more Liberal Logic

HomeInspect

Senior Member
Feb 26, 2012
1,258
206
48
Maryland
Lanza broke 41 different laws in his rampage, yet some argue that if we had more laws, things like this would not happen.

$laws.jpg
 
20 of them were executing 6 year olds. Are you saying we shouldn't have laws against murder?

What is weaker than Liberal logic?

Liberal reading comprehension.

Is murder not one of the laws Lanza broke?


Maybe if I type real slow... it will be easier to understand..

Since murdering children is the ultimate, or just about the worse crime you can commit, do you think anyone who is intent committing this act would worry about breaking a law such as "illegal possession of a firearm" ?

Chicago and DC have some of the strictest gun laws in our country, yet they top the charts in gun violence and murder... hmmm...
 
What is weaker than Liberal logic?

Liberal reading comprehension.

Is murder not one of the laws Lanza broke?


Maybe if I type real slow... it will be easier to understand..

Since murdering children is the ultimate, or just about the worse crime you can commit, do you think anyone who is intent committing this act would worry about breaking a law such as "illegal possession of a firearm" ?

Chicago and DC have some of the strictest gun laws in our country, yet they top the charts in gun violence and murder... hmmm...

States with the highest percent of gun ownership have the highest rate of gun crime. Cities are always dangerous.

As for breaking the law. If a cop/or series of cops, were to determine that Adam Lanza had broken the law prior to the spree, they be able to have arrested him. Your contention that laws are useless because criminals break them is stone stupid.
 
Last edited:
Lanza broke 41 different laws in his rampage, yet some argue that if we had more laws, things like this would not happen.

View attachment 23164

20 of them were executing 6 year olds. Are you saying we shouldn't have laws against murder?

The mindless hearing voices in their heads again.. LOL


Hey dude. Comment on this "law". The law of common sense that says that if you have military grade weapons and ammo in your house, along with a young man you know is having mental issues, how about using some common sense and either removing the weapons for a while or locking them in a gun safe with no chance of the crazy getting access.

Woman had an income of 300k a year. Wasn't like she couldn't afford the gun safe.
Or mental health treatment for her son.


And this woman was what you gun freaks call a responsible gun owner.

Yea. Lots of evidence of the law of common sense there.
 
20 of them were executing 6 year olds. Are you saying we shouldn't have laws against murder?

The mindless hearing voices in their heads again.. LOL


Hey dude. Comment on this "law". The law of common sense that says that if you have military grade weapons and ammo in your house, along with a young man you know is having mental issues, how about using some common sense and either removing the weapons for a while or locking them in a gun safe with no chance of the crazy getting access.

Woman had an income of 300k a year. Wasn't like she couldn't afford the gun safe.
Or mental health treatment for her son.


And this woman was what you gun freaks call a responsible gun owner.

Yea. Lots of evidence of the law of common sense there.

Absolutely wrong. If she was responsible gun owner, she would have had them locked and in a safe. Use your head..
 
Is murder not one of the laws Lanza broke?


Maybe if I type real slow... it will be easier to understand..

Since murdering children is the ultimate, or just about the worse crime you can commit, do you think anyone who is intent committing this act would worry about breaking a law such as "illegal possession of a firearm" ?

Chicago and DC have some of the strictest gun laws in our country, yet they top the charts in gun violence and murder... hmmm...

States with the highest percent of gun ownership have the highest rate of gun crime. Cities are always dangerous.

As for breaking the law. If a cop/or series of cops, were to determine that Adam Lanza had broken the law prior to the spree, they be able to have arrested him. Your contention that laws are useless because criminals break them is stone stupid.

Gee,, your first line makes sense.. The states with the most cars have the most accidents and the highest number of deaths on the highway... so ?? And where did I say the laws were useless ? Seems in every thread people read things that are not there. What law(s) to you suggest they make, that comply with the constitution, that would stop crimes with guns ?
 
Is murder not one of the laws Lanza broke?


Maybe if I type real slow... it will be easier to understand..

Since murdering children is the ultimate, or just about the worse crime you can commit, do you think anyone who is intent committing this act would worry about breaking a law such as "illegal possession of a firearm" ?

Chicago and DC have some of the strictest gun laws in our country, yet they top the charts in gun violence and murder... hmmm...

States with the highest percent of gun ownership have the highest rate of gun crime. Cities are always dangerous.

As for breaking the law. If a cop/or series of cops, were to determine that Adam Lanza had broken the law prior to the spree, they be able to have arrested him. Your contention that laws are useless because criminals break them is stone stupid.

Yeah, there's a lot of that stone stupid going around.
 
Maybe if I type real slow... it will be easier to understand..

Since murdering children is the ultimate, or just about the worse crime you can commit, do you think anyone who is intent committing this act would worry about breaking a law such as "illegal possession of a firearm" ?

Chicago and DC have some of the strictest gun laws in our country, yet they top the charts in gun violence and murder... hmmm...

States with the highest percent of gun ownership have the highest rate of gun crime. Cities are always dangerous.

As for breaking the law. If a cop/or series of cops, were to determine that Adam Lanza had broken the law prior to the spree, they be able to have arrested him. Your contention that laws are useless because criminals break them is stone stupid.

Yeah, there's a lot of that stone stupid going around.

Stone Stupid is when someone doesn't read and comprehend, or puts words in someone else's mouth. I don't believe anyone has said we shouldn't have the laws we already have and enforce them
 

Forum List

Back
Top