interpreted by people with and understanding of English and common sense...

I'm saying No matter what logic I evidence to you; your ego? perhaps? is incapable of conceding. I'm saying you don't 'want' to learn anything here. For every argument I present, you will turn the point of the argument around, and force it to fit into one of your preset conclusions. It's akin to trying to convince a tree that it is a salmon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top